1. Don't miss our 7th annual American Craft Beer Fest featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers this May 30 & 31 in Boston, MA! Buy your tickets now!
  2. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Michelob Hop Hound Amber Wheat - Anheuser-Busch

Michelob Hop Hound Amber WheatMichelob Hop Hound Amber Wheat

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
70
okay

241 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 241
Reviews: 198
rAvg: 2.99
pDev: 17.06%


Brewed by:
Anheuser-Busch visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Wheat Ale |  5.30% ABV

Availability: Spring

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

An unfiltered amber wheat ale with a slight caramel sweetness and refreshing citrus note. Brewed with Cascade and Willamette hops from the Pacific Northwest and Hallertau hops from Southern Germany, Hop Hound certainly lives up to its name. The amber hue results from the blend of caramel, wheat and pale barley malts.

20 IBU

(Beer added by: Tone on 01-15-2009)
View: Beers (76) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 241 | Reviews: 198 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of zbs
zbs

New York

1.35/5  rDev -54.8%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

Bought for $4 / six pack in Brooklyn at 4 am. Did not catch "Michelob" in the aisle, which would have given me pause. (But that price is highly unusual for New York, so no telling.) Despite the corniness of the name, was encouraged by the presence of "hop." Anyway, wrong decision. Should have stuck with High Life.

HHAW: chemical sweetener, one-dimensional brownness, overweight body for the profile.

Avoid.

Serving type: bottle

08-20-2009 22:04:57 | More by zbs
Photo of brdc
brdc

Wisconsin

1.53/5  rDev -48.8%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Small capped bottle poured into a pint glass.

This is hard to describe, and to be honest, I did not notice it was a Michelob before opening it and having a sip. Nice amber color, but the white head lasts just one minute or so, and there is no lacing to be mentioned.
Aroma is essentially not there, maybe some breadiness. Flavor is slight caramel, minimal bread, no hops.
The hound obviously found no hops, it is indeed amber, no wheat notes anywhere. A misnomer to say the least.

Serving type: bottle

07-10-2009 23:04:45 | More by brdc
Photo of mempath
mempath

Pennsylvania

1.75/5  rDev -41.5%
look: 2 | smell: 1 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

yep, i admit, the words HOP made me buy this SINGLE (not a big gamble)...maybe that is what A-B was counting on. hope it isn't false advertising...

looks nice, cloudy orange as expected and decent head that has some stayin power...but little to no lacing...except a small 'anomaly' area... (?)

hmmm...my first impression of the nose is....HARD BOILED EGGS...i love hard boiled eggs...i love eating them with beer/ale! but i don't want the beer or ale to SMELL like them. another brave sniff and i sense some sort of wheatiness....but where are the hops? i meant to say WHERE ARE THE HOPS? by this time, the head has gone flimsy.

taste: it tastes like an NA hefeweizen...i think a lemon or key lime juice actually IS in order...

mouthfeel is ok, decent, perhaps only because it seems (not BETTER but) not so bad as the other elements at play.

it's drinkable if you have scruples and hold your nose and don't try to look at it or smell it...and make sure you are eating something spicy and with alot of people and talking and just not paying attention to this brew. sure, it's better than water in some cases.

again, A-Busch spies, if you are reading, please drop the HOP scotching about. and to think, i gave decent kudos to your pale ale.

again, i feel I'VE BEEN HAD by A-Busch...no more. there are millions like me who aren't spending anything on your swill. copying sam adams is not a way into our hearts either...

NOT RECOMMENDED. DON'T LET THE "HOPS" labeling fool you!!!

flat, demi-uni-dimensional beer. what a travesty.

Serving type: bottle

03-24-2009 23:08:28 | More by mempath
Photo of dmamiano
dmamiano

West Virginia

1.78/5  rDev -40.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Had on tap at a local bar in Morgantown, WV.
Poured an orange, cloudy color with absolutely no head. Poor looking beer.
Smelled of grainy corn, husky and some metallic notes.
Taste was plain awefull. I actually didnt/couldnt even drink it.
It was very bad.

