Bell's Batch 10000 - Bell's Brewery, Inc.

Not Rated.
Bell's Batch 10000Bell's Batch 10000

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
85
very good

402 Reviews
THE BROS
-
no score

(Send Samples)
Reviews: 402
Hads: 764
rAvg: 3.78
pDev: 12.7%
Wants: 57
Gots: 348 | FT: 16
Brewed by:
Bell's Brewery, Inc. visit their website
Michigan, United States

Style | ABV
American Strong Ale |  9.20% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: Spica66 on 11-29-2010

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

"Strong Brown Ale"
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last
Reviews: 402 | Hads: 764
Photo of PDXHops
1.54/5  rDev -59.3%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

12 ounce bottle, Duvel tulip. It pours out a mysterious murky combination of what seems to be several shades of brown and mahogany. Good retention from the beige head, but little in the way of lacing.

The nose is somewhat of a cluster, in no small part due to a persistent wave of alcohol. It's not boozy; there's simply a lot of odd solvent alcohol here. Nuts, smoke, burnt rubber. What the hell? There are some familiar beerlike aromas of chocolate and roasted malt in there as well.

Tastes marginally better, but we're talking degrees of displeasure here. It starts out OK, roast and chocolate with a nice smokiness, but alcohol and an odd tangy/minty/tobacco combo that wears out its welcome long before it continues to linger in the finish. Rather reminiscent of menthol cigarettes, actually.

Overall impression: Drainpoured halfway thru the bottle. Majorly disappointing offering from a normally excellent brewery. (924 characters)

Photo of 7ways
1.84/5  rDev -51.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

A: Looks pretty good, nice warm dark brown with a soft tan head, with tiny flecks of lace left behind.

S: Smells weird. Quite medicinal, with notes of herbs/anise/licorice, light/fake smoke, and cereal grain. Tree bark. Figs. Overall, it's pretty weak in strength and character.

T: There are so many flavors competing it's like being screamed at by an entire room full of people. Lots of transitions, kind of variable from sip to sip, so I guess you can call it complex, and it all seems to come full circle by the end of the glass. I pick out German hops and Simcoe (or some other catty hop), pretty balanced against the 986,000 different malts. But mostly I'm noticing some evil combination that tastes like headache medicine, menthol, soap and ham, and glue on the finish. Some things just weren't meant to be.

M: Dry and astringent, light/medium bodied.

D: I won't finish this glass.

If this beer was made by anyone but Bell's I don't think anyone would notice it. (973 characters)

Photo of MbpBugeye
2.03/5  rDev -46.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A- This is a dark beer with slightly odd tints of reds, purples and browns. The color visible around the edges takes me back to being a kid and mixing every crayon in the box. The result is a muddled, busy brown. The head is nice, if only for a moment. It left me one ring of lace before it faded to a skin.

S- The smell is weak but it has a lot going on. Dare I say too much going on? Who would have guessed that a beer with 100 fermentables and 60 hops would get a bit clucterfucked? Some of the few scents that I can describe include peppermint, salted chips, licorice rope, burnt rubber, pencil erasers, and barber shop (which is a melange in it of itself). It smells like a trashcan in an elementary school lunch room.

T- The major tastes include months of anticipation, dozens of reposted threads, hearsay with a touch of speculation, and most notably, disappointment.

This beer doesnt know what to be. It starts out malty with a bittersweet cocoa dryness a long with some roast. The maltiness is never big, luxurious or robust. But just as you think the maltiness up front is getting all over the place the hoppiness comes in. And like a kick to the temple, anything nice that the malts bring are plunged into amnesia. There is a little bit of every kind of flavor here. Spiciness is big, pine, citrus, aspirin, tylenol, as well as ibuprophen. Its like my spice rack and medicine cabinet were both emptied to yield ingredients for this beer, oh, and the whole concoction was stirred using a burnt piece of timber, still soaked in gasoline.

M- There is nothing gross about how this beer feels, persay. Indeed the cocoa powdery dryness is quite nice. However, the body isnt anywhere near what one would expect from a beer with so many ingredients.

