1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Shock Top Wheat IPA - Anheuser-Busch

Not Rated.
Shock Top Wheat IPAShock Top Wheat IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

462 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 462
Reviews: 106
rAvg: 2.77
pDev: 23.1%
Wants: 2
Gots: 24 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Anheuser-Busch visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Wheat Ale |  5.80% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Shock Top Wheat IPA is no traditional beer. It’s a unique hybrid that combines the fresh flavor and smoothness of wheat beer with the crisp hop bitterness of an IPA. The result is a beer that is truly like no other.

To serve, pour down the side of the glass until a half inch is left in the bottle. Swirl the remaining brew and pour to produce a rich, thick collar of foam that releases the citrusy Cascade hop aroma.

(Beer added by: allforbetterbeer on 01-31-2012)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Shock Top Wheat IPA Alström Bros
Ratings: 462 | Reviews: 106 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of jacknsally5148
2.25/5  rDev -18.8%

jacknsally5148, Mar 08, 2012
Photo of khargro2
3.5/5  rDev +26.4%

khargro2, Mar 07, 2012
Photo of zbooks
3/5  rDev +8.3%

zbooks, Mar 06, 2012
Photo of NEDmiller
2.5/5  rDev -9.7%

NEDmiller, Mar 06, 2012
Photo of Mick-e-d
3.5/5  rDev +26.4%

Mick-e-d, Mar 05, 2012
Photo of redfox405
4/5  rDev +44.4%

redfox405, Mar 04, 2012
Photo of wages
3.38/5  rDev +22%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Served in official Shocktop glassware

Appearance - 4.5/5 - hazy orange with a one inch head.

smell - 3.5/5 - faint smell of wheat. It was served with an orange slice which of course is giving a citrus aroma

Taste - 3/5 - the wheat is not over powering, but the IPA hop flavors aren't either. In fact, it's a bit disappointingly so. After squeezing the orange slice into it, it's better, but not much. it has more Flavor than a typical macro brew wheat, but nothing resembling IPA...not to my mind.

Mouthfeel - 4/5 - smooth and refreshing carbonation level. Pleasant feel. only subtly lingers.

Overall - 3.5/5 -flavor is a big factor in my sense of a beer, and in this case, that is the weakest point if this beer. This comes from a dedicated IPA fan

wages, Mar 04, 2012
Photo of tdm168
3.2/5  rDev +15.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a cloudy, dark orange with a thick layer of foamy head that has decent retention. The nose has notes of straw, grapefruit, and orange peel. The flavor is light, straw-like, and citrusy with notes of orange peel. The mouthfeel is light to medium bodied, smooth, and a little crisp.

This is a rather hoppy beer for a pale wheat, but it comes across a little unbalanced. The malt character isn't built to withstand the citrusy, bitter hop character. It's a good idea, but I'd go for a Lil Sumpin Sumpin or a Saranac White IPA before I get another one of these.

tdm168, Mar 01, 2012
Photo of bigbeers84
2.5/5  rDev -9.7%

bigbeers84, Mar 01, 2012
Photo of russpowell
3.25/5  rDev +17.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours an effervescent amber with 3+ fingers of cream colored head. Clouds up a touch as this warms. Average lacing & head retention

S: Faint bready notes, some apple

T: Follows the nose, some citrus notes, cloves & grainyness up front. Faint juicy-fruit notes as this warms& some cloves & apple juice notes. Finishes with cloves, more apple juice, & faint orange peel & just a bit of pineynesss & grainy bread, & nice grainybess

MF: Medium bodied, firm carbonation

I don't really think much of this as an IPA, but it is drinkable enough. I think AB should've just called this a cascade wheat beer & that would've been more accurate. I have to deduct .5 on aroma & taste just due the muted use of hops. This would suffice as a choice in many bars around here, although I still think the Wit is better

russpowell, Mar 01, 2012
Photo of kylemckinnis
2/5  rDev -27.8%

kylemckinnis, Feb 27, 2012
Photo of Darkmagus82
3.43/5  rDev +23.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from bottle into pint glass

Appearance – Pours a hazy golden orange color with a billow white head. The head fades leaving a thin persistent film and some nice lacing.

Smell – Very little to be detected here. For an IPA the hop aroma is definitely lacking. A very light piney aroma and possibly the slightest bit of citrus mixed with a little bit of wheaty malt aroma.

