1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

't Smisje Great Reserva - Brouwerij Smisje

Not Rated.
't Smisje Great Reserva't Smisje Great Reserva

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
81
good

35 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 35
Reviews: 28
rAvg: 3.56
pDev: 15.73%
Wants: 0
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij Smisje visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Belgian Strong Dark Ale |  10.00% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Catherine the Great Imperial Stout aged in Cognac barrels.

(Beer added by: Gueuzedude on 01-03-2009)
View: Beers (22) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 35 | Reviews: 28 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of GClarkage
GClarkage

California

4/5  rDev +12.4%

07-03-2014 00:21:05 | More by GClarkage
Photo of Offa
Offa

California

2.94/5  rDev -17.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

My bottle said Smisje Great Reserva Catherine the Great and indicated that it was an imperial stout aged in Cognac barrels, 10% abv.

It was an ok beer, but simple and a bit one-dimensional, harsh & boozy.

Hazy dark brown, thin ring of bubbles - off-white.

Aroma was fermented caramelised dried figs and sherry, not really what I'd call an imperial stout aroma.

Taste was woody wine, vague hints of sherry and dried fig, quite boozy, a bit sweet and zesty, hint of caramelised grain in finish. It is a decent sipping beer, but not one I'd ever choose again, being one-dimensional and boozy.

Serving type: bottle

02-17-2014 06:42:23 | More by Offa
Photo of stuppy
stuppy

Maryland

2.63/5  rDev -26.1%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Appearance: light brown, opaque, light tan head when poured, leaves small ring around glass,

Aroma: Dark fruits, oak, vanilla, some sour notes. Cognac/rum like qualities, alcohol

Flavor: Caramel, oak, strong vanilla, cognac, alcohol strong on finish

Mouthfeel: med heavy body, med carbonation,

Overall: Very barrel forward. Heavy cognac and lots of alcohol. Not very pleasant looking. Not a Stout as described on bottle, nor as a Belgian Dark Strong as listed on Beer Advocate. Will not have again. Bottle says "t' Smisje Catherine the Great Stout Man Cognac Barrels", google translate wasn't working properly the day they decide on label as I am not sure what that means.

Serving type: bottle

02-05-2014 00:50:28 | More by stuppy
Photo of weeare138
weeare138

Pennsylvania

3.75/5  rDev +5.3%

01-01-2014 02:02:06 | More by weeare138
Photo of Soto
Soto

North Carolina

2.75/5  rDev -22.8%

09-07-2013 00:41:34 | More by Soto
Photo of WOLFGANG
WOLFGANG

South Carolina

4/5  rDev +12.4%

07-03-2013 21:32:39 | More by WOLFGANG
Photo of WDJersey
WDJersey

Colorado

3.75/5  rDev +5.3%

03-05-2013 04:54:45 | More by WDJersey
Photo of nUgZ
nUgZ

North Carolina

3.55/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

11.2 ounce bottle poured into a snifter.

A: Pours a dark amber color with a half finger head and minimal lacing.

S: Sour fruits and cognac. Sour.

T: Lots of cognac, oak, vanilla, and some fruity flavors. Again, sour. Alcohol is evident.

M: Medium bodied with light carbonation.

O: This is not my style, but it's not all that bad. More barrel evidence than there is of the base beer though.

Serving type: bottle

01-30-2013 23:47:15 | More by nUgZ
Photo of ColForbinBC
ColForbinBC

New Jersey

3.8/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

11.2oz bottle poured into a snifter, split with Keanlacrosse

The body pours an ice tea color with a thin off white cap. Not much retention or lacing. The nose is of sticky caramel, candied granny smith apples, pear skins, oak tannins, and cognac. Light earth, leather, and tobacco poke through as it warms. On the palate, oak tannins, caramel, and candied tart apple skins hit first. Caramel, earth, leather, toffee, and tobacco notes come through before a finish that is sweet and tart. Alcohol warming is hugely present, making this an ideal sipper. Medium body with minimal carbonation. This is an enjoyable after dinner sipper. Complex flavors and aromas and just plain tasty.

