1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Shock Top Belgian White - Anheuser-Busch

Not Rated.
Shock Top Belgian WhiteShock Top Belgian White

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
69
poor

2,646 Ratings
THE BROS
69
poor

(view ratings)
Ratings: 2,646
Reviews: 683
rAvg: 2.96
pDev: 22.97%
Wants: 12
Gots: 154 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Anheuser-Busch visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
Witbier |  5.20% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
We’ve shaken up traditional tastes by brewing a spiced Belgian-style wheat ale with real orange, lemon and lime peels,and then added a little coriander spice to the mix. This uniquely-crafted and award-winning ale is unfiltered to create a brew that is naturally cloudy with a light golden color and a smooth, refreshing finish.

(Beer added by: Bitterbill on 12-04-2007)
View: Beers (76) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Shock Top Belgian White Alström Bros
Ratings: 2,646 | Reviews: 683 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of orangesol
orangesol

Pennsylvania

2.75/5  rDev -7.1%

03-08-2013 00:19:33 | More by orangesol
Photo of DoubleJ
DoubleJ

California

2.9/5  rDev -2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

AB joins the big three with their own witbier entry. Where will this one rank compared to the other two (Blue Moon and Leine)? Let's find out, and on to the beer we go:

Big puffy head on top a mildly hazed light straw body. That head's staying up for awhile, and the body's color really looks like that of an authentic witbier. Coriander and fruit peels in the smell.

Unfortunately, it tastes like a watery witbier. Not bad by any means, but the flavor intensity borders that of a light beer. Although it gets better as it slightly warms from the fridge, I'm not particuarly excited about this, and I really enjoy witbiers. Not very spiced with light wheat malt. Bah.

Disspointment never breaks hearts, raised hopes do. The appearance brought up my hopes, but the raised expectations from it broke my heart when I tasted it. This is one witbier that might need an orange slice to keep your interest.

Serving type: bottle

04-16-2008 03:52:09 | More by DoubleJ
Photo of Wasatch
Wasatch

Utah

2.28/5  rDev -23%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours a cloudy yellow color, nice carbonation, nice one-finger white head, with some sticky lacing left behind. The nose is malty, slight yeast, some spice. The taste is malty/yeast, not much spice. Light body. Not drinkable, I was kinda syked about this brew with the nose, but the taste is pretty bland/watery, a big disappointment.

Serving type: bottle

11-14-2008 03:39:54 | More by Wasatch
Photo of DrunkinYogi
DrunkinYogi

Connecticut

3/5  rDev +1.4%

07-01-2014 00:48:00 | More by DrunkinYogi
Photo of duceswild
duceswild

Maryland

3/5  rDev +1.4%

03-15-2012 01:56:34 | More by duceswild
Photo of mothman
mothman

United Kingdom (Wales)

3.1/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured into Weizen Glass.

Pours a 2 finger head that settles after a few minutes. Leaves very little lace. Color is a hazy dark staw yellow.

Aroma is like fruit loops (2nd beer in a row to remind me of fruit loops, lucky me). Also has some citrus and orange aromas. Not to bad for an A-B product.

Taste is very similar. It is very fruity (mainly oranges). There is some zest and bready malts. A little alcohol shows throught here.

Mouthfeel is a little crisp, mainly cream/smooth and ends with a slightly sticky aftertaste.

Overall, there was way too much orange/fruity flavor going on here. I wouldn't want to buy this, because I know I could find a good hefe instead.

Serving type: bottle

03-31-2009 17:48:32 | More by mothman
Photo of ejimhof
ejimhof

Pennsylvania

2/5  rDev -32.4%

12-25-2012 22:00:34 | More by ejimhof
Photo of Stinkypuss
Stinkypuss

Pennsylvania

2.38/5  rDev -19.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A. Poured into a 12 oz. plastic "glass" at a Steelers game. Pale yellow with a decent head.

S. Very light citrus and spice.

T. A pretty bland tasting beer really. Very little to taste, faint grains, even fainter wheat, and just a bit of orange citrusy hoeggarden like wit taste.

M. Somewhat smooth and bland to the palate.

D. Overall this is average drinking at best. Surely beats most if not all other AB products, but I will be leary of this one as well..

Serving type: on-tap

09-08-2008 20:36:44 | More by Stinkypuss
Photo of BARFLYB
BARFLYB

Pennsylvania

2.7/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Bottle provided to me by a friend, poured into a budweiser pint glass.

A- Tangerine orange with two fingers of loose off white soapy foam that faded but left a lasting cap. Kind of cloudy looks good, no lace.

S- A bunch of artifical orange flavor with some coriander and light sweet malt. No hops in this, just fruity/citrusy with a small hay scent after warming.

T- Oranges and faint apricot although doesent taste like the real thing. Small spice and a dash of wheat, more citrus forward than wheat. Getting some soggy fruit pebbles taste which turns me off. Not a good representation of the style IMO, more like fruit juice.

