1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Michelob Golden Draft - Anheuser-Busch

Not Rated.
Michelob Golden Draft
No picture uploaded.
Have one? Upload it now.
BA SCORE
62
poor

97 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 97
Reviews: 30
rAvg: 2.52
pDev: 31.35%
Wants: 3
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Anheuser-Busch visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.70% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Michelob Golden Draft is a premium, cold-filtered lager beer that is brewed using two-row barley malt, premium American hops and corn to achieve its smooth, full taste.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 04-22-2002)
View: Beers (80) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100  | next › last »
Ratings: 97 | Reviews: 30 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of cokes
cokes

Wisconsin

3.48/5  rDev +38.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Straw golden with a tight fleeting white foam leaving nothing to indicate it was ever there.
Grain husk and cornmeal aroma with a dash of powdered sugar sweetness.
A brief graininess signals its entrance in the mouth. Here, it switches quickly to cornbread, with that same powdered sugar dusting. Fairly vapid through the middle with some residual sweetness. Hopping is nearly non-existent, but a dry grassiness adds phantom traces of late bitterness.
Not as fizzy or insubstancial as many American Macro lagers. The CO2 is geared down a notch, giving the body a tad bid more heft than most.
All in all, this is a solid version that a touch beefier and sweeter than the majority of its peers.

Serving type: bottle

10-16-2009 02:14:31 | More by cokes
Photo of AdmiralDiaz
AdmiralDiaz

Minnesota

2.98/5  rDev +18.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from 12oz bottle to pint glass.

A: Pours a golden body with small white head with usual retention and some spots of lacing.

S: Typical adjunct, corn, cereal grain, slight hops and malt

T: Just the same as the taste. About average for the style, but I like this just a little bit better.

Overall: Good standard carbonation and highly drinkable seeing as how it is an adjunct.

Serving type: bottle

03-29-2009 00:29:47 | More by AdmiralDiaz
Photo of rye726
rye726

Colorado

1.78/5  rDev -29.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I think this deserves a healthy 2 acorss the board. It is a clear yellowish liquid and has a fizzy white head that quickly disappears. The nose is light and grainy. As is the taste. No real hop presence. Thin body goes down fine for the style. Nothing special here, but nothing too bad either.

Serving type: bottle

10-31-2008 06:30:56 | More by rye726
Photo of pmcadamis
pmcadamis

Illinois

2.17/5  rDev -13.9%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

I had a couple bottles of this stuff with my breakfast buffet at the Route 66 motel after running a 5k with a bunch of co-workers...and yes, they were drinking at breakfast too.

A - Prototypical macro lager gold with a prototypical macro lager flimsy sudsy head. Doesn't look any worse or better than any other (IB)MC crap.

S - Lagery generic "beer" smell. I don't know what that means since beer can smell like anything from tart fruit to pumpkins to dark chocolate, but this smells like what any red-blooded 'Merican would tell you beer smells like.

T - Not bad in any way, but not good in any other way. Corn, cereal grain, and clean rice.

M - High carbonation is typical for the style, and the clean crisp finish is what we Americans want in a beer right? No lingering taste = good. IMO, no aftertaste or finish = bad.

D - If I'm at a joint like the Route 66 Motel where the beer "selection" consists of MGD, Miller Light, Bud, Bud Light, Coors, and Coors Light (what DIVERSITY!) I'll pick this since it at least has more calories and hopefully that equates to more flavor than the other swill-beers.

Serving type: bottle

09-16-2008 22:40:26 | More by pmcadamis
Photo of tempest
tempest

Pennsylvania

2.9/5  rDev +15.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured into a stemmed pilsner glass like you might see in the old-school PBR commercials.

Looks golden-yellow as opposed to the lighter straw-yellow of many macros. Smell and taste are just a simple, sweet bready flavor that's not entirely unpleasant. Most of the off-flavors and harsh mouthfeels of most bad macros is masked or just non-existent, so while this beer doesn't qualify as tasty, it's not bad either. In fact, I suppose for the style, it's pretty decent and I'd liken it to a lighter Yuengling Lager.

Serving type: can

12-28-2007 22:18:08 | More by tempest
Photo of budgood1
budgood1

Minnesota

2.4/5  rDev -4.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

pours out of the 12 oz. can a clear golden colour. thin head and lace, rather fizzy and not very sustaining. adjunct sweetness in the nose, a bit more than than you normally get from A-B. taste is light on the barley malt, more adjunct sweetness and very little hopping, if at all. light bodied, pretty smooth mouthfeel with some crispness in the end. albeit drinkable and good enough to quench the thirst after work or play, i much prefer budweiser or regular michelob to this marketing gimmick of a beer.