Taste – The taste is better than the nose would let on. Initially there is some piney hop flavor mixed in with a bit of wheat bread flavor. The flavor then shifts to a little bit of sweet malt of fruit; a combination of citrus fruit and some brown sugar. At the very end there is a nice citrusy hop flavor which takes hold and leaves a nice aftertaste in the mouth.

Mouthfeel – A medium to slightly above medium, body with a moderate to a bit high, carbonation level. The body is a bit dry, which with the carbonation kind of tingles on the tongue. Quite appropriate of the brew.

Overall- For the price of the brew it really is quite nice. The aroma is definitely lacking but the taste makes up for it. A good session beer; easy to drink and affordable.

Darkmagus82, Feb 25, 2012
Photo of andyschaps
3/5  rDev +8.3%

andyschaps, Feb 22, 2012
Photo of Brad007
3.63/5  rDev +31%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a beautiful mix of blonde and amber with a frothy head into my glass. Is this similar to Saranac's version?

A mix of wheat and earthy hops with a touch of spicy malt. It's not going to be one of those hoppy examples. I like this.

Sweet and floral with just a touch of hops and wheat. Leans more towards the wheat ale side.

Lingering citrus and grassy hops. Wheat. Etc. Not bad.

I don't taste the IPA part here. Not bad but why bother?

Brad007, Feb 22, 2012
Photo of barczar
2.71/5  rDev -2.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pours a fairly hazy orange copper color with a two finger cream head that dissipates to a solid layer of foam, leaving nice lacing.

Citrus and wheat dominate the nose, with a cardboard finish. Adjuncts are evident.

Flavor is fairly malty initially, slightly caramel and toasty, with am apricot/pineapple combination surfacing mid palate. Wheat and a slight hop bitterness finish the profile.

Body is moderate, with moderately high carbonation. A slight slickness is felt.

Overall, more of a wheat beer than an ipa by far. Not something I'll revisit.

barczar, Feb 21, 2012
Photo of murf1087
2.5/5  rDev -9.7%

murf1087, Feb 21, 2012
Photo of Pegasus
3.5/5  rDev +26.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Hazy golden amber body, topped by a moderate, dense,persistent off-white head, thick glass-coating lace, slight carbonation.

Aroma: Moderate citrus and pine tar hops, against a solid wheat malt presence, with the characteristics of freshly-baked bread.

Taste: Opens with tart wheat malt, followed by slightly assertive pine hops. There sis a pleasant note of orange zest throughout as well, which balances nicely against the hops and sweet malt. Finishes with a mild, lingering note of earthy and pine hops.

Mouth feel: Smooth, soft, and pleasant.

Drinkability/notes: Not bad, really, not likely to be a favorite, although I would think Shock Top Wheat IPA would be refreshing on a hot summer day.

Presentation: Packaged in a custom twelve-ounce brown glass long neck bottle with a twist-off crown, served in a standard Pilsener glass.

Pegasus, Feb 20, 2012
Photo of TMoney2591
2.48/5  rDev -10.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Served in a Gale Sayers shaker pint glass.

I somehow don't think "wheat IPA" is gonna catch on as a style name... This stuff pours a lightly hazy pale straw topped by a finger or so of white foam. The nose comprises light greens, light orange rind, and a pinch of what may or may not be pepper (I don't like that I can't tell...). The taste brings in more of the same, with everything coming in muted, faded, and with a touch of tartar sauce in the background. Hrm... A mild bitterness pervades throughout the finish. The body is a rather light medium, with a light moderate carbonation and a slightly watery feel. Overall, a pretty sad brew. I'm not a Shock Top hater, and I applaud the attempt here, but this just came out pretty poorly, if you ask me.

TMoney2591, Feb 20, 2012
Photo of scottfrie
3.58/5  rDev +29.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle into SA perfect pint.

