Royal Challenge Indian Premium Lager - Shaw Wallace & Company Ltd.
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 35 | Reviews: 26 | Display Reviews Only:
2.69/5 rDev +17%
Royal Challenge shared at the 2014 RBWG.
A rather run of the mill lager Its strong point is the aroma, which is a decent light malt with lightly spicy and floral aspects.
On the weak side, the light body is watery.
The flavor is unremarkable for a mass produced pale lager.
02-14-2014 01:38:13 | More by chinchill
1.6/5 rDev -30.4%
Well. I gave this one the benefit of the doubt and poured it cold, straight from the fridge with an aggressive pour and got a medium size, white, foamy head that quickly settled out and no lace. Color is a clear yellow with lots of huge bubble trails. Aroma is the best thing with the beer, is sweet, beerish, hint of hop and malt. Flavor is sweet, hint of malt & hop bitter and lots of carbonic tang. Body is ok, but the carbonation is so harsh that it totally dominates, Finish is a little strange - it's like flavor and is fairly short while leaving a neutral sweetness and alcohol warmth. Maybe the warmth is there due to the heavy carbonation enhancing the 5% into feeling stronger. Not very good stuff.
05-14-2012 02:50:52 | More by drpimento
2.63/5 rDev +14.3%
Pours a clear straw yellow with a thick but not too persistent white head. Aroma is malty and just a bit fruity, not very strong. Flavor is malty and palatable, just a hint of apple - nothing to tweet, but OK. Smooth texture has only average body and just a little fizz. Well, India is not known as a great beer country - yet.
03-16-2012 01:35:03 | More by Cyberkedi
3.38/5 rDev +47%
Wow. A lot of hate for this one. Honestly, this isn't half-bad for a random international lager.
Deep gold color. Definitely more visual appeal than most, and it left lace rings on my glass, too.
The nose is pretty pedestrian. A bit on the sweet side.
Tastes a hair sweet, but not overbearing. The hops leave a bit of an herbal note. A little bit of a cereal grain character doesn't impart any major problems. This isn't too bad, really.
I had no problem downing the bomber of this at my local Indian restaurant, and I might even be tempted to order it again the next time I'm there.
Much better than the usual Flying Horse, Old Monk, Taj Mahal, etc.
Not the greatest beer anywhere, but I'd probably take one over a fair number of US macros, too.
03-12-2012 15:38:02 | More by Domingo
2.2/5 rDev -4.3%
Pours amber with a tiny head.
Nose shows sweet light malt, vegetables, light floral notes and brown sugar.
Very sweet tasting, more cooked vegetables and cardboard. Practically no bitterness. Somewhat cloying.
Carbonation is much too high, body watery.
06-20-2011 02:09:23 | More by CrazyDavros
1.27/5 rDev -44.8%
This is one brew ive never heard of and after tasting i hope i never do again it pours a see through straw hue with average carbonation that leaves behind a one finger head that quickly dissaptes and leaves no lacing,the smell is pretty horrible with hints of grains and weak grassy hops,it has a light bodied well carbonated macro mouthfeel and the only tastes i get are grains,pale malts and weak grassy hops and overall to be honest this brew is definately one to avoid and hate to say it but no matter how good the indian food just go kingfisher instead.
05-14-2011 11:11:36 | More by ADZA
2.85/5 rDev +23.9%
Served in a pokal glass from the 650ml bottle
When you go to an Indian restaurant the beer you should get an Indian beer. That was the thought process that led me on Valentine's day to getting this beer while getting my girlfriends favorite type of food. Well as it turns out all of the Indian beers on the menu were AAL, though I had never heard of most of them it was like throwing darts at a dart board trying to figure out which one to choose. How can you turn down a beer called Royal Challenge?
This beer pours a golden straw color faint white foam that didn't last very long. The smell was sweet with aromas that included sweet corn and malted sugar. The flavor when it was initially poured into a frosted glass from a cold bottle, was a pleasant yet corn filled sweetness. The unfortunate part is that I had to take down all 650ml by myself. That meant that that the beer was sure to warm up. When it was cold it was almost pleasantly sweet to drink, as it warmed it became like drinking a watery corn syrup that was no longer pleasant to consume. The mouthfeel was rather sticky the whole time, which for a light beer wasn't as desirable as you might imagine. This beer was only temporarily drinkable then it became pretty awful to drink. It wasn't the worst Indian beer I got to consume, but there is still a long way for this country to go before it starts producing good beer.
02-15-2011 16:42:16 | More by Vdubb86
3.53/5 rDev +53.5%
Poured a pale straw yellow with a half finger of head that left a little sticky lacing on the glass. Surprisingly it has a fruity aroma with grains, slight malt, and some underlying citrus notes. There is some slight grape notes upfront with a good balance between the fruit grains and malt its a light but pleasent flavor. The beer is light in body with a fair amount of carbonation that had a fruity malty finish. The beer was very drinkable and went good pair with some chicken tika. This one really surprised me even thought is light across the board.
08-07-2010 05:40:19 | More by Gobzilla
2.42/5 rDev +5.2%
Appearance: Light honey color with very little carbonation and head combine to produce scant lacing.
Smell: A slight hint of hops is overpowered by adjuncts.
Taste: Lets just say it's the Bud of India.
Mouthfeel and drinkability: It's cold and wet.
11-29-2009 17:51:36 | More by cudmud
3.33/5 rDev +44.8%
I found this bomber in an Indian grocery in Bloomington and I decided that I just had to take the "royal challenge."
A - Crystal clear gold brew with a small fizzy white head.
S - Slightly fruity (I'm noticing a trend in Indian beers) and clean... almost like clean linen or something. Very fresh and balanced to my nose, but there isn't a lot of complexity.
