1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Budweiser - Anheuser-Busch

Not Rated.

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

4,570 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 4,570
Reviews: 1,445
rAvg: 2.33
pDev: 33.05%
Wants: 22
Gots: 336 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Anheuser-Busch visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Brewed using a blend of imported and classic American aroma hops, and a blend of barley malts and rice. Budweiser is brewed with time-honored methods including “kraeusening” for natural carbonation and Beechwood aging, which results in unparalleled balance and character.

(Beer added by: kbub6f on 11-21-2000)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 4,570 | Reviews: 1,445 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by IronDjinn:
Photo of IronDjinn

Alberta (Canada)

2.1/5  rDev -9.9%

I've had enough Budweisers in my life, mostly offered to me, that there was a reason I tended to steer clear of them, it just wasn't what I was looking for in my beer drinking. Never occurred to me to review it until a recent thread got a little out of hand getting the consistency of the stuff confused with the quality of the stuff. Apropos to that, I thought I'd finally come to my own official opinion and review the stuff.

Went all out for this one, skipped over the 24 pack with free t-shirt, and grabbed a 950ml tallboy can instead. No freshness date to be found on the can, but there is some sort of cryptic stamp on the bottom of it. Pours out of the can a pale uninspiring clear yellow, but with an impressive 2-finger snow white head. It was a nice show while it lasted, as retention leaves a great deal to be desired.

Faint aroma, not much to pick up except some thin malt and a hint of sour grains. After a while that mild sourness is all I can pick up, not that it is very overpowering, but there really isn't anything else on the radar.

Flavour? What flavour? This stuff is bland, honestly, honestly bland, almost as if flour were used as an adjunct instead of rice. It's not a bad flavour per se (until it warms up a bit), but the fault of this lager is the near complete and utter lack of flavour. As a regular Budweiser drinker, and there are many many of you out there, you're obviously not drinking this alcoholic beverage for the sake of the taste--perhaps the lack of taste--, so are the vast hordes of Bud drinkers out there just drinking Bud to get drunk? A little tipsy watching the game? A faint buzz after work? All the hype must surround the consistency of how bland and unthreatening this beer is, a beer for people who don't like the taste of beer. Or is that Bud Light?

As the realm of most macro produced lagers lies within the fizzy watery texture, I have to admit this Bud I'm sampling has a decent mouthfeel for the style, all things considered. Hell, I've tried pale ales and ambers more watery than this stuff. Bud, you get a straight C for average for mouthfeel, which is better than most of your cousins can do. No caustic burn across the palate and down the throat with poorly mismanaged adjuncts, you keep your additives and preservatives in line, and I will salute that at least.

Overall I can't see myself ever buying another Budweiser again, I paid my ticket for the ride, took the trip, and walked away with no thrills, and yet no spills. Mediocre to the extreme, the wishy-washy middle road. The Charlie Brown of beers in fact, always talks a good game but continually fails to kick that football in the end. I have no doubt in my mind that they spend unfathomable amounts of money to produce this beer, to use quality ingredients, to maintain state-of-the-art sanitized production facilities. And yet in the end they waste all of that producing this wallflower of a beer, which requires countless amounts of clever advertising dollars to market. After all, without the help of a well-paid PR department, you wouldn't approach this easily overlooked kid at the high school dance either. It's all about hype, not substance.

10-03-2005 19:31:06 | More by IronDjinn
More User Reviews:
Photo of RyanLaCount03


3.61/5  rDev +54.9%

I thought that Budweiser was actually a decent beer when I tried it. The taste of the beer good. The taste of hops was present throughout. The motuhfeel of this was actually pretty good as well; it seemed pretty smooth to me. Overall, this historic beer is worth trying and isn't a bad beer to have once in awhile.

02-22-2013 01:26:43 | More by RyanLaCount03
Photo of davemarc87


2.5/5  rDev +7.3%

03-25-2014 03:49:20 | More by davemarc87
Photo of RoyalT


2.68/5  rDev +15%

Appearance – Light yellow in the body with nice-looking carbonation. I was able to work a little head out of the can with some good arm action on the pour.

Smell – Classic American graininess. I thought for a second that I could smell some hops, but I was wrong.

Taste – More grain in the flavor with a touch of gummi-bear sweetness at the finish.

Mouthfeel – The carbonation is just right and it went down pretty smooth for me. No bad surprises here, which is important when striving for mediocrity.

Drinkability – Ice cold, can-fermented, and skunk free make this beer a winner.

Comments – The King is a good standard for American piss beers. It’s smooth, well carbonated, and refreshing. Of course, it’s mostly water with little to no body, but it goes good with pretzels, pizza, or a four pound salt lick.

