1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Redbridge - Anheuser-Busch

Not Rated.

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

404 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 404
Reviews: 195
rAvg: 2.61
pDev: 26.82%
Wants: 1
Gots: 26 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Anheuser-Busch visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Lager |  4.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Rich, hearty and full-bodied gluten-free lager brewed from sorghum. Redbridge has a distinctively fruity hop aroma, a sweet toasted grain flavor and a well-balanced, moderately
hopped finish.

(Beer added by: BeerBeing on 12-10-2006)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Redbridge Alström Bros
Ratings: 404 | Reviews: 195 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Joeyuwp
1.5/5  rDev -42.5%

Joeyuwp, Aug 18, 2012
Photo of krazybartender
2/5  rDev -23.4%

krazybartender, Aug 08, 2012
Photo of Doyle
2.75/5  rDev +5.4%

Doyle, Aug 05, 2012
Photo of dirtyharry2489
2.75/5  rDev +5.4%

dirtyharry2489, Aug 02, 2012
Photo of Stoutlad
2.75/5  rDev +5.4%

Stoutlad, Jul 31, 2012
Photo of Lynn
2.5/5  rDev -4.2%

Lynn, Jul 24, 2012
Photo of czernobog
3.75/5  rDev +43.7%

czernobog, Jul 14, 2012
Photo of Ranz
2.25/5  rDev -13.8%

Ranz, Jul 11, 2012
Photo of TheBigBoy
1.75/5  rDev -33%

TheBigBoy, Jul 07, 2012
Photo of Dapperticus
4/5  rDev +53.3%

Dapperticus, Jul 05, 2012
Photo of DruC4
2/5  rDev -23.4%

DruC4, Jun 18, 2012
Photo of jsisko01
3.4/5  rDev +30.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance - Pours a clear golden-amber hue with a thin head that dissipates instantly. Lacing is pretty nice.

Smell - It has a subtle sweetness and a little grainy.

Taste - It's quite sweet, but a strange sweetness I can't exactly describe. Has a strong metallic flavor to it too.. along with a corn-like flavor in the finish. It's probably the sorghum?

Mouthfeel - Light body with medium carbonation. Very crisp.

Overall - It's quite drinkable.. but for some reason I usually get heartburn from this beer.

jsisko01, Jun 10, 2012
Photo of EagleTalon
2.13/5  rDev -18.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Pours out to a thin bubbly white head and amber color. No real head retention to speak of. Aroma is berry, apple and a hint of A-B banana and hop-skunk. Flavor is wine-like, reminds me of sherry or muscadine but is is very faint with some rubbery, skunky hops in the finish. Nothing resembling malt or cereal grain is in this brew. Mouthfeel for a low-point beer is average. Overall, this is a different taste sensation more like a watered down melomel or a cider and not much like beer, unless you count bad beer.

EagleTalon, Jun 09, 2012
Photo of chrispoint
1/5  rDev -61.7%

chrispoint, Jun 06, 2012
Photo of rundocrun
2.05/5  rDev -21.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

I don't believe it, but I'm actually reviewing an Anheuser-Busch beer. At least it's not Bud Light... but we'll see if I end up eating my words after this one.

A - body of the beer is exactly the color of apple juice, and just as clear. Lots of carbonation in this beer as evidenced by the streams of bubbles coming up the glass. Head is coarse white foam that fades quickly, but is replaced by a finer head from the bubbles rising from the bottom. No lacing.

S - Slightly sherry-like and medicinal. Hints of fruity cider and sweet hard candy.

T - Sweet, slightly tangy and fruity up front. Just sort of bland and flavorless as it moves over my tongue. Then its aluminum. An overwhelming taste and aftertaste of the vats this stuff was probably brewed in. Nearly undrinkable because of it.

M - Thin body. Overpowering carbonation. Clean finish.

Overall - still better than bud light.

rundocrun, Jun 06, 2012
Photo of TimoP
2.25/5  rDev -13.8%

TimoP, Jun 04, 2012
Photo of crobinso
1.5/5  rDev -42.5%

crobinso, May 29, 2012
Photo of Pillowburn
2/5  rDev -23.4%

Pillowburn, May 26, 2012
Photo of MammothTarantula
1.75/5  rDev -33%

MammothTarantula, May 17, 2012
Photo of Irish7r
2.75/5  rDev +5.4%

Irish7r, May 17, 2012
Photo of Brewsed
3/5  rDev +14.9%

Brewsed, Apr 18, 2012
Photo of BlottoOtto
1.75/5  rDev -33%

BlottoOtto, Apr 11, 2012
Photo of avisong
2/5  rDev -23.4%

avisong, Apr 06, 2012
Photo of SopwithCamel18
2.25/5  rDev -13.8%

SopwithCamel18, Mar 30, 2012
Photo of EgadBananas
2.18/5  rDev -16.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.5

This beer looks pretty much like a macro lager. Calling it an amber is a stretch to say the least. Retention was pretty decent though, all things considered.

The aroma is slight, with a hint of sweetness and an adjunct sort of smell.

The taste is just... strange. There's this weird sweetness that I guess comes from the sorghum and sweetener. It's palatable, but just strange and hard to like for me.

The mouthfeel kinda sucks. It's super creamy, though it looks bubbly in the glass. There's a dry, kinda soapy finish to it. It's not wildly pleasant.

It's drinkable, but if I was Gluten intolerant, I'd choose other forms of booze like hard liquor over this. In similar vein as NA beers, what's the point?

EgadBananas, Mar 17, 2012
Redbridge from Anheuser-Busch
62 out of 100 based on 404 ratings.