1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

't Smisje Great Reserva - Brouwerij Smisje

Not Rated.
't Smisje Great Reserva't Smisje Great Reserva

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
81
good

35 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 35
Reviews: 28
rAvg: 3.56
pDev: 15.73%
Wants: 0
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij Smisje visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Belgian Strong Dark Ale |  10.00% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Catherine the Great Imperial Stout aged in Cognac barrels.

(Beer added by: Gueuzedude on 01-03-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 35 | Reviews: 28 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by nUgZ:
Photo of nUgZ
3.55/5  rDev -0.3%

11.2 ounce bottle poured into a snifter.

A: Pours a dark amber color with a half finger head and minimal lacing.

S: Sour fruits and cognac. Sour.

T: Lots of cognac, oak, vanilla, and some fruity flavors. Again, sour. Alcohol is evident.

M: Medium bodied with light carbonation.

O: This is not my style, but it's not all that bad. More barrel evidence than there is of the base beer though.

nUgZ, Jan 30, 2013
More User Reviews:
Photo of mikey711
3.6/5  rDev +1.1%

Poured a bottle into a oversized wine glass. Heavily carbonated, filling up to the top with white foam on top of a dark murky brown. The lacing is pretty good as the foam sits on the sit of the glass nightly. It has a spice of alcohol that stings slightly. Good fruit notes, grapes likely from the cognac. Some yeast and earthy aromas arise as well. It tastes slightly and alcoholic. It is fruity, mostly grapes, with some dryness, a bit of woodiness, and bitterness. This beer could benefit from a little bit of age, but I actually enjoy the alcohol heat in this beer. The mouthfeel stings a bit from the cognac and there is a little acidity. Definately a sipper

mikey711, Jul 29, 2009
Photo of bluemoonswoon
3.58/5  rDev +0.6%

Editors note: I am going to be elaborating on this beer from notes, but here are some things to keep in mind.

1. Bottle says it is Catherine the Great imperial stout aged in cognac barrels but looks nothing like an imperial stout and pours out nothing like an imperial stout colorwise or headwise, massive head very lacy, does the barrel really impart these kinds of changes, I don't think so and it's listed as a Belgian Strong Dark Ale on the site. What gives?

2. For being aged in cognac barrels I don't really pick up on it at all, really more of a slightly sour, woody almost oxidized smell versus the sweetness I am used to from barrel aging.

3. Tastes is difficult to explain, lots of wood character, lots of oak mixed with a bit of funky sourness, grassiness and sweet grainy malts, finish is quite fruit and lingers for a long while after the beer is past. Feel and tastes nowhere near 10%.

4. A beer clouded in mystery, not quite sure what to make of it besides the fact that it is really like nothing I've encountered, certainly not what I was expecting but also not a appointment either.

bluemoonswoon, Mar 29, 2010
Photo of metter98
3.73/5  rDev +4.8%

A: The beer is cloudy brown in color and has a small head that's off white in color. Despite a very light amount of visible carbonation in the rising bubbles there is a good amount of head retention.
S: There aren't a lot of cognac aromas in the nose, which has more notes of chocolate and oak.
T: The cognac flavors are more pronounced in the taste and particularly stand out in the finish. There is some bitterness and notes of oak and pepper.
M: It feels light- to medium-bodied on the palate. The limited amount of carbonation makes this feel a bit thin and there is some alcohol burn.
D: The beer is easy to consume when it is sipped, although I'm not sure if I would have this again because I thought there would be a larger presence of cognac.

metter98, Jun 13, 2010
Photo of organicbrewer
3.15/5  rDev -11.5%

a-ruby brown. Brilliantly clear with a huge khaki head.

s-slight peaty smoke. Not as impressive as the taste. rum soaked cherries. No hops.

t-Firmly bitter. light smokey phenols. A bit of alcohol. Almost like scotch.

m-Prickly carbonation. Slight alcohol burn, but ok for style. Some toasty malt.

d-I couldn't do more than one of these in a night. Good beer, but a lot going on. Between the phenols and alcohol, i can't have another.

organicbrewer, Jul 13, 2009
Photo of weeare138
3.75/5  rDev +5.3%

weeare138, Jan 01, 2014
Photo of WynnO
3.5/5  rDev -1.7%

WynnO, Sep 08, 2012
Photo of TMoney2591
3.78/5  rDev +6.2%

Served in a Dogfish Head snifter.

