1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Cains Finest Export Lager - Robert Cain & Company Limited

Not Rated.
Cains Finest Export LagerCains Finest Export Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
73
okay

27 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 27
Reviews: 16
rAvg: 2.95
pDev: 24.75%
Wants: 0
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Robert Cain & Company Limited visit their website
United Kingdom (England)

Style | ABV
Euro Pale Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: wl0307 on 03-25-2011)
View: Beers (10) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 27 | Reviews: 16 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of TMoney2591
TMoney2591

Illinois

3.05/5  rDev +3.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

Served in a Chicago Bears shaker pint glass.

Well, if it's the finest export lager, I guess I've gotta give it a go, eh? This stuff pours a clear pale brass topped by a finger or so of off-white foam. The nose comprises dry biscuit, sweetgrass, light hard water, and a twinge of sweet flowers. The taste brings in more of the same, with more biscuit, more hard water, and a bit of what seems like wild rice. The body straddles the border between hefty light and light medium, with a light moderate carbonation and a fluid feel. Overall, a pretty boring and understandably unassuming beer, one that I'm not sure deserves the title of "finest".

Serving type: bottle

09-08-2013 07:14:23 | More by TMoney2591
Photo of TheManiacalOne
TheManiacalOne

Rhode Island

2.89/5  rDev -2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Poured from an 11.2oz bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a dark gold color, with a thin white head that fades quickly and leaves a very thin lace on the glass.

S: The aroma contains light caramelized malts, lager yeast, honey and a faint touch of hops.

T: The taste starts out with some sweetness from flavors of honey, adjuncts and thin malt character. There’s some mild lager yeast and malt breadiness. The hops presence is very mild but brings some balance. The after-taste is slightly sweet.

M: A little crisp and a little smooth, light-to-medium body, medium carbonation, finish is slightly sticky.

O: Not very flavorful, goes down easily since there isn’t much to the beer, not too filling, mild kick, decent representation of style, there are definitely better alternatives in the style.

Serving type: bottle

06-14-2013 02:09:02 | More by TheManiacalOne
Photo of BlackHaddock
BlackHaddock

United Kingdom (England)

3.35/5  rDev +13.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Tasted during a German and lager evening last week, did OK against some well known Pilsners and Exports.

Brown 500ml bottle, best before May 2012.

Typical lager/pilsner/export golden body, clear and clean looking.

Fairly sweet in the nose and taste, not unpleasant, but certainly not as dry tasting as the German Exports also being reviewed at the time.

Mid-strength in body depth and flavour, an OK brew and just above average for it's style (on BA).

Serving type: bottle

08-09-2011 13:10:30 | More by BlackHaddock
Photo of kojevergas
kojevergas

Texas

2.1/5  rDev -28.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

500ml bottle acquired at Abbott's Alehouse off-license in Cork, Ireland, and served in a Grolsch pint glass. Reviewed from notes. Label reads "Cains prize-winning finest export lager". If you have to include that many self indulgent adjectives just in your title, then something's amiss.

A: Four finger head without cream, but of nice thickness and retention. Clear dark yellow colour.

Sm: Slight cream and malted barley. A scent of light strength.

T: Medium cream and light barley body. Simple but refreshing. Balanced well, but built only average at best for the style (which is outright wrong on beeradvocate; this is not a Euro pale lager). I'd like more complexity, particularly involving hops. That is to say, I'd like to taste some hops.

Mf: Creamy smooth wet refreshing feel. Complements the simple body.

Dr: Prize winning me arse. It's cheap enough in Ireland - probably because it has to be, but it's of decidedly poor quality.

Serving type: bottle

06-01-2011 14:57:50 | More by kojevergas
Photo of wl0307
wl0307

United Kingdom (England)

3.4/5  rDev +15.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Coming in a slim 500ml brown bottle, BB May 2012, served chilled in a pint-size pilsner glass. NOTE: this lager is brewed using Maris Otter malts.

A: burnished golden hue, coming with a fluffy off-white beer head and abundant fizziness.
S: lightly dusty, sweet orangey hops plus English pale malts (with that stinky edge, yes, not lager malts), plus salty-sweet yellow prunes and a touch of caramel; a clean edge of saltiness typical to a lager beer is apparent in the background, but not assertive. The overall impression of this beer reminds me of a lot of golden bitter/ales these days actually.
T: far more English pale-malty than any other continental lager on the palate (again, the pale malts with that stinky edge), coupled with boiled taro, caramel, orangey and grassy hops with rough bitterness lingering in the end; a flow of nice grainy note seems to linger nicely as well, adding extra pleasure in the aftertaste.
M&D: not so fizzy on the palate as in appearance, this medium-bodied lager beer is really like a golden ale, maybe due to the flavour profile defined strongly by the English ingredients. Although I can't easily compare it with any other continental lager I've tried, I have to say this is not a very bad product, either. Quite drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

03-25-2011 19:51:56 | More by wl0307
Photo of woodychandler
woodychandler

Pennsylvania

2.93/5  rDev -0.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This represents my not-so-finest moment of The CANQuest (TM) as I bought a number of Cain's CANs for trade and nearly traded all of these away, not having reviewed it first! I am not sure how I caught my error, but one quickly got set aside and today being New CANned Beer Sunday, it got the nod.