Serving type: bottle

11-10-2012 17:44:57 | More by ColForbinBC
Photo of popery
popery

California

3.18/5  rDev -10.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

New batch, picked it up in August or so, I think. This beer pours a brownish amber. Though fairly hazy, it's still pretty easy to see through and looks lighter than expected. Very little head, just a ring of khaki bubbles after a few seconds. The aroma is heavy on the cognac in a rather indelicate manner. There's some nice sweetness and complexity in there, but it's behind a wave of vinous booze. Cocoa and Belgian earthiness are further in the background. Some caramel sweetness. The taste has similar faults. It's just a bit harsh. Fairly sweet, lots of wood, lots of cognac. Mouthfeel is heavy and a tad harsh, though fine, really. To be honest, it's started to grow on me, but I'm still not a big fan. I think they needed a lighter touch with the barrel-aging, but it might also just be a harsh base beer, to boot.

Serving type: bottle

10-26-2012 05:07:24 | More by popery
Photo of WynnO
WynnO

Florida

3.5/5  rDev -1.7%

09-08-2012 05:45:23 | More by WynnO
Photo of corby112
corby112

Pennsylvania

3.13/5  rDev -12.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a dark chestnut brown color that's completely opaque with amber edges and a one finger off-white head that settles into a lasting ring. Sporadic spots of lace left behind.

Boozy whiskey barrel aroma that slightly overpowers the characteristics of the base beer. Some dry oak, vanilla and toasted coconut along with a very prominent cognac/whiskey presence. Smells more like liquor than beer until it warms up considerably and the malt notes come forward.

Medium bodied with an explosion of hot, boozy whiskey that dominates the flavor, covering up almost everything from the base beer. All barrel character with dry oak, vanilla and a very strong cognac flavor. I like whiskey and the flavor is pretty good but it demolishes all of the other notes. It takes a while for the palate adjust and the other elements to come forward. Subtle hints of spicy rye, caramel and toffee. If you are a cognac/whiskey lover than you might enjoy it but it's very one dimensional and kind of boring.

Serving type: bottle

08-09-2012 05:20:29 | More by corby112
Photo of brystmar
brystmar

Texas

2.38/5  rDev -33.1%
look: 4 | smell: 1 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Stubby old bottle thanks to blatantdream.

Good appearance: sticky lace above a brown body, solid retention on the head. Aroma started off unpleasant but intensified as it warmed to become offensively bad. Rotten barrels, burnt smokey wood, ok I'm gonna stop smelling it for components because it's AWFUL.

Taste follows suit, unfortunately. Spoiled malts, disgusting barrel character. That's enough; drain pour incoming. Avoid.

Serving type: bottle

08-03-2012 03:39:38 | More by brystmar
Photo of feloniousmonk
feloniousmonk

Minnesota

4.33/5  rDev +21.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

't Smisje Catherine the Great Imperial Stout Man Cognac Barrels. (Wait, that doesn't make sense.)

't Smisje Great Reserva, brewed & bottled by Smisje, Oudenaarde, Belgium. No other information. Except, 10% Alc/Vol.

Well, let's find out what it is by drinking it, shall we?

Dark brown body, small, cocoa-tinged head on top, slims down to a tight ring.

Aroma: Ooooh! Aaaah! That's whiskey-up, people! Deep, dark, dank, rich, ridiculous! Maple, licorice, molasses, vanilla, and the darkest chocolate. Incredibly indulgent. Bourbon and brandy are running rampant here. Whoa.

Taste: Pow! Alcohol is not hiding, fairly prominent, practically biggish. Getting bigger, rising higher, getting stronger. Full-bodied, but not quite as full as I'd like to keep up with every other big thing in this beer. Large amount of sweetness here, terrific bourbon-y flavor.

