Dismiss Notice
Microbrew Invitational
Join us June 3 + 4 in Boston and help us drink 300+ beers, ciders, kombuchas, meads, sakes and more!

TICKETS: beeradvocate.com/micro/

Anchor Steam Beer | Anchor Brewing Company

YOUR RATING = None |
BA SCORE
87
very good
1,990 Reviews
BEER STATS
Reviews:
1,990
Ratings:
5,760
Avg:
3.85
pDev:
12.99%
 
 
Wants:
206
Gots:
1,107
For Trade:
1
Anchor Steam BeerAnchor Steam Beer
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Anchor Brewing Company
California, United States | website

Style: California Common / Steam Beer

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.90%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
Anchor Steam® Beer owes its deep amber color, thick, creamy head, and rich, distinctive flavor to a historic brewing process like none other.

It is a process that combines deep respect for craft brewing tradition with many decades of evolution to arrive at a unique approach: a blend of pale and caramel malts, fermentation with lager yeast at warmer ale temperatures in shallow open-air fermenters, and gentle carbonation in our cellars through an all-natural process called kräusening.

Added by BeerAdvocate on 07-08-2001

View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
Reviews: 1,990 | Ratings: 5,760
Photo of TackleDummy
3.45/5  rDev -10.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

It pours a copper color with a minimal off-white head. The head lasts for quite a while and leaves creamy white lacing on the glass.

The aroma is that of malt with a bit of citrus.

The flavor starts with a bit of a hop bite and a slight malt flavor, and finishes with a citrus taste with a decent amount of bitterness.

The mouth feel is pretty light and just a little creamy, and it goes down smoothly.

 412 characters

Photo of Waypoint
3.45/5  rDev -10.4%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

A :Good light brown color nice carbonation.

S: Light malt aroma.

T: Mild flavor low amount of hops

M: Medium body smooth to swallow

O: A nice easy drinking beer refreshing but no wow factors. I liked the beer but I think that there are way too many other beers out there that are much more interesting.

 306 characters

Photo of Mazda3
3.44/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I wanted to try this as I have often heard it mentioned and thought it would be interesting to try a new style. I did have a bit of indecision as the store carried both this beer and their ale. In the end I got this as it is a rare example of a style not often seen.

The initial pour is good with some head development and a beautiful amber color. Unfortunately the head does not last long and sinks back forming a ring.

The initial taste is very bitter, and it is not a hoppy bitterness, perhaps metallic or vinegary? The mid taste is almost non existent, perhaps due to excessive carbonation.

I hate to say it, but this reminded me of a BMC light beer with more bitterness. The carbonation was on a par with a Michelob Light I tried recently. At least the light beer had no offensive flavors.

I might be being harsh - this beer (according to Wikipedia) is a style that was designed to be cheap and easy to produce and was the choice of those without any money back in pre-prohibition California. For this reason one shouldn't expect it to be the best tasting beer in the world.

This beer improved as it warmed a little, and it was interesting to try a new style. I looked it up here on BA and wanted to like it based on the favorable reviews, but in the end I think it is overrated and I don't think I will be buying this beer again.

[Edit] this beer improved a LOT when taken with some food, even some chips or something. The malt and sweet flavors came through and the bitterness reduced. I have changed my opinion of this beer (with food).

 1,550 characters

Photo of BethanyB
3.44/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Clear, dark gold. A thick cloud of an off-white head.

Smell: Sinus-clearing mint and citrusy hops on one end, and plenty of grainy malt on the other. As a whole, however, the aroma is light and clean.

Taste: Earthy bitterness and a tart character overpower the biscuity malt. Altogether, the taste is much less complex than I had expected.

Mouthfeel: Medium-light mouthfeel and high carbonation keep the brew crisp and clean.

Overall: More flavorful than a lager, yet more simple than a typical ale. It's a solid beer, but not one that sparks any real interest for me. I can't think of a specific season or situation where something different would be more appropriate or satisfying.

 702 characters

Photo of Doomcifer
3.43/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a fairly hazy amber color with a good head that retains nicely. Aroma is of grains, yeast, some fruitiness. Not too strong but pleasant. Taste is of more light graininess, yeast, light hop spice found in the finish. Mouthfeel is fair bodied, very crisp, and good carbonation. I could take a few of these down in succession but not an entire 6-pack.

