Dismiss Notice
Save $5 when you subscribe to 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine by selecting auto-renew.

Subscribe now →
Dismiss Notice
Join Our Email List →

And we'll send you the latest updates and offers from BeerAdvocate, because knowing is half the battle.
Dismiss Notice

Pre-order your Respect Beer "Hipster" Hoodie today!

Plus: Free shipping (US only) on orders of $25 or more until 12/18/15. Just select "Free Shipping" at checkout.

Shop now →

Coors - Coors Brewing Company

Not Rated.

Educational use only; do not reuse.

657 Reviews

(Read More)
Reviews: 657
Hads: 2,638
Avg: 2.68
pDev: 55.6%
Wants: 25
Gots: 468 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Coors Brewing Company visit their website
Colorado, United States

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 08-17-2001

No notes at this time.
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Coors Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 657 | Hads: 2,638
Photo of UCLABrewN84
2.68/5  rDev 0%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

Pours a clear yellow with a foamy khaki head that settles to a film on top of the beer. Small dots of lace slowly drip into the remaining beer on the drink down. Smell is of malt, grain, and a distinct popcorn aroma. Taste is much the same with a sweet finish. This beer has a good level of carbonation with a crisp mouthfeel. Overall, this is a pretty poor beer that is only drinkable when it’s super cold.

 409 characters

Photo of kylehay2004
3.47/5  rDev +29.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Had on tap at the brewery in Golden.

A: slight hazy and straw colored.

S: sweet bready notes. Some malt. No hops

T: very sweet bready taste. Its actually not terrible. I am not sure if I have ever had coors before now. Mostly had budweiser products back when I was going for quantity over quality (college)

M: high carbonation and light body.

Overall: Not as bad as I was expecting. sweet and fairly drinkable.

 415 characters

Photo of metter98
2.58/5  rDev -3.7%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3

A: The beer is crystal clear light straw yellow in color and has a moderate amount of visible carbonation. It poured with a finger high white head that died down, leaving a thin layer of bubbles covering the surface and a narrow collar around the edge of the glass.
S: Moderate aromas of adjunct malts are present in the nose-corn seems to stand out in particular. Notes of grainy malts and hints of grassy hops are also perceptible.
T: Like the smell, the taste has lots of flavors of corn adjuncts along with a slight amount of bitterness.
M: It feels light- to medium-bodied on the palate and has a moderate amount of carbonation.
O: I found this to be not a bad beer for the style because it doesn't have a light-bodied or watery mouthfeel and has enough in the way of bitterness to balance off the malts.

 813 characters

Photo of StonedTrippin
2.28/5  rDev -14.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

this is no cowboy classic, this is crap. watered down yellow pee looking adjunct brew that only leaves you with a few extra bucks in your pocket and a hangover for the ages. this is for the birds. weak extracty malt nose, metallic taste, minneraly and off in the finish, a little sweet, and oddly grainy in feel. its got too much carbonation, not enough body, and is highly lacking in the tradition and western values it seems to have built its reputation on. is it better than a coors light? maybe in certain circumstances, but in isolation, this is a terrible beer and i would much prefer to not drink than to drink this 9 times out of 10.

 641 characters

Photo of Knapp85
2.97/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Coors Original in most ways is a pretty standard looking and tasting beer. The pour is golden yellow with a thin head that vanishes quickly. The aroma of this beer is a fresh sweet smell of grains. The taste backs up the smell with a little bit of a honey flavor in the aftertaste. This beer is much better than their light version. I wouldn't mind consuming this one at a party or something like that.

 402 characters

Photo of BEERchitect
3.13/5  rDev +16.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Its middle of the road for an American Lager. Looks brightly straw with more than average carbonation. A stark white head that wanted to hang around. No lacing to mention. Smells sweetly of light malts and smooth vegetol flavors--corn? Tastes same smooth corn sugar flavors. Light grainy and barley like. Some sourness from fermentation, albeit light. Body is round for a lager, settles toward the finish. Finishes smooth and subtle. Everything about this beer is subtle, but clean.

 482 characters

Photo of Phyl21ca
1.81/5  rDev -32.5%
look: 2.75 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 1.75

Can: Poured a golden color lager with a medium bubbly white head with minimal retention and some light lacing. Aroma of light adjunct notes with light sweet notes. Taste is quite bland with light sweet adjunct notes that are noticeable. Body is light with good carbonation. Nothing shocking here and probably better then Coors Light but still incredibly bland at the end of the day.

 382 characters

Photo of biboergosum
2.55/5  rDev -4.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

16oz can. The mountains are blue, so I guess it's time to finally get a kick at this so-called classic, procured at a pit-stop in Helena, MT.