Serving type: can

09-10-2007 23:34:25 | More by budgood1
Photo of Beerbuddha
Beerbuddha

Louisiana

2/5  rDev -20.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Appearance- Golden pale color with thin white head

Smell- Smelled musty with hint of hops, very bready

Taste- Not very good. A bit of hops with a fruity taste.

Mouthfeel- Highly carbonated.

Drinkability- None. This was not a very good beer. I would not recommend this to friends at all.

Serving type: bottle

07-25-2007 22:14:23 | More by Beerbuddha
Photo of badbeer
badbeer

Iowa

3/5  rDev +19%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured a clear, straw like color with a finger width white head that ran away and left no lacing. Creamed corn smell, hint of alcohol or boozy smell. Creamed corn perceived again, straw, a bit of graininess, no hop presence. Light bodied, highly carbonated. Pretty drinkable I suppose, it goes down pretty easy, but it's just not that great.

Serving type: bottle

04-30-2006 00:32:08 | More by badbeer
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

2.23/5  rDev -11.5%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Despite the fact that this beer was first brewed in 1991, I never knew it existed until a few minutes ago. When I plucked it off the singles shelf at John's Grocery last month, I thought I was buying Miller Genuine Draft, the original MGD, released in 1986. In any case, this lesser known A-B product is one half of Macro Smackdown IX, my periodic 'mano a mano' between macros both foreign and domestic. Schlitz is its venerable competitor.

Michelob Golden Draft is the more golden of the two and is more clear (due to 'cold filtering' no doubt). I'm happy to see fine-bubbled carbonation rather than large, soda-like bubbles, although it isn't helping the head in the least. The cap is dirty gray, mealy, featureless and is fading away quickly as if embarrassed to be seen. I would be too if I looked like it does.

The noses are definitely different. This one is sweeter and cornier with a whiff of muskiness (hops?). It isn't pathetically weak, nor does it jump out of the glass. Given what it smells like, I'd say the intensity is about right.

There isn't much flavor to be had. The more I drink, the more I realize that that's a good thing. The beer isn't as sweet as it smells and I'm now questioning whether corn is the adjunct being utilized or whether (A-B's signature adjunct) rice is. There's little, if any, hoppiness. Bottom line: bland, making a quick turn toward nasty as it warms.

The mouthfeels are pretty close to identical. Both are light without being aqueous and are well-carbonated without being fizzy. That puts them ahead of the game compared to most members of this style.

When I woke up this morning, I didn't know that Michelob Golden Draft existed. I could have gone another few decades without that knowledge. It isn't horrible beer, and is a damn sight better than most A-B beer, but it's the clear loser of Macro Smackdown IX. When will A-B brew something that appeals to me? I'm not holding my breath.

Serving type: bottle

03-12-2006 13:24:51 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of BeerBob
BeerBob

Nebraska

3.05/5  rDev +21%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Michelob Golden Draft pours a light clear amber from a 12oz clear glass bottle with a twistoff cap. Head of white foam with fine bubbles went to over two fingers before going down to a firm ring of foam with a broken cap of very fine foam. Lacing is is in a good amount and clings well to the sides of my beer glass.

Nose is of damp sweet grains and a few whiffs of alcohol, not a lot, but in small amounts. Palate is an up front sweet grain that is immediately overcome with the bittering of hops and reinforced with the bight of carbonation.

A clean and clear “Draft Beer” that is well suited for a new place in the global macro beer market.

Serving type: bottle

10-17-2005 23:45:20 | More by BeerBob
Photo of Frozensoul327
Frozensoul327

Michigan

2.88/5  rDev +14.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I guess this is a step up for the AB family of brewing. Poured out to a decent golden color with a weak head and higher carbonation. Go figure, how'd they pull that off? Odors of malt and hops. Flavor was slightly sweet, with strong indications of grain and grass. Finished slightly bitter. A pretty good macro. Recommended.

Serving type: bottle

08-17-2005 00:50:23 | More by Frozensoul327
Photo of Vancer
Vancer

Illinois

1.8/5  rDev -28.6%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Went by a buddy’s’ house after golf, and he had a case of this crap. Sure wasn’t gonna turn down a free beer, but jeez, this stuff was awful. An immediate skunk smell (freakin clear bottle) followed by a corn adjunct quaff. No malt. I had my buddy throw a lime in it just to make it manageable. AB made this shit to compete with Miller in Chicago.

