1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Hell Hath No Fury Ale - Bell's Brewery, Inc.

Not Rated.
Hell Hath No Fury AleHell Hath No Fury Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
very good

1,132 Ratings
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 1,132
Reviews: 602
rAvg: 3.77
pDev: 12.47%
Wants: 64
Gots: 72 | FT: 3
Brewed by:
Bell's Brewery, Inc. visit their website
Michigan, United States

Style | ABV
Belgian Strong Dark Ale |  7.70% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: CRJMellor on 11-03-2004)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 1,132 | Reviews: 602 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of JohnnyM2002
3.53/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Sampled from a 12 oz bottle into a snifter at 50 degrees.

A - Pours a beautiful dark black with a medium-sized tan head; good retention through the life of the beer.

S - Strong burnt aroma that most resembles a dark-roast coffee.

T - Complex taste that starts as a bready coffee, and fades to spiced cocoa. The spices really came out the more I drank. I think I was expecting more of an imperial stout, which might have altered my perceptions...

M - Medium body with a dry finish...not as creamy as I expected.

D - As I stated earlier, I think I expected too much out of this. I split some Bell's cases and ended up with Java Stout, Double Cream, and Expedition...so I might have been swayed.

Still, a good cold-weather strong ale, but not top-5.

JohnnyM2002, Nov 23, 2006
Photo of drinknewbelgium
3.18/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

pours dark almost totally black leaves small head smells are of sweet and roasted malts hints of coffee tastes of roasted malts coffee hints but spiced with sweetness finishes with more than enough hops i could say id maybe have another or two

this beer seems to be more of a stout to me the only thing that seperates it from that is sweet belgium spices but to be frank the tastes are sloppily arranged maybe if it was aged?

drinknewbelgium, Nov 22, 2006
Photo of ZAP
2.7/5  rDev -28.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A-Pours black...thick...looks like an Imperial Stout...

S-Nose is smokey and peaty...some blackened, burnt malt too...not real assertive aroma.

T-Does not strike me as a Dubbel...carries more stout characteristics than anything....burnt malt....smoke....

M-Thick, full and rch..again seems more like and Impy Stout

D-This is the third bottle I have had of this and I am not impressed....really has no true dubble characteristics..might have worked fine as Bells 8000 or something with a looser clasification, but even then this comes off as a muddles, poor tasting beer....regardless of what it is classified as I would not buy it again....give me more of the hopslam please..

ZAP, Nov 22, 2006
Photo of carln26
3.55/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Deep brown color, topped by a thick fizzy tan colored head. The head doesn't retain that well and leaves little lace. The nose is a wild mix of dark malt (black patent maybe?) and some fruity esters. Almost a hefe type banana character on the finish. The flavor has dark fruit, candy syrup, dark berries, and more of the mild banana ester. Mild bitterness (undefined in flavor) lingers for a brief period. The mouth feel is reasonably full, and smooth. It's tough for me to characterize this beer. Decent offering, but not a strong performer.

carln26, Nov 21, 2006
Photo of rhoadsrage
4/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

(Served in a chalice)

A- This beer has a black body with a creamy tan head that fades to a ring pretty quickly. There is a gentle carbonation that can be seen but the body is a bit dense unless held to the light where it is a warm brown as the glass narrows.

S- This beer has a slight sweet prune and brown sugar note with a smell of sweet dark roasted malt with a faint earthy hint.

T- This beer has a smooth dark malt flavor with some notes of brown sugar. There is a spicy note that finishes the flavor. The is a light cola note and a faint coffee roasted malt flavor that come through as it warms but the flavor is very well blended together.

M- This beer has a medium-light mouthfeel with a tiny little fizz that cleans up the finish nicely.

D- The beer has a very nice flavor and is very smooth and drinkable.

rhoadsrage, Nov 21, 2006
Photo of dfried
3.5/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Fairly dark, just a bit of brown and red at edges, small coco colored head forms a ring after a minute. Sweet caramely and chocolaty aroma, with Belgian yeast and some fruity plum and raisin like-ness. The flavor is much the same, I kept picking up some black licorice too. Medium bodied, a lot of yeast at the bottom.

Verdict: solid offering but nothing extraordinary. An original/Amercan take on the dubbel style. I had one on tap and liked it a lot more than from the bottle. Bell's has so many awesome beers it kind of turns into a let down when one is just average.

dfried, Nov 21, 2006
Photo of jcdiflorio
3/5  rDev -20.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Served 12oz long neck brown bottle crimp-on cap into snifter.

