Budweiser Select 55 - Anheuser-Busch
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 461 | Reviews: 129 | Display Reviews Only:
1.05/5 rDev -34.4%
A relative was "nice" enough to leave a bottle of this in the fridge for me. Why not? Many reasons, I find out. First, it pours without almost no color and can't hold a head or produce lacing with the hardest of pours. Smells like a tiny bit of grain and tastes the same. No off flavors, but that's not enough to keep it from getting the "awful" mark. Feel is quite light and overly carbonated. Drinks quickly, but there's absolutely no reason to take a second sip.
10-08-2010 01:21:55 | More by Thorpe429
1.78/5 rDev +11.3%
Select 55 hits the glass with a fizzy, over-carbonated pour with lots of aggression and anger. Straw in color, the beer is crystal clear. The carbonation fuels a light lace of foam and there's actually a bit of lacing. The appearance is on par for most German Helles.
Faint aroma of grain.... and that's about it to the nose. A quick mention of sulfurs, apple, and corn could make the notes on aroma a bit more thorough but really, it's a stretch.
More grain in the flavor, accompanied by a harsh minerally taste that kills any of the lighter malt compounds. A light corn flavored sweetness emerges in the finish and aftertaste. Metallic and grainy.
The thin mouthfeel and over carbonation gives a harsh carbonic bite that nearly stings the tongue. The beer feels (and tastes) a lot like Alka-Seltzer.
I was hoping to find a clean beer that was void of both meaningful flavor and flaws. Looks like I was right about the meaningful flavor omition....
01-26-2010 02:52:06 | More by BEERchitect
2.95/5 rDev +84.4%
another entry from the lost notebook!
i saw this one in the in laws fridge and had forgotten to bring anything with me that day so i just went with it. poured it into a pint glass and a light golden amber comes through right away. again nothing really crazy here an exactly what i had expected. short lived head and lively carbonation were common place. aroma is light grain, muted and touched by very light hop notes that seem to provide something, but again so light it is really hard to detect. crisp, clean, super light and had virtually no aftertaste. not a terrible beer just a non existent one. too light and overly carbonated but i have had much worse.
02-23-2011 02:32:54 | More by mikesgroove
1.58/5 rDev -1.3%
Born on: Jan 25, 2010.
Appearance: Pours out a clear, pale gold body with a fizzy white head that gasses out in mere seconds.
Smell: "Ugh, it smells awful." --TheLibrarianGirl. Come on, TLG, no spoilers. Sourish, stale-scented grains in the nose that gets mustier as it warms. Very unappealing.
Taste: Grainy, slightly metallic taste with very, very little sweetness. No real hop character or bitterness. Weak, watery finish. Unpleasant and unenjoyable like off-tasting seltzer water. There are no real redeeming factors here.
Mouthfeel: Thin-bodied with a truly watery mouthfeel. Fizzy carbonation.
Drinkability: Yeesh. The stuff they have the nerve to slap the word "premium" onto... Steer clear of this one, friends. Bud 55 is an awful beverage for those that feel Bud Light is simply too rich and filling.
03-29-2010 19:25:39 | More by ChainGangGuy
1.35/5 rDev -15.6%
Had to try it just to see what the hype was all about. I'm still impressed that this hasn't been retired by the brewery. It's one thing to have a light beer, and it's another thing to have a Light Light Beer. Honestly, I'm struggling to see the purpose to this. If Americans are getting too fat to enjoy a good beer from time to time then they shouldn't be having beer at all. This beer is a waster of money, time, ingredients, and everything else that is put into making this. I'd rather see this removed from the shelves and Crystal Pepsi put in it's place.
03-20-2011 16:18:00 | More by Knapp85
1.2/5 rDev -25%
I don't know what to say aside from I'm glad it was free. To say it looks like a light lager would be inaccurate. It was lighter and more clear than any other beer I've seen. I can't say I smelled anything. Is that possible? As for the flavor, it honestly tastes like a 50-50 mix of Bud Light and water. Guess what? The mouthfeel was watery and thin. Drinkability is where this beer takes off. It's low calorie, has no awful bitterness that most adjunct lagers have, and it's low ABV makes it extremely sessionable. I imagine you'd have to drink a case to get a buzz which would counteract the low calorie effect. I guess you win some and you lose some.
