1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Michelob Honey Lager - Anheuser-Busch

Not Rated.
Michelob Honey LagerMichelob Honey Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
60
poor

217 Ratings
THE BROS
33
awful

(view ratings)
Ratings: 217
Reviews: 141
rAvg: 2.48
pDev: 31.05%
Wants: 3
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Anheuser-Busch visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Lager |  4.90% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
We brew our Michelob Honey Lager with European aromatic hops and toasted caramel barley malt for a balanced taste.
What makes this beer really special, however, is the addition of a touch of natural wildflower honey. It all adds up to a just slightly sweet and uniquely soft beer.

21 IBU

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 01-01-2002)
View: Beers (79) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Michelob Honey Lager Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 217 | Reviews: 141 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

1.8/5  rDev -27.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

Slightly more orange than amber with honey colored trim. Several streams of small bubbles can seen disappearing into the underside of a head that is ecru in color and has acceptable texture. Disrupted rings of sudsy lace don't appear to be committed to the cause.

The nose is way too weak and is bland to boot. It's apparent that the beer is going to be somewhat sweet, although it's difficult to appreciate the honey per se. No real nastiness keeps the score from falling too far.

Honey Lager is the first beer in quite some time to fail what I like to call the involuntary grimace test. If the first sip causes me to (you guessed it) contort my face into an involuntary grimace, then the beer in question is seriously lousy. This beer is seriously lousy. A-B doesn't have a good track record with respect to the IG test.

The flavor profile consists of grain soaked in sugar syrup. That's it. I must have had sweeter beer, but this one seems sweet in an intolerable way. Call me crazy, but it still doesn't taste much like honey. All that extra sugar just glues up the works and prevents the flavor of the grain from being appreciated. Actually, in this case, that's probably a good thing.

There's nothing inherently wrong with the body/mouthfeel, though it could use higher quality carbonation. The honey seems to fill it out a bit, which is a good thing. I still can't go with an average score, though. Mostly because it's so hard to separate mouthfeel from flavor. Gack.

I'm willing to give Anheuser-Busch props when they deserve them. Michelob Honey Lager is deserving of nothing but scorn. Even though it doesn't taste like them, this is beer for those who think that Fruity Pebbles are the ultimate in breakfast cereal. Two thumbs waaay down.

Serving type: bottle

11-17-2008 13:31:35 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of mikesgroove
mikesgroove

South Carolina

1.7/5  rDev -31.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

And the bottom of the barrel takes a beating again today, got off early and hit up greens and bilo and grabbed what I could, this should be a fun night. Served cold and poured into my pint glass, consumed on 08/23/2010

there is just truly something wrong with some of these beers, case in point.the pour is not horrible, in fact it had a darker amber then some of the others i have seen lately. small head fades quickly.

aroma is sweet, very very sweet with tons of artifical honey and caramel notes that just dont seem to be rightly placed. as i take the first sip i reach a consensus that there is just too much going on here. soo sweet without any balance to it from the hops at all. very light feel is just too light with way too much carbonation which only serves to push the sweetness even further up. some balance would have done wonders here i am sure.

overall another i will have to pass on, just not doing it for me at all.

Serving type: bottle

08-24-2010 01:54:05 | More by mikesgroove
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

2.28/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

The Honey Lager begins with a deep golden color, heavily carbonated but with a timid head that forms the lightesst cover for the beer but has staying power.

Grainy and sweet sums it up. But going further, the grain aroma and flavor out weigh the maltiness for an uneven balance. More like tasting the husk of the grain than the malt. Honey sweetness makes a strong impact and does have a pleasant floral taste but also dominates the beer with unresolves sweetness.

Low maltiness makes the beer seem thin and grainy. Sweetness tries to buffer the beer against the grain but without true maltiness, this doesn't happen. Low hop flavor and bitterness doesn't allow for the dry balance to come into play. Nor does the carbonaiton help to clean things up.

