Pilsner Style Beer - Churchkey Can Co.
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 26 | Reviews: 18 | Display Reviews Only:
3.2/5 rDev -7.2%
A big shout out to woodychandler for this beer. Poured from a 12 oz. steel can. Uh-oh, she's a squirter. This beer came gushing out and finally settled to a rich golden color with a 1 1/2 inch head. Smell is sweet and malty. Taste is malty, some grains, a bit of an unusual metallic taste lingering at the finish. Feels light in the mouth and overall is a mediocre beer.
03-02-2013 19:40:17 | More by tone77
2.03/5 rDev -41.2%
This was not just a CAN, but a steel CAN! Major ups and big props to both MSUBulldog and BeerTunes (?) for sending me a total throwback. A church key, for those not in the know, is a combined bottle and CAN opener, the likes of which have not been needed since the advent of the pop top CAN. There was a "The Rockford Files" episode in which a parolee tried to impress Jim Rockford by crushing a CAN on his forehead until Rockford explained that CANS were now made of aluminum, in which case he ripped a phone book in half. Impressive then, less so now. I remember my first sip of beer - it was Carling Black Label in a steel CAN in our living room as my late-Pops talked strike strategy with his union steward when I was 5 y/o. This brings back memories ...
From the CAN: "Opener required"; "Crafted in the USA"; "Est. recently"; "It's worth the effort"; "The harder it is to achieve your goal[,] the greater the satisfaction."; "Please recycle this CAN and everything else you CAN."; "Drink very responsibly"; "Flat Top Steel CAN [-] An old forgotten experience new again. Back to simple times with simple tools that change an interaction into an experience. For the first time in nearly 50 years, an often forgotten beer experience is available once again. We hope that you will join us in paying homage to an era of hard work, community, and some great stories."; "Our Home Brewers [-] Creators of our Pilsner Recipe [-] Our home brewers[,] Lucas Jones & Sean Burke[,] have been crafting home brewed beer in their garages for many years. They share these brews with their friends at backyard BBQs and over the holidays as gifts. They love this hobby and are passionate about their beer and the community they cultivate with it. We are very excited to have these two all-AmeriCAN guys create the recipe for the Churchkey Pilsner. We hope that you enjoy it as much as we do. To find more about Lucas & Sean, please visit ChurchkeyCANCo.com".
Color me deeply unimpressed! I opened one with markings "141 300222 0515121402" on the bottom and it immediately began spraying beer everywhere and when it became manageable, I poured it into a glass only to be confronted with a brownish-grey cloudy mess that smelled highly metallic. I then attempted a second, unmarked CAN with the following results:
I still got a fountain of beer but I acted quickly to get as much of it into a glass as possible. I initially had two fingers of off-white head, but while I worked to get my kitchen cleaned up, it fell away to nothing. Color was a cloudy lemon-yellow with evident floaties. Nose smelled of grassy Saaz hops, which seemed better than that first attempt. Mouthfeel was thin with a grassy. lemony taste along with a metallic tang on the tongue. Finish was semi-dry, but the metallic taste really seemed to linger. If this is nostalgia, you CAN keep it!
01-06-2013 21:59:43 | More by woodychandler
3.1/5 rDev -10.1%
Had the first one right out of the can and couldn't shake the taste of steel. I waited a day and had another, poured direct into a pilsner glass. It was much better, though the head was very bread-like. (Scientifically speaking, there's user error to be accepted in that but I had the same result when I poured my first can from the previous night into a glass. And, a day later, I went into the second knowing I had to compensate for the pour. Could be me.)
I really like the churchkey part of it. Makes me feel like I'm drinking a beer with my 19-yo Dad. But I feel pretty picky about a pilsner, and I'm not blown away. I can't find a "best by" date so it could be that these are a little past their prime, but I'll be saving the rest of the sixer for its novelty.
I wanted to like it more. I love American pilsners. I love the idea of getting a beer I need a churchkey to open -- and I was on the veeerrrryy last end of that era. But I didn't love the beer itself, so I ain't gonna deal with the hassle if I don't gotta, y'know. I'd definitely pick up a different style or give 'em another chance, though.
12-11-2012 03:34:25 | More by FamousShoes
2.53/5 rDev -26.7%
Picked up a can at EuroMarket. Hmm, I dont think this is supposed to pour a hazy amber. The flavor isn't terribly pleasant either. I don't see a best-by date on the can, but I'll be sure to revisit this beer. In the meantime, I've got an opaque, lightly acid lager with a mild, spicy bitterness and a sweet, bland barley taste. Yeah, I really hope this is an off can. I go to EuroMarket often enough to know this hasn't been on the shelf for more than a couple months.
11-03-2012 23:46:42 | More by tempest
3.68/5 rDev +6.7%
A: Pours a crystal clear pale straw yellow in color with moderate amounts of visible carbonation near the surface of the beer. The beer has a two finger tall dense foamy & frothy white head that slowly reduces to a thin film covering the majority od the surface of the beer with a medium sized very thick patch and a medium thick ring at the edges of the glass. Significant amounts of lacing are observed.
