1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Bass Pale Ale - Bass Brewers Limited

Bass Pale AleBass Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
77
okay

1,989 Ratings
THE BROS
68
poor

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1989
Reviews: 990
rAvg: 3.37
pDev: 16.62%


Brewed by:
Bass Brewers Limited visit their website
United Kingdom (England)

Style | ABV
English Pale Ale |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 03-17-2001)
View: Beers (5) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Bass Pale Ale Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 1,989 | Reviews: 990 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of Bushrod
Bushrod

Georgia

1/5  rDev -70.3%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

I thought this beer was all about the water at bruten on trent and the old fermenters???? what the hell happened? I know alot of contract brews are out there, but when I pay for a world class brew, I'd like to have just that; not a fake! I use to be able to get Fuller's and Belhaven, I guess thouse days are gone and now Sam Adams is making "light " beer; Good God what is the world coming to???

Serving type: bottle

12-13-2011 01:14:42 | More by Bushrod
Photo of Mitchster
Mitchster

Michigan

1.25/5  rDev -62.9%
look: 4 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

Crystal clear amber brew forms a rocky white head sitting on top medium-sized bubbles. Head quickly thins, but forms a meringue peak which lingers until 1/4 way through the glass. Moderately-high carbonation, forming spirals of bubbles at a hypnotic rate. Aroma is of canned philadelphia mushrooms, toffee, almonds, sweet dog food, and margarine in that order. (Honestly!) What a perplexing smell. Flavor is of sweet malt with no apparent graininess, which fades to a strong metallic tinge, and ends in fizzy dirty dishwater that had caramel candies sitting in it. The fusel alcohols become more dominate in the start of the beer with progressive sips and really becomes unbearable by the end. This beer is intriguing for a few seconds, and looks pretty, but is absolutely horrible. Just a few sips gave me a nasty temporal headache, and I poured 1/2 of it down the sink. I never want to drink this beer again.

Serving type: bottle

01-10-2003 19:46:47 | More by Mitchster
Photo of kbnooshay
kbnooshay

New York

1.4/5  rDev -58.5%
look: 4 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1

never again! This poured a clear amber color with a good rocky cratery head that sticks around for a little white. Decent lacing. Aroma is sweet like candy. Taste is where this goes bad. Is is metallic sweet malt weirdness. No good beer flavors in here. It is a EPA with no flavor, just harsh ass. I mean you can tell what it is, it just sucks. I wouldn't mind tasting what this used to taste like. Had it on tap once and it wasn't this bad. This tastes dirty and by the end of the glass you wish you might need water to clense your ass oiled palate. It does look pretty though!

revisited 2 days later...
WTF? Tastes worse this time.I can't believe this is bass. Because it tastes like pure ass.

Serving type: can

01-10-2006 16:20:09 | More by kbnooshay
Photo of johnbonham1980
johnbonham1980

Idaho

1.4/5  rDev -58.5%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

I don't know if my tastes have changed, if I got a bad batch, or if Bass has gone way downhill, but this particular example was horrible. Actually, my tastes have changed quite a bit, but I wouldn't have liked this even back before I discovered the wonderful wide world of quality brew...

Poured directly from a 25 oz. can into a large wine goblet. Not much carbonation, average head, nice amber color which happens to be the high point of this beer.

Taste was best at the beginning, but throughout there was a huge presence of fruit past its prime, old bread, and near the end, total macroswill flavors dominated with an awful background of metal... I was tempted to just toss it out midway through but I hate wasting any sort of beer so I chugged the last 3rd, grimaced, and vowed never to have this beer again.

From my best memories, this beer was decent on tap and as part of a black and tan, but in this tasting, YECH.

I think something has happened to this brewery to be honest. Have seen posts in the forums before discussing the downward spiral...

Serving type: can

02-20-2007 00:58:50 | More by johnbonham1980
Photo of ElGuapo
ElGuapo

New Jersey

1.55/5  rDev -54%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1

Bass should just drop the "B" and then the name would describe the beer perfectly. upon pouring this beer, it looks ok. the smell is not terrible, but you are somewhat forewarned of the awful experience you are about to have. this is one of the worst beers i have ever had.

the beer itself is not terrible, but there is just a horrible aftertaste. it is however, much better out of the 220z bottle.

Serving type: bottle

06-26-2002 18:04:03 | More by ElGuapo
Photo of troobie
troobie

California

1.6/5  rDev -52.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

This is the stuff brewed in Baldwinsville, NY.

I'm fairly convinced that I somehow managed to buy a skunked/spoiled 12 pack. I don't usually use that excuse, but I'll elaborate below. The outside of the 12 pack, and the long neck labels, have the date "11291" on them, and today is December 7, 2011. If that is the production date they should still be fine, but if that is the expiration date they are months past it.