Opaque,black browish hue,mocha ring around glass,chunks of yeast floating in the beer.
Aroma was very roasty,chocolaty,a bit smokey a moderate malt nose to the beer. Fruity aromas also and hints of clove.
The taste was very chocolaty,yeasty hints of clove a bit fruity.Syrupy with a dry bittersweet finish.
A medium mouthfeel,a bit cloying and sticky. A bit rough on the palate.
Beligium meets stout very different, just didn't really excite me
A bit of a dissapointing offering from Bell's one of my favorite breweries.
A really different beer,worth at least a try,just because it's so different.

jcdiflorio, Nov 19, 2006
Photo of alexgash
3.68/5  rDev -2.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Very dark, murky brown with a small, sticky, light brown head. Dark chocolate and cocoa beans mix with brown sugar and estery fruit; a little banana-y and yeasty. Sweet malt and chocolate [milk] flavors up front. Turns a little harsh and roasted raw hop bitterness. Gets a little boozy and swampy toward the finish, with leftover cocoa and fruit. Misses the mark a little, but not too bad. Medium-bodied with a decent, bottle-conditioned feel. Kind of pales next to the Hopslam in terms of recent Bell's releases, but then again, most things pale in comparison to the Hopslam!

alexgash, Nov 17, 2006
Photo of beermanbrian
3.6/5  rDev -4.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a dark black with a thin tan head. Smell of roasted malt and some dark fruits. Also some chocolate. Smells more like a porter to me than a Belgian Dark Ale. Taste of burnt roasted malts and some dark fruit, plum and cherries. Some alcohol comes through with a slight burning aftertaste. Overall a nice beer. Not Bell's best but certainly worth a try.

beermanbrian, Nov 17, 2006
Photo of treedoctor5002
2.65/5  rDev -29.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

This beer pours a very dark brown color with a nice dark tan head.
This beer basically stinks to me. There is some kind of odd chemical smell that is really nausiating. I've never smelled any other beer like it.
The alcohol is really up front here along with other odd burnt rubber tasting flavors. I can't figure out what they're going for here?
Mouthfeel is similar to a stout, thick and heavy.
Overall not very drinkable for me. I'll pass.

treedoctor5002, Nov 14, 2006
Photo of bucko
3.28/5  rDev -13%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

This beer pours a dark shade of brown, perhaps even black with a minimal head that fades quickly. Nice lacing. The aroma is that of roasted, almost burnt malts. Slightly earthy and fruity as well. The flavor is slightly fruity but dominated by the roasty flavor... perhaps a little caramel in the background, too. Mouthfeel is full, creamy yet not too heavy. Drinkable? One, yes. There's too much to this beer for me to drink more than one at any given time, but definitely enjoyable.

bucko, Nov 09, 2006
Photo of Chaz
4.18/5  rDev +10.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Dark brown / burgundy in color, with a nice thick tan head and sticky lace. Dark fruit esters tickling my schnozz from two feet away, beckoning me "come hither!" . . . I might end up calling a cab tonight. Yeasty too, just as I'd hope a Belgian dubbel or dark ale would be. Nice lively mouthfeel and carbonation, malty but balanced, with some bitterness evidenced toward the end of the palate. This is actually fairly dry and a bit tannic, woody - smokey? Maybe . . . it's definitely well-balanced, vinuous and slightly chcolatey as well as dangerously drinkable. When I ordered it I was told that it was a Belgian dubbel in style, and that seems more specific than the Strong Dark Ale style designation provided here . . . am I splitting hairs tonight? Probably, but when I think Belgian Strong Dark Ale I think of something a bit bigger than this all around, somewhere between Ommegang (which this reminds me of, just a little bit) and a Quad or Blue Cap. Splitting hairs again . . . I really like this on first impression, and should like to try it again to see if I'm not just an uncritical sucker for Bell's brews.

Chaz, Nov 08, 2006
Photo of adams82
3.55/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: Pours black with a slightly tan colored creamy head. The head is a little bit on the thin side, leaving a small amount of lacing. Yeast sediment easily found its way into this one!

S: Smells of yeast and a hint of chocolate/roasted malt behind it. Almost what I thought it would smell like after seeing the pour.

T: Tastes a bit yeasty and finishes with sweet dark malts, slightly spicy... a bit of alcohol on the finish too... just enough to be noticable, not overpowering what so ever.

M: Mouthfeel is nice; smooth and slightly creamy. Nice medium body, carbonation is subtle.

D: It would be easy enough to have one or two of these in a sitting considering the ABV. It goes down easily and is a nice take on the style. Definatly worth another visit or two!

adams82, Nov 06, 2006
Photo of clvand0
3.45/5  rDev -8.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

This one pours a dark color with a moderate head that falls quickly and doesn't leave a lot of lacing on the glass. The aroma has a lot of yeast character with some vegetable hints floating around. Smells ok, but could be better. The flavor is pretty sweet with some light spices and hints of alcohol. The spices in this one aren't my favorite and they seem to dominate the flavor. The body is fairly full and the drinkability is ok, but the flavors just don't do it for me.

clvand0, Nov 06, 2006
Photo of TastyTaste
4.03/5  rDev +6.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Appearance: Tar black body, chunks of sediment on the bottom of the glass. Head is small and tan. Pretty dark for a dubbel.