S: Just shy of moderate amounts of bready and grainy malt aromas.
T: Upfront this beer is slightly sweet with moderate bready and grainy malt flavors followed by lighter amounts of grassy hops. There is a light amount of bitterness which lingers through the finish.
M: Light to medium bodied with moderate amounts of carbonation. Clean and crisp with light amounts of dryness in the finish.
O: This is an easy to drink and enjoyable beer - not the greatest pilsener ever but not a bad one either. I enjoyed the somewhat gimmicky can that required a church key to open it. I would enjoy another of these.
Note: This beer was to celebrate the birth of my first daughter - it seemed appropriate as I first read about this beer right around the time we found out we were expecting and finally found it to try the week before she was born. I guess this beer matched the timing of our pregnancy.
10-27-2012 23:09:21 | More by dbrauneis
3.58/5 rDev +3.8%
A: The beer is clear light pale straw yellow in color and has a moderate amount of visible carbonation. It poured with a half finger high dense white head that died down a little but has excellent retention properties and consistently left a thin head covering the surface along with lots of lacing down the sides of the glass.
S: There are light to moderate aromas of bready and grainy malts in the nose.
T: The taste is similar to the smell but has some added notes of grassy hops, a light to moderate amount of bitterness and some hints of sweetness. The bitterness stands out in the finish.
M: It feels light- to medium-bodied on the palate with a moderate amount of carbonation. It's somewhat clean and crisp and also has some dryness, the latter of which lingers through the finish.
O: This isn't one of the best pilsners I've ever had, but punching the holes in the flat top with a churchkey is an interesting experience, and the small triangular hole delivers a more precise pour compared to a punch top can. Overall, it's an easy to drink beer.
10-21-2012 17:27:28 | More by metter98
4/5 rDev +15.9%
12 oz. can poured into a classic pilsener glass (had to be done that way, you understand). The opener is very well matched to the can top, and it provided the nostalgic satisfying crack-and-whoosh I remember from my pre-teen sampling. Surprisingly enough, there was virtually no head, and you can tell this wasn't brewed in a big factory, as the beer has a mildly cloudy standard beer yellow appearance. The bubbles take me back to the happy days of Brew 102.
As for taste, it is a nice competent malt and hop flavor that leaves no unpleasant after taste. This is definitely the brew for beer lovers that want a break from the demanding taste of Scotch/Irish/British ale or IPA's or Belgian-style offerings. There's a couple of TV shows I want to watch tonight, and this will be the ideal accompaniment.
09-18-2012 01:42:03 | More by sabinelr
3.43/5 rDev -0.6%
The beer looks good on the pour out of my, shall we say, "old-fangled" churchkey can. This is quite malty sweet with very thorough inky tones pervading the beer as well. Grain aspects are there on the flavor profile as well, but it's a minimal kind of thing on the back end and as an after thought.
This is an okay pilsener. Can't really say it blows me away, or does much for me. And frankly, the novelty of the churchkey can definitely wears off halfway through the 6-pack and becomes cumbersome and annoying.
08-22-2012 08:06:10 | More by RblWthACoz
3.25/5 rDev -5.8%
Thanks to 5000 for sending this can my way.
The beer pours a yellow color with a white head. The aroma has a lot of grain and corn notes in it, as well as some biscuit malt. The flavor is similar. I get a lot of the sweet malt notes from the biscuit and pilsner malt, with some grain and corn notes thrown in. I also get some nice grass from the hops and a low amount of bitterness. Thin mouthfeel and medium carbonation.
08-05-2012 20:22:50 | More by Mora2000
4/5 rDev +15.9%
The Churchkey Can Company produced a good beer in a steel can. The marketing is genius to bring back a production method from earlier last century. The beer itself poured a clear straw color and a two finger head.
The smell was sweet and fruity. Is that a flaw for a pilsner? Either way it was good and the taste was smooth with a little spice on the end. Bitterness was low and left a tine mark on the tongue. Overall seems to be a pretty solid effort in a unique delivery method from the old school.
07-22-2012 00:52:05 | More by cswhitehorse
British Columbia (Canada)
3.4/5 rDev -1.4%
Fancy tin can!
Appearance. Pours a clear straw with half a finger of bubbly white head.
Smell. Light sweet grains and some grassy hops.
Taste. Grassy hops, some sweet light grains with a little bitterness.
Mouthfeel. Medium-light body, medium-strong carbonation.
Overall. I liked it. The can is kinda fun too.
07-19-2012 02:52:09 | More by Rutager
3.7/5 rDev +7.2%
I added one to my basket because of the unique can. Thought i would try one before I dropped $10 on a sixer. I broke out a member of my churchkey collection to pop the two holes.