A: Pours a deep honey color with a finger of short lived cream colored head that quickly faded into a thick collar.
S: Other than smelling a bit synthetically sweet this doesn’t smell all that bad. I get some clean notes of chalky wheat alongside brighter notes of citrusy cascade hops.
T: Follows the nose with a chalky and bready base of wheat overlain with sweet notes of citrus and lightly bitter and leafy flavors of hops. I get a note or two of coriander and peppery spices as well. I’m not loving the aftertaste, which is a bit minerally and synthetic, but overall the flavor is pretty much what it says on the bottle.
M: Medium body, light and clean mouthfeel with soft carbonation. Pretty refreshing.
O: I hate to say it but I would drink this again. I won’t BUY it again because I already feel bad enough having given AB my money for this one bottle, but I was surprised not by how good this beer was, but how bad it wasn’t. It’s still a bit synthetic tasting, and definitely a fast food style Belgian IPA, but it’s a decent effort on their part.

scottfrie, Feb 20, 2012
Photo of mbacon3227
3/5  rDev +8.3%

mbacon3227, Feb 19, 2012
Photo of EgadBananas
1.33/5  rDev -52%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

Bottled 1/18/12

Pours a fairly nice orange color, hazy, with a cream colored head.decent lace. Aroma is slight wheat, malts, spices, and the most muted, mild citrus note. Take the aroma, add an almost undetectable bitterness, and that's the taste. Carbonation is stingy. The feel is rough and jagged. I can't finish this.

Up an down the label, this is an ipa with flourishing citrus hoppiness... utter BS. I can't say I've ever tasted such misrepresentation before. Pass.

EgadBananas, Feb 19, 2012
Photo of zeff80
2.78/5  rDev +0.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

A - Poured out a clear, golden amber color with a small, short-lived head of foam. It left little to no lacing.

S - It smelled of wheat and lemon. Not getting much IPA-like aromas.

T - It tasted of wheat, grains and some lemon. Not much spicy bitterness.

M - It was crisp, sharp and smooth. A light to medium bodied ale with a dry finish.

O - Not a fan. Maybe I don't get the "Wheat IPA" thing yet, but it isn't working for me.

zeff80, Feb 18, 2012
Photo of birddogg66
1.95/5  rDev -29.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Poured from a 12 oz bottle into a Sam Adams Perfect pint glass.

A- I really liked the color of this ale. A beautiful hazy burnt orange color.

S- The nose hit me as a very soft caramel with the citrus coming through. Unfortunately, it wasn't the citrus from the Cascade hops that I was hoping for. A little toasted bread, but very faint.

T- Is this really supposed to be an IPA? Where are the hops? A very mediocre hit of malt to begin with some citrus and just the slightest amount of bitterness in the finish. Coriander is listed on the bottle, but I can't find it. A bit of bitterness emerges as the beer warms, but it is pretty faint.

O- I am rating this beer pretty low, not because of it's flavor, or it's origin, but because I feel that it is mislabeled. If this was called a wheat pale or bitter wheat or something, I might have scored it higher. But, come on! An IPA? It is a shame that they even put that there are Cascade hops in this beer. One of the finest hops on planet earth, and they are just hidden in this beer. I feel bad for those poor Cascades, who never lived up to their potential, and were forced to represent a beer with a slice of orange sporting Oakley sunglasses, and a multicolored mohawk on the label.
This beer is nicely balanced, but no where near the malty backbone of an English IPA. Please stop trying to 'hop' into the craft beer market with ales like this, and stick to what you know. Good commercials, and tag lines.

Mahalo for the sample bottle.

birddogg66, Feb 18, 2012
Photo of socon67
3.4/5  rDev +22.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Pours copper with a thin white foam. Minimal lacing. Visible carbonation.

S - Noticable scent of fresh wheat. Nothing in the way of hops, but does have a fresh scent.

T - Flavor is of hearty wheat, some residual sugar, and a dash of citrus. Again, do not look for that hoppy bite; it isn't there.

M - Quite refreshing. Feels light, smooth, and easy to drink.

O - In short, the label is misleading. If you can deal witht hat it actually is a decent beer. Just understand this is a wheat ale, and not an ipa.

socon67, Feb 14, 2012
Photo of bashiba
2/5  rDev -27.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured a dirty dark orange with a very thin soap ring of a head.

The smell is very boring, where are the hops? Just light Belgian spices, coriander, a touch of wheat with light oxidization.

The flavor - Once again where are the hops? Seriously, why put IPA on it if there is no hops, I have to bang it for that alone. The flavor is mild and wheaty with a touch of Belgian spice and a metallic coppery oxidization in the finish.

The mouthfeel is thin and watery.

Once again why call it IPA if there are no hops, even taking that into account it would be a very substandard Belgian Wheat.

bashiba, Feb 14, 2012
Shock Top Wheat IPA from Anheuser-Busch
66 out of 100 based on 462 ratings.