1. American Craft Beer Fest returns to Boston on May 29 & 30, featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers. Tickets are on sale now.

Anchor Small Beer - Anchor Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Anchor Small BeerAnchor Small Beer

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
72
okay

448 Ratings
THE BROS
70
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 448
Reviews: 325
rAvg: 3.13
pDev: 17.25%
Wants: 17
Gots: 13 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Anchor Brewing Company visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
English Bitter |  3.30% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: UnionMade on 11-11-2000

"We believe you will find Anchor Small Beer delicious--similar to what modern brewers call a "bitter"--and we hope you will also enjoy the idea of reviving an ancient brewing tradition, which is something of great importance. "

"We make our Old Foghorn Barleywine Style Ale from the rich first runnings of an all-malt mash, and Anchor Small Beer is our attempt to duplicate the "small beers" of old by sparging that same mash: sprinkling warm water over the Old Foghorn mash after the first wort has run off, thereby creating a second, lighter brew from the resulting thinner wort. "
View: Beers (25) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
to view all ratings, reviews and sorting options.
Ratings: 448 | Reviews: 325
Photo of mempath
4.42/5  rDev +41.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

figured i'd try this since it's a tip of the hat to brewing history and activity...and i like anchors offerings. surprised to see the 'score' but here goes...

nice bright deep brass color with an active head that laces briefly but disappears quickly. definitely appears to have a good body. so far so good. the nose is subtle but instant hint of herbs, floral. i don't know why but each sniff makes me think of the alps. weird. something medicinal in a good way...ree-colahhh. the translation to taste is similar, but the shift from subtle/mysterious is more revelatory. definitely not watery, rather astringent (in a good way) thanks to an active mouthfeel. crisp, uncomplicated but not simply 'simple'...for something so malty, there is a hoppy menthol sense that makes this a little more mysterious once again. i guess it's good it's low ABV....but i do wish it didn't cost so much ($6+ for the bomber)

would be interesting to pour a few ounces of Old Foghorn in...and vice versa when i have an OF on hand.

Photo of WetCoaster
4.35/5  rDev +39%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 5

Appearance: Deep honey amber with a pure white head. Good retention. Incredibly fine, almost invisible carbonation. Some slippery lace.

Smell: Surprising. Really rich, nice malt backbone with a distinct floral hoppiness. Mild, but quite good.

Taste: Wha? Even more surprising. The body is very light and crisp, as you might expect. The flavor, though, is something else. The flavor is a bit of an hourglass; there's not much body, but the hops and malt really pop. There's a smooth, creamy malt richness with a bracing hoppy bitterness. It's mild, and you can sort of tell it's a dumbed-down version of something, but the balance is almost perfect.

Drinkability: Taken in context, outstanding. Is this a great, or even above average, pale ale? Not really. But if you think about what this beer actually is for a minute -- a 2-2.5% "near beer" (rumor has it the listed 3.3% is QUITE optimistic) -- it's a bloody miracle; a picnic/gathering beverage you can drink all day and remain (relatively) sober that doesn't taste like tin can full of boiled cat urine. Wouldn't drink this every day, but in that situation, I would definitely go back to this one. Try it -- you might be surprised.

Photo of seedyone
4.34/5  rDev +38.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25

06/27/13 On tap At Rattle N Hum, NYC. As 'small beers' are, by definition, made from the by-products of other batches, this has quite a substantial taste. Don't see it in the long haul, but there is nothing to shy away from in his glass.

Photo of pathman
4.25/5  rDev +35.8%

Photo of nebula1999
4.2/5  rDev +34.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Pours reddish-copper colored from bomber into 1/2 liter mug. Very carbonated, nearly overflowing. Cream colored head remains with some lacing. Not entirely transparent. Head is just about the same color as the background color on the label.

Smell is of light grain, some grass. Nothing too powerful comes through, but not empty either. I'm thinking this is going to be a light tasteless beer, but not so.

Flavor is clean and light with a mild, then pronounced bitterness on the back of the tongue. Lightly roasted grain is present. Lasting dryness. Bright. Lip smacking. A pleasantly refreshing beer that I could easily work my way though most of the afternoon into the evening. Low alcohol is welcome, but only because the beer actually has some decent flavor accents. I think that "good" beer does not always have to be high in alcohol, or exceedingly complex. This beer fills a niche that I seek out, but rarely find in the micro market.

Mouthfeel is light and quenching with some softness. Pilsener-like. Yet nothing like a macro light. This beer is worth trying. Especially on those hot days when you want to be refreshed, but without the high alcohol that some other ales can deliver. Recommended.