Serving type: bottle

06-06-2005 12:37:37 | More by Vancer
Photo of Bighuge
Bighuge

Minnesota

3.43/5  rDev +36.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pale clear yellow. Slight off white head. Lace is negligible. Aroma is soft maltiness and barley. Pretty decent. On the palate, the malts are clean, sweet and grainy and the overall taste is balanced. The mouthfeel is not as fizzy as some macros, which is good. And the body is pushing above medium slightly. Good macro.

Serving type: can

04-03-2005 04:30:13 | More by Bighuge
Photo of mynie
mynie

Indiana

3.4/5  rDev +34.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Pretty darn good Macro, easily the best AB beer around.

Dark gold with a nice head that doesn't stick around very long. Rich smell of deep malt. Nice but not complex in the least.

Tastes incredibly smooth. Very malty. Strong taste of wheat (not wheatmalt, just wheat...like bread) followed up by a surprising dose of hops in the back.

Goes down very smooth. Solid body. Not way too carbonated like most AB beers.

Serving type: bottle

03-14-2005 23:32:22 | More by mynie
Photo of Rifrafboy
Rifrafboy

Minnesota

2.73/5  rDev +8.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours light and bubbly. Aroma is of grains (corn?). Decent hoppiness. Taste is light bodied and refreshing, a little on the dry side, which is typical for a "draft" served in the bottle. Overall, tasted like a cheap beer, almost like crap.

Serving type: bottle

03-23-2003 12:16:15 | More by Rifrafboy
Photo of Mick
Mick

New Jersey

2.25/5  rDev -10.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

An average macrobrew, nothing outstanding. Typical clear yellowish translucent color. No notable aroma, nothing outstanding. The tastes, body, and after glow is what you would expect from the macro line. Although, better than a Budweiser

Serving type: bottle

09-11-2002 11:16:37 | More by Mick
Photo of garymuchow
garymuchow

Minnesota

3/5  rDev +19%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

My impression of this beer was the mouthfeel, as there seemed little overall flavor. There was a softness and fluffiness to the feel that was unusually obvious, leading almost to a sense of creaminess. Other characteristics seemed pretty typical for style.

Serving type: can

08-17-2002 14:26:17 | More by garymuchow
Photo of ADR
ADR

Pennsylvania

2.78/5  rDev +10.3%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Head lasts longer than many macros, but has no body. Clear golden-yellow color. Smell is like a combo of slightest yeast and root beer extract. There is a smoothness, brought on by less-than-expected carbonation and some of the most distinctively sweet malt I have ever tasted in the last five years. Flavor is cleared before the swallow. I think this has less hop than MGD, but I don't prefer either. A beer for those who choose vanilla soft serve at the ice cream stand. Very distinct smoothness and sweetness. One of the surviving "Goldens" that were big in the 1980s...

Serving type: can

07-11-2002 08:40:23 | More by ADR
Photo of goindownsouth
goindownsouth

Pennsylvania

3.33/5  rDev +32.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

While I am not the biggest fan of American lagers, this is not a bad beer. Well balanced so it can go with just about any kind of food...or no food at all. Worth a try and, if nothing else, econimical. Prost!

Serving type: bottle

07-09-2002 14:42:51 | More by goindownsouth
Photo of proc
proc

Michigan

2.5/5  rDev -0.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Decent, but not inspiring. There is just nothing very
distinguishing about it. Very similar to Miller Genuine Draft. Must be the infamous "cold filtered" myth and mystique...Very Average and slightly watery. I've had a few of these at Tiger games at Comerica Park. Not bad on a hot day.

Serving type: bottle

05-10-2002 11:06:17 | More by proc
Photo of ZAP
ZAP

Minnesota

3.38/5  rDev +34.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

It might just be me, but I don't think this is bad at all. it tastes on the sweeter side to me when compared to the other american lagers..almost a little syrupy feel to it. If someone else was buying I'd drink these...if you like sweeter style beers this might be the Macro of choice for you

Serving type: bottle

05-09-2002 21:43:41 | More by ZAP
Photo of John
John

New York

2.4/5  rDev -4.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

I probably wouldn't have tried this if it hadn't been for a weekend pig roast where it was the kegged swill of the day. True to the label claim with it's golden color. No head or aroma to speak of. Fairly smooth and more flavorful than many macros. My expectations were nil, but this stuff somehow exceeded them and as it turned out, really wasn't all that bad.

Serving type: bottle

04-22-2002 08:10:30 | More by John
« first ‹ prev | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100  | next › last »
Michelob Golden Draft from Anheuser-Busch
62 out of 100 based on 97 ratings.