Serving type: on-tap

03-01-2009 00:26:25 | More by dmamiano
Photo of Michadelphia
Michadelphia

Michigan

1.83/5  rDev -38.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Neither Hop nor Wheat beer. Where the heck were they? I should report AB to the BBB for false advertising. The brains at AB wanted to call this Hop Hound... Really? Hound Piss is more like it.

Part of me feels embarrassed because my gut said "Do NOT Buy This!". And the other part of me wants my 8 dollars back to spend on a case of Black Label. Which I would find much more enjoyable.

Serving type: bottle

03-19-2009 01:35:51 | More by Michadelphia
Photo of ZAP
ZAP

Minnesota

1.83/5  rDev -38.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

A-Orange/tan color...cloudy..

S-Not much here...some apple like fruitiness and a hint of caramel.

T-Again, not much here...more of the caramel in front...a little earthy hop feel...

M-Light to medium bodied...jazzed up seltzer like carbonation that is very unimpressive to me...

D-Pretty much a "nothing" beer...bland...very few redeeming qualities. I realize this is a basic american wheat ale so I'm not expecting a ton of esters and the such but it should have more character than it does. Not recommended..

Serving type: bottle

05-30-2009 04:43:23 | More by ZAP
Photo of nlmartin
nlmartin

Ohio

1.83/5  rDev -38.8%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

This beer was served cold in a pint glass.

Appearance: The beer has a scuzzy orange coloration. The head needs some viagra. Simply put its limp.

Smell: Not really getting much in the way of aroma no real hop notes. It does have a very weak carmel apple sort of smell and not in a good way.

Taste: The beer has a sweet caramel corn type flavor. Nothing in the way of what I would call hops.

Mouthfeel / Drinkability: The beer is watery thin. Some carbonation might have helped things along but the beer is limp. The Drinkability is pretty bad. It wasnt a drain pour but I wont drink another. Wheres the Hops?

Serving type: bottle

06-14-2009 22:19:59 | More by nlmartin
Photo of alleykatking
alleykatking

Indiana

1.88/5  rDev -37.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Poured from 12oz bottle. Review from notes.

A- Pours a semi-hazy lighter amber color. Little 1/2 finger white head that dies almost right away. No real lacing to speak of...everything just slides back into the glass.

S- Sweet smell right off the bat. I would even throw out some apricot off scents in there. There was a sweet malt smell coming from this beer as well. No real Hop or Wheat scents with this in the nose. This kind of threw me off.

T- Very malty tasting right from the get go. There is no wheat or hop taste in this beer at all. There is a light bready note floating around this big caramel sweet body. No real hops until a light dash in the tail end of this beer. Not really bitter but more earthy than anything. The apricot smell turned into a light taste in the middle of this beer.

M- Light mouthfeel. Carbonation is good for the beer. Sickly sweet malts left on the palate and in the aftertaste. The end of this beer gets a little tough and chewy to me. It could be because I didn't want to finish it.

D- The way this beer is now...I would not want another one. Maybe if this comes back out this next year I will retry it. As far as right now goes though...this is crap and should not be drank as is. Oh and change the name A-B...it can be confusing for people thinking they are buying a hoppy beer.

Serving type: bottle

12-27-2009 03:28:04 | More by alleykatking
Photo of JDV
JDV

Texas

2/5  rDev -33.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours a nice attractive orange to amber color with a big lasting white head in a weizen glass. Enough to fool you that it would taste great. Smell however, is bland, metal and stale grain. Taste is equally as unappealing with watered down, very thin stale and metallic wheat malt. Well below average for the style, and not particularly enjoyable. Extremely thin flavored, but perhaps a step up from some other mainstream beers...Who knows.

Serving type: bottle

04-06-2008 18:04:14 | More by JDV
Photo of IntriqKen
IntriqKen

California

2.2/5  rDev -26.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Pours a golden, clear orange with a respectable head of white foam that seems to stick around awhile.

