1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Busch Light - Anheuser-Busch

Not Rated.
Busch LightBusch Light

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
46
awful

1,247 Ratings
THE BROS
42
awful

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,247
Reviews: 358
rAvg: 1.81
pDev: 37.57%
Wants: 5
Gots: 58 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Anheuser-Busch visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
Light Lager |  4.10% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Busch and Busch Light are both brewed with a blend of premium American-grown and imported hops and a combination of malt and corn to provide a pleasant balanced flavor. Additionally, Busch Light undergoes a longer brewing process that produces a lighter body and fewer calories.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 11-28-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Busch Light Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 1,247 | Reviews: 358 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of t0rin0
t0rin0

California

3.5/5  rDev +93.4%

08-18-2012 20:02:22 | More by t0rin0
Photo of djrn2
djrn2

New Jersey

1/5  rDev -44.8%

11-20-2011 00:14:14 | More by djrn2
Photo of Thorpe429
Thorpe429

Illinois

1.02/5  rDev -43.6%

Pours with a bit of color and leaves the tiniest white head. Smells like weak amount of grain--a covered silo from a few miles away. Tastes like a bit of grain but mostly husk. Flavor is almost immediately washed away by the excess carbonation. It's like they don't want you to taste it. Unusual. Drinks like carbonated water with some cardboard and old rice.

10-08-2010 01:30:38 | More by Thorpe429
Photo of nmann08
nmann08

District of Columbia

3/5  rDev +65.7%

12-14-2011 04:10:11 | More by nmann08
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

1.63/5  rDev -9.9%

Busch Light is the away team in today's Macro Smackdown IV. The home team duties are being handled by The Silver Bullet, Coors Light. This beer may not be as cold tasting as its rival, but it may end up as its superior. I'm on the edge of my seat with anticipation, so let's get the festivities started.

Pale yellow; a nearly identical shade to the Coors product, but even more pale. The head is brighter white on this beer and is the better for it. The foam has a bit more substance to it and lasts a few minutes longer. No great shakes, but the first round goes to Busch Light.

There isn't a dime's worth of difference between these two noses. This aroma might have a slight edge in terms of strength. As well, it's a little less floral and bit more musky. There isn't enough separation for different scores to be granted though.

This is turning into the battle of the pathetic losers. Busch Light's flavor is far from good, but it does have a slight edge on Coors Light, if only because it has less flavor. The nasty graininess is more muted and therefore slightly more palatable. It too is descending into the realm of disgusting as it warms, but it's the barely more acceptable beer on the way down.

The mouthfeel is pathetic, as it is on the other beer. Watery from start to finish. This one has a slight edge thanks to the longer lived carbonation; further evidenced by the persistence of a filmy cap and a partial short collar of lace. The Coors beer is completely devoid of both head and lace and has been for quite a while.

Busch Light isn't good beer, but I think you knew that already. It is, however, ever so slightly preferable to Coors Light. When it comes to the flavor of a macro light, less is often more. Busch Light may not be as 'cold tasting' (what a bunch of hooey), but it should be as close as possible to freezing, while still being able to exit the can/bottle as a liquid, before drinking. If you absolutely must, that is.

05-22-2005 13:25:13 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of zestar
zestar

California

1.5/5  rDev -17.1%

05-10-2014 08:09:00 | More by zestar
Photo of acurtis
acurtis

New Jersey

1.25/5  rDev -30.9%

01-19-2012 18:24:22 | More by acurtis
Photo of mikesgroove
mikesgroove

South Carolina

1.78/5  rDev -1.7%

And so we begin another long arduous road down into the depths of the bottom of the barrel list. Grabbed a few quick cans last night and decided to go for broke. Served cold and poured into a pint glass, this one was consumed on 08/16/2010.

The pour was about what I would have expected with a thin amber color to it if you could really call it amber in any way. Lots of fizzy white foam coming up through the bottom of the glass, and reach about an inch before dropping back down and not leaving any bit of lacing what so ever. Aroma is light grains, musky and full of moldy, bready notes. Nothing you would really want to go around bragging about in any way. Clean and crisp, it made for a good water substitute, but again that was about it as it really just had very little flavor to it at all. Wet hay maybe and a light touch of corn, but nothing really.

Overall these are all mostly the same in my mind, just one pale lager after another.

08-18-2010 00:38:58 | More by mikesgroove
Photo of womencantsail
womencantsail

California

2.4/5  rDev +32.6%

Dare I say the highlight of this adjunct lager laden haul?

A: The pour is pale yellow, like pretty much all light lagers. The head is white, like pretty much all light lagers.

S: Sweet adjuncty goodness here. Corn and apple juice define the nose and this one is just all sweetness and nothing else.

T: Grain, corn, apple juice, and sugar. No real bitterness at all, but no offensive skunk or urine character either. A winner, indeed.

M: The body is light, as you might expect, with a pretty lively carbonation.