A: Light golden copper color. Obscenely clear. You could do your taxes while looking through a glass of this stuff. Aquafina is less filtered. A very hard pour resulted in a moderate head of fine bubbles that lasted for about 15 seconds and leaves no lacing. The bubbles racing up the glass are champagne like, as is the head. Not a good sign.

S: Cooked vegetables. Vanilla pudding. Cherries. Lots of alcohol in the nose for a 5% ABV beer.

T: Ugh. Stale tasting. Very reminiscent of Budweiser. Not really much there. Some sweetness, that's about it. Once again too much alcohol taste/feel for 5% ABV. Leaves a slightly bitter and oily coating on the back of your tongue after you swallow.

M: Extremely carbonated. Carbonation is champagne like and burns your tongue as you drink it. Watery.

O: I so seldom buy spoiled beer (it's been years) that it is hard for me to call any beer spoiled. I just don't think this 12 pack of Bass Ale is right. If I ever have it again in the future I'll be sure to re-review it. For now, I have 10 more bottles of this stuff to choke down.

Serving type: bottle

12-08-2011 04:36:30 | More by troobie
Photo of Onenote81
Onenote81

North Carolina

1.73/5  rDev -48.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

Waiting in the Seattle airport, and this was one of the "better" offerings at a restaurant there. Came out a deep gold with a small white head on top. Decent lacing rings around the glass edge. Not bad looking, but it's downhill from here...

Smells of malts and breads, pretty sweet smelling. Not too bad. Mouthfeel is extremely watered-down and slick. No crisp bite, no sharp carbonation, nothing. Flavor was like if someone soaked a biscuit in water for 2 days, pureed it, strained it, and drank the dessicant. This was one of the most watered-down, flavorless beers I've ever had. My wife even said this was really weak, and she doesn't know beers that well. Very disappointing. I'll possibly try to get my hands on a bottle and give that a try to compare, but I'm not that excited about it. Avoid.

Serving type: on-tap

05-09-2009 15:34:12 | More by Onenote81
Photo of bierschmecktgut
bierschmecktgut

Massachusetts

1.73/5  rDev -48.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

strong amber color, watched it under the tap..no head at all.

smell was sweet, smelled like wort

taste was sweet, reminded me of those wrapped root beer hard candies.

Mouth feel was bad because taste wasn't working on the palette.

not my beer, I'd reach for a "mass marketed" beer before grabbing this again.

Serving type: on-tap

01-10-2011 02:41:11 | More by bierschmecktgut
Photo of SteveGus
SteveGus

Indiana

1.75/5  rDev -48.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Avoid, if possible, the stuff that's made in Baldwinsville, New York.

This is not the Bass Ale you were looking for. The real stuff is dry. This is annoyingly sweet and not as well attenuated as it ought to be.

The real Bass Ale has a hint of grain astringency that complements the bittering hops in the finish. This is what I was looking forward to. I did not get it out of this. Miller High Life has more grain character than this does.

This is too sweet and needs to ferment longer or harder. What hop there is in the finish is soapy, and not in the good cilantro notes you used to get with Watney's Red Barrel, either.

They may not have the water right yet in Baldwinsville. They might be following the recipe perfectly but for this, but it would make a big difference. Some more sulfate salts in the water would probably improve this.

At least, we still have Guinness Extra.

Serving type: bottle

12-18-2011 05:42:17 | More by SteveGus
Photo of Stephen63
Stephen63

United Kingdom (Scotland)

1.85/5  rDev -45.1%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

A - Amber bodied ale with a finger of head after it had settled from the pour.

S - Virtually nothing, a little sweetness.

T - Incredibly bland with hardly any hops but unpleasant sweetness.

M - Felt like creamy water, almost no carbonation.

D - Hardly finished the pint.

There were three "cask" taps available, two of which were Boddingtons (there were also some nitro taps). If I had not seen the Bass poured I would have sworn I'd got a pint of some "cream flow" Boddington like pint. Not impressive and something that gives cask real ale a bad name.

Serving type: cask

03-08-2007 07:19:45 | More by Stephen63
Photo of TheKingofWichita
TheKingofWichita

North Carolina

1.93/5  rDev -42.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Pours a deep coppery color with a thick yellowish white head and a little bit of lacing. Smells of sweet malts and a little earthy hops. Tastes much the same with earthy hops, a ton of sweet malts, and a little bread and some metallic flavor. Mouthfeel is thick and oily with a mild carbonation. Drinkability is okay.