Aroma is more a sweet, malty lager than an ale. Don't notice wheat in the aroma at all...just very sweet malt.

Taste follows aroma even more so. Very sweet amber malt with just a bit of wheat drying towards the end and what seems to be an unbalanced hop finish.

Sorry to say, I didn't enjoy this one at all.
Not terrible, but not to be bought again.

Serving type: bottle

05-24-2008 21:13:13 | More by IntriqKen
Photo of pmcadamis
pmcadamis

Illinois

2.2/5  rDev -26.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

A - This one is murky and dank looking, and the color is very much the same as the label. That is to say, this is an amber-peach hue that looks really nice in the glass. The head is initially about two and half fingers in my imperial pint glass, but retention leaves something to be desired.

S - Super malty. Carrot cake, caramel, and vanilla taffy. Where do they get off calling this "Hop Hound" when its very clearly a malt bomb? In a blind smelling test, I would have guessed that this is an Oktoberfest malt-focused lager. This actually smells pretty good, but I can't pick up any hops.

T - Ugh. This is not so good. What smells nicely sweet and malty in the nose comes off as artificial and cloying on the tongue: like cheap Halloween candy. There are unpleasant chemical notes that add to the "fake" feeling, and what is being passed off as hoppiness is actually a sour, acidic, and acrid feeling on the back of the tongue that is more akin to a lemonhead than a hop leaf.

M - Light bodied and uber-carbonated. This is like sweet Jone's Soda pop or something. Super-super sweet and WAY to fizzy.

D - I got five of these from my neighbor. Apparently he didn't care for it either and decided to pawn the rest off on the neighborhood beer geek. Well, this is definitely better than a drain pour, so I will drink them eventually. Could be a halfway decent lawnmower beer, but I wouldn't buy this for myself.

Serving type: bottle

06-10-2009 05:00:52 | More by pmcadamis
Photo of mynie
mynie

Indiana

2.2/5  rDev -26.4%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours orange and hazy with a respectable head.

Smells like pretty much nothing. Very light fruit. No hops, that's for sure.

Tastes almost exactly like it smells. Light caramel, light generic juicy fruit, and, really, there are hops there. But I only know the hops are there because their absence isn't conspicuous. The hop profile here, whatever it may consist of, is like the paintings inside a motel room--it's *there*, yeah, but good luck describing it even a second after you saw it.

Well, I opened up two of these so as to fill up an imperial pint. That might have been the worst decision I've made all day. Not that this is especially awful, but, man, there is so much else in my fridge right now.

Serving type: bottle

05-20-2010 05:55:40 | More by mynie
Photo of mikesgroove
mikesgroove

South Carolina

2.23/5  rDev -25.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

from notes, this one was brought up to the cabin by my father in law in a mixed 12 pack of michelob brews. served cold and me and my brother in law kicked these back on the deck on night.

the pour was not what i was expecting as this dark amber liquid comes forward quite nicely and really was clear and concise with a nice overall carbonation and head level. aroma is a disgrace though as wet hay mixed with rotten citrus and musky grain. the flavor was about the same with a dark grain note and musky and wet hay that had been sitting around and mixed with a ton of grass.

overall a mess of a beer that i am not sure what style it falls into, but it was not one that i really appreicated overall.

Serving type: bottle

01-11-2011 01:05:16 | More by mikesgroove
Photo of APNumber3
APNumber3

Florida

2.28/5  rDev -23.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

12 oz. bottle was a gift from a neighbor.

Appearance: Agressively poured into pint glass. Beer is pale orange is color with a 1/2 inch off white head that dissipated rapidly.

Aroma: Faint hints of orange, couldn't pick up much else.

Taste: Light malty sweetness up front, then some slight lemony bitterness that fades quickly. At the end I detect some sweet marmalade.

Mouthfeel: Very thin, light carbonation.

Overall: I would definitely take one of these over a Bud or Coors light. However, it isn't something I would buy.