This beer pours a crystal clear, bright pale golden straw colour, with one finger of fizzy white head, which doesn't stop to ask for directions on its way outta town, nor does it have the good graces to leave much in the way of any lace calling card.

It smells of grainy mashed corn, a bit of acrid plastic-like phenols, and some earthy, vegetal mustiness. The taste is sweet corn/ricecake 'malt', wet cardboard, some well past its prime lemon juice, and very soft musty, earthy, and dead weed hops.

The carbonation is average to low in effervescent joy, the body medium-light in weight for the style, but doing at least one better than the expected thin mouthfeel, and adequately smooth. It finishes off-dry, the aforementioned adjunct sweetness somehow tempered, what with little else to really push the issue.

A fair lot better than its little brother, the only Coors brand currently available this side of the 49th parallel, but that's only saying so much. Still plain and stiff, but I give it props for the general lack of skunk. And even though I've finally sampled this, I suppose I'll never know if Joe the Cop was right in his assertion regarding the relative quality of Pawtucket Patriot Ale.

 1,350 characters

Photo of emerge077
3.2/5  rDev +19.4%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3.25

Was under the impression that Banquet was the "original recipe" Coors, but it seems to be marketing (BS) rebranding. Rated to style.

Pale anemic yellow, plenty of rapid champagne carbonation. A thin layer of white foam and even some lacing that forms a collar around the edges. Lasting coverage and retention.

Aroma is mild, and thankfully not skunky. Faintly floral hop and white bread.

Flavor is similarly mild, light apple and saltine cracker. Sort of bland, though clean and with a dry finish. Feel is a little astringent and over carbed. Lingering crisp apple note, and a slight dry paperiness.

Honestly, this is one of the better macro AAL's out there. Despite it's flaws it's very inoffensive and highly drinkable.

 725 characters

Photo of zeff80
2.51/5  rDev -6.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - Poured out a bright, golden color with a small, short-lived head. Very fizzy and carbonated.

S - It smelled merely of corn.

T - Tasted of corn and grains. Just a slight hint of hops. And a little bitter.

M - It was crisp and sharp. A light-bodied beer.

D - Not bad for a BMC product. Has a somewhat unpleasant aftertaste and nothing special in terms of flavor.

 368 characters

Photo of BuckeyeNation
1.72/5  rDev -35.8%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Pulled straight from the cooler at my local grocery about 30 minutes ago. This is a 24 oz. collector can of 'Jessie's Custom Six Pack' of custom motorcycles. I got can #5, 'Snappin' Necks El Diablo'. I just hope that the beer is as bitchin' as the bike, but I'm not overly optimistic.

Time was (long, long ago in a Midwestern town far, far away) when Coors beer held a near-mythical status. Nearly impossible to acquire, it was supposed to be well worth it for the lucky few who were able to lay their hands on some. I've known better for a long, long time.

Medium straw yellow, almost dark enough to be considered amber. The head is bright white, exceedingly soft/fizzy/airy and falls to a thin film in mere minutes. The glass is clean as a whistle; there's not a trace of lace.

The aroma is subpar and that's being kind. Sweet and grainy, there's nothing at all in the nose that reminds me of good beer. Insipid, adjuncty nastiness on the palate. Sweet corny flavor flops around on my taste buds for a bit and then mercifully fades away with a whimper.

There's also an unpleasant off-flavor (if that's not a redundancy) that I can't quite place. No skunkiness, but then the last time I checked a physics textbook it said that light has a hard time penetrating aluminum. The body/mouthfeel is anorectic; thin and watery just about covers it.

I am forever amazed at how adjunct lagers from BMC can continue to be brewed and consumed in such large quantities. Coors Original doesn't trigger my gag reflex, but I won't be drinking it once it warms because all bets will then be off. I guess that I'll have to blame my latent masochistic streak for the impulse to buy this can on my trip to the grocery this morning.

 1,730 characters

Photo of mikesgroove
2.72/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

The American classic I grabbed a can of this and needed something fast to wash the last taste out of my mouth (oh yes, it was that bad). Served cold and poured into a pint glass, this one was consumed on 08/16/2010.

Pour was your standard bright golden color with tons of carbonation bubbling up to the surface throughout the entire session. Head settled down and eventually left behind little to no lacing and a steady stream of bubbles. Aroma of light grain, touches of some bready notes, a hint of light grain and a nice and even mix of malts. Not actually that bad. Given the style we are now on an upswing as this was coming around fairly decently. Nice small notes of bready grains, muted hops, and a touch of grain all come together with a quick hitting, light, crisp and clean profile that I really found somewhat palatable.