I figured this beer would be so thick that they would have to package it in squeeze bottles but its not that way at all. Carbonation is dialed back nicely but the most annoying flavors of all are the ones that linger, and linger. The finish is looong and stuck with aspirin, charcoal and gasoline.

D- This beer will make a good extra but only because of its label.

I can only hope that this beer marks the end of the "everything but the kitchen sink" mentality, and most importantly, the end of a lackluster year from Bell's. (2,291 characters)

Photo of Spider889
2.13/5  rDev -43.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

In the wake of nuclear holocaust, when no malts or hops are labeled properly, and ingredients are scarce and limited to what can be foraged from stale Mr. Beer kits and the wild outside, this is the beer that results. No wonder John Connor sent his father back in time to stop Judgment Day...

Review from notes on 12/07/2010.

Thanks to MbpBugeye for the bottle. I likely would have never tried this otherwise, as the price tag was way too high for a beer I had serious doubts about. Once again my homebrew proves useful! :-)

This beer pours well enough, lending a tall khaki head in my glass. The color is a tad on the odd side though. A dark murky brown, the color of maple syrup and sun-burnt grass (with the earth clods still attached to the roots. The consistency was about that of thin maple syrup as well. In the light the beer takes on an orange hue. Lace is very spotted.

A dark beer that smells light, almost like a bad black IPA. Green hop pellets - nothing fresh-smelling about the hops in this one. There are so many competing hops that the profile is largely indistinguishable. Lots of leafy grasses, earthy aromas, and oddly sweet. An almost bourbony aroma filters in and out as the beer warms - some faint vanilla and maple sweetness. The hops still dominate throughout, this smells like it will be a bitter beer.

To be frank, on a normal basis it's a good sign when you can detect a large number of aromas or components in a beer. But when they are competing and as varied as in this beer, it's a bad thing. Sweet maple/bourbon and strong grassy hops make for a strange muddled mess that is unappealing.

The flavor is very heavy. There's certainly a very strong hop presence. Not as bitter as I first feared, but instead it is an amalgamated mess of pine, earthy, and citrus hops competing to be dominant. I can almost smell the dead hop carcasses as they kill one another off in this civil-war style chaotic battle of ingredients.

Very high carbonation and an unpleasant initial alcohol twinge at the tip of the tongue. The beer is barleywine-ish with the strong alcohol. Malts are HUGE in this beer, and do even more damage to each other than the hops do. In short, it's just a freaking mess. Flavors become muddled and unpleasant. The beer finishes sweet, with bitter grapefruit, earthy moss, scotch, and sweet ginger notes. I am left with the taste of freshly mowed grass.

The mouthfeel is flat-tasting and sticky on the palate, leaving a dry finish. Looong after the swallow the bitterness grows ever stronger, and ever out of place.

The beer is not undrinkable, but it is entirely undesirable. I am so happy i did not have to pay for this bottle. Most Bell's beer is overpriced, but in its defense, most of their beer is good. This one was like a home brewer's mistake.

My final notes proclaim: "Not undrinkable, but not enjoyable either. Strange - no real style. Too dry."

This was a kitchen sink disaster for Bell's. I can't even give 'em points for being 'original' or 'innovative' or 'experimental.' No one in their right mind could have thought so many ingredients could work well together. If they did, in fact, believe that, well... they were wrong. (3,190 characters)

Photo of Phyl21ca
2.23/5  rDev -41%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Bottle: Poured a medium murky brown color ale with an average size foamy head with light retention. Aroma of fusel alcohol, caramelized malt with a bunch of other characteristics that are hard to describe. Taste has lots going on with notes of fusel alcohol, caramelized malt, light smoke, some paint and astringent finish. Body is quite full with good carbonation and some apparent alcohol. I guess this is what happened when you throw everything in the kettle. (462 characters)

Photo of olympuszymurgus
2.36/5  rDev -37.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Poured into a large red wine glass after a meal of rosemary venison. Dark red and brown, minimal head, huge hops in the nose. Some citrus but mostly herbal hoppiness comes across, kind of pleasingly smoky as well.

Taste though, is harsh. Boozy yet sweet, the peat malt is freekishly forward, not pleasing when compared to the herbal hops. Mouthfeel is fine, about what should be expected.