Pours a dark, nearly opaque black-brown with a half-finger of bibbly, very light tan head that leaves little lacing behind. The smell is almost entirely wood, though some notes of smoke, brandy, coffe, and dark malts are also hanging around in the background. The taste is a bit if a step-up: the brandy and wood are still in good abundance, they allow the dark malts, figs, molasses, and brown sugar to share in more of the spotlight. The body is almost heavy, with light carbonation and a generally smooth feel. The relatively high ABV and thickness and the prevalence of the wood, though, keep the drinkability from climbing higher.

TMoney2591, Mar 06, 2010
Photo of Spider889
2.13/5  rDev -40.2%

Picked this up in Orlando. Sounded great. Buuut... well... yeah...

Poured into a Duvel tulip.

I tried, I really did. But there's not head to be had here. This thing has sat undisturbed for months, then chilled for several days in the fridge as well, so it is as settled as it was going to get. But the beer is very cloudy. Murky, pond-water cloudy. Muddy pond water to be precise, as this beer is not black, it's more of a burnt sienna color. Why do I take issue here? Because it's supposed to be a BA stout. The Catherine the Great stout was darker than this (though not a lot), I can personally vouch for that much.

The bubbles that do form look like tapioca. Now... I am half tempted to include this element under "mouthfeel" because as I was sipping this I could tangibly feel these sturdy bubbles brush past my lips. Not pleasant. In short - as a BSDA this is an ugly beer. As a stout (per the label, friends) it fails completely.

The aroma is odd at first, but it definitely has its moments. At first it is extremely boozy, and the cognac is very potent. But soon enough strong aromas of toffee and vanilla greet the nose, and assure us that indeed this is a barrel-aged beer. A hint of the ashy char that was so prolific in the regular stout is still detectable here.

The flavor begins with all booze. It's hot and a bit phenolic. There are moments when I am getting peat and juniper. I am not a cognac drinker by any means so let's see what makes a liquor a cognac (to see if these flavors should be expected).

Annnd nope. A quick search yields that cognac is a french type of brandy, made with grapes. Then I must assume that Catherine the Great is to blame here. The ashy stout and the phenolic scotch and juniper notes muddle the subtlety that you'd expect from a fine brandy.

Boozy through and through. Maybe a bit gritty, with low, and odd carbonation.

Overall I liked this better than Catherine the Great, but this still falls short of the mark, especially if you're hoping to drink a BA stout. As I get more into this glass the more I am tasting scotch whiskey vs cognac. I am having flashbacks to the peat whiskey smoked Black Hole from Mikkeller. Just as the base beer was, this is turning out to be an inevitable drain pour.

Avoid.

Spider889, Nov 14, 2011
Photo of portia99
3.48/5  rDev -2.2%

11.2oz bottle poured into a Brooklyn snifter. Classified here as a Belgian Strong Dark Ale, but the label proclaims it is an Imperial Stout aged in cognac barrels...we will see which it is.

A - Pours a very dirty dark brown with huge and obvious wisps of yeast swirling through the glass. Three fingers of dense tan head with oustanding staying power - pretty impressive for a 10% beer - a small amount of lacing left behind on the glass. The overall muddiness of the appearance detracts a bit here.

S - A bit fruity up front almost Grand Marnier like, a bit of lemon, some woody bite around the edges. Raisins, licorice, prunes, some alcohol round things out. Very unusual...some smells in there that definitely are unique in the beer realm.

T - Boozy, alcoholic in flavor up front. Strong woodiness throughout. A sharp bitterness in the middle with some unusual sourness on the edges. Still get some orangey citrus in this sourness. After the swallow some sweet caramel flavors creep in. Not at all what I was expecting out of this.

