1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Batch No. 91406 (Los Angeles, CA) - Anheuser-Busch

Batch No. 91406 (Los Angeles, CA)Batch No. 91406 (Los Angeles, CA)

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
72
okay

125 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 125
Reviews: 50
rAvg: 3.08
pDev: 18.83%


Brewed by:
Anheuser-Busch visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Lager |  6.00% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: justintcoons on 10-26-2012)
View: Beers (75) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 125 | Reviews: 50 | Show All Ratings:
Reviews by Arsenal0328:
Photo of Arsenal0328
Arsenal0328

Missouri

2.75/5  rDev -10.7%

04-11-2013 01:59:39 | More by Arsenal0328
More User Reviews:
Photo of Syncro-Vox
Syncro-Vox

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev -2.6%

04-11-2014 23:03:22 | More by Syncro-Vox
Photo of RBorsato
RBorsato

Virginia

3.75/5  rDev +21.8%

03-09-2014 18:44:20 | More by RBorsato
Photo of EF4
EF4

Oklahoma

1.75/5  rDev -43.2%

03-04-2014 03:10:41 | More by EF4
Photo of ToddHolder
ToddHolder

Illinois

2/5  rDev -35.1%

02-28-2014 16:32:05 | More by ToddHolder
Photo of ejimhof
ejimhof

Pennsylvania

2.75/5  rDev -10.7%

02-07-2014 23:52:26 | More by ejimhof
Photo of OtisCampbell007
OtisCampbell007

Tennessee

3.5/5  rDev +13.6%

01-01-2014 17:32:31 | More by OtisCampbell007
Photo of boszormeny
boszormeny

Ontario (Canada)

1.25/5  rDev -59.4%

12-30-2013 01:37:51 | More by boszormeny
Photo of Kroller86
Kroller86

Illinois

2.75/5  rDev -10.7%

11-24-2013 22:18:51 | More by Kroller86
Photo of brandonld23
brandonld23

Massachusetts

3/5  rDev -2.6%

11-01-2013 00:34:03 | More by brandonld23
Photo of jharris0624
jharris0624

Missouri

4/5  rDev +29.9%

10-24-2013 00:04:00 | More by jharris0624
Photo of InspectorBob
InspectorBob

New Jersey

3/5  rDev -2.6%

10-22-2013 21:28:17 | More by InspectorBob
Photo of zaraspook
zaraspook

Illinois

3/5  rDev -2.6%

09-13-2013 19:51:33 | More by zaraspook
Photo of emwild12
emwild12

Illinois

4.5/5  rDev +46.1%

08-09-2013 10:13:52 | More by emwild12
Photo of Eric908
Eric908

South Dakota

3/5  rDev -2.6%

08-03-2013 21:04:53 | More by Eric908
Photo of FreshButterbeer
FreshButterbeer

West Virginia

3.25/5  rDev +5.5%

07-29-2013 17:43:48 | More by FreshButterbeer
Photo of Andrew526
Andrew526

Michigan

3/5  rDev -2.6%

07-22-2013 14:00:01 | More by Andrew526
Photo of mpayne5
mpayne5

Indiana

2.75/5  rDev -10.7%

07-13-2013 17:42:10 | More by mpayne5
Photo of cgarcer
cgarcer

Georgia

2.75/5  rDev -10.7%

06-20-2013 02:51:06 | More by cgarcer
Photo of imperialking
imperialking

Illinois

3/5  rDev -2.6%

05-10-2013 17:14:35 | More by imperialking
Photo of mooseo
mooseo

Pennsylvania

3.16/5  rDev +2.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

12oz bottle into pint glass.

A - Bright clear amber with a large foamy white head.

S - Fresh grains, light caramel, a bit grassy. A metallic scent is also present.

T - A blend of sweet caramel malt, bready grain, rice, and subtle grassy hops. Hint of wood. Fruity yeast is evident, and the metallic aftertaste is surprisingly muted in this version.

M - Smooth, light bodied, crisp and clean. High carbonation.

O - Well it's better than regular Bud, and my favorite in this 'experimental' series. It has a decent malt body and is not overly sweet. Very drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

04-26-2013 02:18:12 | More by mooseo
Photo of Fatehunter
Fatehunter

Oregon

3.53/5  rDev +14.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A good finger of head on a clear, amber colored body.
The aroma is a little grain with some fruit, the beechwood is evident too. Smells nice.
The taste is balanced and smooth. It has only the mildest bitterness to go with it's malty body (for a lager).
The texture is crisp with moderate carbonation.
It's a smooth and tasty lager.

Serving type: bottle

03-17-2013 01:45:01 | More by Fatehunter
Photo of BlackHaddock
BlackHaddock

United Kingdom (England)

3.43/5  rDev +11.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

12 Fl Oz bottle: Drank on 7 Feb 2013 in my hotel room (San Francisco).

I quiet enjoyed this actually: lager based but with a bit of character.

Golden body, but with a slightly darker hue than most lagers: same white head that refuses to hang around though.

Not quite odourless but almost: some grainy and hop notes can just about be detected if you sniff hard enough.

Crisp and refreshing with a corn bread and mild hop feel.

Forget who brews it and the beers isn't bad at all. It's a lager with a bit of umph to it and should be marked accordingly.

Serving type: bottle

03-13-2013 21:35:15 | More by BlackHaddock
Photo of ggourde
ggourde

Missouri

3.75/5  rDev +21.8%

03-05-2013 20:21:05 | More by ggourde
Photo of NeroFiddled
NeroFiddled

Pennsylvania

3.63/5  rDev +17.9%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

If Budweiser can make kick-ass beers like their Tomahawk IPA, why do they bother with these basic beers? This is just a slightly sweet, reddish lager. It's got a very nice, gently caramelish malt component to it, and some fresh, balanced hops but it's far from anything to write home about. In fact, it initially reminded me of the first Killian's Red that I had back in 1984 - almost 30 years ago! Ahhh... putting my disappointment aside, I guess I can see this as a stepping stone for some drinkers, and there is certainly a lot more malt and flavor here than in the flagship brand, which is, I believe, still one of the best selling beers on earth. So, to a certain extent, that all makes sense. When you're that big you need to be careful about how you change your image in the eyes of the consumers that are paying the bills. And I assume they know that it'll pay off just based on people trying the beer. But here's my final conclusion. If I walked into a roadside bar one night and found only Bud, Bud Light, and this on tap which would I drink? I'd probably stick with the Bud.

Serving type: bottle

03-05-2013 14:14:53 | More by NeroFiddled
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Batch No. 91406 (Los Angeles, CA) from Anheuser-Busch
72 out of 100 based on 125 ratings.