M&D- No bitterness, fruity and sweet on the way down with some fizz from the carb. A step below medium bodied which is bigger than most wit's i've come across. This is not something that i would consume for refreshment in the summer. Needs to take a step down in body and increase the spice/wheat and bring down the citrus.

Serving type: bottle

12-28-2009 01:20:01 | More by BARFLYB
Photo of biegaman
biegaman

Ontario (Canada)

3.3/5  rDev +11.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Shock Top Belgian White looks as though it's been crafted with almost as much careful detail as its creative packaging. It's a fairly conventional looking witbier that, while its complexion may be a somewhat deeper orange colour than normal, still exemplifies that characteristic 'white ale' cloudiness. Head retention is fair; lace production is poor.

The aroma is very inviting, subtly slipping the nose pulpy, citrusy notes as if they were bribes. At this point I'm relating it more closely to a no-name brand OJ than to any of Belgium's great witbiers. They've gone pedal to the metal with the citrus, much to expense the of the coriander and malt. It smells lovely, don't get me wrong, but blatant and kitschy.

What ingredients the brewery does list on the can are coriander, orange, lemon and lime peel and wheat; the ones they don't are the stabilizers, preservatives and other industrial adjuncts. But you can be sure from the taste that they're in there. For all the quenching, citrusy, zest the flavouring should add, the beer is still fairly dull and innocuous.

Drinking Shock Top is like slurping all the juice out of an orange wedge and then continuing to suck on the dry rind; in the mouth it is juicy and citric, with a pulpy orange flavour, but in the finish it is dry and pithy. Both the lemon and lime peels are nothing more than footnotes, contributing (if anything) a subtle, slight acidic kick in the aftertaste.

There are few things better in the beer world than witbiers - and few things worse than Anheuser-Busch products. A combination of the two results in something predictably average: while it is pleasant and agreeable and, frankly, quite appealing, it is also a shamelessly kitschy, half-rate offering that compares poorly with honest, integral examples of the style.

Serving type: can

05-11-2011 14:35:22 | More by biegaman
Photo of John_M
John_M

Oregon

2.45/5  rDev -17.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Yet another mediocre craft beer wannabe from the folks at AB.

Shock Top pours a hazy darkish honey color with fair head retention and lacing. The beer doesn't look that bad, but once again looks can be deceiving. Initially I got almost nothing on the nose, but as the beer warmed up there was noticeable "wheatiness," coupled with sort of an odd mustard aroma. This beer's wheatiness was even more apparent on the palate, but as it warmed up a bit, I got a distinct alka seltzer flavor. Mouthfeel is light and watery, and drinkabilty was not good. There was a gasiness to this beer that was really pretty unpleasant, that really gave me a bloated feeling near the end of the glass (which ultimately I did not finish).

This is not an awful beer, but by the same token it's nothing special either. I don't know what it is about these "crafty" beers from BMC, but their poor quality always seems to show the more I drink of a particular beer. Needless to say, I will not ever be ordering this stuff again.

The folks at Yellow Dog included a slice of orange with this beer without my asking for it. Normally I find that annoying, but in this case I was glad for the slice of orange. It was much tastier then the beer and helped to clean my palate afterwards.

Serving type: on-tap

04-11-2009 14:14:51 | More by John_M
Photo of brandoman63
brandoman63

Illinois

2/5  rDev -32.4%

11-22-2011 21:50:09 | More by brandoman63
Photo of plaid75
plaid75

New York

3.48/5  rDev +17.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured a cloudy medium straw hue with a half finger foamy white head. There was little retention and lacing.

The smell featured a light yeast esther and some traces of coriander.

The taste consisted a lightly chewy wheat malt and a bit of spice.

The mouthfeel was of average fullness for the style.

Overall a servicable wit. Easy enough to drink.

Serving type: on-tap

05-05-2008 14:20:06 | More by plaid75
Photo of beerthulhu
beerthulhu

New Jersey

3.45/5  rDev +16.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A: Poured a hazy tangerine-orange with a slight bubbly white head that quickly faded. Visible carbonation was soft and almost non detectable.

S: a bucket full of fresh citrus oranges, at times smelling like sunny d orange juice with some sugary sweetness.

T: The initial flavor was sweet tangerine/oranges with a touch of yeasty sourness. The citrus was dominant and pungent at times. The palate was wheaty, crisp, and clean allowing the strong citrus to fade rather quickly on the finish leaving a slight tart sourness from the yeast behind.

M: medium, very spicy with a tangerine tartness and very soft carbonation, almost juice like.

D: A sweet citrusy and refreshing summer time drink and a decent attempt by A-B. a touch to sweet to drink in multiples but much better then coor's blue moon in my opinion.

Serving type: bottle

02-05-2008 00:11:56 | More by beerthulhu
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
Beerandraiderfan

Nevada

2.03/5  rDev -31.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Meh. Looks like AB got a little jealous of the Blue Moon market share, so they developed their own crap. And while I never thought Blue Moon to be all that, it certainly whips this stuff.