First drink from the can- leaves a metal/mineral aftertaste with some hops that seem to work with the other flavors.
Poured into a glass - golden with a nice white fluff of head. Smells sweet, lightly hopped and biscuit.
In the glass there is still a mineral mildly tingly roof of mouth flavor left in the aftertaste. You start to get used to it about halfway through the beer.
I'd like to see them come out with some other beer styles.
I have a feeling it tastes better when strained through a hipster mustache. I think it's kind of cool, but I'd rather drop coin on a better local pils. But it's a nice option for glass-free areas.
06-25-2012 02:44:26 | More by Dubbercody
3.98/5 rDev +15.4%
Poured from 12oz flat top steel can into a pint glass.
Appearance: pale golden hue with a light touch of haze that creates a slight matte appearance. Lazy but good effervescence is present, but there's very little head, possibly due to the way I poured.
Smell: sweet, enticing malt aroma and a good dose of lightly spicy noble-smelling hops. I like it.
Taste: sweetish malt with a little bit of graininess but not the sourness which sometimes can occur with grain present. Hops are way out front with a spicy, noble character and a decent but balanced bitterness. Quite good.
Mouthfeel: medium bodied with a good level of carbonation and a refreshing prickliness. I like it.
Overall: a tasty and refreshing Pilsner. The can is admittedly gimmicky, but I actually kind of like it. I feel like an old man when I drink it -- perfect for doing outdoor chores around the house.
06-21-2012 15:06:29 | More by flagmantho
4.03/5 rDev +16.8%
- Pours a clear straw-yellow brew. Big fluffy white head, about 4 fingers, pillowing and slowly settling. Lace is left alla bout, and a thick bed sits behind. Pretty pilsner for sure.
- Right as I poked the can, I got a wonderful hoppy aroma. Wonderful creamy bready and grainy smell with an earthy herbal and grassy pine hop. This puppy smells good, and full flavored.
- Nice bready creamy pislner. This puppy is packed with spicy hops, earthy, bitter and pine-like. It has a wonderful bite and grainy flavor, like a true pilsner should. There is however a slight tinny taste or metallic taste that sits deep in the back row.
Mouth Feel: (4.0)
- This is a chewy dry pilsner for sure. A spicy burning dryness sits behind from a rather medium bodied pilsner which is very well carbonated. So well-carbed that almost every can in the six-pack was bulging at both ends.
- The beer is a solid and tasty recipe. I am impressed with it's great pilsner taste and quality. It's tough for me paying $10 for a 6-pack, but it is a higher-than-usual quality pils. Other than the slight off-flavor, it is solid and drinkable. The packaging is rather cool. I guess it's nice to have Two Beers right next door, otherwise shipping a beer for packaging to them from afar might up the price quite a bit on it.
05-31-2012 00:44:48 | More by Docer
3.9/5 rDev +13%
A: Poured alight golden color with a small white cap and lowly attenuated. The head fades rather fast and is not as big as what it should be for the style
S: Bittering hops, some grass, floral notes and hay
T: Immediate bittering hops with some floral, spice and grains. A little bit of biscuit is present
M: Dry, light bodied with a nice bitter finish but could have had a little more pop and crispness on the backend
O: Not bad. If you look at the parameters of the beer it matches up with the BJCP guidelines for the style. ABV, IBU, SRM are on target as does the flavor profile. Only issue being the poor attenuation and head retention issues
05-08-2012 02:40:03 | More by barleywinefiend
3.5/5 rDev +1.4%
12oz can - read all about the design elsewhere.
For the record, I don't think is a cool idea. I think it's pretty damn stupid. I used a standard can opener and poured this into a pint glass.
appearance: served in an ale asylum shaker pint, pale hazy copper body, sticky white foam. all things considered, pretty nice looking pils
smell: light floral aroma - lemongrass, light citrus, bready
taste: really not a bad offering - a bit derivative for the style - grassy citrus hops, herbal and floral, light biscuit tones
mouthfeel: delicate and fresh, light bitterness
overall: ok - packaging is a bit gimmicky so we'll see how long this lasts
04-29-2012 02:04:53 | More by dirtylou
3.43/5 rDev -0.6%
Poured into a Black Raven pint glass. Pours a cloudy straw yellow amber with lots of fine particulates. Massive white head with good retention and huge lacing. Aroma is very mild Pilsner wheat with a hint of mineral, subdued. Flavor is better, with light toasty malt and citrus with decent in-style spicy hops with little herbal element. I was pleased that this beer fit the look and flavor of a classic Pilsner. Fairly light flavor, but decent moderate hops. Light to medium bodied. Nothing stands out and a slightly mineral aftertaste in the finish, but a nice job for something that appeared to be fairly gimmicky (flat top can that you need to use an old fashioned punch can opener to open).
04-27-2012 03:33:04 | More by LiquidAmber
Pilsner Style Beer from Churchkey Can Co.
80 out of 100 based on 26 ratings.