1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Hoodoo - Boom Island Brewing Company

Not Rated.
HoodooHoodoo

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
89
very good

51 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 51
Reviews: 13
rAvg: 4.02
pDev: 11.94%
Wants: 3
Gots: 6 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Boom Island Brewing Company visit their website
Minnesota, United States

Style | ABV
Dubbel |  8.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: morimech on 01-29-2012)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 51 | Reviews: 13 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of SlightlyGrey
SlightlyGrey

Minnesota

3.75/5  rDev -6.7%

08-29-2014 00:00:19 | More by SlightlyGrey
Photo of mmulebarn
mmulebarn

Minnesota

2.75/5  rDev -31.6%

07-19-2014 02:27:44 | More by mmulebarn
Photo of mattmarka1
mattmarka1

Minnesota

3/5  rDev -25.4%

07-19-2014 02:21:17 | More by mattmarka1
Photo of MikeC1959
MikeC1959

Wisconsin

3.75/5  rDev -6.7%

07-04-2014 21:03:54 | More by MikeC1959
Photo of LeeW
LeeW

Minnesota

4.25/5  rDev +5.7%

07-01-2014 16:19:36 | More by LeeW
Photo of Phocion
Phocion

Minnesota

3.63/5  rDev -9.7%

Notes from phone, May 3, 2014.

750ml mushroom corked bottle poured into Westvleteren chalice. Dark mahogony body with a finger of frothy, beige foam. Little retention on the head, but it left a nice, thick lacing.

This thing was a yeast bomb. Clove, banana, and Dubble Bubble gum. Notes of molasses and caramelized sugar, bread, perfume, and slightly vinous. Plum and other stone fruit came out as it warmed.

The flavor is fairly well balanced but overall still a bit yeast-forward. Slightly sweet malts, dark fruity esters, and spicy phenolics. Dry finish and mildly sour, but not in a good way.

Moderate carbonation. Slick with a body that is a bit thin and not able to stand up to this style of beer.

Overall this was decent, above average, but not exceptional.

06-24-2014 23:55:39 | More by Phocion
Photo of Richardbcoffin
Richardbcoffin

Minnesota

5/5  rDev +24.4%

05-28-2014 16:48:44 | More by Richardbcoffin
Photo of ChopperSmith
ChopperSmith

Minnesota

4.1/5  rDev +2%

Poured from a 750 ml bottle into a clear tulip glass.

Appearance: A hazy deep brown with ruby hues and a nice tan foamy head. Foam faded fast but lest a little sticky lacing and a nice little foam cap that lasted throughout.

Smell: Sweet, malty and yeasty with a little clove spice and dark fruits.

Taste: Sweet and malty with a good fruity yeast flavor of spices, caramel and banana. A bit of alcohol in the mix as well, but not overwhelming.

Mouth Feel: Creamy and medium bodied with medium carbonation. Finishes sweet and a little sticky.

Overall: A great interpretation of the Belgian Dubbel style. All the right flavors and elements of a good Dubbel are here...sweet and fruity with good yeast and malt flavors and a nice ABV for a good warming brew. Love it!

05-23-2014 19:50:11 | More by ChopperSmith
Photo of DaveMiller
DaveMiller

Minnesota

3.5/5  rDev -12.9%

03-23-2014 22:26:14 | More by DaveMiller
Photo of capuchinpilates
capuchinpilates

Minnesota

4.5/5  rDev +11.9%

03-15-2014 00:12:04 | More by capuchinpilates
Photo of memak19
memak19

Minnesota

4/5  rDev -0.5%

02-28-2014 22:52:02 | More by memak19
Photo of ddavison
ddavison

Minnesota

4.5/5  rDev +11.9%

02-14-2014 18:54:48 | More by ddavison
Photo of Boomstick
Boomstick

Minnesota

5/5  rDev +24.4%

02-09-2014 20:26:54 | More by Boomstick
Photo of Pug
Pug

Minnesota

4.25/5  rDev +5.7%

01-31-2014 14:20:34 | More by Pug
Photo of AnalogErik
AnalogErik

Minnesota

3.5/5  rDev -12.9%

01-06-2014 20:46:41 | More by AnalogErik
Photo of zeff80
zeff80

Missouri

4/5  rDev -0.5%

12-23-2013 02:23:33 | More by zeff80
Photo of kojevergas
kojevergas

Texas

3.08/5  rDev -23.4%

2012 vintage. 8.5% ABV confirmed per the label. 750ml brown glass bottle with unremarkabl label art and unbranded hood-and-wire cap (aka cage) over a cork acquired at Four Firkins in Minnesota last year and served into a Westvleteren stem-goblet in me parents' gaff in high altitude Castle Rock, CO. Label clearly identifies it as a dubbel. Reviewed live. Expectations are above average given its current 89 rating.

Is the name vaguely racist? You decide.

Served cold - straight from the fridge - and allowed to warm over the course of consumption. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: No bubble show forms as it pours.

Pours a 2.5 finger wide head of nice light khaki colour. Good creaminess. Pretty good thickness. Nice consistent and pretty even lacing clings to the sides of the glass as the head recedes. Retention is good for the ABV - about 6-7 minutes. Nice soft complexion and smooth consistency.