D: While this was the winner of the evening, this was a Dairy Challenge situation (where there are no winners). I don't think I'll be rushing out to buy any more Busch Light.

10-27-2010 23:27:55 | More by womencantsail
Photo of ygtbsm94
ygtbsm94

Virginia

1/5  rDev -44.8%

01-15-2012 08:12:31 | More by ygtbsm94
Photo of spycow
spycow

Illinois

2.5/5  rDev +38.1%

01-14-2013 05:42:45 | More by spycow
Photo of Knapp85
Knapp85

Pennsylvania

1.27/5  rDev -29.8%

This is a really poor beer. Very little of anything going on in this. I was handed a can at a friends party and i tried it because I didn't want to be a jerk. I had a few beers before this one that were quite good and I felt like this had nothing in it. I couldn't pick up real strong tasting notes or aromas. Still don't get how people crave this stuff...

03-21-2011 01:19:04 | More by Knapp85
Photo of TMoney2591
TMoney2591

Illinois

2.6/5  rDev +43.6%

Served in a chilled mug at The Tombs.

Killing time before my arms control class, I just couldn't resist ordering one of these. I have no idea why. Anyway, this stuff pours a clear pale straw topped by a half-finger of short-lived off-white foam. The nose comprises stale barley, hard water, and astringent grass. The taste generally follows suit, with the hard water really taking over. The body is pretty light, with a light moderate carbonation and a watery feel. Overall, I knew what I was getting: a watery, light, mildly-fizzy alcohol delivery service. It's not very good at all, but I have still had much worse...

09-08-2013 06:18:17 | More by TMoney2591
Photo of zeff80
zeff80

Missouri

1.27/5  rDev -29.8%

A - 12 oz can pour out a straw yellow with no head. It is very carbonated.

S - Skunky and of alcohol. Maybe a little corn smell, too.

T - It is very watery. There is a corn taste, as well.

M - It is fairly crisp and sharp on the tongue. It's just sad that mouthfeel is the highest rated element.

D - Drinkable....if you want to get drunk very cheaply. I have had worse.

07-15-2006 19:15:41 | More by zeff80
Photo of biboergosum
biboergosum

Alberta (Canada)

2.15/5  rDev +18.8%

24oz can, a one dollar gas station special (cheaper than soda, my mind reels) in the off-ramp splendour of downriver SE Michigan.

This beer pours a crystal clear, very pale golden straw colour, with one finger of frothy, foamy, and fizzy (the 'F' trifecta!) dirty white head, which leaves some mere island speck lace around the glass as it quickly gets outta dodge.

It smells of rather mild and yet sweet breakfast cereal grain (yer rice, yer corn, yer, um, well, that's it), sanitized hard water, a bit of cold melted plastic, and ethereal weedy, skanky hops. The taste is a reduced gritty adjunct graininess, sweet and sour as ever was, and gently contaminated well water.

The carbonation is quite sedate, just a feeble fizziness throughout, the body light, dilute, and having benefited from the many marketing cycles of its parent brewer and their ilk, consequently smooth. It finishes with the expected paltry amount of faint corn and rice pithiness, and lingering anemic laboratory bitterness.

Not too hard to drink, not too hard at all, if you need a palate (and maybe a soul) cleanser, that is. Not much to say otherwise, not too much at all. Ok, ok - light macro-lager 101 (auditing, only - this crap could never make it to school - oh, wait, it does - stupid college kids).

09-26-2011 22:14:59 | More by biboergosum
Photo of NeroFiddled
NeroFiddled

Pennsylvania

2.25/5  rDev +24.3%

As would be expected of any A-B product, Busch Light delivers a beautiful appearance. It's crystal-clear straw-gold in color beneath a creamy head of bright white that holds fairly well for a light beer, and even leaves some tiny splashes and spots of lace about the glass.

The nose is clean with a lightly sweetish note and the suggestion of alcohol. It's not grainy, and not hoppy, but there is a subtle yeasty fruitiness (apple, grape).

The flavor is basically the same as the flavor, and the saving grace here is that it's clean. The fruitiness and alcohol dominate, but that's basically because there's nothing else there... no grain, no hop, no bitterness. It is just slightly sticky, lingering in the finish with a film of residual sugar. Some hops or bitterness could have set that off, but that's not what the majority of consumers seeking this are looking for.

The mouthfeel is also nice, with a delicate, fine-bubbled carbonation that leaves it smooth across the palate whereas some competing brands come on almost like fizzy and bristling soda-pop.

On a hot day when you should probably be drinking water and avoiding alcohol altogether, if you must have beer this might be a good choice.

06-09-2007 17:35:56 | More by NeroFiddled
Photo of TheManiacalOne
TheManiacalOne

Rhode Island

1.85/5  rDev +2.2%

Poured from a 12oz can into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a pale yellow color, with a very thin white head that fades almost instantly and leaves very little lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is faint but contains light malts, adjuncts and a very faint touch of hops.