Overall, not a beer I want to drink.

Bells- I love you anyways. (458 characters)

Photo of MrOH
2.38/5  rDev -37%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Very dark reddish brown, but still shy of black. Half finger of tan head with very little retention.

First whiffs are sweet, raisiny, and bready. Figs, prunes, sniffs of chocolate, roast, and hops come up with a couple of swirls. Some alcohol and traces of everything from citrus to rye and smoke are in there too.

Confusing. Definitely get some smoke, sweetness, and hops. A wide range of hop flavors; spice, herbal, citrus. The smoke sticks around. The dry spiciness I associate with rye is there, as is the breadiness that goes with wheat. There are only hints of the darker malts. A lot of the stickier dark fruits that you get in barleywines are there as well. As it warms, things smooth out a tad, but the breadiness takes over from the sweet dried fruits. Just disjointed as a whole.

Pretty heavy, medium carbonation, as expected at its strength.

Well, after 8 or 9 months, it still hasn't come together. I think this might be one that I just have to forget about for 5 years or so. Hate to give it a lowish (for the site) score, because I'm sure it will come together with time. (1,091 characters)

Photo of Stevedore
2.39/5  rDev -36.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12oz bottle of Bell's Batch 10,000. Thanks Regen for this one. Poured into an O'so snifter today, 2/6/2014.

App- Dark brown body, very similar to Batch 9,000. One finger brown head, better retention than 9000, no lacing

Smell- Smells quite oxidized but hard to get much of anything in the nose even as it warms. A bit of dark fruit, sherry.

Flavour- Very uninteresting and frankly, not good. Dark fruit, sherry mixed in with a sugary sweetness would normally sound good but the flavours here are so incredibly muted.

Mouthfeel- Thin-medium bodied, not particularly thick, ok carbonation, basically zero aftertaste

Overall- This was like drinking extremely watered down Batch 9,000. I don't think this is what Bell's intended, but this simply was just not very good at all. (777 characters)

Photo of Bmoyer0301
2.39/5  rDev -36.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Appearance:

Pours a dark brown with some reddish and deep purple hues. On the pour there is a very thin (not even one finger thick) of head lingering around my glass. When I hold it up to the light there this baby is opaque with no yeast chunks floating around. Upon swirling my glass I notice the viscosity is pretty decent.

Smell:

Right off the start I am getting chocolate, heat alcohol and something rubbery. As my glass warms up a little bit I am finding plastic notes followed by band aids and cough medicine. Maybe some grapes ? There is absolutely no hop presence and in the finish some dates and licorice.

Taste:

Again, rubber and cough medicine are taking front stage here followed by some caramel notes. There really seems to be a hodgepodge of hop flavors that contradict themselves becuase it goes from earthy, spicy, to citrus. Very astringent almost like sucking on a tea bag that has been smoked.

Mouthfeel:

Not bad actually, but for a barley wine I'd like just a little bit more on the palate.

Drinkability:

I was rather let down by this one, I feel like they made this recipe by cleaning out the grain room and the hop storage cooler. There were flavors all over the place and I just couldn't get into it. Oh well, Bells still makes other great ales that I am generally very pleased with. (1,316 characters)

Photo of Ryan011235
2.46/5  rDev -34.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured into a snifter on 12/8/10

Thanks to MbpBugeye, I think...

The color is dull matte-brown; not quite as dark as cola. Settles much darker with highlights of ruby & plum at the edges of the glass. A tight cap of foam rose to one finger's worth before slowly dissipating to a bubbly skim. Pretty good lace at the onset; none by the end.

Right after opening the bottle I took a whiff whereupon I noticed aromas of pine, muddled citric zest, dirt, charcoal & GUBNA. Yikes. Once in the glass, the nose proper is no better, though it is different. Malts are more appreciable with an underlying breadiness. Notes of marshmallow, caramel, toffee, butterscotch, musty attic, yeast, burning tires, over-stretched rubber bands, rotten lemon zest, Pine-sol, raisins, moldy figs, a certain garage on South Rich St, cocoa, bubblegum, solvent, warm cherries & mild booze. It isn't particularly bold, considering. At least it isn't too sweet. Afterward, the empty glass surrenders aromas of damp forest & dried manure. The empty bottle smells of vanilla cherry coke & cough drops.