Body colour is a very dark chestnut amber. No nontransparent. Lightly translucent; the bottom of the glass is a lighter hue on the underside than in the body. No floating yeast particles are visible, but that may be because it's so dark. The label's description "Dark brown color with red highlights" is accurate.

Overall, it's spot-on for a dubbel and I'm really looking forward to trying it. It's not unique or special per se, and there are no egregious flaws.

Sm: Brown sugar, dark Belgian malts, light banana, clove spice, raisin, faint dried fig, some bready malts, a hint of vinous notes, and some restrained dark fruit of some kind - likely a stonefruit, but seemingly not plum nor dates. It's well within traditional style conventions, and while it's not as deep, subtle, or delicate as the best examples of the style, it's very appealing. I do want some biscuity yeast of some sort to emerge, but it remains a bit too clean.

A pleasant and fairly subtle aroma of mild strength. I'm quite pleased and am eager to try it.

No hop character, alcohol, or yeast character is detectable.

T: The malty body is overly open to the drinker, lacking the sheltered pleasing reticence of the best beers in the style. It's not a delicate or fragile flavour profile, and lacks any subtlety, intricacy, or nuance. Depth of flavour is also very limited for a dubbel. Average duration and intensity of flavour. Okay in terms of complexity, with dark fruits - especially raisin, ripe young fig, banana (likely from the yeast), and a nebulous stonefruit that I just can't place. I'm not finding plum or dates. Buried brown sugar. Belgian dark/brown malts. Its amateurish simplicity is a huge drawback. In terms of spices, all I really notice is clove - likely emerging from the yeast. Somewhat bready. A kiss of cocoa powder.

Decently balanced, but built generically. This doesn't hold a candle to traditional Trappist examples of the style. Not at all gestalt, but certainly cohesive. If Trappist yeast was used, I'm surprised because it isn't showcased at all here.

For a year old brew, this drinks shockingly raw and young.

Mf: Lightly creamy. Entirely too smooth and wet; this style requires a fragile balance of dryness/wetness and coarseness/smoothness, neither of which is present here. A bit thin and weak. This isn't the 'meal in a glass' filling feel a proper dubbel should have. Lacks body. Suits the flavour profile decently, but the texture fails to fully facilitate delivery of all the flavours and doesn't seem at all custom-tailored specifically to the taste. Unrefreshing. Too damn light, bordering almost on watery.

Frankly, it feels like the kind of mouthfeel that would be accentuated on nitro - and that's not at all what you want in a dubbel. Too creamy and airy.

I will say a highlight for me is its pleasant softness.

Not oily, astringent, harsh, boozy, rough, gushed, syrupy, or hot.

Dr: It doesn't hold a candle to the traditional Trappist dubbel, and even in ideal glassware with a year of age on it comes across shockingly young and painfully simple. There's none of the artful nuance, careful fragility, or delicate quality of the best beers in the style. Boom Island hasn't done badly for an American dubbel, but I definitely wouldn't get this again at its unreasonable price point (relative to the quality) and I wouldn't recommend it to friends. Where's the yeast character? The yeast notes almost seem German in character. I'm surprised at its current high rating.

Bottom Line: A drinkable but forgettable dubbel that falls well short of traditional offerings and doesn't age well. Not worth trying, especially for sincere fans of the style. Sort of a dubbel lite.

C+

12-13-2013 02:51:14 | More by kojevergas
Photo of jakea
jakea

Wisconsin

4.25/5  rDev +5.7%

11-09-2013 02:28:11 | More by jakea
Photo of Beerlover
Beerlover

Minnesota

4.5/5  rDev +11.9%

10-20-2013 04:42:29 | More by Beerlover
Photo of Joey1566
Joey1566

Minnesota

3.75/5  rDev -6.7%

10-08-2013 04:51:28 | More by Joey1566
Photo of sparx1100
sparx1100

Minnesota

3.5/5  rDev -12.9%

09-18-2013 03:10:18 | More by sparx1100
Photo of koes0024
koes0024

Minnesota

3.75/5  rDev -6.7%

09-03-2013 00:57:00 | More by koes0024
Photo of zeledonia
zeledonia

Minnesota

3.5/5  rDev -12.9%

08-28-2013 00:21:37 | More by zeledonia
Photo of Ross_Haddow
Ross_Haddow

Minnesota

5/5  rDev +24.4%

07-27-2013 23:08:25 | More by Ross_Haddow
Photo of Bighuge
Bighuge

Minnesota

4.55/5  rDev +13.2%

Deep, dark mahogany tone. Good clarity. Slight beige head leaves some sparse, spotty lace. Aroma is cherry, chocolate covered raisin and fig. Even some plum too. Nice nose. Flavor follows suit. Quite nice. Chocolate covered cherries and bread pudding. Banana esters and cakey yeastiness. Dates and almond. A virtual bonanza of flavor. Mouthfeel is even keeled...smooth and lightly carbonated Drinkable is an understatement. One of the better dubbels I've ever had. It's not one of my favorite styles, but this is at the top.

07-16-2013 04:32:42 | More by Bighuge
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Hoodoo from Boom Island Brewing Company
89 out of 100 based on 51 ratings.