Appearance, cloudy, still too yellow instead of the more orangish charm I like to see in a hefe.

Smells too similar to BMC stuff as well. Taste leaves a bad clove, tobacco and non hoppy kind of citrus taste in your mouth, like someone put a cigarrette out on a lemon and then threw it in your beer. Mouthfeel, you just want to get it out, it doesn't develop, it gets worse, and thus, isn't too drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

12-17-2009 01:46:30 | More by Beerandraiderfan
Photo of smakawhat
smakawhat

Maryland

2.1/5  rDev -29.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Christmas party leftovers Part Two continues! The so called "faux craft" drink? How does it hold up? Pouring this into a Hoegaarden glass!

A very creamy/foamy topped head that falls fairly quickly. Body color is an off orange/yellow with lots of cola sticking bubbles. Seems to leave a small puck, but not any lacing.

Nose seems highly artificial. Powdered orange breakfast drink. Nothing else here, no sense of malt either.

Taste? what is this? Sweetened artificial orange juice? This doesn't even taste like beer. Extremely wet bodied, where is the malt density in this? No classic hints of lemon or zest. Sugar artificial Splenda tasting. No wheat chew whatsoever.

Overall... ugh. Barely even tastes like beer let alone a Witbier. Never would have bought this to begin with, so thank god I didn't.

Serving type: bottle

12-28-2011 00:15:57 | More by smakawhat
Photo of Latarnik
Latarnik

New Jersey

3/5  rDev +1.4%

05-25-2014 12:54:46 | More by Latarnik
Photo of LXIXME
LXIXME

New Mexico

3/5  rDev +1.4%

11-29-2013 23:26:04 | More by LXIXME
Photo of tdm168
tdm168

North Carolina

3.08/5  rDev +4.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a light hazy yellow with 1/2" of foamy head that fades after a little to a nice lacing. Smells of yeast and mild coriander. The flavors are all rather faint; orange peels and coriander with mild yeast tones. Mouthfeel is very light and frothy; drinkable and refreshing.

Not huge on flavor but it does quench your thirst.

Serving type: bottle

08-19-2011 00:40:31 | More by tdm168
Photo of Kelp
Kelp

New Hampshire

2.25/5  rDev -24%

01-29-2013 09:10:25 | More by Kelp
Photo of Mebuzzard
Mebuzzard

Colorado

1.5/5  rDev -49.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

So the 'witbier' and the label make me think this will be refreshing, light and have some sort of citrus or spice to it.

Far from it. A murky light golden pour begs an apology. Sick malt aroma, some coriander if I think about it. Faint faint faint citrus.
A bad taste. The malt is overpowering and beyond stale. No spice whatsoever in the taste. Fuzzy orange essence--the fuzz coming from mold.
Light beer. Filmy aftertaste. This is bad.

Serving type: bottle

11-16-2009 05:09:52 | More by Mebuzzard
Photo of sendbeer
sendbeer

Georgia

2.5/5  rDev -15.5%

10-22-2012 20:49:41 | More by sendbeer
Photo of beertunes
beertunes

Washington

2.33/5  rDev -21.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Served in straight pint glass. Poured a cloudy light yellow color with about an inch of white head that relatively low retention and lace.

The aroma was very soft and subdued, none of the usual fruit and spice aromas of one of my favorite styles was apparent. On the tongue the story was the same, no wheat, orange or corriander came through.

The body was nicely smooth and pretty typical for the style. Drinkability was good, but lost some points because the was so bland, why would you drink more than one? Overall, this may make a good "training wheel" beer for the non-craft drinker. Get 'em started with this and then they can expand their horizons.

Serving type: on-tap

11-28-2010 00:21:32 | More by beertunes
Photo of Tone
Tone

Missouri

3.13/5  rDev +5.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A clear golden color with a slight to average head. Little lacing and the head quickly disappears. Strong fruit smell with a noticeable coriander mixed with the cleanliness of a lager. The fruit flavor is lacking in the flavor and it is more or less a lager. A light beer with slight carbonation. Easy to drink but the fruit flavor is to weak.

Serving type: bottle

11-30-2008 23:38:14 | More by Tone
Photo of Brad007
Brad007

Vermont

4.5/5  rDev +52%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Color: Pours a cloudy yellow-white color with a small but foamy head.

Aroma: Coriander and orange peel in the aroma. Appetizing smell but will the taste match up? So far, so good.

Taste: Nice and wheaty. Orange peel and coriander make their presence known upfront. Pleasant and like eating an orange. Goes down smooth. No goofy aftertaste.

Mouthfeel: Never too dry or wet. Smooth.

Verdict: I actually like this witbier. It's smooth, decent and interesting introduction to the style. I will give A-B credit for this one.

Serving type: bottle

02-16-2008 01:51:39 | More by Brad007
Shock Top Belgian White from Anheuser-Busch
69 out of 100 based on 2,646 ratings.