The Michelob brand is capable of making solid beers, but did not do so here.

Serving type: bottle

02-13-2010 04:31:11 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

3.03/5  rDev +22.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance: Pours a clear, pale orange body with a small, bubbly, white head.

Smell: Mild aroma of honey, grain, and flowers. Pretty basic, at best, though nothing to get sore about.

Taste: Basically tastes like their standard Michelob with a few drops of honey stirred in. Simple, sweet maltiness with a hint of grain. Faint floral hops with a light bitterness. Encroaching wateriness on the sweetish finish.

Mouthfeel: Medium-thin body. Medium carbonation.

Drinkability: Not a terrible ride for the one bottle, though I'd be pretty loathe to accept an entire six-pack.

Serving type: bottle

06-10-2008 05:02:29 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of jaydoc
jaydoc

Kansas

2.25/5  rDev -9.3%

10-20-2013 14:00:40 | More by jaydoc
Photo of zeff80
zeff80

Missouri

2.75/5  rDev +10.9%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

A - Poured out a clear, gold color with a small, short-lived head. Highly carbonated and no lace.

S - It smelled very sweet. I could pick up notes of honey and a corn/grain aroma, too.

T - It tastes of sweet honey. There are some malt and grain flavors, as well.

M - It was fairly crisp, but a little thin. A light-bodied beer.

D - This is not a bad macro lager. I purchased it alot in college because my girlfriend would actually drink it. But I picked some up recently and it is still a good session beer.

Serving type: bottle

04-25-2007 18:41:52 | More by zeff80
Photo of biboergosum
biboergosum

Alberta (Canada)

3.65/5  rDev +47.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This beer pours a clear medium golden amber hue, with two fingers of foamy, sudsy white head, which settles quite slowly, leaving a drooping ring of lace around the glass. It smells of country road weeds, light honey, and mild white grain. The taste is honey, mild sweet rice/corn malt, and metallic, floral hops. The carbonation is on the low side, the body medium weight, sugary smooth, and soft. It finishes fairly sweet, the malt and honey redoubling their efforts.

Not a bad honey lager - it tastes like, well, honey, which also provides the benefit of distracting from the otherwise mediocre amber lager underlying things. For all the weak-ass honey ales/lagers that I've had over the years that hardly have a whiff of honey essence and sweetness to them, now I get (pretty close to) the real deal from AB? Will wonders never cease?

Serving type: bottle

07-25-2010 02:53:18 | More by biboergosum
Photo of NeroFiddled
NeroFiddled

Pennsylvania

3.88/5  rDev +56.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Michelob's Honey Lager delivers a clear, deep golden body capped by an average-sized head of white foam that drops shortly but maintains a thin surface covering, and leaves some nice lace before it goes. The nose is welcoming with a disctinctly sweet, honey flavor and some malt. There's no hop presence to speak of, but that's to be expected for the style. Surprisingly dextrinous in the mouth, it's creamy and smooth with a medium body and delicate carbonation that gently bristles the tongue. The flavor is sweet and honeyish as well, but it's not overdone; and there's enough bitterness there to pull it into a drying finish, and keep it from becoming cloying. Well done!

Serving type: bottle

04-23-2005 11:35:47 | More by NeroFiddled
Photo of nickfl
nickfl

Florida

3/5  rDev +21%

11-15-2011 07:34:05 | More by nickfl
Photo of TheManiacalOne
TheManiacalOne

Rhode Island

2.58/5  rDev +4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Poured from a 12oz. bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a deep gold color with a large white head that fades quickly and leaves a thin lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is of honey, caramelized malts, lager yeast and a faint touch of hops.

T: The taste starts with a honey sweetness that is quickly followed by the breadiness of lager yeast and light malts, but there's also an adjunct sweetness in the background. There's a very mild hops presence that is not enough to bring much balance. The after-taste is slightly sweet.