T: The taste is starts out with a little breadiness from flavors of grain and adjuncts followed by a mild malt sweetness. The hops presence is very mild but there’s enough to bring a little bit of balance. The after-taste is slightly sweet.

M: A little crisp and a little smooth, light body, medium carbonation, finish is slightly sticky.

D: Not very flavorful, goes down ok since there isn’t much to it, not filling at all, very mild kick, not the absolute worst in the style but there isn’t much good to say about it either.

06-19-2011 22:49:42 | More by TheManiacalOne
Photo of Jason
Jason

Massachusetts

1.6/5  rDev -11.6%

Presentation: 12oz can. Stamped born on date. States to be "Born of Natural Ingredients, Smooth, Refreshing Beer" ... "Brewed from water, barley malt, cereal grain, hops and yeast." It does not say natural ingredients only does it?

Appearance: Perhaps the lightest colour beer out there, translucent pale yellow. Thin white lace is what is leftover of the quick foaming head.

Smell: Vague cooked corn, very clean aroma so clean that you can't smell anything else. So clean you can smell the alcohol in this beer.

Taste: Incredibly light body, well manufactured smoothness and a well placed crispness that makes this brew a bit refreshing. Very thin malt flavour, cereal grains are abundant in the flavour but stay clean. Hops seem processed, a lazy bitterness that barely tweaks the scales of taste threshold. Some astringent grain tell you that this brew is quick from start to finish ... by the time you think of swallowing the taste is gone leaving a dryish end.

Notes: Light beer = less calories = less flavour. Why drink beer with less flavour, how much fun is it to eat a diet meal that tastes like nothing?

09-17-2002 21:02:22 | More by Jason
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

West Virginia

1.73/5  rDev -4.4%

Pours yellow and fizzy with a very carbonated short lived white head. The aroma predominantly corn and rice adjuncts bringing a sweetness to the aroma, but at the same time it also brings an off tone that just isn't pleasant of feet. No real hop profile maybe a chemically formulated one, but that's about it. This is not a real beer, this is a macro beer meant to be consumed in masses by the masses. Cold and crisp, the label describes this beer properly "refreshing light beer", well so is water I will stick to that. Flavors to note here is a bland sweetness mixed with a bitterness that just isn't right. Mouthfeel is thin and water like, which is why this beer can be consumed right after another without a problem. If your looking for a good beer pass on a Busch Light.

05-12-2003 22:22:02 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of drabmuh
drabmuh

Maryland

1.78/5  rDev -1.7%

The father-in-law ticking project is coming to an end because the only other beer variety he has is PBR and I'm pretty sure I've written a review for that.

Beer is clear, almost not even yellow, big head that disappears immediately, carbonation low, no lacing.

Aroma is corny, vegetal. Gross.

Beer is thin, no aftertaste at least, almost no flavor, what is there is very bland and boring, mildly sweet, boiled corn and cabbage in the midpalate, overall not as much a beer as it is an experiment in making a flavorless suspension of biomolecules. SUCCESS!

04-25-2011 01:12:55 | More by drabmuh
Photo of Slatetank
Slatetank

Pennsylvania

2.25/5  rDev +24.3%

05-25-2013 10:30:52 | More by Slatetank
Photo of StonedTrippin
StonedTrippin

Colorado

1.76/5  rDev -2.8%

truly inferior beer, even for budget crap. offensive yellow soda water that tastes more like licking a battery than anything containing grain or hops. extract all the way here, I just don't taste any grain at all, none. metallic in the finish, more aluminum than I care to taste. its only asset (if you can call it that), is its refreshment capacity. when its freezing cold, a good chug can quench a thirst. this is so because the beer has essentially no flavor, so like a massively carbonated water. I don't mind a regular busch, but this low cal offering is brutal, even as the 30 pack stuff goes.

11-03-2013 22:11:54 | More by StonedTrippin
Photo of jwc215
jwc215

Wisconsin

1.75/5  rDev -3.3%

Born on date - 13 Apr 06.

Poured light yellow with a very thin wisp of a head that almost immediately disappeared to nothing despite the carbonation.
The smell was a small whiff of corn (?) adjuncts.
The taste was of very watered-down corn (? - so light it's hard to tell) adjuncts.
A slightly metallic watery feel is left in the mouth.
This is not even refreshing on a hot day - no flavor - might as well have water. A friend of a friend brought this and left one in the fridge. I figured I would give it a shot. I don't know why I bothered. It's a mix of a great deal of water a touch of metal and a touch of some sort of adjuncts that are hardly noticeable.

07-14-2006 18:08:36 | More by jwc215
Photo of Rochefort10nh
Rochefort10nh

New Hampshire

1/5  rDev -44.8%

12-06-2011 18:06:35 | More by Rochefort10nh
Photo of XmnwildX12
XmnwildX12

Minnesota

1.25/5  rDev -30.9%

11-22-2013 01:49:48 | More by XmnwildX12
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Busch Light from Anheuser-Busch
46 out of 100 based on 1,247 ratings.