Budweiser - Anheuser-Busch

Not Rated.
BudweiserBudweiser

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
57
awful

5,459 Ratings
THE BROS
80
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 5,459
Reviews: 1,709
rAvg: 2.35
pDev: 33.62%
Wants: 54
Gots: 993 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Anheuser-Busch visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: kbub6f on 11-21-2000

Brewed using a blend of imported and classic American aroma hops, and a blend of barley malts and rice. Budweiser is brewed with time-honored methods including “kraeusening” for natural carbonation and Beechwood aging, which results in unparalleled balance and character.
View: Beers (87) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Budweiser Alström Bros
Ratings: 5,459 | Reviews: 1,709
Photo of BigD1972
3.65/5  rDev +55.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Light yellow/amber in color

Nothing special about the smell.

It is very drinkable not bad tasting (Better than Coors) typical American larger

Goes down smooth, no aftertaste. I have had many on a nice warm day and while I dont think it is the "King of Beers" it is one of my favorite Macro Brews

Photo of bigdeuce
3.09/5  rDev +31.5%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 3.25

Hey, it's budweiser, what can you expect. They lie on every add, well, coors lies a little more. Bud is actual drinkable if you haven't had any micros beforehand. Has a little taste, no smell, no hops, not much life. But if you're gonna drink an american macro, bud should probably be the choice.

Photo of mcowgill
2.73/5  rDev +16.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours an almost crystal clear pale yellow. Nothing distinctive at all. The Narragansett I just had was more appealing. Not much at all in the smell department. I do enjoy the taste of a Budweiser now and again though, especially in the summer or at a baseball game or watching football. This is the easy drinking beer for the masses and although I don't reach for it often, I never turn it down either.

Photo of GuinnessHero
3.25/5  rDev +38.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Let's keep this simple. This is a beer that is world renowned, and will continue to be that way as long as marketing has it's way.

Appearance - Yellow, very typical color with a small head that dissipates through the beer.

Smell - Slightly metallic, with a strong smell of rice and hops.

Taste - Full flavored unlike it's sister beer Bud Light. Very clean finish with a touch of hops and carbonation. Very tolerable.

Mouthfeel - Clean as it hits the pallet and very refereshing.

Drinkability - The best part of this beer. Very refreshing and decent taste makes it a decent beer in my book. Great for a hot afternoon in the south like I am.

Overall, this is not as offensive as everyone says it is. Ice cold, it can be a great beer, and compared to some of the things coming from Asia and other rice-based beers, this is a great beer for using rice. Give it a chance, and it will actually be a party favorite.

Keep an open mind.

Photo of John_M
1.7/5  rDev -27.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

I have to say I have mixed feelings about the "king of beers." Once upon a time I found this beer to be perfectly acceptable (if nothing to write home about), but then 'back in the day,' my expectations weren't very high either. These days I have a fondness for double IPA's and Belgiums. Tastewise, Bud might as well be on the dark side of the moon in comparison to Pelican IPA, Blue Dot, Chimay and La Chouffe. In fairness one should compare like with like, but even here bud falls flat (pun intended). Ostensibly, Bud is modeled after some of the great pilsners from Czechoslavakia and Germany. However, it has nothing like the flavor, smoothness, richness and drinkability of a great German/Czech pilsner. On the contrary, the beer goes flat very quickly, has minimal flavor, with almost no noticeable finish.

My question is this; why does this beer have to be soooo uninteresting and flavorless? I know they're marketing to the masses, and I've read plenty of beer reviews noting that the chief aim is to just get drunk (see reviews for Natural Ice light), but still... would a litte extra flavor be too much to ask?

I'll finish with with what I think is a funny story. I was in Ireland (Dingle) a few years back, kicking back with a pint of Harp. A young lady sitting across from me had gotten a bottle of bud, which she proceeded to pour into a pint glass filled with ice. I smiled and told her that back in the states, the brewers at AB would be horrified that she was diluting the "king of beers" that way. She laughed and said well, it was such a light beer after all anyways, how could diluting it with ice hurt it? I laughed and told her I agreed, but then pointed out that back in the states AB markets the beer as a rich, full bodied, satisfying lager/pilsner. When I said that she just laughed; I could tell she didn't believe me. The really funny thing is that bud has more calories then guinness, and so if she was watching her weight she'd have been a lot better off with a glass of stout.

Bottom line. This beer is not very good and there's no excuse for how boring and flavorless it is. This is just another example of the old addage that if you try to brew a beer that will offend no one, ultmatley you'll make a beer that appeals to no one.