M - Medium/full bodied with medium carbonation too. Alcohol warmth and unusual combination of fruity flavors fills the mouth completely. Sweet caramel on the finish lingers into the aftertaste.

D - A very unique offering. Not entirely sure how I feel about this one...but leaning towards not liking. Not a drainpour (at least if you go in open-minded), but definitely not an easy drinker either. Don't think I'll be trying this one again. Glad to give it a shot, but this one is a bit out there for me.

portia99, May 08, 2010
Photo of John_M
4.33/5  rDev +21.6%

Sampled today at Max's during 72 hours.

The beer pours a slight hazy brown color with good head retention and lacing. The nose is impressive, with coffee, chocolate, vanilla and smoke. This is a very fine smelling beer. Flavors replicate the nose, with the spice and smoke balancing the sweetness very nicely. Both the nose and the flavor profile are hugely impressive, with a boatload of flavor. Mouthfeel is medium bodied, with a long finish. Alcohol is well disguised, and this beer is remarkably drinkable for its abv.

Another very nice effort from the folks at Smisje.

John_M, Feb 12, 2010
Photo of ktrillionaire
3.13/5  rDev -12.1%

Firstly, this is not an Imperial Stout in any respect. The brew pours a hazy mahogany-brown hue and is topped with a short-lived cap of tan froth that recedes to an encircling wisp. The nose is strange; somewhat off-putting, and definitely strange. It reminds me of a fig and cheese plate, with contrasting sweet dark fruity and pungent lactic notes. The taste is incongruous to the aroma; there is a good deal of barrel and booze atop a lighter barleywine-ish brew. The Cognac impartation is just that - an adjunction of nice Cognac. The feel is rather thin and barely petillant, but it works well enough for the brew. Overall - quite a strange brew; not sure I'd be eager to revisit it.

ktrillionaire, Jul 30, 2011
Photo of brewdlyhooked13
3.65/5  rDev +2.5%

Appearance - a nice amber iced tea color, lots of pale mocha foam. Graduations of rings hit the glass as the head falls and holds at a quarter-inch.

Aroma - a nice sugary sweetness balanced with a good Belgian yeastiness.

Taste - mild malt influence. The abv heat is in force pretty quickly. The swallow has a mild tartness and bitterness. Some yeast on the swallow, the flavors working out together better after some warming.

Mouthfeel - a moderately crisp brew yet quite smooth. Not oily slick or anything but creamy and fulfulling.

Drinkability - a stiff nightcap, not quite as much flavor as I'd hoped for given the strength. Not a bad bottle of suds though.

brewdlyhooked13, Dec 24, 2009
Photo of brystmar
2.38/5  rDev -33.1%

Stubby old bottle thanks to blatantdream.

Good appearance: sticky lace above a brown body, solid retention on the head. Aroma started off unpleasant but intensified as it warmed to become offensively bad. Rotten barrels, burnt smokey wood, ok I'm gonna stop smelling it for components because it's AWFUL.

Taste follows suit, unfortunately. Spoiled malts, disgusting barrel character. That's enough; drain pour incoming. Avoid.

brystmar, Aug 03, 2012
Photo of stuppy
2.63/5  rDev -26.1%

Appearance: light brown, opaque, light tan head when poured, leaves small ring around glass,

Aroma: Dark fruits, oak, vanilla, some sour notes. Cognac/rum like qualities, alcohol

Flavor: Caramel, oak, strong vanilla, cognac, alcohol strong on finish

Mouthfeel: med heavy body, med carbonation,

Overall: Very barrel forward. Heavy cognac and lots of alcohol. Not very pleasant looking. Not a Stout as described on bottle, nor as a Belgian Dark Strong as listed on Beer Advocate. Will not have again. Bottle says "t' Smisje Catherine the Great Stout Man Cognac Barrels", google translate wasn't working properly the day they decide on label as I am not sure what that means.