 354 characters

Photo of nickydel
3.43/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I'm a little perplexed by this one. Lots of praise to be said. Gorgeous beer in the glass and a pleasing smell. I was impressed by the body for this type of beer. However, the damn thing tasted like soap, and the after taste was extremely bitter. I'm a big fan of huge IPAs and other very bitter brews, but this seemed extremely out of place and was not pleasant. A bad bottle? I have had Steam Anchor before and remembered it fondly, but I could barely get through this one. And I'm far from picky about different styles of beer.

 530 characters

Photo of heebes
3.43/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

355 ml bottle, 8 2012
Review from notes.

Pours a clear bubbly straw amber, good head leaves no lacing. The nose is sweet, citrusy, floral, grass. Taste is straw, grain, malt, a sort of bland alcohol taste but a fuller flavour than any BMC beer. Mouthfeel is medium bodied, slightly chewy. Drinkability is high and this would be quite sessionable at 4.8%. Also comes in a cool unique stubby bottle.

 398 characters

Photo of LeafCutter
3.43/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pour - A clear light amber. Nice thick head with good retention. minimal to no lacing on glass.

Smell - Smell a slightly sweet citrus with a noticeable yeast. Toward the bottom of the glass I began to smell hints of honey.

Taste - A quick bite of tangy fruit, and a moderately bitter finish with a mellow malt/yeast end note. Throughout the taste there is a dry sweetness that is enjoyable and not too overwhelming. Despite the lack of carbonation in looks, it has a very pleasant bubbly feel on the tongue, that again has a bit of a zang.

Overall- It was a good beer, not great, but good. The beer has a great balance. The sweetness is very consistent throughout the taste and provides a nice balance with that fruity "zing". Adding to the balance, the bitterness is more than I was expecting (in a good way). Because it has decent flavors, I may buy again if it went on sale. Otherwise nothing really stood out to write home about.

 937 characters

Photo of maddogruss
3.43/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

This is my first Steam Beer/California Common...whatever you want to call it!

A: Pours an amber body with a small white head. There was decent retention, but eventually slowed to a nice lacing that held to the finish.

S: Not much of a smell. Smelled slightly malty and alcoholic.

T: Tastes like "beer." Reminded me a lot of a macro light lager but tasted a lot smoother. Also, tasted slightly salty, which was interesting.

M: A nice, light mouthfeel that was rather crisp.

D: Definitely a drinkable beer. Does not really taste like much, but it was pretty light and easy to drink. Definitely good for the summer or grilling.

 629 characters

Photo of guinnessfan
3.43/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

12 oz bottle purchased from Total Wine in McLean, VA.

A: Nice burnt copper/amber color with a slight 1 finger head and virtually no lacing.

S: Malty/bready sweet smell.

T: Slightly burnt-like malty goodness. Pilsner-like, but more roasted. Reminds me of fire-brewed Stroh's on steriods.

M: Crisp, clean and refreshing. Good carbonation tingle and balance.

D: Good beer, not over the top and easy to session.

 422 characters

Photo of fscottkey
3.43/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

A: [3.50] Dark honey colored beer. The beer pours out with a nice full finger of white head. I can't find an ABV listing. The date is "5UP" (which magically translates to born on 6/15/15)

S: [3.50] Prominent "lager" type scents. Breadiness. Biscuit. Caramalized sugars.

T: [3.50] My first instinct was Belgian yeast (for the first several sips) but that was gone so fast that it almost didn't seem real. After that if follows the nose. Bready flavors with some malt backbone sweetness. I still get hints of some spiciness from the yeast.

M: [3.25] Tingly carbonation. Decent body to back it up.

O: [3.25] This is nothing to write home about. It is a solid beer. Tastes like a traditional lager with maybe a tiny curve ball with the yeast. It is drinkable and repeatable. But also forgettable.

 811 characters

Photo of jibjib513
3.43/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Serving Type: Bottle in to Pint glass.

Appearance (3.5): Medium amber color, creamy healthy head.