Photo of dubman003
1.61/5  rDev -31.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

It's the stink that does it for me...I think it's horrible. There is something to be said about a beer when its aroma has a natural 'stink' to it; I still can't place it specifically, but the stink carries into the taste. Don't get me wrong, I can drink it if it's offered, but there is something very sour about Budweiser.

Realistically, people drink 'bud' because they think they are the all-American for it, which is a horrible reason to drink budweiser. The image of the hardened American backwood dweller is not something to be proud of...and associating Budweiser with yourself? Shows you haven't had that much to drink.

Photo of jasonjlewis
3.09/5  rDev +31.5%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This beer is supposed to be a full flavored beer. It tastes really watered down. I compared it to an MGD in a bar, and liked the MGD a lot better. Bud has no taste to it IMO. I think it's more for people who don't like a lot of beer taste in their beer. It has a nice flavor and is really smooth and has a nice crispness. I could knock these back all night with no problem and not care, but I prefer other beers over this one.

Photo of rabsten
2.3/5  rDev -2.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

I end up with Bud on a fairly regular basis, unfortunately. A couple of my friends won't drink anything else, and if I show up at their place, I bring a six. Add to that the fact that there's not much else available in my backwoods region, and, well.

Pours yellow with a fizzy head that evaporates like a soft drink's. lots of carbonation.

Smell is corn or rice and corn syrup. No hops to speak of.

Tastes on the sweet side of American Macro-lager. It goes pretty well with a turkey sandwich and doritos. That's the highlight.

Mouthfeel = soft drink. Fizzy, with no resonance on the palate.

Drinkability: not to be a smartass, but it depends on how much I've paid for it. I can, and have, drunk this beer all night. However, that's because of its alcohol delivery qualities. It can be a pretty refreshing drink though. Quintessential lawnmowner beer.

Look, we all know this beer and what it represents. However, for all its problems - and they are legion - it's not completely offensive. I'm drinking a little 7oz. pony bottle as I write this, along with the aforementioned turkey sandwich and a cup of coffee (lunchtime). I think the pony+sandwich+coffee makes a good lunch: the flavors all play off each other and there's so little alcohol involved it doesn't interfere with the afternoon's work.

Photo of chrisms86
2.68/5  rDev +14%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3.5

Aside from th prejudices many on this site hold against companies like Anheuser-Busch, Budweiser is not a bad beer. It does not have the complexities of a microbrew, but it doesn't have the price of a microbrew either. I find it almost impossible to review this beer because it is the beer upon which all others are rated. It pours with enough of a head for you to believe it is a beer (unlike other low-price brands), and it is not as filling as a micro so you can pound a few without getting a big gut. The taste is not revolting, but it isn't anything impressive either. The mouhfeel is probably he most disappointing in that you can feel the sharpness of the carbonation.

Not all of us can afford to spend $8 or more for a sixpack all the time. When I can't get my high class stuff, I won't cry over having to buy a halfrack of Bud.

Photo of Applesauce1
2.13/5  rDev -9.4%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Got Bud on-tap at the CI in Athens, OH.
Yellow-piss color off the tap into my nice plastic cup.
Smelled pretty bad, that typical macro smell (skunky)
Taste: kinda sucked, no presence of hops or malt or anything but the cereal flavor
Mouthfeel: kinda fizzy
Drinkability: cheap, can drink a lot of these in a night to get drunk

People need to quit drinking this beer.

Photo of jdmorgan
2.46/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

This beer had a moderate head that didn't last long and the color was light. The aroma was fairly weak and smelled faintly of the malt. The taste wasn't very hoppy and had a thin body to it. The mouthfeel felt about average and had a moderate to high carbonation to it. As far as drinkability goes, I think this beer would be adequate for those who just want to have a reasonably priced macro lager that atleast has a bit more body to it than light lagers.

Photo of Pepeton
2.05/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 3.5

I have no excuse. I tried this one because I couldn't avoid it in a social gathering.

It's appearance is almost non existant.

Smells of almost nothing.

Taste is less of almost nothing.

Mouthfeel is, again, less of almost nothing.

Ah! It's high is in it's drinkability. Easy to gulp.

If it weren't for it's drinkability Bud would be almost a beer.

¡Salud!

Photo of DrJay
2.33/5  rDev -0.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Crystal clear and very light yellow, it looks kind of like watered down apple juice. The fluffy white head dissipated rapidly. Faint malt in the nose, along with a hint of apple and alcohol. Light grainy malt and just a whiff of hop bitterness and sweetness at the end. Just a bit of fruit here as well. Thin body, crisp carbonation and very clean. This isn't as terrible as many believe, just incredibly boring with a thin flavour. I've had some very nice "light" beers from smaller brewers lately with delicate flavours and light bodies that completely outclass this beer.