stuppy, Feb 05, 2014
Photo of GClarkage
4/5  rDev +12.4%

GClarkage, Jul 03, 2014
Photo of ToasterChef
4.22/5  rDev +18.5%

Reviewed from my notes. The notes are based upon a 6oz pour from one of a trio of bottles shared among the patrons of the Lion's Pride last night. The Great Reserva is a version of the Catherine the Great aged for six months on cognac barrels. It has a dark brown color and a single finger of light brown foam. It is translucent, with a very dark center, but I can see some light sneaking in around the edges. It is most important to note that this does not look at all like I expected a big barrel-aged stout to look. Smisje can make a world class stout that doesn't look anything like it's American counterparts. There is a slightly funky, sweet smell. I didn't pick up on as much of the cognac as I thought I would. The flavor has some sweet toffee malts. I can taste some of the cognac, but again, it's not excessive. The amout of alcohol is very good and doesn't overwhelm or distract. It has a medium body (again, not like most big stouts I'm familiar with) and medium carbonation. There is plenty of alcohol and carbonation in each swallow to tickle my tongue. It doesn't have much mouthcoating; it is more of a cloud of estery vapors that I can feel after I swallow. I certainly wouldn't call this a session beer, but for a high ABV Belgian stout aged in cognac barrels, it is remarkably drinkable. If you are lucky enough to see a bottle of this beer, buy it!

ToasterChef, Feb 25, 2010
Photo of StJamesGate
3.03/5  rDev -14.9%

Pours a not-viscous rosy brown with a fast-fading thing taupe head that leaves some trailers. Nose is leathery perfumed cognac notes with more than a bit of barrel funk. Earth, walnuts and unsweetened cocoa and maybe some prune, lots of harsh phenols, followed by some iodine woodiness then tobacco (as another review said) and mild winter spice plus straight bitterness to finish. Thin to medium, way hot, tinny. Calms down as it airs.

OK, right away I'm wondering what Catherine the Great is like to begin with, and I see it's not much of an RIS, so it's not a surprise that this is lightweight even for a BSDA.

Trouble here is that it doesn't seem they started with a beer that could stand up to barreling with something distinctive like cognac. So this too thin, too hot dark ale then gets clobbered by heavy booze notes, to ugly effect.

Far out of balance, and at 10%, a chore to drink.

StJamesGate, Dec 31, 2010
Photo of patmcd
4.33/5  rDev +21.6%

I really didn't know much about 't Smisje, and almost passed on the great opportunity until I went to my favorite brew shop and the sales associate very excitedly told me 1) ONE case was imported to the entire state and 2) It's aged in Cognac barrels. My only regret was not buying a second bottle.

I was a bit hesitant to buy it initially, because it was a ridiculously hot summer day and I didn't want an extremely dark and heavy imp stout that I usually associate with the winter time. However, I was informed that Belgium Imp. Stouts aren't typically like their American/Russian counterparts, and they are actually pretty translucent and lighter brown in color.

12oz bottle into poured into a snifter.

As now expected poured in a dark brown, with a noticeably burnt sienna/red accent. Poured a nice thick, creamy beige head which left lacing all the way down to the bottom. The head settled to a neat 1 finger thick.

On the nose the aroma of the alcohol of the cognac definitely shined through with hints of vanillay-oak and dark chocolates.

On the Palette, the cognac is certainly a featured element which lends it sweet to a semi-sweet, luxurious caramel a hazelnut. I also detect a hint of tart berries. The stout wasn't overloaded with bittery hops, which really let the intricacies of this brew reveal themselves. Sip slowly, because there is much to experience. There is an appreciated mild and cutting alcohol burn that lingers in your throat, but I enjoyed it as if I was drinking a cognac.

This was extremely smooth, and in terms for imp stouts light and silky.

Sipping on this beer on a late summer night, was one of the most relaxing beer experiences I've had in a long time while drinking a beer. I must find more.

patmcd, Jul 31, 2009
Photo of chicagobeerriot
3.6/5  rDev +1.1%

The label says imperial stout aged in cognac barrels. The taste says Belgian Quad. What is a reviewer to do?

Well, let's stick to the facts. Right out of the bottle, it's clear that this is not an imperial stout. It pours a cloudy bronze with yellow highlights at the edges. A thin off-white head develops, but beats a hasty retreat.

