1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Jhoom - Yuksom Breweries, Ltd.

Jhoom
No picture uploaded.
Have one? Upload it now.
BA SCORE
-
no score

8 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 8
Reviews: 7
rAvg: 2.38
pDev: 25.21%


Brewed by:
Yuksom Breweries, Ltd.
India

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BuckeyeNation on 03-15-2009)
View: Beers (5) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers
Ratings: 8 | Reviews: 7 | Show All Ratings:
Reviews by thekanna:
Photo of thekanna
thekanna

Maryland

3.28/5  rDev +37.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Pale clear yellow with about 2 fingers of white head.

S: Relatively clean, a bit of smokiness and herbal medicine; mostly yeasts and adjunct malts.

T/M: Interesting. Crisp, adjunct malt taste which ends in a slight astringency and an aftertaste that can only be characterized as smoked hops. Light bodied with medium carbonation.

D: Definitely an interesting aftertaste to distinguish it from the other macro-lager crap. Not a bad beer overall (given the pedigree), and something that's definitely drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

10-28-2010 04:59:16 | More by thekanna
More User Reviews:
Photo of cliff1066
cliff1066

Virginia

2.5/5  rDev +5%

01-04-2013 17:34:10 | More by cliff1066
Photo of crossovert
crossovert

Illinois

1.23/5  rDev -48.3%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

650ml bottle.

It struggles for form a head when it pours, it just immediately fizzles away. The body is a hazy gold.

The smell is almost nothing, but a hint of corn flakes, a pinch of honey, and white bread.

The taste is like sour bread flavored water, low carbonation.

Just really vile

Serving type: bottle

12-01-2010 23:18:22 | More by crossovert
Photo of StevenBilodeau
StevenBilodeau

Connecticut

2.8/5  rDev +17.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Wow, just wow...
you would think that a beer from India would be a little more interesting, or simular to an IPA, but not at all. This pale colored beer was way to sweet in the worst way, a malty nasty malta goya wannabe from India this beer wasn't what I thought it was gonna be.

But overall, this wasn't the worst beer I ever had.

Serving type: bottle

07-14-2010 22:37:00 | More by StevenBilodeau
Photo of drpimento
drpimento

Wisconsin

1.78/5  rDev -25.2%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

Had this at Mayura Indian Resto in Milwaukee last night with dinner. Poured with small, soap bubble, white head and no lace. Color was a slightly hazy gold. Aroma was most notably smokey along with some malt and a little hop. Flavor was about the same. Body was on the heavy side for the style and little carbonation. Finish was what you'd expect from the above description. Couldn't finish the bottle of 500 ml. Friend I shared it with who used to be a high end beer distributor, agreed. Not a session.

Serving type: bottle

11-20-2009 16:47:02 | More by drpimento
Photo of NeroFiddled
NeroFiddled

Pennsylvania

2.78/5  rDev +16.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

So what they say about this beer is true, it's pretty ragged. It's husky and a bit astringent, and not well balanced. But that's to be expected really, isn't it, coming from a country where not too many people drink?

It pours a slightly hazy (no freshness date) deep golden body beneath a short head of bright white foam that evaporates into an average collar before your eyes. That's the first indication that they don't know how to brew beer. Onward...

The aroma is mildly grainy, and a bit floral. There's not much there. It's otherwise basically clean, and lager-like. I can't really pick out any sulphur, but I get that "lager yeast" aroma.

The flavor offers a thin grainy malt along with a bit of floral hops and a hint of yeasty fruitiness. More sulphur is present than in the nose (not in a bad way), and there are also some very low-level but odd fermentation notes. It's balanced by a low-level bitterness, and perhaps some spiciness from the hops. It finishes mostly dry, but some sticky maltiness lingers - oddly juxtaposed by a tiny spot of raspy bitterness. It's husky, and a touch astringent. They're either trying to pull too much out of their malt, or sparging it too hot. I'll guess they're trying to pull too much out because although there's malt flavor to it, it still seems a bit thin. And that's a shame because there are some good hops in use here. It's just not balanced properly.

As to drinkability, well, there are worse beers. And there are some noticeable malts and hops to it, rather than just adjunct emptiness. But it's not really well done at all. Everything's a trade-off. I think I might go for a better made adjunct beer over this, given the limited choice.

Serving type: bottle

10-09-2009 20:02:11 | More by NeroFiddled
Photo of spointon
spointon

Illinois

2.55/5  rDev +7.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Had this one at a Indian restaurant in West Lafayette, IN on 4/26/2009.

A= This beer poured a clear pale yellow gold with a 1/4" foamy white head. The head dropped to zero in about 30 seconds and did not leave any lace.

S= The aroma, what there was of it, was made up of sweet grain and sulfur.

T= Super sweet creamed corn, metal, and sulfur. And not in a good way...

MF= Light bodied fizzy yellow water.

D= Not recommended. If you are in a restaurant get the Kingfisher or Royal Horse instead...

Serving type: bottle

04-27-2009 04:21:23 | More by spointon
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

2.15/5  rDev -9.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pallid winter sunshine gold beneath a softly crackly cap the color of lightly yellowed ivory. All in all, the foam doesn't look too shabby. It hangs around for a bit and manages to lay down at least a token amount of lace. Average is as far as I'm willing to go.

Since the word 'Premium' is on the label, this stuff must smell great. Oops... I forgot. All Indian pale lagers have the word 'Premium' on the label. Thankfully, the beer falls short of olfactory offensiveness, but it's still nothing to write to Bombay about. Lightly sweet grain and mildly musky hops is about it.

There are no surprises on the taste buds (not that I was expecting any). The front label says Jhoom is 'for export outside India'. Thanks Yuksom, but that really isn't necessary. I'll refrain from any wisecracks about the brewery's name and the taste of the beer since that joke pretty much writes itself.

Does natural spring water from the Himalaya's Mount Kanchenjunga help the flavor taste fresh and clean. No it does not. What we have here is yet another lousy lager that tastes like barley water runoff with a shot of skunky-grassy hops that don't even provide enough bitterness to make drinking worthwhile. At least the label is pretty cool (as Indian labels go).

The mouthfeel is okay for the style, but then the bar on that pole vault pit is set pretty low. It's thin to start, reaches watery on the finish and is lacklusterly carbonated. On second thought, that all adds up to... not impressed.

India pale ales are some of the best beers in all the world. Indian pale lagers are some of the worst. I'm aware that one has nothing to do with the other, but I'm searching for something interesting to say about this excruciatingly uninteresting brew. Save your money.

Serving type: bottle

03-15-2009 12:45:41 | More by BuckeyeNation
Jhoom from Yuksom Breweries, Ltd.
- out of 100 based on 8 ratings.