T - Just like the nose, this is crisp, clean, and slightly fruity. There are some fusel alcohol notes along with a quasi-German-pils saltine cracker pale malt note.
M - Light, refreshing, crisp, and airy. This is highly carbonated, and that suits the flavors just fine.
D - Nothing special in the flavor department, but this is a beer designed to wash down spicy food, and I think that it would do well in that aspect. This is a solid session beer... especially in the heat of summer. I like it.
07-20-2009 01:53:25 | More by pmcadamis
3.3/5 rDev +43.5%
Pours a clear, pale yellow color. 5/4 inch head of a white color. Good retention and decent lacing. Smells of adjunct, yeast, and pale malt. Fits the style of an American Adjunct Lager. Mouth feel is smooth and crisp with and average carbonation level. Tastes of yeast, pale malt, and slight hop. Overall, little metallic aftertaste, very smooth, and a decent blend of flavors.
06-30-2009 07:59:03 | More by Tone
2/5 rDev -13%
Poured from a bottle into a stange. Here we go, my first experience with beer in India. My expectations were not high.
Appearance: Pours a dark, slightly cloudy golden color with a small head that disappears quickly. Plenty of internal carbonation.
Smell: Not much here; some light floral and straw notes. A little rice.
Taste: Very light flavor. Some light straw along with rice and grain flavors. This is a little bit stronger than your average macro, maybe because it is "brewed longer," as it tells me on the bottle. Tastes a little skunky. This is a constant taste from start to finish.
Mouthfeel: Somewhat crisp at the beginning of the sip, from the heavy carbonation. The crispness fades and the pungent taste makes me pucker more towards the end of the sip.
Drinkability: Although light and somewhat crisp, this beer just tastes too bad to be able to drink much of it.
India beer experiment number 1: failure.
12-30-2008 09:31:31 | More by KickInTheChalice
1.78/5 rDev -22.6%
650ml bottle dated July 7, 2007 (5 months old or so.. hmmmm...)
A - 2.5. Straw yellow, bubbly, little head. Nothing offensive here, typical look of a macro lager
S - 1.5 - Ohhh wow... no not so great. Onion smell, malt liquor like ...
T - 1.0 - Taste? what taste? I can't grade it if it's not there.
M - 3.0 - Oddly pretty good. Thin, bubbly, smooth.
D - 3.0 - Frighteningly drinkable. The lack of flavor makes this like drinking water.
12-03-2007 14:55:44 | More by splat215
1.4/5 rDev -39.1%
Lightly flecked rustic gold with a suggestion of orange when backlit. A dirty white cap of tight-bubbled foam sits atop the beer and manages to stick around for a bit. No more than a few sudsy streamers of lace find their way to the glass. A decent look all in all.
The nose is par for the Euro pale lager course, even though it's designated as an American macro lager. And the difference is... what exactly? Choice and amount of hops? Royal Challenge is moderately skunky, although I don't believe, despite the green bottle, that it's actually skunked. There's very little of interest here. Make that nothing of interest.
Gack! This is absymal beer. The nose gave me no hint as to just how crapalicious it really is. The first few seconds of each mouthful are indistinguishable from a below average EPL... and then the fun starts. Harsh, raw, jarring, metallic, sharply bitter, repugnant in the extreme. How is it possible to brew beer this bad unless it's on purpose?
I really have nothing good to say about the thin, lifeless mouthfeel; it's just that in comparison to the stomach-churning awfulness of the beer, it's (barely) acceptable. To be as bad as the flavor, it'd have to be slimy or full of small chunks of gristle or something comparable.
The Royal Challenge brand is given to all manner of alcoholic beverages exported from India by Shaw Wallace & Company, including Royal Challenge Premium 'Scotch' Whisky. What a joke. I don't remember when I've had another so-called beer that was this revolting. The only challenge is whether or not I'll be able to finish the bottle. Looks like I lost. Willingly.
09-17-2006 13:38:02 | More by BuckeyeNation
1.9/5 rDev -17.4%
Green bottle: poured a pale pils-like beer in the glass.... weak head, poor lacing, active carbonation.
Has the Heineken/Beck's "skunk" from sulphers in the light- spoiled lager yeast mixing with the saaz hops. Light body, sandy mouth feel, faint malt spine. Light-struck flavor of sweet and sour hop-malt over musty earthy notes, fast finish where the musty tastes are detected ( these musty notes verge on nasty and spoil an otherwise inoffensive bland Heineken clone)
I think I got a light-struck sample that skunked....I'd like to try this fresh to make a proper evaluation even though I'm sure it will be a Beck's clone.
05-01-2006 18:55:53 | More by pootz
1.33/5 rDev -42.2%
This Indian beer come in a very light green bottle. It pours a vapid yellow haze with some dandruff like flecks that might be yeast (I hope theyre yeast, then again these kinds of lagers are usually so tightly filtered no yeast will get through). Head and lacing consist of a scummy film.
This is the ugliest beer Ive seen.
The aroma is nasty with skunk, metallic grain, rotten vegetables and saccharine sweetness. The taste is soapy with a hop bitterness that is overpowered by skunk and metallic flavors. I cant taste malt over the astringent maelstrom. The mouthfeel is unnatural and almost puckering with off flavors. The finish is as nasty and ruins my palate.
This is not a good beer, in fact its one of the worst Ive ever tried. Makes Bud and Canadian sound very appealing. Since the skunk flavors werent out of control, this probably wasnt a bad bottle either.
02-19-2006 16:36:09 | More by CAMRAhardliner
Royal Challenge Indian Premium Lager from Shaw Wallace & Company Ltd.
62 out of 100 based on 35 ratings.