Smell: Nice smell, Belgian style yeastiness and sugary dark fruits, a little chocolatey, even.

Taste: A good amount of roasted malts are noticeable, combining quite nicely with the fruitiness of the yeast. Alcohol is well hidden, but adds to the flavor nicely. I would like to see more age on this one, but it is a good American take on this Belgian style.

Drinkability: A nice glass of beer, very different than many of the traditional Belgian examples, still I like it.

TastyTaste, Nov 05, 2006
Photo of xav33
3.88/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Bell's Hell Hath No Fury
12 oz bottle
Packaged 10/06, descended into 11/06
Medium pour in a snifter.

Poured black, with brown highlights, with an average frothy mostly diminishing light brown head with a tiny ring of lacing.

Smelt of smoked game, earthy, burnt malt.

Taste was upfront moderate sweet and bitter coffee roast and earthy yeast, followed by a moderate bitter soy sauce and dark dark chocolate sweetness on a long smokey finish. Mouthfeel was medium to full bodied, syrupy and velvety, softly carbonated, with light astringency.

Overall, the flavors are a bit odd and interesting, a combination of dark malt roast bitterness and yeasty sweetness. Despite the strongly astringent finish,it mostly works.

xav33, Nov 04, 2006
Photo of brewcrew76
3.05/5  rDev -19.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A - Pours a solid black with a creamy brown head.

S - Vegetal is the dominant aroma with some smokey/roasty malt in the background.

T - Vegetal taste with a roasty, grainy, chalkiness. Tastes like a stout that has gone sour the way lagers fermented at warm temperatures turn vegetal.

M - Creamy and dry and chalky at the same time.

D - I am surprised to have the bad of a beer from an amazing brewery like Bells. I had this one on tap at the Maduro during the Great Taste of the Midwest and do not remember it being this bad.

brewcrew76, Nov 04, 2006
Photo of SupaCelt
4/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This beer pours a rich, deep and dark brown colour. I got a fairly large cocoa coloured head off the pour that was frothy and cola like. It quickly reduced to a thin surface layer. This thing is extremely dark to the extent that I cannot visualize the carbonation level. It looks quite lovely. It leaves some lacing behind.

The nose is characterized by a chalky Belgian yeastiness that overlies cocoa tones and a mild dark fruit character. There is a faint bubblegum scent that lies fairly well masked by the overall earthiness of the nose. Vague alcohol presence is detectable with gentle agitation of the glass.

The taste is laden with a pleasant yeast character again. The taste is otherwise hard for me to describe. It has a definite fruitiness. I guess I could say it has some subtle chocolate influence, be it cocoa or say a baker's chocolate blandness. It is quite earthy. I am thinking of woodsy character like bark or dried leaves. Maybe a faint bit of nuttiness. It has a very natural appeal to it. There is a spicy and peppery quality that is right at home. Rich and a bit complex. Dry finish with some noteable bitterness as well.

The mouthfeel is pleasantly medium. It has a vague creaminess that is offset by the dryness of the finish. Easy to tolerate.

Drinkability is good. I am not having any problem enjoying this, but I think I can feel it hitting me in the head a little. I will respect the authority. This is good. It is hard for me to find fault with any of its aspects. I think I may have experienced some bottle to bottle differences, as this bottle was quite a bit more appealing than my first bottle was. I don't see how that is possible being a small batch and coming from the same six pack too. Maybe I am just tasting better today. Perhaps not earthshaking, but solid and well made per usual. Great label as well.

SupaCelt, Nov 03, 2006
Photo of feloniousmonk
3.95/5  rDev +4.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Solid brown body, opaque, thin, but lasting layer of cocoa-tan foam above. Solid look for a dubbel.

Nose is all cocoa powder, with suggestions of maple, nuts, & other sweet, dark and tasty things.

Taste is more of the same, with an appreciated heft to the feel. Comes on and grows spicy on the tongue, coats the palate with a slick, chocolately, syrupy sweetness. Cloys a tad, but still delights.
Thins out a touch and dries nicely in the finish.

feloniousmonk, Nov 01, 2006
Photo of quasimoto
3/5  rDev -20.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A - Deep opaque dark dark brown, with a finger and a half of tan head. There is a slight ruby hue to this one.

S - Strong aromas of chocolate, spice, orange peel, and above all coffee. smooth, but not overpowering. Then there is a sort of smokey molasses flavor. Not too pleasant.