01-08-2010 23:43:53 | More by zeff80
2.15/5 rDev +34.4%
One 'souvenir' of a somewhat ill-advised scorched-earth invasion of small-town Washington State...
This beer pours a clear, surprisingly medium golden colour, with one finger of rapidly dissipating soapy white head, which leaves nary a speck of lace around the glass as evidence of its existence. It smells of very diluted white grain, and nothing else. The taste is a soul-deadening experience - Casper the Ghost in beer form. No skunk, no off-flavours, just a very tame graininess, and then, zilch. Nothing offensive, nothing good. Just nothing. Like slightly malted water. The carbonation is lower than average, the body like water exposed to a potato for a hour or so, and it finishes with a mild twinge of cheap lager, to complement that Dasani water quality.
I'm actually quite surprised - the only way that this is truly offensive is in its concept - as for its execution, it is just a very, very mild lager - no skunk factor whatsoever. Just like your go-to grocery store bottled water. However, that defence falls short - this is supposed to be BEER!
07-21-2010 02:51:03 | More by biboergosum
2.1/5 rDev +31.3%
Poured from a 12oz bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.
A: The beer is a pale gold color, with a short white head that fades very quickly and leaves a thin lace on the glass.
S: The aroma is of light malts, adjuncts, grain and a very faint touch of hops.
T: The taste starts out bready from flavors of grain and adjuncts. Then some light malt sweetness quickly follows. The hops presence is extremely faint and there’s a little balance. The after-taste is slightly sweet.
M: Crisp and a little smooth, very light body, medium carbonation, finish is clean.
O: Not very flavorful, goes down quite easily and is not filling at all since there isn’t very much to this beer, extremely mild kick, it’s a watered-down version of a beer that didn’t have much to it to begin with.
04-24-2012 01:29:06 | More by TheManiacalOne
1.95/5 rDev +21.9%
Been watching my caloric intake so I saw this the other day and figured let's try it just to see how bad it is and also to see it filled a void that I had for my beer cravings. This is literally watered down Bud Select. Pours a fizzy yellow golden color with a highly carbonated quickly fleeting head, leaves sparse speckled lacing on the sides of my glass. Aroma has cooked vegetable, corn, generic beer nose, no actual hop component with a bit of metallic character going on. The first sip has a watery non discrete grainy quality with some more of the cooked corn rough husk quality, no herbal no hops just generic mass produced beer flavor. Ferments out to only 2.4% alcohol this is a glorified non alcoholic beer. Labeled as premium light beer, I'm just surprised that it's only 55 calories the only other drink other than water that I've had on a regular basis has been Gatorade G2 at 45 calories. Mouthfeel is light bodied with high carbonation pretty rough just because of the graininess light flavors and high carbonation.
01-29-2012 15:36:41 | More by WVbeergeek
1.9/5 rDev +18.8%
Pours golden with a white head that becomes a white patch - Lacing sticks. Decent appearance for the style.
The smell is of mild grain - maybe...not much of anything in aroma, though. Clean, but vacant.
The taste is cardboard-ish with tonic water - a bit of sweetness. Extremely bland, even for a very light "beer".
The feel is all fizz.
This is not good, even for a macro light lager. Why bother... might as well drink tonic water...in fact, I probably would prefer to, would be less cardboardy.
05-11-2010 19:14:52 | More by jwc215
1.02/5 rDev -36.3%
12 oz. bottle, I can't believe I actually paid for this,
A: Pours yellow with a really fizzy white head, poor retention.
S: Carbonic acid and very light hints of cereal grains.
T: Seltzer water, Alka-Seltzer - this is not a flavour I like. Carbonic acid, that's it. Not even a smidge of malt.
M: Mouthfeel of club soda, way overcarbonated since the body is so light it fluffs up in your mouth and is annoying.
D: After a couple of drinks I'm bored. Really what's the point anymore. Drainpour. This beer is so light it makes Michelob Ultra look like Yeti.
03-12-2010 23:04:03 | More by Halcyondays
2.3/5 rDev +43.8%
I CAN see giving A-BInBev another shot today since with the blowing snow, I CANnot leave the house at this point. Feel free to come along on the CANQuest.