Overall this might have been the best of the night. I could bring this to the beach if I had to.

 931 characters

Photo of womencantsail
2.78/5  rDev +3.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A: The pour is a crystal clear golden color with a fluffy white head that quickly dissipates.

S: The smell is full of sweet grain and some malt, without any hops. Fortunately, not much, if any skunk in this one.

T: Much like the nose, this beer is sweet and grainy with a slight maltiness.

M: Light in body with a high level of carbonation.

D: To be honest, one of the better adjunct lagers (although, that's not saying much). A decent enough beer for drinking games or at a ballgame, etc.

 493 characters

Photo of ChainGangGuy
2.11/5  rDev -21.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Twelve ounce bottle under the "Banquet" title downed at the nearby Taco Mac in Kennesaw, Georgia.

Appearance: Pours out a clear, thin-looking, yellow body with an equally thin, fizzy, white head.

Smell: Particularly light, dull notes of grain and yellow corn and, sadly, that's about it.

Taste: Starts with altogether meek tastes of water-washed grains and lightly sweetish corn husks. As about as little bitterness as one could have, though no real hop taste. All flavors seem vacant on the finish that delivers just a bit of tongue-tingling fizz.

Mouthfeel: Thin-bodied. Medium level of fizzy carbonation.

Drinkability: Clean and painfully over-filtered to a fault, really. A very empty experience, indeed! If you do come across a bottle or can of this, well, just be sure to drink it cold and drink it quick.

 816 characters

Photo of NeroFiddled
3.48/5  rDev +29.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Crystal clear and straw gold in color with a 1/2" dense creamy head that holds OK but soon drops to a thin surface covering. It leaves some minor lace about the glass. The aroma is mainly of a mild grainy malt with some minimal hops mixed in, and a bit of sulphur. It's also slightly fruity. The body is light/medium with a very fine and moderate carbonation that leaves it crisp but smooth in the mouth. The flavor is reflective of the aroma: a semi-dry maltiness with minimal hop flavors that are so buried in the malt that they appear just slightly grassy like fresh straw, some light fruitiness (gentle strawberry?), and a slightly crisp sulphur that actually helps give the beer some character. It finishes crisp with a gently lingering maltiness. Refreshing and enjoyable.

 778 characters

Photo of kojevergas
2.52/5  rDev -6%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Traded a bottle of Shock Top Honey Bourbon Cask Wheat to my flatmate for a can of this. I consider that a great trade. Canned April 07, 2014. Can is aluminum, with an appealing label I'm sure has gone through many a focus group. Served cold (per the asinine blue mountain temperature system, as opposed to "super cold" - can you hear my eyes rolling?). 5% ABV. This is one of the retro-looking Coors Banquet cans. Apparently the Rocky Mountain Water [sic] lends it a "Legendary Taste." I'm from Colorado, so this will be interesting. Expectations are below average. Reviewed as an adjunct lager given common sense.

Side-poured lightly into an Independence brewing pilsner glass as overcarbonation is anticipated.

A: No bubble show forms as it's poured.

Pours a three finger wide head of white colour. Fluffy but thin. Lacks creaminess and full frothiness. No lacing clings to the glass as it recedes. Head retention is average - about 2 minutes. Consistency could be fuller and more inviting. Complexion is subpar.

Body colour is a clear translucent yellow. It's thin and weak looking, but not as severely so as most adjunct lagers. Subpar vibrance. Appears overcarbonated. It's clean looking, if perhaps a bit watery - I don't see any yeast particulate or hop sediment.

Overall, it's looking pretty standard for an adjunct lager - mass produced or otherwise. I've seen far worse head retention - even in craft brews below this ABV - and the body could be worse. Not an off-putting appearance by any means, but it leaves a lot to be desired.

Sm: I'm probably way off the mark, but I'm finding flaked oat and flaked wheat in addition to the requisite graininess - which while cereal-dominant, isn't as off-putting as it could be. Clean malted barley is featured here, and along with the corn adjunct lends the aroma that bland depleted character we've all come to expect from macrobrews. I also find it too sweet for an adjunct lager.

Hop character? None. At least nothing noteworthy. I suspect some Saaz was used.

What I'm really missing is any kind of crisp full pilsner malt foundation.

No yeast character or overt alcohol is detectable.

Sure, it's not a great aroma, but I've experienced far worse. It isn't medicinal or infected or anything like that, and there are no egregious off-notes. Maybe some mild diacetyl, but I doubt it given the brewery (say what you will, but they're damned consistent). I guess it's just a light buttery character.

It's an inoffensive aroma of average strength.