Serving type: bottle

01-31-2009 00:43:27 | More by APNumber3
Photo of JMBSH
JMBSH

Colorado

2.28/5  rDev -23.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

A - Pours about four fingers of head with a hard pour. Head shrinks to a decent coating but leaves no lacing on sides of glass. Lazy light orange in color. A fair amount of carbonation can be seen at first. When I reached the half way point, there was some but very little on the glass and only on the side opposite of where I was drinking from.

S - Very faint citrus scent. Almost unnoticable.

T - Very mild. "Hop Hound".... No really noticable hop bitterness. I can taste so spice that was added but no hoppiness.

M - I'm surpriced by the beer tasting almost flat even though I can see the carbonation in the glass. No aftertaste since the flavor leaves the mouth after swallowing the beer.

D - For a lot of people who drink macro beers this style will do them nicely. Smooth and light. Nothing that will shock they taste buds. For someone looking for hops, they will do go looking elsewhere.

Serving type: bottle

02-22-2009 00:16:57 | More by JMBSH
Photo of yemenmocha
yemenmocha

Arizona

2.3/5  rDev -23.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Hazy orange with some brown hues and off-white head. Nose is very, very weak/light with a trace of sweet malts, caramel, perhaps a touch of biscuits.

Palate offers a light bodied ale that is caramelly sweet, but almost as if it has been artificially sweetened (not sickly sweet though, just basically a light amber with sugar added). Hops make an attempt to balance but are beaten out by the sweetness.

Is this a pale ale or a wheat beer, or both? Make up your mind A-B.

For a pseudo-craft it isn't horrible, but in the larger scheme of things where craft beer is available, this one fails miserably.

Serving type: bottle

04-19-2009 22:26:55 | More by yemenmocha
Photo of bort11
bort11

Missouri

2.33/5  rDev -22.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

12 oz bottle poured into a pint glass. Tall light tan head that quickly recedes and leaves no lacing. Color is a slightly hazy orange/amber.

Smell is mostly a caramel malt with a hint or burnt oranges. Taste is pretty much the same. Pretty tannic.

Mouthfeel is light and almost watery. This gets a big "meh" from me.

Serving type: bottle

05-16-2008 03:45:29 | More by bort11
Photo of FuzzyGuy84
FuzzyGuy84

Virginia

2.35/5  rDev -21.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

12 oz bottle poured into a pint glass.

A - Caramel color, opaque. Minimal carbonation throughout but I did get a big, bluffy head. Medium lacing.

S - Very raw sugary smell, almost like cookie batter. A bit of grain and caramel as well.

T - Thin and watery. A little bit of orange peel up front, and a clean finish with a nice punch of hop bitterness. What flavors come through are enjoyable but it's such a challenge to detect anything.

Mf/D - Light bodied with an easy finish. Very drinkable, but in the same way water is very drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

03-08-2009 18:40:30 | More by FuzzyGuy84
Photo of schoolboy
schoolboy

Ohio

2.4/5  rDev -19.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Michelob Dukel Wiesse is good beer, so when they had a buy four six packs get $15 deal, I was in (the 6's are only 6.49). Then I saw this beer. I hadn't tried it, but I never had ANY good beer from Mich until the Dunkel Weise. Fortunately, good judgment prevailed and I only got one 6 of this.

I will never buy this beer again and do not recommend it.

I guess it tastes right, and it isn't offensive, it just doesn't impress in any way. There are so many better beers out there to drink.

It definitely isn't worth the money (but I got charged the same price for this even though it was supposed to be more. Operator error at the store.

Serving type: bottle

02-07-2009 01:36:18 | More by schoolboy
Photo of AlCaponeJunior
AlCaponeJunior

Texas

2.4/5  rDev -19.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Poured yellowish orangey, mostly cloudy, two finger jet white head that lasted a bit and left a fair amount of lacing.

Not a whole lot in the smell department. Slightly hoppy with obvious wheat and citrus.

Tastes more wheaty than hoppy, don't know where the hop hound came from. Some lemon and a little spice, but overall not too impressive.