The Crack & Glug was marvelous, creating a bunch of foam that began to cascade to form a liquid beneath. I backed off briefly to allow for some settling, then hit it again, finally ending up with a finger-and-a-half of French Vanilla-colored head with nice retention. Color was a golden-yellow with NE-quality clarity and King Midas and Croesus were both seen drooling, as was I. Nose had a pleasant, grainy malty sweetness which beat smelling yet another AAL six ways to Sunday, with today being Sunday. Hard to beat, just like a boiled egg. Mouthfeel was medium with a grassy, slightly metallic taste on the tongue. Finish had it all - a lager-like honey sweetness, a dry grassiness and still a bit of metallic tang. It really was not all that bad, but neither would I want a whole bunch of it. I have had numerous Cain's CANs and I would recommend them over this one. Oh well, CAN't win 'em all.

Serving type: can

08-05-2012 16:29:42 | More by woodychandler
Photo of Latarnik
Latarnik

New Jersey

2.5/5  rDev -15.3%

05-30-2014 00:17:28 | More by Latarnik
Photo of flagmantho
flagmantho

Washington

3.01/5  rDev +2%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from 440mL can into a dimpled mug.

Appearance: golden hue with a light haze and a very light effervescence. Head is a finger of frothy ivory foam which doesn't have much in the way of retention.

Smell: sweet malt with a distinct fruitiness. It's almost got that over-sweet character I usually associate with Euro strong lagers. It's not gross, but it's mildly off-putting.

Taste: the general sweet malt character works better in the flavor than in the aroma, but it's nothing to write home about. Hops and bitterness are basically nonexistent.

Mouthfeel: light body with a decent carbonation and a slightly creamy mouthfeel. There's not enough carbonation here to get a big creaminess (going for "real ale" character, maybe?), but I guess that's stylistically OK.

Overall: this is an OK lager; it's better than most macros, but its sweetness and lack of flavor balance just kind of leave it in "meh" territory.

Serving type: can

05-31-2013 00:01:18 | More by flagmantho
Photo of tone77
tone77

Pennsylvania

3.53/5  rDev +19.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A thank you goes out to woodychandler for providing this beer. Poured from a 14.9 oz. can. Has a rich golden color with a 1/2 inch head. Smell is of malts, maybe a touch of corn. Taste is malty, slightly sweet, bready, some grains. Feels medium bodied in the mouth and overall is an easy drinking lager.

Serving type: can

07-03-2012 21:45:59 | More by tone77
Photo of barnzy78
barnzy78

Illinois

3/5  rDev +1.7%

11-25-2011 04:10:03 | More by barnzy78
Photo of enelson
enelson

Illinois

3.25/5  rDev +10.2%

01-03-2013 14:04:05 | More by enelson
Photo of jazzyjeff13
jazzyjeff13

United Kingdom (England)

2.55/5  rDev -13.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A 500ml bottle with a BB of Dec 2011. Features a metallic label with the Cains logo writ large - I've always liked their branding.

Poured into a Guinness pint glass. A clear golden colour with light carbonation. Yields a large head of white foam with good stability; remains for a few minutes before reducing to a surface layer. Aroma is close to non-existant - a faint hint of light malt and stewed corn. None too enticing.

Tastes of very light malt with an unpleasant aftertaste of faint stewed leaves and hints of solvent. Notes of overcooked corn. Mouthfeel is smooth and dry with little carbonation. Aftertaste is nasty - an artificial chemical bitterness.

Bad - not a well made beer by any standard. What little flavour there is crosses into unpleasant territory, whereas most lagers are merely bland. The subtle off-notes make for a poor drinking experience - one to avoid.

Serving type: bottle

07-19-2011 23:14:30 | More by jazzyjeff13
Photo of pmcadamis
pmcadamis

Illinois

2.3/5  rDev -22%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

A - Clear golden brew with a small wispy eggshell head.

S - Caramel malt. Carrot cake....oddly enough.

T - This is quite malty... especially for the style. Almost bock-ish IMO. Some grassy hops are there too. Some cooked vegetable "off" flavors really detract from this one.

M - Medium bodied and chewy/dextriny. Feels thick and sugary like a malt-liquor.

Not good. Stick with their 'Bitter' and 'Mild' brews. This tastes like Euro-trash malt liquor. Smells a lot better than it tastes.