T - Most of the aromas transfer over to the flavor, but it turns sort of red fruit flavor, like raspberries, very sweet. But once again there is that smokey molasses flavor that turns it to a BBQ flavor. Nasty.

M - Very smooth, not real chewy, and doesn't leave a residue. Very nice.

D - I could drink this all night. But for the style, it is not really on key. It seems more like a coffee stout, with a Belgian yeast, mixed with some BBQ sauce.

quasimoto, Oct 31, 2006
Photo of BEERchitect
3.53/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

That's a pretty strong beer. Alcohols make it seem much higher than the 7.7% advertised. Begins with a deep, rich mohogany / burgundy color and nearly opaque. Initially good retention, but fades relatively quick. Good lacing. Smells very fruity (dried prunes, raisons, berries, and cherries), sweet (licorice and candy sugars). Maltiness could have come through better. Tastes strong with the fruits and sugars, but still weak with the bready, malty qualities. Remains hot and spicy. Spices seem to come from alcohol and added ingredients, and not from the classic Belgian yeast. Feels hot, very very hot with a follow up of thin sweetness, and yet no real texture or firmness. The beer is nice, but comes through a little too cough syrup-like. Probably could use some age.

BEERchitect, Oct 31, 2006
Photo of terrabyte
3.2/5  rDev -15.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a deep black color with a medium brown head.

Aroma is thick with coffee and dark chocolate

The flavor will wake you up. Dark, bitter chocolate, toasted walnuts, cappuccino, smoke, and burnt firewood. Aftertaste has quite a boquet of flavors. Here you can catch hints of dark fruits, raisins, cherry cough syrup, and a bite of alcohol flavored like Jagermeister. Ending with some d.

Mouthfeel is a bit heavy and creamy. Low carbonation. Still drinkable despite all this.

Write your reviews fast when drinking this. I found most of my flavors in the beginning, and began to get used to them by the end. This is an assaulting mix of flavors that almost seem to be picked just to piss you off. Unlike some of the other reviewers, I didn't hate this beer than much. I merely raise an eyebrow at the combination. I think if it didn't have the burnt campfire ember in it, I might actually have enjoyed it more. Real hell, would have no beer.

terrabyte, Oct 31, 2006
Photo of ADR
3.2/5  rDev -15.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Thick almost completely black color, dark tan creamy head. Fat globs of lace on the glass. Dark pumpernickel aroma, slight fruitiness but not much. Carbonation is lower, body fairly heavy. Flavor doesn't match style at all well, some aspects of non-descript sweetness at first, but an odd cooked celery impression that links up with an instant coffee sense and too much bittering at the close. The beer would be an OK dark Porter or a weaker Imperial Stout, but its not a good example of a Dubbel. Not really an awful brew, though on its own, its not much above average in that realm either.

ADR, Oct 31, 2006
Photo of Frozensoul327
3.9/5  rDev +3.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: Onyx presentation with a brown foam head. Medium level of carbonation. Some brown lace is present.

S: Rich toffee, cocoa, roasted malt, java.... Very complex. Hints of corrander and spices. Nice.

T: Medium bodied, yet still rather rich and complex. Seemed to get better as it warmed. Flavors of roasted malt, rich plumbs and dark fruits, fermented grain, chocolate, and a touch of woody smoke.

M: Lighter than what I anticipated. Smooth. Easy going down. A touch of density wouldn't hurt.

D: Pretty good. Not an everyday brew, but undoubtedly one i'll revisit as the weather turns cooler.

Notes: Not bad. Some dubbel-like character. If it had more "stouty" mouthfeel, this would be a top beer for me.

Frozensoul327, Oct 29, 2006
Photo of CortexBomb
3.1/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pour is deep black to plum in tone, with a modest white head. It really looks more like a stout than a Belgian, but the purpleish tone does make its style more evident. Smell on this is a bit odd: pears, malts, some caramel. I do like it, but the style expectation here is high, and it did not impress on that basis.

Taste malty up front, orange peel, yeast, a bitter on the back of the tongue from the hops and a very full, creamy mouth. Alcohol starts to show up about midway, and on the swallow it is very prominent. There are bit of other Belgian trademarks here, some dark fruit character for instance, but they aren't hugely prominent. I would call the taste average for the style.

Mouthfeel, again, a bit above average for the style it has a nice creamy feel with some hop bitters. Drinkability, not bad, but the alcohol is certainly more notcieable here than with the average Belgian, so I have to keep drinkability down to a modest 3.

Basically: Bell's does Belgian Ale here with a moderate degree of success. The flavour on this one has less fruit and more alcohol than I personally care for though, so this one ends up getting average marks. Not a bad beer though.

CortexBomb, Oct 28, 2006
Hell Hath No Fury Ale from Bell's Brewery, Inc.
85 out of 100 based on 1,132 ratings.