Feels watery and bland. Not too impressive.

Drinkability low. It would be ok if only crapro big name beers were available, but not by a whole lot.

Serving type: bottle

07-20-2010 21:16:17 | More by AlCaponeJunior
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

2.42/5  rDev -19.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Appearance: Pours a clearish, orange body with a small, white head.

Smell: Mild aroma of wheat, toasted malt, and spice.

Taste: Wheaty maltiness, light taste of toasted malt. Mild sweetness. A few flecks of lemon peel half-heartedly tossed in. Spicy hops, mildly bitter. Touch of yeast. Metallic hint to the otherwise crisp finish.

Mouthfeel: Medium-thin body. Medium carbonation.

Drinkability: A bland, vapid product slathered in slick marketing and frisbee-loving mascot dogs. Thanks, but no thanks, AB.

Serving type: bottle

02-19-2009 04:52:10 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of philbertk
philbertk

Washington

2.42/5  rDev -19.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Anheuser-Busch, Inc. Sun Dog Amber Wheat--American Amber Wheat Ale--2008 12 oz. Bottle. 5.30% ABV. 12 IBU's.? (3.75 / 5.0) Wheat Ale--Amber. Fizzy thin white head. Mild lace. Clear thin bright pale amber color. Mild wheat hop front. Mild sweet fruit thin caramel wheat fizzy mild orange citrus body. Smooth refreshing mild hop spice citrus fruit mild wheat spice end. OK but thin. Sampled 5/5/2008. 6-Pack $6.99.

Anheuser-Busch, Inc.--Michelob Brewing Company--Hop Hound Amber Wheat Ale--Spring Seasonal--2009 12 oz. Bottle. 5.30% ABV. 25 IBU's. (2.5 / 5.0) Dense pillowy lacy off white head. Cloudy bright dark orange color. Dense dark sediment. Mild hop sweet wheat ester front. Aged stank hint. Slightly cloying sweet wheat mild fruity thin textured creamy hint amber ale body. Mild hop easy fruit end. Bland-Old. Unfair rating as Brew has Aged Poorly. Sampled 12/25/2010. 6-Pack purchased for $7.49 @ Safeway, Astoria, Oregon April 2009.

Serving type: bottle

12-25-2010 21:41:28 | More by philbertk
Photo of Throckmorton
Throckmorton

Pennsylvania

2.45/5  rDev -18.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

I picked this up, never having seen it before. was not favorably impressed.

A - kind of a muddy brown

S - has a decent hop nose coming off, but not wheaty or malty.

T - Hops seem to disappear, wheat? malt? HUH? indistinct, muddled, slight bitterness, not in a good way.

M - avg, light

D - one is all I wanted

Serving type: bottle

04-08-2009 15:37:19 | More by Throckmorton
Photo of Portertime
Portertime

Florida

2.48/5  rDev -17.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

A new brew from Anheuser-Busch. Had this well chilled in my Samuel Smith pub glass. Poured a cloudy honey color with a pathetic head and lots of mini bubbles rising from the bottom. Smell was barely there with a touch of hops. Taste was all right, a little citrus hops, some caramel malt. What turned me off was the stinging on the tongue, too much for a sipping beer.

Serving type: bottle

04-29-2008 20:11:12 | More by Portertime
Photo of MTNboy
MTNboy

Germany

2.53/5  rDev -15.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

It has an orange amber body. There is a nice head but it dissipates quickly. The lace is middle of the road for the most part.It has a very plain malty smell. Not what you expect for a wheat beer.The taste is just like the smell. It has very adjunct flavor not like a wheat beer at all. Where are the hops it is nowhere near as hoppy as the name would have you believe. The mouthfeel is slick and carbonated.This not a beer I would go out of my way to drink again.

Serving type: bottle

03-30-2009 07:28:39 | More by MTNboy
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Michelob Hop Hound Amber Wheat from Anheuser-Busch
70 out of 100 based on 241 ratings.