Shock Top Belgian White - Anheuser-Busch

Not Rated.
Shock Top Belgian WhiteShock Top Belgian White

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
71
okay

746 Reviews
THE BROS
69
poor

(Read More)
Reviews: 746
Hads: 3,375
rAvg: 3.05
pDev: 20.33%
Wants: 44
Gots: 663 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Anheuser-Busch visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
Witbier |  5.20% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: Bitterbill on 12-04-2007

We’ve shaken up traditional tastes by brewing a spiced Belgian-style wheat ale with real orange, lemon and lime peels,and then added a little coriander spice to the mix. This uniquely-crafted and award-winning ale is unfiltered to create a brew that is naturally cloudy with a light golden color and a smooth, refreshing finish.
View: Beers (87) | Events
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Shock Top Belgian White Alström Bros
Reviews: 746 | Hads: 3,375
Photo of WoostaBia
2/5  rDev -34.4%

Poor imitation of a belgian white. Watery imitation of Blue Moon even when the Blue moon white is a poor beer. I have a fondness for Bluemoon as it was my notice of the idea of Craft Beer and the existence other beers other than adjunct lagers. (246 characters)

Photo of DaneBramage
2.95/5  rDev -3.3%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3

I've found that drinking ST from the bottle and following the directions on the bottle on how to pour into a glass makes a big difference. Especially if you add a slice of orange to the glass. Still a fairly weak macrobrew, but better than your typical Bud or Miller swill. (273 characters)

Photo of Shade1951
2.79/5  rDev -8.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Well, it could be that my palate has been unduly influenced by the very hoppy ales I've been drinking. I found this Belgian White to be almost devoid of any flavor at all. I don't think I'd be able to tell much of a difference between this and one of the mainstream lagers.

I don't find anything exactly bad about it. It's kind of refreshing in the way sparkling water is refreshing, though with a bit of flavor one would likely identify as "beery." If there are spices, they were used most sparingly.

I've had MUCH worse beers than this - some so bad that I had to pour them down the drain. This beer is disappointing as a "white ale," but definitely NOT drain pour. I wouldn't spend money on it, but it it's hot or very warm out and it's offered to me, I will gladly take it simply as a thirst quencher. (807 characters)

Photo of Russell_L
4.48/5  rDev +46.9%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4.75 | feel: 5 | overall: 4.75

Shock Top taste great UNLESS you do not read the bottle. With this beer it is important that you pour the beer into a mug except for about an inch of beer in the bottle. At this point you need to swish around the beer in the bottom of the bottle to get the sediment out and dump into your glass. You will have a much better tasting beer. I also recommend squeezing a slice of orange into the beer for a more citrus flavor. (422 characters)

Photo of Urk1127
3.06/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 2.25 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.25

I personally like blue moon better than this, but shock top has more of a sort of water down Orange juice flavor to it and was good for the hotter days. Less citrus out of the bottle than poured into a glass. It's like a lighter option to blue moon. (249 characters)

Photo of Radome
2.34/5  rDev -23.3%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2.25

Served from a 12 oz bottle into a wine goblet.

A - Color is medium straw with lots of orange. Appearance is very cloudy and murky (ok for style). Low head quickly disappears. Light lacing.

S - Low bready malt and wheat. Light flowery note like chamomille, maybe some other light spices. No hops. Citrus doesn't come across, nor do any yeast notes.

T - Malt is so faint it's almost not there. No obvious wheat. Some spice, but it is indistinct. Citrus not noticeable. No hops or yeast.

M - Medium body with a strange "powdery" mouthfeel. Slightly sweet and cloying finish. Some bitterness appears to be combination of hops and citric acid. No alcohol presence.

O - Not only not distinctive, but actually a poor example of style in a lot of ways. Where is the wheat? Where's the yeast character? Or even the citrus for that matter? (835 characters)

Photo of jsausley
2.92/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

On draft at Crab Catchers Little River.

A: Orange and golden, thick and cloudy like most wheats. Nice firm head that retains well. Decent carbonation and textured body.

S: Wheat and citrus, yeasty breadness, some orange from the slice that my server put on the rim... for some reason.

T: Slight wheat body with some malty character, very mild. No detectable hop variety. Nice citrus flavors. Very easy to drink and a good balance but not overly flavorful.

M: Thick but smooth, wheaty body. Some carbonation.

O: Not a bad entry level wheat. Lacking of any major characteristics but not a bad go to for if you can't find a wheat with more character. (652 characters)

Photo of Heaz
3.85/5  rDev +26.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4

A step up from the junk stuff,
and a good anytime go to. Refreshing
in the summer and a reminder in the
winter that warmer weather is coming,
without being over light or island
style. Always good, I never have any
guests that complain or refuse one. (251 characters)

Photo of leantom
3.64/5  rDev +19.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

Have always been curious about this beer. A lot of people (undeservedly, I might add) give this beer low scores merely because of who makes it. I decided to pick it up at the local Fastmart. Here goes:

A: OK, but somewhat lackluster. Beer pours a cloudy yellow, which is normal for beers of this style. The head was also nice and fluffy, but it quickly dissipated and left no lacing whatsoever (I mean NO lacing). Usually Belgian ales - especially low-density ones - leave a ton of lacing due to protein-synthesizing yeast. Not so with this beer.