What's the base beer? I can't say, but it's not evident, doesn't show, it's pretty much covered by the barrel-aging. Not that I care too much, it's terrifically tasty. Oh, it's just damned delicious.

Serving type: bottle

06-25-2012 09:39:44 | More by feloniousmonk
Photo of Viciousknishs
Viciousknishs

Virginia

3.83/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A- pours a burnt orange russet color with two fingers of off white head. Ok head retention.

S- Man, if ya like cognac you should be all over this brew. Overwhelming musty oak, cognac(there it is again) and rich topsoil tones pretty much characterize the aroma. Some cherry pit and very heady alcohol hit the nose on the finish.

T- substantial cognac flavor dominates this brew with notes of musty oak, cherry pit and sugary fig. Lots o' alcohol heat on the back end that somehow works quite well. Earthy finish with some maltiness and booze lingering in the palate.

MF- sugary slick mouthfeel. Thick body with an active carb that seem to simmer down as you sip.

D- one hell of a sipper. Although its only 10 percent it drinks almost like a spirit.

Overall a very interesting beer. Wish the beer had held up to the barrel.

Serving type: bottle

03-09-2012 04:23:25 | More by Viciousknishs
Photo of JAHMUR
JAHMUR

Connecticut

4.75/5  rDev +33.4%

11-15-2011 00:18:39 | More by JAHMUR
Photo of Spider889
Spider889

Ohio

2.13/5  rDev -40.2%
look: 1 | smell: 4 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Picked this up in Orlando. Sounded great. Buuut... well... yeah...

Poured into a Duvel tulip.

I tried, I really did. But there's not head to be had here. This thing has sat undisturbed for months, then chilled for several days in the fridge as well, so it is as settled as it was going to get. But the beer is very cloudy. Murky, pond-water cloudy. Muddy pond water to be precise, as this beer is not black, it's more of a burnt sienna color. Why do I take issue here? Because it's supposed to be a BA stout. The Catherine the Great stout was darker than this (though not a lot), I can personally vouch for that much.

The bubbles that do form look like tapioca. Now... I am half tempted to include this element under "mouthfeel" because as I was sipping this I could tangibly feel these sturdy bubbles brush past my lips. Not pleasant. In short - as a BSDA this is an ugly beer. As a stout (per the label, friends) it fails completely.

The aroma is odd at first, but it definitely has its moments. At first it is extremely boozy, and the cognac is very potent. But soon enough strong aromas of toffee and vanilla greet the nose, and assure us that indeed this is a barrel-aged beer. A hint of the ashy char that was so prolific in the regular stout is still detectable here.

The flavor begins with all booze. It's hot and a bit phenolic. There are moments when I am getting peat and juniper. I am not a cognac drinker by any means so let's see what makes a liquor a cognac (to see if these flavors should be expected).

Annnd nope. A quick search yields that cognac is a french type of brandy, made with grapes. Then I must assume that Catherine the Great is to blame here. The ashy stout and the phenolic scotch and juniper notes muddle the subtlety that you'd expect from a fine brandy.

Boozy through and through. Maybe a bit gritty, with low, and odd carbonation.

Overall I liked this better than Catherine the Great, but this still falls short of the mark, especially if you're hoping to drink a BA stout. As I get more into this glass the more I am tasting scotch whiskey vs cognac. I am having flashbacks to the peat whiskey smoked Black Hole from Mikkeller. Just as the base beer was, this is turning out to be an inevitable drain pour.

Avoid.