Smell (3.0): Had to go average here because even with a vigorous poor there was not much of an aroma coming from the beer.

Taste (3.5): Somewhat bitter initial taste, with a nice malty after taste. Interesting.

Mouthfeel (4.0): Seemed light in the mouth, which to me kind of went with the "steam" idea.

Overall (3.5): It taste good, however it does seem to be lacking a bit. Will be interested in trying this again.

 518 characters

Photo of hunteraw
3.43/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Amber color, But wasn't poured into a good glass so not a whole lot else I can describe as far as appearance goes, I'm afraid. Nice looking bottle, though.

Tasted this with a cold, so I can't really comment on the smell, I haven't been able to smell much of anything the last few days...

Hops and molasses flavors come through strongest, but there's something else there that I haven't been able to place. It seems like every reviewer is calling it something different, but there's something interesting going on here...

Mouthfeel and drinkability are average, nothing particularly notable. Interesting beer, worth a tasting for sure.

 643 characters

Photo of RVigz
3.43/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I had this beer on tap at Kimballs Pub in Williamsport PA. It poured a clear amber color with about a half inch head. It smelled slightly sweet and sour. The taste was slightly sweet like dried fruit but it was a little malty/bitter. The best thing about this beer is that it is very very smooth with a creamy mouthfeel.

 320 characters

Photo of kmpitz2
3.43/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours incredibly deep copper color with a finger of head taht falls slightly to a healthy foam over top. The nose is lightly grainy, light caramel. Overall, it is not an overly aromatic brew. Flavor is prominently grainy, with a light caramel. A light hop bitter hangs on the finish. Nothing really grabs me and keeps my interest, though this would be a good transition brew for those just fining craft beer. Feel is moderate with a very active bubble on my tongue. The beer is smooth and very easy to drink. I'm not the biggest fan of the grainy nature of it. There is nothing flawed in it, but I don't think I would buy this one again. It just doesn't do it for me.

 667 characters

Photo of Riggsy
3.43/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

12oz bottle poured into standard pint glass

Appearance: Pours crystal clear copper color with off-white head. Head persists well into drinking.

Aroma: Faint earthy hop aroma with slightly sweet undertones

Taste: Grainy malt, little to no hop presence. Very clean, crisp flavor, finishes dry.

Mouthfeel: Light body fitting for style, with adequate carbonation.

Drinkability:Definitely a refreshing session brew. Prefect for summer afternoon's at the ballpark.

 473 characters

Photo of danieelol
3.43/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Nice to give such an apparently seminal beer a go.

Pours a light orange with good head/lacing.

Smell is of nice clean malt. Zesty orange marmalade. A little green apple.

Taste is more of the same clean orangey marmalade malt characters. As it warms I get more of a hop bite.

Mouthfeel is fairly palate coating yet crisp and readily cleanses itself from the palate upon the swallow.

Solid beer, holds up well in spite of its "classic" (and potentially outdated) status.

 473 characters

Photo of UnderPressure
3.42/5  rDev -11.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A clear, pale copper color with a one finger head that melts after a minute.

Pilsner malt aroma. Has the smell of a good quality pilsner.

Pilsner malt flavor up front. Quite lager-like at first. With a murky, muddy somewhat fruity finish. Not crisp like a pilsner.

Thinnish mouthfeel. Appropriate for the style.

I guess essentially I am drinking a lager/ale hybrid. Not bad. It's different. Just don't go into it expecting something it's not.

 446 characters

Photo of 10Crumra
3.42/5  rDev -11.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a nonic pint glass. Bottled on date of Nov 7, 2014.

Poured a dark golden color with a nice one finger white head. Lots of bubbles visible.

The aroma had some slight hoppiness but was overwhelmingly biscuity. I like to call that distinctive smell/flavor "corn flakes."

The taste has a strong helping of corn flakes upfront. The beer had some faint hop notes and had a nice malty aftertaste that lingered for a while.

The mouthfeel was slightly creamy yet fairly light-bodied like a typical lager. The beer was strongly carbonated as its appearance indicated.