S: OK, but somewhat muted. Can detect coriander, spice, white pepper, lemon and orange. However, to my surprise, the smell only lasted for a couple minutes after opening the can! Not as strong as I would've liked, but oh well.

T: Bordering on good-to-OK. Has a nice citrus flavor, and I can detect lots of spices. However, the beer lacks that bready characteristic that's typical of Belgian ales (i.e., the one produced from Belgian yeast). It feels somewhat less robust than it should be. Otherwise, this would be a good brew.

M: Somewhat lackluster given the lack of a bready character. Otherwise OK.

O: An OK representation of the style. Would much rather have an Allagash White, though. (1,242 characters)

Photo of SensorySupernova
3/5  rDev -1.6%

Appearance: Cloudy gold with white head

Smell: Orange smell, but mostly wheat.

Taste: Malts and wheat, no bitterness or alcohol detected.

Mouthfeel: Thin and well-carbonated.

Overall: Not too interesting but nothing offensive. Certainly a step up from the standard lagers you find at social events. Cheap, easy to find, and good on a hot day. This is one of the few beers that I can share with my friends who don't like intense beers. (439 characters)

Photo of jaredtp
4.24/5  rDev +39%
look: 4 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25

This beer was a pretty good beer. I liked it a lot, I like to put a orange wedge in it. The citrus flavor that it has is really good. The citrus flavor that it has made the beer taste even better I think. The smell of this beer was also pretty good as well. (257 characters)

Photo of BEERMILER12
2.96/5  rDev -3%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Pours a cloudy yellow color with a fingers worth of head that fades down to pretty much nothing

S: A bit of citrus and spices with a wheat backbone. A bit simple, and a little too much of what I can only describe as a sports bar stink... weird

T: Definitely wheat-forward with quite a bit of the orange peel and a bit of the coriander and spices. Not too much else

M: Medium bodied with moderate carbonation. A bit chalky

O: A very mediocre witbier which is pretty much what you'd expect from AB. Decently drinkable, but could get a little cloying after a few (566 characters)

Photo of JLaw55
5/5  rDev +63.9%
look: 5 | smell: 5 | taste: 5 | feel: 5 | overall: 5

This is the beer that started it all for me. The one that got me into beer, not the first I had tried, but the one that made me give beer another shot. After trying a couple of horrendous mainstream options, this one wet my whistle for trying more. I still love it to this day, but only on tap. Out of the bottle, it does not taste even remotely the same to me. On tap at a bar though, delicious.

Will continue to purchase and drink from time to time, even while on this journey of beer. (488 characters)

Photo of wordemupg
2.82/5  rDev -7.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 2.75

341ml bottle poured into tulip 2/7/14

A hazed yellow, a few bubbles but even a hard dump down the middle I don't get much for foam, no lace

S lots of orange rind and spice, perfume, sweet cereal, smells a little artificial

T some orange crush pop, tastes like a radler, more juice and pop then beer, not awful but not exactly a Wit

M thin and a little foamy, slippery almost slimy on the palate, lots of orange rind lingering

O what happens when a macro goes Wit? something like this, far from undrinkable but far from something I'd look for

a macro attempt at craft never really works out and this is no exception, I'll stop short of saying its offensive but its a one and done for sure (695 characters)

Photo of thefullmontiii
3.3/5  rDev +8.2%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

A decent compromise between quality and cost for a summer brew. Nothing special really, but not what you'd call bad either.

Best served poured into a glass with a slice of orange, the fresh citrus compliments the beer. Without the orange, though, pouring yields a mild head, with notes of citrus and coriander. Slightly cloudy in color. More sweet and refreshing than anything else, can't really even tell there's hops in it. Good for barbecues and summer get togethers. (471 characters)

Photo of DirtyMikeandTheBoys
3.53/5  rDev +15.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

I've seen some bad ratings for this beer but figured I'd try some after a hard days work on a hot summers day. Not a bad beer for the price. Would recommend for someone who enjoys wheat beer but is strapped for cash. Goes down smooth. Here's my review.

A-it's good with a nice orange tint and creamy head that lasts several minutes.

T- Hoppy wheat taste with some grains and a hint of malt. Some mild creamy orange as well. Tastes lingers on the tongue.

S-mild orange smell. Nothing to speak of.

M-full mouthfeel with creamy lasting taste

I'd recommend trying Mustang Wheat Beer or Boulevard Unfiltered Wheat. Boulevard is like a good thanksgiving yeast roll.

Shock top is well worth trying (697 characters)

Photo of SteveJeremy
3.3/5  rDev +8.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Not at all a bad beer - significantly better than Miller's Blue Moon and seems to play similar instruments as some craft beer in terms of experimentation with flavors and variations on the brand. The pour reveals a very foggy, hazy yellow/orange color, the smell is rather neutral, with possible hints of orange, and the taste's only flaw is that it's heavily carbonated, much like cheap domestic offerings, which throws the beer off quite a bit. Other than that, the taste is definitely good, with its subtle citrus undertones and wheaty texture. Between this and Goose Island 312, I can tell I'm digging wheat beers far more than any other type. The mouthfeel is good, but thrown off because of the strong carbonation at hand.