Serving type: bottle

11-14-2011 10:22:47 | More by Spider889
Photo of ktrillionaire
ktrillionaire

Florida

3.13/5  rDev -12.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Firstly, this is not an Imperial Stout in any respect. The brew pours a hazy mahogany-brown hue and is topped with a short-lived cap of tan froth that recedes to an encircling wisp. The nose is strange; somewhat off-putting, and definitely strange. It reminds me of a fig and cheese plate, with contrasting sweet dark fruity and pungent lactic notes. The taste is incongruous to the aroma; there is a good deal of barrel and booze atop a lighter barleywine-ish brew. The Cognac impartation is just that - an adjunction of nice Cognac. The feel is rather thin and barely petillant, but it works well enough for the brew. Overall - quite a strange brew; not sure I'd be eager to revisit it.

Serving type: bottle

07-30-2011 20:20:14 | More by ktrillionaire
Photo of Allpe45
Allpe45

Arizona

3.48/5  rDev -2.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

11.2oz bottle

Appears cloudy, dark brown with reddish tints and a thick and monstrous tan head that delays the pour. Good retention and lacing. Smells like mold and aged cheese, some compost and bready malts. Tastes like dark fruit and sweet malts at first. It's very sweet throughout. The fruitiness fades away to reveal caramel, toffee, wood, and a touch of chocolate. A little bit of cognac in the end but the initial sweetness never goes away, causing a lingering dry finish. Medium-light bodied with low carbonation. I found it tasted much better than it smelled.
Interesting but not something I would seek out.

Serving type: bottle

06-17-2011 00:27:03 | More by Allpe45
Photo of StJamesGate
StJamesGate

New York

3.03/5  rDev -14.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pours a not-viscous rosy brown with a fast-fading thing taupe head that leaves some trailers. Nose is leathery perfumed cognac notes with more than a bit of barrel funk. Earth, walnuts and unsweetened cocoa and maybe some prune, lots of harsh phenols, followed by some iodine woodiness then tobacco (as another review said) and mild winter spice plus straight bitterness to finish. Thin to medium, way hot, tinny. Calms down as it airs.

OK, right away I'm wondering what Catherine the Great is like to begin with, and I see it's not much of an RIS, so it's not a surprise that this is lightweight even for a BSDA.

Trouble here is that it doesn't seem they started with a beer that could stand up to barreling with something distinctive like cognac. So this too thin, too hot dark ale then gets clobbered by heavy booze notes, to ugly effect.

Far out of balance, and at 10%, a chore to drink.

Serving type: bottle

12-31-2010 19:14:18 | More by StJamesGate
Photo of chicagobeerriot
chicagobeerriot

Illinois

3.6/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

The label says imperial stout aged in cognac barrels. The taste says Belgian Quad. What is a reviewer to do?

Well, let's stick to the facts. Right out of the bottle, it's clear that this is not an imperial stout. It pours a cloudy bronze with yellow highlights at the edges. A thin off-white head develops, but beats a hasty retreat.

The smell is dark fruit, fig, caramel, biscuity malt and just a bit of alcohol.

The mouthfeel is medium-full with more carbonation than you would expect from a stout (but again, more in line with a Belgian quad).

The taste has many of the flavors that are present on the nose: caramel, toffee, cherry and biscuit. But there's also some wood/vanilla action going on here and some sweet alcohol warmth on the finish.

A very nice beer for warming up in front of the fire, and should pair quite nicely with pork belly or duck. Just be sure to ignore the "Imperial Stout" label.

Serving type: bottle

12-12-2010 03:51:51 | More by chicagobeerriot
Photo of UnDeadly
UnDeadly

North Carolina

3.7/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

11.2 oz bottle, Urthel snifter

Appearance - Strangely light-colored, a dark, burnt amber color. Pour with a moderate head, but no lacing. Pretty good retention though that hung in there for a good 10-15 minutes.

Smell - I guess it smells like cognac? I don't know, I don't drink the stuff myself. Slight notes of brown sugar and oak as well. It's nice, but relatively consistent and unremarkable.

Taste - Pretty nice, the flavors really came together as the beer warmed. Light notes of rum and milk chocolate came through the front, and then glide smoothly to the back with a buttery oak. There is very, very little bitterness to the beer that is only found in the aftertaste. Very late in the aftertaste I start getting cigar/tobacco notes as well.