Photo of maddamish
2.48/5  rDev +5.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I am not here to slam on bud. BUt I will say this.

When I was a bud light drinker, I would switch to this and would think about how strong this beer was.

I walked in the door of my parents house and my father had one of these out. I jump at the chance to drink it again since I haven't tried it since I have been reviewing beers.

Lets just say that it isn't what I remembered. It isn't bad for a lager but there are much better versions of the style out there. This one is watery and the "strong taste" was pretty much gone.

After you have crossed over into the world of good beer, it is kind of hard to go back to the BMC crowd.

Photo of mcarroll10177
3.26/5  rDev +38.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 5

Keep in mind the syle of the beer before laughing at this review.

With that cavat in mind this is prime example of an American macro lager.

Poured from a can into a traditional pint glass.

A- very pale yellow with a white head that disappears quickly. Lots of fizz and lots of carbination.

S- does not have really any nose to it. Hints of hops perhaps. That being said it does not smell bad, like a particular green bottled beer for instance.

T- a good tasting beer for what it is. No complexity at all but that is not what this style beer is about. Crisp up front, clean clean finish.

M- nothing really stands out here, watery but this is not a Russian Imperial Stout, so what should someone expect.

D- the easiest drinker around smooth and very clean. The best example of a macro lager and the only one( in my opinion) worth a review. Nothing complex here, but nothing offensive either.

If going strictly by style for review give it 4.5s this is the best of the big mass produced macro lagers.

Photo of lpayette
2.72/5  rDev +15.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Pours a crystal clear, very pale straw color with a bright white head into my pilsner glass. Excellent retention as well. Tons of bubbles.

Smells of light corn, and hops. Not as bad as some beers in this style as far as smell, but still nothing to be impressed with.

Tastes- Very light... Some corn/rice and a very light hop bitterness. Very one-dimensional as expected, but drinkable as it goes down pretty easy with no awful tastes coming through. Another positive is that it's pretty fresh tasting.

Photo of Rumpole
3.65/5  rDev +55.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

There was a time when I snobbishly cast aspersions upon this beer, but that was ages ago when I was drinking expensive microbrews and imports. With the change of the economy, and more enlightened attitudes towards the middle and working classes amongst our betters in government, I now look upwards, financially at least, at what I formerly scorned down upon. I have also come to admit that what I then denigrated was more the marketing image of Budweiser rather than the brew itself.

The King of Beers, whether in the bottle or the can, comes with arguably the best label in the business. It is iconic in the whole realm of commercial art, let alone that of beer, and over the years it has been tweaked by A-B to keep it looking contemporary without losing its traditional look and with it the connection with all those previous decades; the result is nothing short of spectacular.

Budweiser pours pale and clear gold, so pale and clear that it surprised me at first. It’s nothing to worry about, as it simply reflects A-B’s use of rice as the adjunct grain for the brew. For all its clarity, it still delivers a solid 5% abv, and once that has been proven, and time is spent with the beer, the color takes on a bright cheeriness.

The scent is very light and faint, pretty much just a beer smell but with a light herbal and floral quality floating over it. It has a light body and light maltiness too, with a wisp of hop to balance the upper register. For most of the tasting, it’s just that light flavor, but there can be an ethereal sweet fruitiness that flickers in and then back out almost as quickly, almost before you can grasp it. It’s like a cross between green grapes, green apples, and Wrigley’s Juicy Fruit, which I admit doesn’t sound very appetizing, but it sure does work in this beer, and with practice you can get so you can look for and anticipate it. It wraps up dry, neat and tidy. Throughout, the texture is just plain wonderful; it has a very consistent softness, like they used top-flight spring water, and the carbonation is energetic but fine, as if they specified only very small bubbles, but a lot of them. The result is lively but never harsh, and it becomes very easy to keep going for more. Endlessly potable; the Rumpole palate has gone through many cases without wearying of it.

King indeed! Maybe it isn't the best beer available, but it may very well be the easiest beer to drink, and its popularity no longer mystifies me. It is underrated on this site, I think, but mostly because of the tarnished reputation of the mega-brewer that makes it, and its tendency towards crass, lowest common denominator marketing. That’s easy to overlook though, with the beer this enjoyable and the label this classy. Budweiser’s biggest drawback is it’s hefty price; outside of special sales, a 30-pack costs $21 in glamorous Worcester, MA. A-B engages in a regular price increase for its brews, and as a result it may eventually be in danger of pricing its bread and butter brand out of its intended market.

