1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Becks's Vier - Brauerei Beck & Co.

Not Rated.
Becks's VierBecks's Vier

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
64
poor

28 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 28
Reviews: 12
rAvg: 2.37
pDev: 22.78%
Wants: 0
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brauerei Beck & Co. visit their website
Germany

Style | ABV
Euro Pale Lager |  4.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: cypressbob on 10-06-2006)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 28 | Reviews: 12 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of vinnicheers
3.75/5  rDev +58.2%

light version of the German beck`s drank in Bremen. very nice and cold on tap..

Photo of flyingpig
1.96/5  rDev -17.3%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 1.25

275ml bottle from Morrison's Supermarker, Glasgow:
Light amber to golden, a 1cm bubbly white head that disappeared completely after 20 seconds.

Very light with some corn & skunk, there was some adjuncts as well & faint grassy hops. Some bitterness comes through but like the rest this is light as well, bordering on weak.

Grassy hops & a light bitterness, there was faint skunk & a few lager type malts & adjuncts. A bland & weak tasting beer that didn't taste great at all.

Light bodied with a grainy feel to it, particularly towards the end of the beer & some chewy patches throughout. The body was very light & watery with some faint bitterness & slightly above average carbonation.

A fairly poor beer from Beck's, although to be honest I wasn't really expecting much more for it in truth. The beer was far too weak & light which made it a drag to work my way down, it wasn't even good for a macro pale lager either & it's not one I'll be picking up again.

Photo of steverx8
2.5/5  rDev +5.5%

Photo of Stuckey_Stuckey
2.25/5  rDev -5.1%

Photo of Howlader
1.75/5  rDev -26.2%

Photo of Griffith
3/5  rDev +26.6%

Photo of Sam-VW
2/5  rDev -15.6%

Photo of endless1408
2.5/5  rDev +5.5%

Photo of Mr_Pink_152
2/5  rDev -15.6%

Photo of BlackHaddock
2.68/5  rDev +13.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.75

On 28th Nov 13 I had a little Lager/Pilsner session and started off with a side by side Beck's v Beck's Vier. Both beers were poured into Veltin badged stemmed tulips. The Vier came in a green 275ml bottle, part of a pack. My son will get the rest of them.

The Vier looked identical to the original Beck's in every way: golden, clear, bright and clean looking: the heads the same white un-lasting wisp, so many in this style of beer seem to have.

This beer however was slightly sweeter and had less body depth than the stronger normal Becks, saccharine came to mind with the sweetness.

Overall it was OK, grainy and a little too sweet for a good Lager, but nothing really bad (or good) about it.

Photo of abeeronthebeach
2.5/5  rDev +5.5%

Photo of Johnq1964
3/5  rDev +26.6%

Photo of JohnBender
2.25/5  rDev -5.1%

Photo of whiterapid
2.25/5  rDev -5.1%

Photo of slacker79
3/5  rDev +26.6%

Photo of jnjander
1.5/5  rDev -36.7%

Photo of fionn13
1/5  rDev -57.8%

Photo of Pelicanrocks
2/5  rDev -15.6%

Photo of rarbring
2.5/5  rDev +5.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A pale straw colored lager with medium sized bubbles, a small white head leaving no lacing and small curtains,

A smell of white bread, boiled vegetables, not much nose really.

A weak corn taste, a dash of lemon juices, some alkaloid bitterness.

Medium high carbonation, rather refreshing texture, a small body and a small short dryness.

In all a very standard euro pale lager, no thrills, no joy but no real badness either.

Photo of vencad
3/5  rDev +26.6%

Photo of TheBrewo
2.55/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

We pour a brightly colored brew, bordering on neon yellow. It holds a transient one finger head of white bubbles that disappears in a flash. There are bits of lacing left around the sides of the glass. There is full translucency and no sediment is noted. Carbonation appears to be high. The nose is mute, with the only real aromatics popping through as toasty barley and stale, grassy hops. Overall the malts are pale, adjuncty, and sweeter, with less metallic bite than one might expect. As we sip, overly metallic and adjuncty grain hit first. These meld together into one, with contributions from a basic, bitter yeast. The middle moves forward with stark, chemically bitterness. This is in part due to the grain, which remains so until the finish. Otherwise we end with further bittering grain, yeast, watery alcohol, and the faintest floral notes to round things out. The aftertaste breathes hollowly, with booze, grain, and general bitterness. The body is light and the carbonation is medium. With each sip there is a cooling coat, but this recedes into the depth of the throat, with all of the moisture it can find, leaving the mouth baked and dry. There is little slurp or froth. The abv is appropriate and the beer drinks somewhere in the middle.

Overall, what we enjoyed most about this brew was the cooling mouthfeel. It was relatively soft throughout, leaving a fair coating. The dryness imparted was not overly so, but rather seemed appropriate and somewhat pleasing. Where we lost points, however, was in the watery, overly light flavoring. We know that the style doesn’t boast big and bold flavoring, but it would have been nice to have a bit more punch to each component, with less bittering grain overpowering everything else.

Photo of fullsweep
2.15/5  rDev -9.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

440 mL can poured into a pilsener glass.

A: thin yellow, fuzzy white head that dissipates moderately slowly and actually leaves a tiny bit of lacing.

S: a bit skunky in the can, but then virtually nothing once poured.

T: very thin, a slight unpleasant bitterness, but not much else. Not a lot to complain about, but there's just very little flavor here.

M: average; fizzy/carbonated; typical lager.

O: had to buy once, for review purposes (not to mention it's cheap in the UK) but won't rush to have this again

Photo of woosterbill
3.03/5  rDev +27.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

On-tap into a plastic pint at Twickenham stadium.

A: Clear yellow body with only vague remnants of a thin white head. Insipid.

S: Flat, boring aroma of pale malt and not much else. Maybe some faint grassy hops. Uninspiring.

T: A little livelier than the aroma promised, with grassy + herbal hops leading to a rather rich graininess. Orange marmalade on a buttered muffin. A little too sweet of a finish, but pretty tasty overall all. Surprisingly interesting.

M: Thin and bubbly at first, but then high carbonation gets smoothed out toward the end. Quaffable.

O: Do I want to drink this beer? Not really. Am I happy drinking it in a stadium while watching rugby? Hell yes. For a slammable lager, you can do a lot worse.

Cheers!

Photo of kojevergas
2.13/5  rDev -10.1%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Served on draught into a Beck's Vier pint glass. Reviewed from notes.

A: One finger head of fair thickness, no cream, and good retention. Wonderful upward bubble show. Clear light gold colour.

Sm: Clean light barley.

T: Clean light barley body with a bit of a creamy undertone - but not really. Simple but balanced. A touch of bittering hops on the climax. Poorly built for the style. I don't know that more bittering hops would help the beer, even if that would bring it more in line with the conventions of the style.

Mf: Too thick for what it is. At this low an ABV and so little flavour, it should be more thin and drinkable. Too smooth and wet - until the climax which is only slightly better. Chewy and lumpy. Rather poor.

Dr: Too expensive (4.30 quid in Galway, Ireland is obscene). You can handle it one after the other with ease, but your wallet probably can't.

Photo of ThaCreep
2.1/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3.5

Nose relatively low basic lager, there is not even an animal presence cereal either the nose or mouth. Very light, very watery, the body remains in default of malt and hops, it proposes that finally ends with a little bitter but that sounds too artificial to derive some pleasure. Just easy to drink and very low in calories.

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Becks's Vier from Brauerei Beck & Co.
64 out of 100 based on 28 ratings.