Shock Top Belgian White is something I could definitely drink on a regular basis. Definitely richer and deeper than the bland offerings by the same brewer. (885 characters)

Photo of mdfb79
3.13/5  rDev +2.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

From 06/07/14 notes. Have had this a few times, finally reviewing it. 12 oz. bottle into a pint glass.

a - Pours a hazy yellow-amber color with one inch of bright white head and moderate to high carbonation.

s - Smells of oranges, wheat, bready malts, sweet fruity malts, corn, grains, and wheat. Not too bad, oranges are there. Very sweet smelling.

t - Taste is similar to the nose but blander. Lots of grains, bready malts, wheat, with some light oranges, light fruity malts, citrus and floral notes to it. Step down from the nose.

m - Medium body and high carbonation. Not as light a body as I was expecting and overcarbonated.

o - Overall not a terrible beer; not great and pretty average, but not offensive at all. Light oranges and citrus in the nose, with less in the taste. Nothing to seek out but not the worst you can do. (837 characters)

Photo of Homebrewkingpin
3.13/5  rDev +2.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

I was unaware of it being an Anheuser Bush product when i saw it on sale.

Appearance- slightly darker than straw yellow lots of carbonation white head not much lace

Smell- adjunct sweet smell not bad just corn sugary maybe with some orange

taste - not great but okay a wheat orange a bit too sweet.

mouth feel- clean lots of carbonation a summer beer serve cold

Overall- its not as bad as some of the reviews on here say i don't know if i would buy again
but at this price point and for the style C+. (507 characters)

Photo of jneiswender
1.37/5  rDev -55.1%
look: 1 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 1

Pour out of a twist top 12 ounce bottle into a tall glass

Pours orange with a foamy off white head

Belgian yeast smell up front not much else

Watery, some orange fresca taste

Well carbonated

So far off from the style. Not even close. Fresca fermented with Belgian yeast isn't a wit beer. Sorry AB. (307 characters)

Photo of ArchimedesSox
3.38/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Cloudy orange color in a 20 oz mug with little head and no lacing. Lots of carbonation rolling up at top of glass.

Smell is sweet of wheat and orange.

Taste does not live up to the sweet smell. More wheat malts than anything with maybe a little bit of spice at the end.

Mouthfeel is nicely carbonated that finishes nice and smooth.

Overall this beer is ok. The pub that I'm at only has 5 choices on tap so the pickings are slim. I may have it again but only if it comes between this and a macro American lager. (518 characters)

Photo of ghisty
3.13/5  rDev +2.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3.25

appearance:
pours very clear for a white, first impression wasnt impressive. small to no head, once poured it does have some carb and minor cloudiness, less of what i had expected.

smell:
grains. which was expected, and far less shocking than hoped for, citrus note ,
but not the sweet lemony smell i had hoped for, more of a dank sort of orangepeel.
slight note of corrainder i think it is.

taste:
not bad. not as much bite as expected, but then again given the crazy packaging,
often these things are overstated, it isnt bad tasting at all, just a bit less exciting than is illustrated by the name and the labels. good tasting though. nice and light. citrusy.
bright.

mouthfeel:
this is where i find it leaves alot to be desired, typically whites are sharp, and more carb but i find this sort of typical for an busch product, base, flat mouth, only a slight after taste of dry citrus improves this.

overall:
not as bad as the ratings would have you beleive, it isnt typical for either styles its mixing together, something similar to like beachchair, but once again slightly more boring, I can see necking back a half dozen in the sun on the beach or something, and it would pair nicely with light food like fish and chips, but over all i must admit to slight dissapointment, not as punchy as I had hoped for. although now that I understand what it brings to the table, I may find a place for it. (1,404 characters)

Photo of FlyingKneeStrike
2.66/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Pours a somewhat clear off orange color. Good carbonation and head. The smell is the least favorable thing about this beer, I really can't detect any scents. Tastes better than it smells, I like the mouthfeel. It's a little better than I expected, not a bad beer. (263 characters)

Photo of DaveBar
3.27/5  rDev +7.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Purchased at the LCBO for approx. $2.80 for a 473ml can. Served at 6deg C in a tulip glass.

A- Ok at best. Opens well and is cloudy but much more golden/copper color then Hoegaarden

S- Half of what Hoegaarden is to say the least

T- Ok at best. Not a very good rendition of a white beer

M- Not bad. Ok I guess

O- Ok. Will not buy again. Will try if on tap as white beers are typically better on tap.

Food Pairing

This ok rendition of a white beer pairs well with... sushi

Enjoy (486 characters)

Photo of NickPiezzo
3.38/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

A-bright, very pale

S- not much going on in nose area

T- very citrusy, very slightly bitter but great taste

M- very carbonated leaves a nice taste in your mouth

O-One of my favorite ales, its getting big in my area of new jersey and its deservingly so (255 characters)

Shock Top Belgian White from Anheuser-Busch
71 out of 100 based on 746 ratings.