T: The corn adjunct is pretty noticeable. The biggest issue here is actually the overdone sweetness. The generic malted barley feels bland and depleted - like any flavour the barley might have had was sucked out of it somehow. I don't find any noticeable hop character. It's a bit buttery, to its detriment. I'm not finding the fresh crisp pilsner malt body I crave, but I guess if that's what I want I should crack open a proper pilsner.

Shallow depth of flavour. Below average flavour duration. Average flavour intensity (for the style).

No yeast character, egregious off-flavours, or overt alcohol comes through.

It's not really a well-balanced beer, which is a bit shocking given how little is going on here. I'd probably prefer an even blander adjunct lager to the off-putting sweetness featured here. There's no complexity, subtlety, nuance, or intricacy here, but the build is quite cohesive. It's not a gestalt beer.

I suppose it does a fair amount with only a few ingredients, and as a homebrewer I can respect that.

Mf: Overcarbonated, absolutely. It's lightly coarse on the palate, which accompanies the overcarbonation bite in a surprisingly complementary fashion. I'll take this weird coarseness over the disgusting syrupy slick texture of more inferior adjunct lagers any day. It's wet, but feels too "empty" to really refresh. Has a depleted feel, like it's the shell of a real beer. It's a bit syrupy, and I find it too thick for the absence of flavour, but it isn't as sticky as I expected. Overall presence on the palate is poor. But I suppose this texture matches the taste in the sense that both are low quality.

Not oily, gushed, hot, boozy, astringent, or harsh.

In its defense, it's not watery - which is a big improvement over most beers in the style.

Dr: Of course it's drinkable, but I've had far more flavorful and refreshing beers in the style - many of which are available around this price point (Trader Joe's stocks some contract brews which are superior). I'm glad I sat down to give this beer its fair shake; it's not a terrible brew by any means, and I think many reviewers will shit on it just because it's Coors. But in a blind adjunct lager test, I think most discerning drinkers would put this in the middle of the pack. While I won't be buying it anytime soon, I have no doubt I'll be drinking it again many times prior to my death.

High D+

 4,900 characters

Photo of TheManiacalOne
2.15/5  rDev -19.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a 12oz can into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a pale yellow color with a thin white head that fades very quickly and leaves very little lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is of grain, adjuncts and light malts with a very faint touch of hops.

T: The taste is mostly bready flavors of grain & adjuncts and the typical macro light malt sweetness. There's very little hops bitterness or any other flavor for that matter. The after-taste is slightly sweet.

M: Crisp and a little smooth, light body, medium-to-high carbonation, clean finish.

D: Not very flavorful at all, goes down very easily since there isn't much to the beer, not filling for that same reason, it's comparable to most beers in the style even though there are several others which are more flavorful that I would pick first.

 815 characters

Photo of Slatetank
3.43/5  rDev +28%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I picked this up in a mix-a-six enjoyed chilled from a pub style goblet from the stubby commemorative 1936 bottle.

The clarity and color is good with golden hue as suggested on the bottle with light chill haze and thick white foam which collapses to a collar of tiny beads with thick lace in ringlets. The smell is mostly sweet with some malt and adjunct aromas like cereal grain. The feel is decently carbonated with a mild sweetness and low alcohol impact with mild spice and gentle dry finish without any cloying or soapy attributes.

The flavor is decent with some gentle corn pop flavor but in general it is clean and refreshing the only real gripe is the minimal amount of malt flavor but it is not that offensive and is pretty crisp flavor-wise. Overall I don't find this to that bad of an example of the style, not my favorite type of beer, but perhaps if you are having a bowl of spicy chili or some extremely hot wings it would not be a bad choice since it is pretty mild and refreshes the palate with moderate but not overdone effervescent quality.

 1,064 characters

Photo of Jason
2.54/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

12 oz can with a freshness date on the bottom of the can. Big frothy white head is showy but does not hold for long, obvious filtered clarity with in the yellowish straw colour.

Mild cooked cabbage and corn, grain and a ghost like hop aroma.

Spicy hop tingles the taste buds lightly though it seems more of a hop oil extract. Light bodied with a moderate forced crispness. Maltiness is very light with a thin graininess. Very clean after taste, almost too clean.

Stripped of flavour and very clean though the aroma is off, tastes like a great beer to cook with … as for putting down a case of the stuff I’ll pass.