The smell is dark fruit, fig, caramel, biscuity malt and just a bit of alcohol.

The mouthfeel is medium-full with more carbonation than you would expect from a stout (but again, more in line with a Belgian quad).

The taste has many of the flavors that are present on the nose: caramel, toffee, cherry and biscuit. But there's also some wood/vanilla action going on here and some sweet alcohol warmth on the finish.

A very nice beer for warming up in front of the fire, and should pair quite nicely with pork belly or duck. Just be sure to ignore the "Imperial Stout" label.

chicagobeerriot, Dec 12, 2010
Photo of Radome
3.45/5  rDev -3.1%

A - Very cloudy, opaque medium brown. Maybe a hint of red in color. The head is off white and creamy, but not huge. This does not look at all like an imperial stout, more like a cloudy abbey ale.

S - Aroma like nothing I've smelled before and tough to describe. A mix of wood, smoke and something organic. The organic note is not sour like a wood-aged gueuze, but more like a "stinky cheese" in the background. None of the roastiness or alcohol I was expecting from an imperial stout.

T - Again, not like a imperial stout. Strong bitternness and alcohol burn are up front, then lots of wood and smoke. No roast coffee notes. Fairly one-dimensional, centered on the smoky wood flavor.

M - Mouthfeel a bit thin.

D - Unique, but too one-dimensional and over the top with smoke and wood for me (and usually I'm a big fan of both in a strong beer).

Radome, Apr 24, 2010
Photo of UnDeadly
3.7/5  rDev +3.9%

11.2 oz bottle, Urthel snifter

Appearance - Strangely light-colored, a dark, burnt amber color. Pour with a moderate head, but no lacing. Pretty good retention though that hung in there for a good 10-15 minutes.

Smell - I guess it smells like cognac? I don't know, I don't drink the stuff myself. Slight notes of brown sugar and oak as well. It's nice, but relatively consistent and unremarkable.

Taste - Pretty nice, the flavors really came together as the beer warmed. Light notes of rum and milk chocolate came through the front, and then glide smoothly to the back with a buttery oak. There is very, very little bitterness to the beer that is only found in the aftertaste. Very late in the aftertaste I start getting cigar/tobacco notes as well.

Mouth Feel - Well carbonated, and this beer should definitely be consumed at warmer temperatures. I got a sting early on that went away. Very silky and buttery.

Drinkability - It would have been nice to have a larger bottle of the stuff, but oh well. I think this beer would be great with a smoke to be honest, and that is something I rarely even think about beers. Pretty high on the ABV, but overall pleasant.

UnDeadly, Sep 30, 2010
Photo of ColForbinBC
3.8/5  rDev +6.7%

11.2oz bottle poured into a snifter, split with Keanlacrosse

The body pours an ice tea color with a thin off white cap. Not much retention or lacing. The nose is of sticky caramel, candied granny smith apples, pear skins, oak tannins, and cognac. Light earth, leather, and tobacco poke through as it warms. On the palate, oak tannins, caramel, and candied tart apple skins hit first. Caramel, earth, leather, toffee, and tobacco notes come through before a finish that is sweet and tart. Alcohol warming is hugely present, making this an ideal sipper. Medium body with minimal carbonation. This is an enjoyable after dinner sipper. Complex flavors and aromas and just plain tasty.

ColForbinBC, Nov 10, 2012
Photo of RblWthACoz
3.93/5  rDev +10.4%

Pours a cloudy dark brown with a big, frothy crème head. Nose is a tangerine or apricot kind of thing with the expected dark sugar tones. Flavor is oddly smoked, like a rauch. Kind of that meaty and bacon thing you get from the German styles. But there's also that Belgian ale character at the same time. Feel is full with carbonation. Liquid is typical. A nice hearty ale. Interesting and different types of character, but a good one to drink.

RblWthACoz, Mar 10, 2009
Photo of Soto
2.75/5  rDev -22.8%

Soto, Sep 07, 2013
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
't Smisje Great Reserva from Brouwerij Smisje
81 out of 100 based on 35 ratings.