While the nose seemed unstable & wont for expressive change, the taste simply doesn't have sufficient wiggle room for any of that jive. If the aroma is an allegorical Detroit-style wanderlust of a wasteland, the taste has an NYC-approved-density that simply cannot allow the vast majority of clustered ingredients to do anything other than jack up the retail price of this beer. Let's be real about what's going on here: we have a backdrop that displays some pilsner malt, toasted bread & grains, roasted cocoa, caramel & some other stray sugars that support a very dry hop profile (one that doesn't display much bitterness, either) comprised primarily of subdued pine sap with an earthy bent & undertones of disheveled citrus.

Full bodied with a languid, plodding feel wrought with a slow rolling grittiness. Carbonation is respectably low, giving each grit a soft kick to keep it lallygagging onward. The feel smooths over time; by the end of the glass carbonation is all but gone. Finishes quickly with lingering nips of an ashtray, dirty coffee beans, roasted cocoa & a modest, dry bitterness.

With a dubious sense of dignity & self-worth such as this, Batch 10,000 might as well be called Cuvee de GUBNA & Nemesis 2010. It could be worse, but I don't get it; it's Seinfeld to me. Regardless, I had no problems finishing the bottle; quite honestly, I'd drink more, if only to spur more descriptors. Drink a bottle. Tell me I'm wrong. Hype it. I'll stick to Expedition for the same price. I don't factor cost into my reviews but, as a side note, this is a rip-off.

Serving type: bottle

Reviewed on: 12-10-2010 03:23:08

~~

On-tap review; lost during the consolidation of serving styles.

L: 4
S: 2.5
T: 3
M: 3
D: 2.5

On tap in a pint glass at Barley's Smokehouse on 12/27/10

Dark plum/brown color with highlights the color of grape juice. Poured 1/4th inch head that takes it's time in dissipating to bubbly, foamy swaths. Retention is thin but good. Impressive wall of lace.

The aroma is over-saturated with malt & hops. Some pine, peppery citric zest of various & sundry ilk, toasted malt, pilsner malt, granular sugar, caramel, toffee, brown sugar, maybe a little rye, dark bread, faint nail polish remover in the back. With warmth, candy hints & subtle dark fruits emerge.

The taste is a vapid, dry wasteland of fermentable detritus. Simply put, too much is going on here; far too much. Hops are earthy, piney & have a penchant for solvency. The solvent-like aspects aren't scathing but they are definitely noticeable. Some astringent bitterness is appreciable; bummer. The malt bill is equally boisterous. Toasted grains, pilsner malt, multi-grain bread, caramel, cocoa & other residual sugars. The sugars really start to pick up as it warms.

Basically full bodied. Carbonation is well-proportioned. Neither attributes are such that I can complain. The finish is another story. There is a chalky feel that is smeared all over the latter half of the beer. Interestingly enough, the whole of the flavors culminate with a charcoal like flavor lingering on (I prefer burnt/charcoal notes in imperial stouts but I can deal with this). Hmm, as it warms & the sugars become more potent, it begins to have a coating, medicinal feel.

Drinkability is ok. I like it better than from the bottle but, after it was implied that I had a "bad" bottle (I simply don't think that was the case), I figured it reasonable to give BTK a fair shake on draft. I maintain the gimmick overshoots the capabilities of the beer. This still isn't a barleywine, by the by. Batch, please. (4,650 characters)

Photo of ehammond1
2.5/5  rDev -33.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Bottle (2010)

Acquired via trade
Thanks sendsilk!

Clear and dark brown pour with some burnt auburn and amber edges. Thin white head. Not a lot of lacing.

A very sweet and sticky type of aroma, like a syrup, along with a bit of smokiness, and perhaps some citrus. Seems all over the place without being particularly interesting--though it certainly is unique.

The flavors don't combine well, in my opinion. This seems like a bad "Suicide" (remember being a kid at the soda fountain and pouring in all 12 soda options into your all-you-can-drink paper cup?). It's overly sweet, with a touch of alcohol, some strange smoke or char flavor along with some wood. It's unique--just not very good.