Photo of CNeilP09
3.8/5  rDev +61.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 5

I can drink this beer for days. Budweiser is what it is: a mass-produced lager fit for the working man. It is certainly light, lacking any of the characteristics most beer connoiseurs ask for in a beer. But Budweiser is the everyday man's beer. It's made of rice, and the finest hops anyone can grow in their backyard, but it's still good. I've spent many a sweaty day, working in my yard, or on my truck, just waiting for the reward i would get from Budweiser. Call the beer simple, or call me simple, i love this beer. It's ultra light straw color, utterly scentless nose, and rustic grainy flavor do nothing for me but quench the thirst in my belly. I'm certainly not writing this to advertise for them, they do enough of that on their own. Simply put, it's the best worst beer out there. And to get a taste of America, crack open a cold Bud.

Photo of thebarnesbomb
2.96/5  rDev +26%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Well well, the king of beers? An intruiging statement, I had to give it a try... So I didn't bother pouring it, sorry. It was actually a little darker than my expectancy, so extra points for that. The smell, nothing special, hard to pick out anything from it. Mostly a faint hoppiness. The taste is basically the same. Nothing too spectacular going on, but hey what do you expect? It is a good crisp beer, refreshing for sure, not too heavy, giving a good drinkability to it. For what it is attempting, a cheap and crisp beer that's refreshing every time, it passes with flying colors.

Photo of danielharper
2.52/5  rDev +7.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

Purchased from the gas station near by apartment, Huntsville, AL.

Freshness date of 25 JAN 06. 16oz can.

A: Pours into my favorite pint glass with a light yellow, completely transparent, body and a very thick white foamy head. The head makes it look a bit like an ice cream float, but no ice cream was ever the color of Budweiser. Head dissipates over time, but leaves very little lacing.

S: Not a lot here. Vaguely corny aroma, slightly unpleasant due to a grassy overtone. Not as sweet as Bud Light. Not terrible, but not good.

T: Strong grainy flavor, notes of corn and rice. No hops present. Sweet, slightly astringent aftertaste. More flavor than other macros, but grating over time.

M: Nice carbonation, thin body, leads to a decent mouthfeel. Pleasant to swish around the palate, although the astringency increases as I do so.

D: More unpleasant than the light variety. Leaves an unpleasant aftertaste, but it works well with spicy food. I've tasted a lot worse beers, craft and macro, but this one isn't going to be in my fridge regularly, although I occasionally have one when eating out. If you're going to drink it, drink it ice-cold.

Photo of Opethsprite
1.61/5  rDev -31.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

Nothing special to look at--a truly piss-yellow with a white head. The smell is sweet and overly-floral...and very overly synthetic. Not much taste to speak of, or what taste there might be is covered by WAY too much carbonation. Hints of vinegar are present between the overpowering, disruptive carbonation. You gotta be pretty desperate to drink this.

Photo of LarryV
3/5  rDev +27.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours with a really thick, fluffy head that takes a moment to calm down. Aroma is grainy, clean, slight. Color is a light golden color.
Taste is crisp, clean with a bit of grain. Quick finish doesn't linger long on the palate. Served cold with a pizza, it's actually a pretty refreshing beer that doesn't demand much of the consumer. Doesn't have that sweet flavor that a lot of macros have. Not bad for the style.

Photo of hunteraw
2.75/5  rDev +17%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Considering the amount of Bud I've had in college (for better or worse) it's surprising it's taken me so long to actually jot down some notes and review it, but here goes:

Appearance is prototypical AML, heavily carbonated straw. Grainy and malty smell, slightly sweetm, Bud reminds you that drinking beer is like drinking bread. That breadiness dominates the taste, along with hops bitterness. Highly carbonated, malt finish... Not a whole lot to be said for a beer everyone knows so well. I don't care what anyone says, on a hot day when you're fishing or sailing, Bud out of a can has a certain charm. Still a hell of a lot better than all of the light beers out there.

Photo of oldirtycaffrey
2.48/5  rDev +5.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

What is left be said of Bud?

Color is pale yellow w/ a slight head that dissipates pretty quickly. The smell is grainy and slightly sweet. The taste is a little bitter; lots of carbonation. It goes down easy and would be fine to have really cold with a burger or hot dog on a summer day. However, like most would agree, it's not a flavorful beer, and if you're used to higher end stuff, this will surely dissapoint you.

Photo of evanackerman
2.7/5  rDev +14.9%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

well, finally getting around to reviewing "the king of beers"

this beer looks terrible, absolutely terrible, very pale yellow with a fizzy white head that disappears rapidly, actually better to drink out of the bottle so you don't have to see how crappy it looks.

aroma is faint grain and alcohol.

taste is unbeleivable clean and boring, a hint of malt, just a touch of hops, very very bland.


boring boring boring. goes down smooth though, a good beer to cook your brats in.

Budweiser from Anheuser-Busch
57 out of 100 based on 5,459 ratings.