 634 characters

Photo of WVbeergeek
2.73/5  rDev +1.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

I used to be quite found of this brew pre beer enlightenment, and well before they did away with the banquet beer approach to their limited ads. Appearance: Golden straw color fizzy white head leaves quickly leaving a collar of thin lacing around my pint glass. Aroma: A corn/rice with 2 row malt sweetness, a bit of huskiness there some very mild hop tones overall clean. Taste: Not overly sweet corn flavor is heavy hops are there in the finish some soft sweetness not bad rather drink this over Coors Light, but that doesn't say much. Mouthfeel: Light bodied fizzy carbonation makes me burp like too much soda. Drinkability: Easy to consume low flavor easy drinking pretty refreshing, but there are so many better well crafted summer micros out there. From the macro perspective I prefer this one over Bud and Miller products.

 829 characters

Photo of feloniousmonk
1.8/5  rDev -32.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Color is barely that, just the slightest shade of a faded pale yellow, though the head, pure white and strong for a time, show some spirit.

Aroma: N/A..seriously, flat, void, bland, nothing but a sprightly spiced piece of moist air...was that politic enough?...(in actual opinion, it's rather obnoxiusly corny)

Taste: once more, there's a fullness of nothingness, a beverage which displays no qualities of actual beer. And this is what we have come to in America, espousing these beers that are most devoid of any flavor or character as being exemplars and avatars as "real" beer. It stuns me, tasting the thing, that so many think so..it's not even a decent lager, and I can enjoy one of those from time to time. It's just a sad load of nothing, and it pains me to finish this bottle, but I shall...

...so to sum, very faint in any kind of flavor, no finish, tiniest body, littlest malt, just a touch of hops, a baby tap...

The very matter of it is that it is perfectly formulated for a certain segment of the populace, those who matter not what travels over their tongues (lemonade has more flavor, after all) and down their gullets, just as long as enough gets into their brains that it sets down the barriers of reason and begins to erode the gates of civility....

In other words, WOOOO!!!

 1,308 characters

Photo of jwc215
3.35/5  rDev +25%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured light straw yellow with a fizzy white head that soon disappeared to barely a wisp.

The smell was of mild adjuncts.

The taste was not much, but more than many others of the style. Nothing really offensive at all. Despite being overfiltered, it retained some flavor - mainly adjuncts, but some sweetness and a slight hint of grassiness. Though a bit watery, again - not too bad for the style.

It was fairly refreshing and smooth, though a touch oily.

More drinkable than some others of style. For what it is it's not bad, and if only American macros are available, it's not a bad choice.

 596 characters

Photo of dbrauneis
2.45/5  rDev -8.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

Served in a bottle at The Village Pourhouse in Hoboken, NJ

A: Pours a crystal clear light golden yellow in color with moderate to heavy amounts of visible carbonation and some light lemon yellow highlights. The beer has a finger tall sudsy white head that slowly reduces to an extremely thin film covering less than half of the surface of the beer and a very thin ring at the edges of the glass. Minimal amounts of lacing are observed.

S: Moderate aromas of sweet malts and grain adjuncts.

T: Moderate flavors of sweet malts with some grainy adjuncts and just a touch of grassy and flroal hops. Light amounts of bitterness in the finish that fade rather quickly.

M: Light bodied with slightly more than moderate amounts of carbonation. Slightly thin/watery.

O: Easy to drink and definitely more flavorful than the other BMC beers (and probably less offensive) - I would not cringe at having to drink this one at the ballpark/stadium or a concert but I definitely will not be purchasing this one for home consumption. The flavor severely worsens as this one warms up - needs to be drank very cold.

 1,101 characters

Photo of mdaschaf
2.6/5  rDev -3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Had at the DE affiliate challenge. Review from notes.

A: OG is pale/straw yellow with a small foamy white head that is gone very quickly and leaves very little lacing.

S: Not a whole lot going on, some grain, light malt, and adjunct. Maybe the smallest hint of a fruit/flower aroma.

T: Breadier than the nose leas on, with some grainy malt and typical adjunct sweetness.

M: Light bodied and smooth, medium to high carbonation.

O: Boring, but at the time, hit the spot, but I think any beer would have worked. The group I got it from also had some New Belgium and Six Point, and when they offered me a beer I was excited..only to get an OG.

 648 characters

Photo of tdm168
3.02/5  rDev +12.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a very pale, see through, gold with a thick layer of soft, white head. The nose is grainy and grassy. The taste is grainy and sweet but the hop character is grassy and adds some balance. The mouthfeel is smooth, crisp, well carbonated and light.

If I had to drink a beer in this style I would probably choose Coors. It's not because it's overly flavorful or unique but because it avoids all of the off flavors associated with the style. It's not metallic nor does it have an apple-like off flavor from the yeast.

 519 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Coors from Coors Brewing Company
64 out of 100 based on 657 ratings.