Somewhat thick and syrupy.

Not one of my favorites. This beer seems like an experiment gone wholly wrong. (801 characters)

Photo of harrymel
2.51/5  rDev -33.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Huh, thought I'd already judged this one. To the docket!

Dark brown with a solid sheet of tan toppage. Smells of dark crystal malts, some tea, some vitamins, some nougat and sweet toasted sugar. Tastes like vinyl, bitterness, some molasses, some toasted malts, mostly difficult for me to get past the vinyl character. Medium bodied with tight carb and a semi dry finish. This beer is not even close to what I remember. (419 characters)

Photo of japetus
2.58/5  rDev -31.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Batch 10000, I have been waiting for you.

A: Rosewood red/brown. A decent light brown head.Looks dark and wonderful!

S: At first smell, you get a nice dose of citrusy hops with a background smell of smoke, plum, burnt chocolate and other dark fruits. Really smells like a good Barleywine.

T: First thing that hits you is a HUGE smoked malts/smoke flavor. Transitions into a gamut of hops...first you get the piney resinous hops, and on the back you get the citrusy hops. Not a huge alcohol presence. When it warms, you get a SERIOUS cough syrup (robotussin) finish. Very unappealing in that sense. This beer is all over the place.

M: Good mouthfeel. It's not a huge "sticky" beer and is pretty smooth. No real "burn" This is the best aspect of the beer IMO.

D: After 3 of them in the past week or so, giving it every chance I possibly could... I won't be having another.The last one, I really almost didn't want to finish it. As I stated before, when it warms even a little..it starts to become fairly unenjoyable.

As a huge fan of Bells beer, this came as a massive dissapointment. When I heard the specs of the beer, I was hoping this wasn't how it would turn out...a huge mess. A beer that tries to be everything, and ends up going nowhere. Maybe I will try one a year from now if the opportunity presents itself, just to see how it ages and to compare, but that's it. (1,381 characters)

Photo of AlCaponeJunior
2.6/5  rDev -31.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 1.5

Dark brown, almost black. Not much head and only fine lacing.

Smell is very IPA-like, strongly hopped but with roasted caramel malts, coffee, chocolate, and smoky notes. Alcohol noticeable for sure.

Tastes more porter or RIS-like, but way over-hopped. Alcohol is very noticeable. Perhaps this one should be aged? Very strong and not all that stupendous. Multitasking to the extreme, this leathery tasting drink has excess hops, too much smoked and roasted malts, and too much alcohol. Coffee and chocolate flavors are noticeable in the taste over the cacophony of "too damn much" going on here, but don't really add much.

Feels slick, not very carbonated, and heavy. Alcohol warming is powerfully strong.

Lacks balance and drinkability. One bottle is all I'll ever want of this stuff, and that was just to say I had it.

As much like a RIS this one is, complete with inky blackness and excessively overblown flavors, I'm surprised BA posters aren't swooning all over it like it's some kind of playboy model waltzing naked on the boardwalk in the summertime. (1,065 characters)

Photo of abuliarose
2.61/5  rDev -31%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured into a snifter, revealing deep deep reddish brown body under a film with creamy greenish hues. Syrupy-looking consistency. Some lacing. Smells like malt and hop-scented soap with a little leathery peaty whiskey character. Hints of sweet mealy malt underneath. Very interesting smells.

Tastes meaty and smoky up front, followed by astringent and bitter hops and ending on a bitter burnt note. Some whiskey character in the taste, also some grass. Mouthfeel is medium-bodied and a touch syrupy but with tiny-nucleating, tongue tingling carbonation that breaks it up. This one's a sipper if anything, but I'm having trouble liking it as is.

Maybe with a few more years on it? (681 characters)

Photo of Lolli1315
2.63/5  rDev -30.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

A- Dark brown character with ruby highlights with a resilient ivory to light tan head made of medium sized bubbles. Head still keeps put as there is noticeable lacing that is clinging to the sides of the glass.

S- Hops jump out almost immediately with a piney and earthy character to them. Limited amounts of roasted and bready malt. Noticeable alcohol character emerges and fills out the smell.