Serving type: on-tap

02-16-2011 02:32:23 | More by TheKingofWichita
Photo of fnmfsm
fnmfsm


1.94/5  rDev -42.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

It seemed to be more watered down that I remember. The carbonation was very poor and very flat. This used to be one of my favorites but not anymore. I guess thats what happend when the big guys take over our old favorites. This beer is now just a fancier Bud light

Serving type: on-tap

02-21-2013 22:03:00 | More by fnmfsm
Photo of Knapp85
Knapp85

Pennsylvania

1.95/5  rDev -42.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

So I give a lot of pride to beers with a history to them. I think it's awesome that this beer was the flagship brew on the Titanic. That makes me want to try beers like this. To me it's kind of like time travel, you can put yourself in a specific time and place and get a little idea of how things were during that time. Bass Ale has the history but it's not the greatest historical brew I've had. Every time I've tried it, it seems for be on the flat side. It's got a really nice color to it but the hops and malts used just don't please my palette that much. I know a lot of people who love Bass but I've just never been able to enjoy it.

Serving type: bottle

03-20-2011 16:34:49 | More by Knapp85
Photo of rastaman
rastaman

United Kingdom (England)

1.98/5  rDev -41.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Not good, another one of these English ales which gets a huge wrap, but it is quite overrated, don't like it.

Serving type: bottle

02-16-2002 19:41:34 | More by rastaman
Photo of Nibbley
Nibbley

Georgia

1.98/5  rDev -41.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Ok, what happened to Bass? i havent had one in a while, But, I dont remember it tasting like this.
Pours an amber with a white head that last a good while, it looks good but the taste is where it goes horribly wrong. Has a watery mouthfeel with a nasty metallic aftertaste. Its bitter but not a hoppy taste, almost artificial/chemical taste. I do not recommend this beer,run Forrest run away from this one!

Serving type: bottle

10-19-2008 20:15:10 | More by Nibbley
Photo of rbbchbum
rbbchbum

District of Columbia

2.03/5  rDev -39.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

On draft in a pint glass at a chain restaurant. After just a few swallows, I sent it back.

Appearance: Light brownish orange. It had zero foam.

Smell: None noted.

Taste/Mouth: Very mild hop finish with moderate malt. Very simple tasting.

Drinkability: This was so flat it seemed like drinking water. Zero carbination. I think I would order wine before I would order this beer again.

Serving type: on-tap

05-28-2009 01:37:06 | More by rbbchbum
Photo of TerryW
TerryW

Ontario (Canada)

2.08/5  rDev -38.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

This was a strange one for me. It had a very odd odour and taste of mushrooms of all things. This was distracting to say the least.

Amber tea coloured with a big rough white head that settles to a thick film. Lots of original lace, but that's all she gives.

Musty mushroom smell. Taste is malt and metal and thin. And finished with mushrooms.

I don't mind an unusual tasting beer. I quite enjoy the earthiness you can find in many beers. But this one just don't work.

Serving type: bottle

02-09-2004 02:08:21 | More by TerryW
Photo of Thrasher
Thrasher

Oregon

2.1/5  rDev -37.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Ordered this from a bar that didn't have anything else worth drinking. It's been a while since I tried it last, and I have to say this beer is pretty bad. It looks fine, and has a good mouthfeel but the flavors are husky, dirty, and muted to the point of being innocuous - I guess to appeal to as many people as possible. Well I'm not one of them. This beer does injustice to all pale ales and to the British beer world as the whole, at least from an American perspective. Goes into the same file as Heineken: imported, overpriced, underflavored, and available everywhere. Needless to say I stuck to scotch for the rest of the night.

If this was packaged as macroswill at 3.99 a sixer that would be one thing. Instead, it's presented as a prestige beer, 7 or 8 bucks a sixer, and almost always an extra dollar a pint at the pub. Unacceptable. However, I should reserve complete condemnation until I have the opportunity to sample the Real deal from a cask in the UK.

Serving type: on-tap

01-22-2003 11:25:19 | More by Thrasher
Photo of BeerBob
BeerBob

Nebraska

2.15/5  rDev -36.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

Date: 08-16-2002
Bass Pale Ale pours from the dark brown one Imperial pint bottle, a rusty amber with one heck of a head, lace and foam abound in my glass.

Nose is a creamy butterscotch sweetness, and palate of creamy sweet butterscotch with a balanced bitter and a touch of gypsum. Absolutely one yummy Ale and a must try for anyone.

Bass Pale Ale has been on my list of Beers to buy when the price is right. Bass Pale Ale is a good tasting pale ale that has been around for a very long time.

Well, I just went through a twelve pack and lo and behold this brew has turned to Banta PoDo, it is nothing at all what it used to be!

Interbrew Be Damned!!!