Overall this beer was pleasant but I was expecting more. It was a decent tasting beer that I could definitely drink it again as a light, sessionable beer. I would like to try a slightly fresher bottle/draft just to see if four months is a bit past this beers prime.

 868 characters

Photo of BayouBengal1537
3.41/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Bottle poured into Pint Glass

Poured a hazy copper color, head quickly dissipated but left some sticky lacing along the glass

Smell was toasted malts, grain, slight hop background

Taste is dry, some fruity lemon is definitely present, bitter hops in the front, dry finish. Mouthfeel is light and crisp, not much linger

Drinkability is pretty damn good, could def enjoy this on a summer day. I'm glad I finally tried this micro classic.

 439 characters

Photo of velosuds
3.41/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a clear pint glass. Appears to be a code printed on the label. I'm lazy. I like bottled on dates foremost, and then best by dates. Codes are better than nothing, for I suppose they can be decoded. Single purchased at local health food store for $1.59.

A-Poured a medium amber hue with a 2+ finger head and modest lacing. Overall, a nice looking beer in the glass.

S-What smell? If I had been wearing a blindfold, I would have only recognized it as "beer." Non-descript.

T-I'm still waiting for this. Someone, please let me know the secret to discerning this beer's taste. But a 12 oz. bottle for nostalgia's sake is all I am willing to grant this offering. Very disappointing. Mostly earthy malts and bitterness. Can't quite tell if bitterness from hops or the modest alcohol. Not very well crafted.

M-Excellent mouthfeel. Exceedingly smooth and well balanced carbonation. This and the appearance are quite good. Too bad taste accounts for 40% of the rating.

D-This went down very easily, but I wouldn't readily reach for another. Taste just isn't there, and there are much more affordable alternatives available for getting a buzz, not that I was looking to this beer for, but presently I can't see much other use for this. Sad.

Not sure about what the California Common/Steam Beer style is all about. This beer makes me want to suggest a new style: enigma. This is a craft beer icon, but it has no taste. Thankfully, it is not yellow. I want to like this beer. It is probably one of the first craft beers I recall having at an excellent hole-in-the-wall pizzeria in Sausalito, CA while on my honeymoon 26 August's ago. Not even close to the caliber of Anchor Liberty or Anchor Porter. I am flummoxed, and disappointed.

 1,759 characters

Photo of Swim424
3.41/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured into hoegaargen mug from 12oz bottle.

A-Pours a nice clear caramel color. lots of bubbles flowing into a nice small creamy fluffy head.

S-smells crisp. A bit of yeast, sort of a malt scent. Maybe a tiny hint of hops. Nothing special here.

T-Very plain, malty flavor, a pleasant sweetness in the middle, with a touch of spicy hop on the finish. Seems very simple.

MF-medium body, A bit creamy, nicely carbonated.

O-This is a nice beer. Definitely a lager. Much better than any mass produced beer, Would love to sip on this on a hot day. Very refreshing, with a nice simple character to it.

 605 characters

Photo of joeskirkie
3.41/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Pours a clear rich amber, BIG creamy head, nice.

It has a faint leafy woodsy hop aroma. Tastes creamy and light and finishes with this sorta sour (in a good way) bite. It's pretty well balanced, not "in your face" by any means.

It's smooth and slightly dry and just oh so easy to drink. This is a great gateway beer for friends and a wonderful session beer to have on hand.

 379 characters

Photo of gcarl
3.41/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

pours into a pint glass with a nice clear tan color and a white wispy head.

Smell is a muddled hop and malt aroma.

Taste is dry with a sweet hop bite in the aftertaste.

A moderate brew, nothing too challenging. May be a nice crossover to a drinker that always reaches for that BMC

GC

 287 characters

Photo of klewis
3.41/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Batch 6MG

A: Pours a caramel color with a big bubbly head with good sustain.

S: Neutral hop aroma with a slight vegetal smell.

T: Sweet with buttery malt flavors and a touch of hop bitterness in the finish.

M: Light-bodied with plenty of carbonation.

D: Nice for a session beer, but in the grand scheme of things, this is pretty average.

 353 characters

Anchor Steam Beer from Anchor Brewing Company
87 out of 100 based on 1,990 ratings.