T- Beginning of the beer starts with a quick malt undertone that quickly escalates into a large roasty spike that seems slightly unwarranted with a cluster of hops that is slightly harsh. The taste develops into an increasingly harsh alcohol character that feels as if it is continually raising. Some chocolate begins to develop more as the beer warms.

M- Medium body with an almost creamy feel to the mouth, but with a noticeable carbonation bite on the tongue.

D- There just seems to be way too much going on in this beer. I know that the point of this beer was to resemble a homebrewer who is just pulling together left over ingredients, but this is a mess in my opinion. Nice thought, but I think that it should be more important to put together a solid beer rather than throwing together a bunch of mismatching ingredients. (1,229 characters)

Photo of HopHead84
2.73/5  rDev -27.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

5/21/2011

Shared by Carlos, thanks!

A: Snifter. Brownish red with a fizzy beige head.

S: Heavily oxidized with notes of caramel, brown sugar, and baked bread. Hops are resinous.

T: Cardboard oxidation and piney hops with caramel, bread, and brown sugar. A good deal of alcohol.

M: Medium in body with moderate carbonation. Sticky and smooth mouthfeel.

Overall: I didn't really enjoy this. The heavy oxidation was out of place and the beer didn't really make sense to me. (476 characters)

Photo of hardy008
2.73/5  rDev -27.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Dark brown with raisin highlights. An aggressive pour gives a 2 finger tan head with decent retention and spotty lacing. The aroma is all over the place. It has Sweet malts, pine hops, earthiness, and dark fruit.

The taste reveals some of what is in the aroma, and a few new flavors also. Sweet malt, bitter grapefruit, pine hops, roasted malt, anise, earthiness, alcohol, and some dark fruit. No one or two ingredients really take control of this beer. It is all over the place, and is disappointing.

Medium bodied, low carbonation, and surprisingly smooth. This was an interesting idea, but not as well executed as I would have expected from Bell's. (654 characters)

Photo of JToad
2.75/5  rDev -27.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Picked up a single bottle for around $3.00

Poured into a standard pint glass a dark chocolate brown, almost motor oil like in color alone.

The smell of burnt shoe leather quickly fills the air. My wife sitting across the room complained "Jesus, I can smell that from here!". Roasted coffee, peat moss and fresh cut crass. You can definitely tell there are loads of different grains and malt used.

Decent hop bittereness, which is a bit different for a barleywine. The leather is way too overpowering though, and eventually destroys your tastebuds. Lacks the sweetness of so many other barleywines. Roasted grains and some smokiness are kings here, almost tasting like a cheap cigar.

Good mouthfeel, full and crisp. Leaves no stickiness on the tounge or teeth. Alcohol is very well hidden underneath all the burnt tobacco and leather.

All in all, I did not enjoy this. I ended up pouring half of it down the drain. It is a cluster of flavors that just doesnt work for me. It can't quite figure out what it wants to be, and in the end, it's just not that good. I realise and can appreciate what Bell's was trying to do here. It just didn't turn out to be a good beer. (1,171 characters)

Photo of zachary80
2.8/5  rDev -25.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

9/17/2011

L
Dark brown, some light gets through. Creamy beige head. Lots of lacing

S
Prominent aroma is a hard to describe variety of hoppiness. There seems to be an almost plastic or soapy smell going on that is unpleasant.

T
Everything kind of melds together, but isn't really complimentary. Some sweetness up front but not very strong. Bitterness sticks around a bit but is mellow. Not as roasty as expected for the color.

M
Somewhat light for 9.2%, finish isn't quite crisp but not sure of a better word right now.

O
Overall Batch 10000 is a little better than average. I think it has started to go downhill - peaked maybe around 6 months. Need to try another bottle before being sure though. (702 characters)

Photo of mdvatab
2.83/5  rDev -25.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from 12oz bottle into Bordeaux glass.

Aroma: Roasty caramel malt, an odd metallic twang, alcohol, and some scotch at the end. Metallic note aside, not a bad aroma, but it also didn't give me a great idea of what I was getting into.

Appearance: Dark brown body with a bit of a haze. Light tan one-finger head has decent retention, and leaves a sheet of foam on the inside of the glass when I tip it.