The two fingers' worth of rocky, bone-white head were reminiscent of the blowing, drifting snow out my back window. The head held up so poorly that I wished that the snow could take its cue from the beer. CAN nothing cheer me up today? The color was a pretty deep-gold with NE-quality clarity, like a ray of sunshine on this snow-white afternoon. That was nice. Nose had a faint lager-sweetness, but only faint. Mouthfeel was thin and watery with only a light sweet taste on the tongue. Finish was equally watery and did not leave me with much of any taste, pleasant or not. It was really a bland beer, overall, and while not worthy of outright avoidance, I would not seek it out unless you are on a CANQuest.
02-10-2010 18:46:43 | More by woodychandler
1.45/5 rDev -9.4%
My buddy offered me a sip of this the other night, I think that was all I will need to review this one...
A - Pours pale straw yellow with a fizzy white half finger tall white head leaving no lacing down the glass.
S - Kinda stale. Very faint hops and lightly toasted malt. How do they get people to drink this stuff? It is terrible.
T - I guess people like drinking stuff that tastes this bad. VERY faint hops and light malt. All you can really taste is how watery it is, and that is not a good thing.
M - Light body and flavor with moderate carbonation. This feels like I am drinking flavored water. Terrible.
D - Not good. How do you make a terrible beer even worse? You make Budweiser Select 55.
03-03-2011 17:09:25 | More by orangesol
1.61/5 rDev +0.6%
A: Pours a crystal clear pale golden yellow in color with significant amounts of active carbonation streaming quickly from the bottom of the glass and some hints of straw yellow highlights. The beer has a half finger tall fizzy white head that quickly reduces to a medium to large patch of very thin film and a thin ring at the edges of the glass. Minimal amounts of lacing are observed.
S: Very light aromas of grainy malts with a touch of rice adjuncts.
T: Not much flavor to this beer - light flavors of grainy malts with a hint of rice adjuncts. No perceptible hops and minimal amounts of bitterness.
M: Light bodied with significant amounts of carbonation. Almost prickly carbonation but still very thin/watery.
O: Slightly skunky but not that shocking since it is packaged in a clear glass bottle. The beer was not offensive but that is because there was not much too it to offend - very little flavor or smell to this beer. I probably would not grab another of these but I can see why some people could go for this when they are looking for low alcohol and low calorie options.
10-27-2013 01:38:48 | More by dbrauneis
United Kingdom (Wales)
1.2/5 rDev -25%
2.4% really? awesome!!!
Poured into pint glass.
Pours a light layer of white head. Fades away quick. Color is a clear golden yellow.
Aroma: Grains. That is all. This smells more like water than it does beer.
Taste: See aroma. Really. This beer has no beer taste to it. Grains at a very minimal.
Mouthfeel: Crisp and crisp. High carbonation. Light bodied. Ends bland and dry.
Overally, is this a beer or some kind of water? I guess it was easy to drink, but that was because it was basically water. Would I drink it again? No.
03-16-2011 04:42:36 | More by mothman
1.53/5 rDev -4.4%
Pours a clean pale yellow color, some carbonation, with a fizzy little white head, some sticky lacing left behind. The nose is grainy/ricy, slight spice. The taste is watery at best, not much going on here. Light Body. Not Drinkable, a waste of money on this one.
02-28-2011 20:53:26 | More by Wasatch
1.1/5 rDev -31.3%
Went all the way to Arizona to buy this swill.
The beer pours a light gold color with minimal head retention and no lacing. The "beer" really doesn't look that bad. On the nose, oh my God, this is flat out horrible. I get corn, rotten veggies, seltzer water and maybe some sulphur. This may well be the worst smelling beer I've ever come across. Flavors replicate the nose, except there's a hint of light american light lager. It's essentially seltzer water, but with a hint of macro swill beer flavor added in. This beer defines the expression watery, with no hint of alcohol in the flavor profile.
Calling this swill beer is a stretch, to say the least. There's sort of a "beerish" flavor to the beer, assuming your definition of beer is macro swill. Was initially planning on giving this beer a 1.5 for taste, but as I drank more and more of it (before dumping most of it down the drain), I realized that was entirely too generous. One of the worst beers ever made.... congratulations AB, you've managed to do it again.
.... and in my humble opinion, trying to cut back on calories and/or losing weight is no excuse for making or drinking a beverage this flavorless.
12-02-2009 04:58:11 | More by John_M
Budweiser Select 55 from Anheuser-Busch
42 out of 100 based on 461 ratings.