08-16-2003 23:36:39 | More by RoyalT
Photo of cam477

Newfoundland (Canada)

2/5  rDev -14.2%

08-26-2013 01:25:59 | More by cam477
Photo of DaPeculierDane


2.63/5  rDev +12.9%

Budweiser is running all sorts of specials for the World Cup, so I find myself drinking it during an Ecuador in order to get some free calamari and garlic bread at an Italian Restaurant. Might as well review.

A/N/T: 5% ABV carbonated water. Completely nonoffensive. Completely lacking in anything.

MF: Crisp, wet, light bodied.

D: Decent but not as high as PBR or High Life. I'll stick with them in the future when free squid isn't a factor.

06-09-2006 19:59:57 | More by DaPeculierDane
Photo of beerhunter13

Ontario (Canada)

1.5/5  rDev -35.6%

09-30-2012 12:26:47 | More by beerhunter13
Photo of Turbo


1.5/5  rDev -35.6%

10-13-2013 23:58:25 | More by Turbo
Photo of tectactoe


1.8/5  rDev -22.7%

Buuuhhh.... What to say about Budweiser that hasn't been said already? Had on tap, bottle, can - take your pick. The beer is a pale straw color, slightly golden with remarkable clarity (hey, at least it has something going for it). Fizzy white head disappears so quickly that you can't even really call it a head. The aroma is almost non-existent - metallic hints, corns, grains, sulfur, maybe some leafiness but nothing that really resembles a hop. Taste is basically the same - corns, pale malts, and some graininess. No really hop flavor or even bitterness for that matter. Astringency and over-carbonation are king of the hill here. Thin, thin body with a super-dry, super crispy finish. Aftertaste has a thin, grain flavor but not much else.

Budweiser is slightly better than Bud Light. But really, what is that saying? I remember after years of drinking Bud Light, I finally had a Budweiser and thought it had so much flavor. Heh, how the times have changed.

01-25-2013 13:28:14 | More by tectactoe
Photo of Hoppin_mad


1/5  rDev -57.1%

05-03-2014 19:04:23 | More by Hoppin_mad
Photo of eduque14


1.6/5  rDev -31.3%

This beer is not one to brag about by any means. It is way over carbonated and the taste is something that I personally can hardly bare at times. I always finish my beer but, with this beer I find it a challenge to do so. I even at times suffer from headaches resulting from this brew. However, it is a cheap beer and people find it somewhat "American" to drink it. But I, as a beer drinker, prefer a beer with much more character. You get what you pay for. But I will not pay for a Bud.

01-04-2012 01:02:05 | More by eduque14
Photo of Mac19872


2/5  rDev -14.2%

11-17-2011 02:58:55 | More by Mac19872
Photo of tohe9384

2.25/5  rDev -3.4%

09-11-2012 23:51:39 | More by tohe9384
Photo of tbryan5


2.25/5  rDev -3.4%

01-11-2013 01:34:22 | More by tbryan5
Photo of ajkiser12


1.25/5  rDev -46.4%

11-27-2012 19:39:55 | More by ajkiser12
Photo of SkiBum22

New York

1/5  rDev -57.1%

10-23-2013 00:27:13 | More by SkiBum22
Photo of joemetric


2.5/5  rDev +7.3%

07-10-2014 18:36:26 | More by joemetric
Photo of BubalooBrewMaster


1/5  rDev -57.1%

12-26-2013 16:40:49 | More by BubalooBrewMaster
Photo of Kcastr01


1.75/5  rDev -24.9%

06-29-2014 04:08:47 | More by Kcastr01
Photo of Dmann


2.88/5  rDev +23.6%

I was recently at a wedding reception and I had Bud for the first time in about 3 years. Although the pour was pretty weak and the smell was of your typifal grain and rice, the taste was pretty smoothe if your goal is just toi get fucked up! It had a decent sweet malfy flavor with almost no hint of hops in the taste. If you are looking for a beer to go down smoothly then this is to one!

09-04-2003 09:04:21 | More by Dmann
Photo of SuomiHobbit


1/5  rDev -57.1%

07-28-2013 15:02:59 | More by SuomiHobbit
Photo of MikeC144

Rhode Island

1.5/5  rDev -35.6%

04-09-2014 15:15:57 | More by MikeC144
Photo of markallmon


4.25/5  rDev +82.4%

03-29-2013 20:45:40 | More by markallmon
Photo of newcastleme


3/5  rDev +28.8%

I feel that this beer is worthy of respect but it is repellingly boring. When most individuals think of beer they think of Bud. This is the original and any beer drinker should have a sip of Budweiser. You won't be that impressed but you'll be happy to know that your beer tasting can only get better.

07-22-2010 18:53:37 | More by newcastleme
Photo of jonny1138


1.5/5  rDev -35.6%

06-21-2014 23:52:27 | More by jonny1138
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Budweiser from Anheuser-Busch
56 out of 100 based on 4,570 ratings.