Mouth Feel - Well carbonated, and this beer should definitely be consumed at warmer temperatures. I got a sting early on that went away. Very silky and buttery.

Drinkability - It would have been nice to have a larger bottle of the stuff, but oh well. I think this beer would be great with a smoke to be honest, and that is something I rarely even think about beers. Pretty high on the ABV, but overall pleasant.

Serving type: bottle

09-30-2010 00:50:24 | More by UnDeadly
Photo of metter98
metter98

New York

3.73/5  rDev +4.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: The beer is cloudy brown in color and has a small head that's off white in color. Despite a very light amount of visible carbonation in the rising bubbles there is a good amount of head retention.
S: There aren't a lot of cognac aromas in the nose, which has more notes of chocolate and oak.
T: The cognac flavors are more pronounced in the taste and particularly stand out in the finish. There is some bitterness and notes of oak and pepper.
M: It feels light- to medium-bodied on the palate. The limited amount of carbonation makes this feel a bit thin and there is some alcohol burn.
D: The beer is easy to consume when it is sipped, although I'm not sure if I would have this again because I thought there would be a larger presence of cognac.

Serving type: bottle

06-13-2010 23:44:14 | More by metter98
Photo of portia99
portia99

Massachusetts

3.48/5  rDev -2.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

11.2oz bottle poured into a Brooklyn snifter. Classified here as a Belgian Strong Dark Ale, but the label proclaims it is an Imperial Stout aged in cognac barrels...we will see which it is.

A - Pours a very dirty dark brown with huge and obvious wisps of yeast swirling through the glass. Three fingers of dense tan head with oustanding staying power - pretty impressive for a 10% beer - a small amount of lacing left behind on the glass. The overall muddiness of the appearance detracts a bit here.

S - A bit fruity up front almost Grand Marnier like, a bit of lemon, some woody bite around the edges. Raisins, licorice, prunes, some alcohol round things out. Very unusual...some smells in there that definitely are unique in the beer realm.

T - Boozy, alcoholic in flavor up front. Strong woodiness throughout. A sharp bitterness in the middle with some unusual sourness on the edges. Still get some orangey citrus in this sourness. After the swallow some sweet caramel flavors creep in. Not at all what I was expecting out of this.

M - Medium/full bodied with medium carbonation too. Alcohol warmth and unusual combination of fruity flavors fills the mouth completely. Sweet caramel on the finish lingers into the aftertaste.

D - A very unique offering. Not entirely sure how I feel about this one...but leaning towards not liking. Not a drainpour (at least if you go in open-minded), but definitely not an easy drinker either. Don't think I'll be trying this one again. Glad to give it a shot, but this one is a bit out there for me.

Serving type: bottle

05-08-2010 18:51:11 | More by portia99
Photo of Radome
Radome

California

3.45/5  rDev -3.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Very cloudy, opaque medium brown. Maybe a hint of red in color. The head is off white and creamy, but not huge. This does not look at all like an imperial stout, more like a cloudy abbey ale.

S - Aroma like nothing I've smelled before and tough to describe. A mix of wood, smoke and something organic. The organic note is not sour like a wood-aged gueuze, but more like a "stinky cheese" in the background. None of the roastiness or alcohol I was expecting from an imperial stout.

T - Again, not like a imperial stout. Strong bitternness and alcohol burn are up front, then lots of wood and smoke. No roast coffee notes. Fairly one-dimensional, centered on the smoky wood flavor.

M - Mouthfeel a bit thin.

D - Unique, but too one-dimensional and over the top with smoke and wood for me (and usually I'm a big fan of both in a strong beer).

Serving type: bottle

04-24-2010 03:53:01 | More by Radome
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
't Smisje Great Reserva from Brouwerij Smisje
81 out of 100 based on 35 ratings.