Serving type: can

12-07-2012 17:35:11 | More by pmcadamis
Photo of rtepiak
rtepiak

Poland

3.43/5  rDev +16.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

one of the most overlapping beer styles on BA. not noble grassy hopping but english orange blossom bitter hints and a sun tea malty back. sterling golden may have been used. golden pour with a nice fresh had. dry feel light a distinctly english bitter bittering. a bit biscuity in the finish. lagers are different everywhere you go. this one happens to have english distinction. down to the poor carbonation. a week point as a lager. don't think this beer matters to the average BA'er. anyone into pre prohibition still lagers would really enjoy this. make sure its fresh though. great for bangers and mash too.

Serving type: can

06-11-2012 08:57:04 | More by rtepiak
Photo of flyingpig
flyingpig

United Kingdom (Scotland)

1.1/5  rDev -62.7%
look: 1 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Terrible looking in almost every respect. Light amber coloured & clear with tonnes of large bubbles rising to the surface in what can only be decribed as an aggressive fashion. It forms a thumb sized, bubbly white head that disappears almost instantly & leaves a fine film around the brim of the glass. Truely shocking looking, I can't think of a worse looking beer.

It smells like a pale lager but without any of the positive aromas that come with the style. A bad combination of grain & bread here that makes me wish I had avoided this particular beer.

I wouldn't have though it possible but it actually tastes worse than it smells with the taste consisting of nothing but grain & corn. This is finished with a musty, off tasting flavour that lingers for far too long despite the beer still being well in date.

Rough on the palate & kind of musty. Despite the huge amount of bubbles rising to the surface the beer was still incredibly flat & generally terrible with regards to mouthfeel.

Truely one of the worst beers I have ever tasted, the only good thing about it was that I wasn't physically sick after taking a sip & it didn't seem to hurt my stomach as I drank it (or the three mouthfulls I took anyway). Avoid this one at all costs, it is shockingly terrible.

More at:
www.abarwithnoname.wordpress.com

Serving type: bottle

05-03-2011 17:05:56 | More by flyingpig
Photo of Kahlerbock
Kahlerbock

Kansas

2.5/5  rDev -15.3%

08-26-2013 21:55:10 | More by Kahlerbock
Photo of EmperorBevis
EmperorBevis

United Kingdom (England)

3/5  rDev +1.7%

11-01-2013 16:48:44 | More by EmperorBevis
Photo of Beerlover
Beerlover

Minnesota

2/5  rDev -32.2%

04-18-2014 04:17:07 | More by Beerlover
Photo of patre_tim
patre_tim

China

4.4/5  rDev +49.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A: Orange gold with a slightly cloudy body. Moderate amount of fine bubbles, 2 fingers of creamy white head.

S: Bananas, grass, caramel, floral, crisp with dull British hops.

T: Bready, yeasty, dull bitter British hops are mild, caramel, crisp, dry, a sort of dank farmyard. Slightly sweet.

M: Medium bready body. Medium low carbonation.

O: Like this one a lot. Far exceeded my expectations and I hope I will be able to get my hands on some again. Really complex and flavourful compared to what I thought based on reading others ratings. Great by itself, would go well with pub fries.

Serving type: can

05-03-2013 14:36:39 | More by patre_tim
Photo of JuicesFlowing
JuicesFlowing

Kansas

3.9/5  rDev +32.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured into a standard pint glass. The beer is a dull orangish-yellow color, kind of hazy. A foamy white head sits on top and slowly dissipates to a frothy film. Nice sticky lacing. The beer smells slightly sweet and kind of sticky with buttery overtones. The beer tastes Sweet and buttery up front. Caramel and dry biscuit come in later, it tastes like a marzen almost. There's a faint bitter hop finish, but it's dulled by all of the malts. Mouthfeel is medium to light bodied and goes down smooth.

Overall, this is way better than I expected. It's very malty, sweet, and drinkable. Not bad for a "euro export lager."

Serving type: can

05-08-2012 23:23:04 | More by JuicesFlowing
Photo of sgoro
sgoro

Illinois

3.25/5  rDev +10.2%

12-13-2012 00:25:51 | More by sgoro
Photo of mquinn919
mquinn919

Pennsylvania

4/5  rDev +35.6%

04-13-2013 22:02:27 | More by mquinn919
Photo of Zakk
Zakk

Florida

2.75/5  rDev -6.8%

08-14-2012 01:43:53 | More by Zakk
Photo of rob133
rob133

California

2.5/5  rDev -15.3%

12-27-2011 22:37:46 | More by rob133
Photo of rawknrall
rawknrall

Uruguay

3.5/5  rDev +18.6%

09-26-2013 20:27:06 | More by rawknrall
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Cains Finest Export Lager from Robert Cain & Company Limited
73 out of 100 based on 27 ratings.