Photo of thejewthatbrews
4.17/5  rDev +33.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 5

Poured from a bottle into a pint glass.
A: Deep golden, honey colored, with a white bubbly head and nice, although thin, lacing. Head retention was minimal.
S: Very balanced. A little more toward the malt side, after the pour, once the head died down a bit.
T: Again, balanced. Slight malt upfront, then a little hops. Hops in the finish, with a mildly malty aftertaste.
M: Pretty light, but not like water or anything. Light enough that you don't feel the need to drink sparingly.
D: Highly drinkable, due to a very balanced, mild flavor, and light mouthfeel.

Overall, in my opinion, a great beer. Balanced all around, and extremely drinkablel. Nothing special, but what would you expect from the second runnings of a mash? Will I buy it again? Definately. It's a beer I don't have to convince myself I like.

Photo of goochpunch
4.17/5  rDev +33.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

Pours out a peach iced tea with moderately spaced out bubbles in the body. The thin head fizzes out to a thin ring. I smell some toasty malts, a good bit of diacetyl, along with tea and herbal hops. Malt is up front with some underlying graininess on the tongue. Diacetyl stands constant throughout the flavor. Herbal hops accompany the dry and slightly astringent finish. Body is rather light and almost spritzy. This would be an amazing session beer if I could only get it in Texas.

Photo of Reagan1984
4.15/5  rDev +32.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Always wanted to try this beer from understanding the historical significance of the method (style)

Poured with a fluffy whipped egg white head. While the head was about a finger plus thick initially, it settled to a very thin cap over time. The beer was a light amber color with no visible carbonation. The glass was splattered with a decent amount of lacing.

Aroma was fresh with a combination of lightly toasted malt, bread dough and an ever so slightly floral hop aroma.

I have to say that I really enjoy this beer. My first thought on how to describe the taste was to put. "It tastes like Beer!" It does, just a classic beer flavor. Very bread like with a nice fruit background. The grain seems to shine through with a nice balance brought about by the bread tones and the light presence of hops. I think the level of bitterness is spot on for the flavor profile and mouth feel.

Beer has light carbonation and a fairly light body.

Immensely drinkable and obviously the definition of a session beer. I knew the scores were a bit low for this beer, but I still wanted to try it. I am so happy I did. I enjoyed this and it certainly has it's time and place.

I wonder how much of the scoring here is due to folks preconceived notions of a lower abv beer. We'll never know, but I think this is quite a nice beer.

Photo of bahana
4.1/5  rDev +31%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

I was very pleasantly surprised by this beer. Very light and drinkable. It would be a good alternative to having a light lager outside on a hot day. I love the mouthfeel how it tingles the tongue. Seems like it would go well with a light fish. Smell isn't much, but the crisp taste makes up for it.

Photo of mschofield
4.1/5  rDev +31%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Pours a coppery gold, topped with a three finger foamy off-white head. Well carbonated and leaves thick patches of lace.
Light malt, pine and apricot in the aroma.
Good bitter taste, pine, toast, wood, leather, citrus rind, light caramel. Light bodied, a little thin.
One of the tastiest low alcohol beers on the market.

Photo of leantom
4.1/5  rDev +31%

Why not? Here goes:

A - Clear orange-amber with a massive head that leaves a ton of lacing. In fact, the beer was bursting forth upon opening the bottle (had to get the glass quickly). Great. 4.5/5

S: Grainy amber and lightly kilned malts. Grainy smells predominate. There is also somewhat of a spiciness imparted from the yeast. I think it's good for the style. Maybe could've been a little sweeter. 4.25/5

T: Taste follows the nose. Grainy taste from the malt; spice/white pepper from the yeast. The yeast imparts a very earthy flavor that is complimented by a light but watered-down malt backbone. Somewhat disappointing, but given the alcohol content I'm not surprised the malt was somewhat lacking. 3.75/5

M: Light and smooth. Glides down the tongue. However, the beer is very well-carbonated. 4/5

O: A solid beer. Malt more robust in the Anchor Steam Beer, but this one is good. 4.1/5.0

Photo of CwrwAmByth
4.06/5  rDev +29.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Poured from a 650ml bottle into a pint glass.

Pours a dark amber colour with a nice white head that lasts for ages.

Smells alright nothing spectacular just a sort of generic beer smell.

Tastes quite nice, but the winning factor is the drinkability of it. It's so well balanced it's a lovely drink.

Overall it is a truly lovely session beer. Though could do with being a bit weaker alcohol wise if i'm honest.

Photo of mynie
4.04/5  rDev +29.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

Dark rust colored with a perfect and retentive head. Filtered clear, very fizzy.

Smells of light caramel malt and very light, dry hops. Nicely balanced, but very faint.