M: Crisp and a little smooth, light-to-medium body, medium carbonation, finish is clean.

D: Not very tasty, goes down ok, not too filling, mild kick, decent representation of style, this beer just didn't do much for me, it is not one that I would drink again.

Serving type: bottle

07-02-2009 03:22:32 | More by TheManiacalOne
Photo of Jason
Jason

Massachusetts

1.18/5  rDev -52.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

Presentation: 12 oz brown twist bottle, with a “Born On Date” on the label on the neck.

Appearance: Golden hue with a bright clarity, obviously they were going for that deep golden honey colour. Above par head retention, nice and bubbly with some stickiness.

Smell: Weird grainy aroma that is similar to horse feed or green barley, little sugary sweet also.

Taste: Smooth mouth feel with a moderate body, little bit of slickness on the tongue. Carbonation is moderate, the sweetness is so high it is nearly unpalatable. Hops are minimal. More and more sweetness, does not taste natural though that is what is stated on the label. Bit of tingling carbonation is the only thing that tries to off set the sweetness. Residual sweetness run rampant to the point of sickly.

Notes: Pretty bad, way too sweet and very hard to drink one 12 oz bottle. Needs a bigger twang of hop and/or a bit of dryness. Not recommended at all.

Serving type: bottle

01-07-2002 20:58:23 | More by Jason
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

West Virginia

3.2/5  rDev +29%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Appearance: Honey golden amber tone with a decent sized silky white head leaves behind some scanty lacing. Aroma: Label claims all malt, this maybe but it's a mild biscuit malt sweetness blended with honey sweetness this one's not bad some very light hopping. Taste: It's not off to me just honey trace throught it with some light bready malt sweetness finishing hops to balance not horrible. Mouthfeel: Lighter bodied not too impressed with this aspect and quite overcarbonated. Drinkability: Well, not a staple but the best of the Michelob sampler in my opinion, refreshing and strangely not bad.

Serving type: bottle

12-24-2003 02:29:28 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of WesWes
WesWes

New York

3.9/5  rDev +57.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

The beer pours a golden color with a lacey white head. The aroma is average. It has lager characteristics, but it has a sweetness to it from the addition of honey. It makes the aroma a little more complex enjoyable. The taste is good. It has the flavor of a macro-lager, but the honey mellows it out and adds a nice sweet flavor. The mouthfeel is good. This is a medium bodied beer with a average amount of carbonation. It drinks well. This is a good beer for the money, macro or not.

Serving type: bottle

12-07-2003 02:26:07 | More by WesWes
Photo of Mora2000
Mora2000

Texas

3/5  rDev +21%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Thanks to blutt59 for sharing this bottle.

The beer pours a yellow color with a white head. The aroma is honey with some grain notes. The flavor is heavy on the honey but I also get some banana and grain. Medium mouthfeel and medium carbonation. Not great, but not terrible.

Serving type: bottle

07-10-2010 05:25:45 | More by Mora2000
Photo of Gueuzedude
Gueuzedude

Arizona

1.5/5  rDev -39.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

Bright deep gold color, creamy short term head that quickly becomes large bubbles and then fades. Smells of apple and adjunct, I can't detect any honey in the nose. First impression is of one dimensional sweetness. No bitterness, but is lightly sharp from the carbonation. Not much to taste except the sweetness. Quite a disgusting beer, I must admit that I threw it out. Tastes like a macro with a tablespoon of sugar added.

Serving type: bottle

08-25-2003 17:19:29 | More by Gueuzedude
Photo of jwc215
jwc215

Wisconsin

3.05/5  rDev +23%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours golden amber- plenty of clarity. A thin head disappears to a few bubbles.

The smell is of honey and some grain with a hint of light, non-descript hop spicing.

The taste is of honey with some caramel in the back. Sweet, but with some non-descript hops that don't lend bitterness, but some restraint to the sweetness. It has a honey stickiness in the finish.

