1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Rook - Rogness Brewing Company

Not Rated.
RookRook

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

37 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 37
Reviews: 9
rAvg: 3.48
pDev: 22.99%
Wants: 1
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Rogness Brewing Company visit their website
Texas, United States

Style | ABV
Scotch Ale / Wee Heavy |  7.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: videofrog on 08-13-2012)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 37 | Reviews: 9 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of TheStashRide
5/5  rDev +43.7%

TheStashRide, Oct 08, 2012
Photo of Jim_Razinha
5/5  rDev +43.7%

Jim_Razinha, Apr 20, 2014
Photo of Britain
4.5/5  rDev +29.3%

Britain, Mar 05, 2013
Photo of Sunmoon1129
4.25/5  rDev +22.1%

Sunmoon1129, Apr 10, 2013
Photo of champ103
4.16/5  rDev +19.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

On tap at Nobi Public House.

A: Pours a dark brown, nearly black color. A two finger tan head forms and gently recedes to a ring that sticks throughout. Light lace is left behind.
S: Up front is big smoke aromas. Not full on peat, but more smoked malt. Toasted malt, chocolate, wood, lightly sweet in the nose as well. Very nice.
T: Follows the nose with plenty of smoke flavor. Almost meaty smoked malt. Toasted and slightly sweet caramel malts. Chocolate, wood. I like it.
M/D: A medium to full body. Moderate carbonation, smooth. The heavy smoked malt character makes this a slower sipper than normal for me. Though still very enjoyable.

This is a good Scotch Ale. I am very happy to have found this, and very pleased that this is not just sweet malts that many American brewery versions are. There is plenty of depth here. Very nice.

champ103, Feb 09, 2013
Photo of backphish
4/5  rDev +14.9%

backphish, Jun 10, 2013
Photo of bkrbdan
4/5  rDev +14.9%

bkrbdan, Feb 19, 2013
Photo of kjkinsey
4/5  rDev +14.9%

kjkinsey, May 18, 2013
Photo of abex44
4/5  rDev +14.9%

abex44, Jun 04, 2013
Photo of brandon911
4/5  rDev +14.9%

brandon911, Jun 04, 2013
Photo of vcoggins
3.8/5  rDev +9.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

22 oz bottle
Served in a tulip glass

A - Pours dark brown and cloudy with an off white light tan 1 finger head.

S - Lots of smoke up front. Sweet toasted malts behind the smokiness.

T - Definitely taste the smokiness but not as strong as I expected. Small amount of caramel toffee malts.

M - Low to medium carbonation. Slightly thick but not heavy.

O - This is a very good beer. My first from Rogness. It is a little more smokey than others of the Scotch Ale style that I have had. I would definitely drink this again but probably won't seek it out.

vcoggins, Jun 07, 2013
Photo of Dwtucker90
3.75/5  rDev +7.8%

Dwtucker90, Jan 13, 2013
Photo of JohnBender
3.75/5  rDev +7.8%

JohnBender, Jan 29, 2013
Photo of cdwil
3.75/5  rDev +7.8%

cdwil, Dec 19, 2012
Photo of DillanWeems
3.75/5  rDev +7.8%

DillanWeems, Oct 22, 2013
Photo of Danobold
3.75/5  rDev +7.8%

Danobold, Oct 06, 2013
Photo of Hellmeh
3.75/5  rDev +7.8%

Hellmeh, Jun 20, 2013
Photo of tjkinate
3.75/5  rDev +7.8%

tjkinate, Jan 31, 2013
Photo of TXBulldog
3.65/5  rDev +4.9%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.75

Poured from a bottle into a tulip glass.

Color on this reminds me of an antique leather - in a good way. Rich brown with some golden notes in the light. Poured with about a fingers worth of head that dissipated down to a minimal ring very quickly, with no lacing to speak of.

Nose is very heavy on the sweet malt with a little bit of underlying peatiness. The deeper I inhaled the more the peat came to dominate. If you're a fan of certain Scotch Whisky (as I am) then the smoky peat can be very pleasant, but it could be off-putting to people unfamiliar with the flavor as it does smell a little boggy.

Palette follows the nose on this one, with the sweet caramel malt really dominating. Very little bitterness here and no detectable hop notes at all. The peat flavor underlies it all and, as with the nose, your mileage may vary on how much you enjoy that.

Mouthfeel is a little thin and has very little carbonation.

The wee heavy is not a style I'm super familiar with, so hard for me to say how well this rates for type. My overall impression is that this one is enjoyable but a little one note. I don't normally say this, but I think this would have benefitted greatly from a higher ABV. A little warming booziness to it and I could see myself having this as a go-to beer when (if) the weather cools off.

TXBulldog, Sep 12, 2013
Photo of blastoderm55
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

blastoderm55, Sep 25, 2013
Photo of Musineer
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

Musineer, Jul 13, 2013
Photo of Hoganlaw
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

Hoganlaw, May 10, 2014
Photo of Gagnonsux
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

Gagnonsux, Mar 02, 2013
Photo of videofrog
3.38/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Served on-tap at the Flying Saucer in Austin.

A: Dark brown, nearly opaque with garnet hues on the edges. Off-white head.

S: Peat smoke, alochol, sweet malts.

T: Peat smoke really strong, alcohol there, toffee, earthy hops, more than usual for the style, but still in the background.

M: Nice and thick, but not as much as I'd like. Carb is low as it should be, dry finish.

O: I liked this offering from Rogness, but won't likely be seeking it out again. I found the peat smoke to be overpowering, but at least it was there. Iron Thistle is easier drinking, but little to no smoke. Rook has more flavor, but I'm still searching for that great Texas Wee Heavy.

videofrog, Aug 13, 2012
Photo of greenspointexas
3.25/5  rDev -6.6%

greenspointexas, Dec 14, 2013
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Rook from Rogness Brewing Company
80 out of 100 based on 37 ratings.