Tastes surprisingly strong. Malt is sweet and bready with a strong presence of ale yeast and then that flavor falls out from under itself for a nice dose of dry, west coast hops. Slightly bitter, all around very flavorful.

This is the session to end all sessions. Very tasty, remarkably drinkable, and only 3.3% alcohol.

Photo of RoyalT
4/5  rDev +27.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Appearance - The orange body is almost florescent. The head looked pretty good and laced the glass on the way down.

Smell - The malt aromas are secondary to the citrusy hops. Everything is kind of light at the nose.

Taste - An interesting mix of straight malt and citrus hops. There's no sweetness to this one. The finish is hoppy and dry.

Mouthfeel - Small carbonation and a refreshing mouthfeel help this one down.

Drinkability - This beer is sharp and undulating. It went down well with my very spicy Mexican dish.

Update - It has been almost five years since I first reviewed this beer so thought I'd give it another whirl in 2008. I thought the aroma was more pronounced as was the carbonation. It really does have a nice bitter kick at the end. I raised my overall rating from 3.8 to 4.0.

Photo of Jeffreysan
4/5  rDev +27.8%

Appearance: Pours a beautiful, clear, deep, amber color with a quarter of a finger of white-colored head that quickly dissolved into a thin lacing of foam that partially covered the top of the beer.

Aroma: Not much in the aroma department, in fact, I don’t get any aromas at all, which is disappointing.

Taste: Lots of flavor, though! Lots of bready, toasted malt flavor up front, imparting flavors of biscuits, whole wheat crackers and English muffins, flowed by some brown sugar-like sweetness, black pepper, and more great toasted malt! Delicious!

Mouthfeel: Medium-bodied and pretty smooth as there isn’t much in the way of carbonation. With an ABV of 3.3%, there is no alcohol on the palate.

Overall: This is a very, very tasty beer! I love all of the bready malt and smooth mouthfeel. Definitely worth a drink!

Photo of Beertracker
4/5  rDev +27.8%

Photo of DmanGTR
4/5  rDev +27.8%

Photo of Wally1912
4/5  rDev +27.8%

Photo of MrHurmateeowish
4/5  rDev +27.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

1 pint 6oz bottle from a liquor store in Nashua, NH. Pours a crystal-clear golden body with nearly an inch of off-white head that slowly dissipates leaving some impressive lacing. Smells malty, fruity, with caramel and brown sugar notes, and a strong citrussy hop presence. Tastes grainy with caramel and citrus hops. Tastes a little watery, which matches the aqueous refreshing mouthfeel with moderate carbonation. Very drinkable and refreshing. Flavor (other than the hop presence) reminds me more of an American blonde or pale wheat maybe, rather than an APA or bitter. Still, reasonably priced (3.50$ per bottle) and is great for a hot summer day like today.

Photo of jak
4/5  rDev +27.8%

Photo of afsdan
4/5  rDev +27.8%

Photo of Ryan1423
4/5  rDev +27.8%

Photo of Mark
3.98/5  rDev +27.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

I have always been curious about this beer and I actually tried it at the breweries tasting room. Color is amber with a decent white head. Faint rings of lace are left. Fresh aroma is really at the same time kind on non descript. Crisp fresh taste that is almost lager like, good finish, decent hopping. I had heard it was supposed to be English bittier like, but this is a mysterious brew. I ranked the taste as good, because it tasted good. Refreshing and drinkable.

Photo of tgbljb
3.98/5  rDev +27.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Poured a medium amber color with moderate white head.
Smell is very light with a slight sweetness detected.
Taste is also of swet malt with a fine light bitternss in the background.
Very light and refreshing.
A very nice beer without being anything extreme. A perfect ber for those occasions when you need something low in alcohol, but still want something with some taste.

Photo of Maction
3.96/5  rDev +26.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

A: Into an imperial pint glass, this is orangey gold, not completely transparent. The head is like a huge fluffy snow bank, dense in the middle and fading around the sides. Very pretty pour.

S: I smell sour bready yeast, minerals, pretzels, and wet pennies.

T: The flavor follows the aromas, with hard pretzels, minerals, and some orange rind.

M: Not watery because of the rolling waves of carbonation. The mineral finish stays wet, reminding me of caves by the sea.

D: While this is not complex, this is yummy and very chug-able. I wish it was available in six packs, as the low alcohol and nice presentation would make it a summer favorite.

Notes: Tasting this in the same night as Coniston Bluebird Bitter, I have no idea why that beer is rated so much higher than this one. They are very, very, similar, although the Buebird is slightly more complex in mineral and citrus flavors. I think that calling this an APA is leading BA's to expect something that this beer isn't going to deliver.

to view all ratings, reviews and sorting options.
Anchor Small Beer from Anchor Brewing Company
72 out of 100 based on 448 ratings.