It is on the fuller-side of light-bodied. Not too fizzy, all things considered.

Too much honey without substance, though there is a slight touch of caramel and light, vague hops - along the "macro" line. Not bad for someone who wants a beer with a heavy hand of honey (and not much else). Honey lingers for an almost annoyingly long time.

Serving type: bottle

03-08-2009 23:00:08 | More by jwc215
Photo of jdhilt
jdhilt

New Hampshire

2.63/5  rDev +6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pour this hard and you get a get head, there isn't a lot of carbonation. Leaves a lace. Pale orange color and a faint honey nose. Very light bodied but better than a Mic lager. Very definite taste of honey and finishes with smooth malt/honey flavor. The ABV is 4.9%.

Serving type: bottle

02-05-2003 15:29:17 | More by jdhilt
Photo of ejimhof
ejimhof

Pennsylvania

2.5/5  rDev +0.8%

12-27-2012 04:53:43 | More by ejimhof
Photo of Mebuzzard
Mebuzzard

Colorado

1.25/5  rDev -49.6%

03-10-2013 17:43:32 | More by Mebuzzard
Photo of Latarnik
Latarnik

New Jersey

2.5/5  rDev +0.8%

05-25-2014 12:42:14 | More by Latarnik
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
Beerandraiderfan

Nevada

2.03/5  rDev -18.1%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Not very distinguishable from the hefe. Good clarity, a light to medium yellow tinge to it. Sweet, but not too sweet honey aroma.

Taste, goes downhill quick, funny aftertaste from whatever honey they are using, doesn't do well with the high carbonation, just a fizzy honey aftertaste and corn left over. A neat beer to smell, but not much else going on here noteworthy.

Serving type: bottle

08-21-2010 19:12:46 | More by Beerandraiderfan
Photo of Brad007
Brad007

Vermont

2.65/5  rDev +6.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours a medium blond color with a one-finger head into my pint glass.

Aroma is light and sweet with honey and sweet malt in the nose. Not too overpowering.

Taste is sweet with honey upfront and not much else can be detected.

Mouthfeel is full of lingering honey and not much else. Seems rather too sweet to begin with.

Not bad but the honey is too much here. Where's the lager part?

Serving type: bottle

03-13-2009 02:23:20 | More by Brad007
Photo of rolltide8425
rolltide8425

Pennsylvania

1.75/5  rDev -29.4%

07-11-2012 00:43:48 | More by rolltide8425
Photo of BeerFMAndy
BeerFMAndy

Wisconsin

2.48/5  rDev 0%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

12 oz bottle poured into a Nonic. 09106 date printed on neck label.

A - Brilliantly clear gold color is beautiful but massively hindered by the insanely fleeting, fizzy white head. Gone in moments and left next to nothing.

S - Skunky dry straw, rice, and sweet corn with no real malt aroma, no hops at all, and just a dab of honey.

T - Wow, ok. Overly sweet with both honey and syrupy sugar. Light malts mingle with corn and straw adjuncts on the finish. Too sweet but really, besides the sugar level, it dosn't offend me.

M - Light and crisp with a very sweet finish that lingers on the tongue.

D - If you don't mind sugary beers, you'll love this. It's definitely a little too sweet to be easily drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

07-13-2009 21:39:53 | More by BeerFMAndy
Photo of Dogbrick
Dogbrick

Ohio

2.5/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Sample at AleFest Dayton: Pale gold color with a thin white head with poor retention. Spotty lacing. Sweet aroma of honey and a hint of malt. Light-bodied with a flavor differentiated from the normal Michelob only by the added honey. It actually seems more like an afterthought than a concerted effort at creating something new. The finish is bland and mildly sweet. Not worth coming back to.

Serving type: bottle

09-07-2006 20:40:15 | More by Dogbrick
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Michelob Honey Lager from Anheuser-Busch
60 out of 100 based on 217 ratings.