Date: 2/23/2014
Now brewed in the USA by AB-InBev
This stuff is just gross...
Mouth-feel is all wrong, and the bite of carbonation is no longer smooth and cream like.
This will be my last update for this brand. I will not buy another drop of this failed replicant.

Serving type: bottle

02-23-2014 08:06:41 | More by BeerBob
Photo of ManekiNeko
ManekiNeko

Virginia

2.15/5  rDev -36.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Served on tap in an imperial pint glass at the local Irish pub.

Appearance: Clear honey orange color with a decent-sized frothy white head. The head eventually shrinks down to a film at the top of the surface. A good show of lacing, about the only good thing I could find in this beer.

Smell: Smells of caramel malt, with a vague hint of floral hops skulking about in the background.

Taste: Strong flavor of caramel malt. No real taste of hops to be had at all. Tastes more like a märzen.

Mouthfeel: One the lighter side of medium bodied.

Drinkability: There's no real character to this beer. It's not that bad, but there's nothing all that appealing about it either. I give this beer my coldest indifference.

Other: I remember Bass being quite hoppy and pale. What no talent ass clown messed it up?

Serving type: on-tap

09-23-2003 01:06:29 | More by ManekiNeko
Photo of AlexLMS
AlexLMS

Portugal

2.15/5  rDev -36.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Appearance: medium copper colour. Brighty appearance. Small off-white head. Poor retention with some lacing.
Aroma: very light caramel. Metallic and musty off-aroma.
Taste: very thin sweet malts. Bitter hops, spices and a cooked vegetable off-flavour.
Mouthfeel: dry feel, average carbonation, medium to high alcoholic presence and a medium body.
Finish: long lasting bitter aftertaste.

Overall: Despite the bitter flavour I sincerely did not like this one. There is something there that did not feel right. Perhaps I was unlucky with the bottle, but Bass did not impress me at all.

Serving type: bottle

12-07-2007 18:44:29 | More by AlexLMS
Photo of bloberglawp
bloberglawp

Quebec (Canada)

2.15/5  rDev -36.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Poured a appropriate cooper, white head dissipates quicky to a thin ring, no lace.

Aroma of nothing. A faint bit of spice and malt and a light buttery vegetal, very faint. Flavor, again very little noticable... a little astringent hop bitterness and a watered down malt profile...

I remember a better product, and this 6 pack was pulled out of a case sitting on a freshly arrived pallet at the suppermarket... my guess is it sat in a warehouse or two before it got to me, try and get this product fresh, it should be better than what I got.

Serving type: bottle

07-04-2008 03:02:34 | More by bloberglawp
Photo of DJED69
DJED69

New Jersey

2.15/5  rDev -36.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Sigh. This is not the Bass Ale I remember. Brewed in Baldwinville, NY?!?!?! Product of the USA?!?!

Sad, shallow, imposter of a once nobel brew. InBev did none of us any favors. Tastes like a Michelob with some added malt. Sigh.

Never again. Don't be fooled. If you never has Bass Ale prior to this switch, you still will never be able to try it. This is a completely different beer now.

Serving type: bottle

11-12-2011 18:50:13 | More by DJED69
Photo of bobhits
bobhits

Kentucky

2.17/5  rDev -35.6%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 1.5

"The World's First Pale Ale"

Ok you've got a hook, and certainly a following so lets see what we have here.

Pours an amber color, very clear with a hint of a head that doesn't hold or last.

Sweet malt dominate with a hint of English hops to just keep things mildly in check.

It tastes much like it smells. This is decent beer and if you like malty beverages you may enjoy this one a good bit. Too sweet and simply lacking complexity to excite me though.

A very nice beer with food.

Serving type: bottle

12-16-2011 03:02:05 | More by bobhits
Photo of Jason
Jason

Massachusetts

2.2/5  rDev -34.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

16.9 oz can with no freshness date, "Bass Pub Pour" ... what the hell is this?

Appearance: Good two fingers of head with a great clarity to show off the reddish amber hue.

Smell: Aroma of nearly rotten fruit with a musty basement yeast nose.

Taste: Apple skin, thin caramel malting and muted hops with a slight bitterness. The malt flavor seems too beat up to give any real sweetness or character at that, just a nasty fruitiness in the finish.

Mouth Feel: Pub Pour? If I was poured a beer like this I'd send it back. It is not lack of carbonation but the slickness that is left in the mouth.

Drinkability: Hard to down even half the can, and once it warmed up it got even worse.

This beer is absolute rubbish.

Serving type: can

01-03-2005 01:45:19 | More by Jason
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Bass Pale Ale from Bass Brewers Limited
77 out of 100 based on 1,989 ratings.