Flavor: Very strange... Canteloupe, some black licorice, come vanilla and coconut, wet leather, and Band-aid. Malty sweetness up front, and a stronger bitterness on the back end. Not what I was expecting, and not very enjoyable.

Mouthfeel: Medium carbonation and medium-full body. A bit of peppery from the alcohol in this one.

Overall: I'm sorry to say that this is probably the first Bell's beer that I'd never care to drink again. It wasn't horrendous, but at the same time, just didn't do it for me. I'd heard some good things about it, so maybe it was just me. Give it a try for yourself if given the opportunity, but I wouldn't recommend picking this one over other well-rated beers. (1,100 characters)

Photo of waltonc
2.86/5  rDev -24.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Thanks to kzoobrew for hooking me up with this as well as several other great Michigan brews.

A: Pours dark brown, and ruby when held to light, with ample tan head.

S: Smell is a blend of chocolate, caramel malt, hops, and a cacophony of other notes.

T: I find both the smell and taste very nondescript, which I assume is because this contains the kitchen sink of ingredients. Lots of malt, lots of bitter hops, fairly strong booze quality, chocolate, coffee, etc.

M: Body is medium, with medium/high carbonation.

D: Overall, not a beer to have more than one bottle of in one sitting, and not a memorable way to end the Batch series. But I am glad to have the opportunity to try this and share with friends. It will be interesting to see what some age does to this brew and whether it rounds it out much. I will miss the Bell's Batch series beers and hopefully they will come up with some new interesting brews in the future, especially with the recent brewery expansion. And hopefully Bell's will stick with 12 ounce bottles. Something I have always appreciated about their beers. (1,087 characters)

Photo of Brent
2.93/5  rDev -22.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

The idea of throwing everything but the kitchen sink into this beer was an interesting concept, but, unfortunately, the result was simply a muddled mess. Assaulting flavors of brown sugar, oak tannin, maple syrup, hops climbing over the top of other hops - all pushing their way to the forefront like a rowdy crowd trying to get out of the stadium after a losing game. (368 characters)

Photo of n2185
2.94/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Pours a very dark brown with some reddish hues around the edges and two fingers of khaki head. The head recedes into a thin layer leaving some decent lacing.

S: Very hard to pick out aromas in this beer . . . piny hops, molasses, caramel malt, some light roasted malts and smoky aromas, a bit of a medicinal smell . . . all bouncing back and forth. Nothing's really distinct.

T: Similar to the aroma, there's just a lot here that's hard to pick out one thing from another. Caramel malt, but also some roasted flavors in there like bitter coffee and chocolate. Molasses is definitely in there to. There's a piny bitterness on the finish as well.

M: Medium-thick body with medium carbonation, this beer is fairly smooth, but also a bit sticky feeling.

O: Overall an interesting beer. It's not bad, but it's not particularly good either. I've read that they used many different types of malts and hops in this and it definitely smells and tastes like they tried to fit as many ingredients in as possible. The end result isn't bad, but the final product is definitely not more than the sum of its parts. (1,107 characters)

Photo of Chaney
2.94/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Poured a dark, dark, dark, dark red (maybe reddish-brown)? Yep.... that was the color. When I held it up to the light, I got a bit of ruby around the edges, as if there was a giant Tootsie Roll dropped into a vat of acidic red sludge. The beige head was about one finger and clung to the glass like a bastard.

S: Hmmmm... I smelled rust first, follow by booze, then came the dark fruit such as raisons, dates, and figs. I got more than a hint of chocolate on the finish.

T: What the hell was the brew supposed to be anyway? Booze galore, with tons of unsweetened baker's chocolate style bitterness. Usually I like the sort of aspriny quality in a beer and think it adds to its refreshing nature... it didn't work here though. The finish was very dry due to the rubbing alcohol.

M: The lacing was ridiculous and the bitterness transcended the adjective. The sweetness was cut down to size by the alcohol, which wasn't saying much.

D: What happened? I loved Batch 9000! I bought a sixer of this stuff so I have five left... now what? (1,038 characters)

first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last
Bell's Batch 10000 from Bell's Brewery, Inc.
85 out of 100 based on 402 ratings.