1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Bink Winterkoninkske - Brouwerij Kerkom

Not Rated.
Bink WinterkoninkskeBink Winterkoninkske

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
87
very good

158 Ratings
THE BROS
70
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 158
Reviews: 122
rAvg: 3.9
pDev: 12.56%
Wants: 3
Gots: 4 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij Kerkom visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Belgian Strong Dark Ale |  8.30% ABV

Availability: Winter

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: stcules on 12-28-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Bink Winterkoninkske Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 158 | Reviews: 122 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of BGsWo22
BGsWo22

New York

2/5  rDev -48.7%

03-21-2013 00:09:26 | More by BGsWo22
Photo of MTNboy
MTNboy

Germany

2.5/5  rDev -35.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Appearance- This beer is dark brown amber. There was a lot of sediment floating in the one that I sampled. Both the head and the lace were wonderful but both disappeared quickly.

Smell- Slightly metallic it also smeller of candy sugar.

Taste- The taste is of roasted toffee sweetness or I would even go as far to say burnt toffee like taste but the flavor for the most part was metallic.

Mouthfeel - Chunky and full.

Drinkability- I am not over keen on this beer at all.

Serving type: bottle

08-01-2008 13:17:15 | More by MTNboy
Photo of Kahlerbock
Kahlerbock

Kansas

2.5/5  rDev -35.9%

02-01-2012 17:10:46 | More by Kahlerbock
Photo of BeTheBall
BeTheBall

Massachusetts

2.55/5  rDev -34.6%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

A: This head quickly disappeared, and no lacing. Color was a dark brown.

S: got the aroma of dark fruits and alcohol.

T: This tasted very, very boozy to me. Nothing the brewer did hid the alcohol at all.

M: Average moutfeel, almost flat carbonation-wise.

D: Could not finish the glass, and will not be going back for another try. Just too much raw alcohol to even consider a 2nd one. Disappointed.

Serving type: bottle

12-29-2008 17:50:12 | More by BeTheBall
Photo of acoatley
acoatley

Texas

2.65/5  rDev -32.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Appearance: poor head dissipates quickly opaque black

Aroma: dusty not much else maybe I'm suffering from palate fatigue

Flavor: Kind of tastes juniper berries light butterscotch and Belgian yeast but the after taste sucks I think this beer is soured

Mouthfeel: creamy but lingers on the palate like sour milk

I definitely got a bad bottle

Serving type: bottle

07-12-2006 02:15:35 | More by acoatley
Photo of CampusCrew
CampusCrew

Florida

2.85/5  rDev -26.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Bouught this at a local store ooff the cleareance rack. No freshness date. we'll see....

appearance: beutiful color but lack of carbonation and head.

smell: strong dark sweet fruits like raisin, figs etc..sublte belgian yeast

taste: sweet, biut no overpowering. I taste an herbal presence possbiyl from the juniper berries. slight sour but a chalky unfomfortable malt taste and a medicine like aftertaste.

mouthfeel: medium bodied, and little carbonation for a belgian

drinkability: not great, but no horrible.

Serving type: bottle

03-09-2010 23:40:07 | More by CampusCrew
Photo of stcules
stcules

Italy

2.88/5  rDev -26.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Dark colour, head thin with a poor persistence.
The smell is herbaceous and floral, with a sharp note of sage.
It's a very particular beer.
In the taste the note of sage is more sharp than in the smell, maybe a little too exagerated. The body is quite moderated.
In the aftertaste you can feel a little of pepper.
It's a little unbalanced.
Anyway, it is an interesting beer. Must retry it...

Serving type: bottle

12-28-2002 14:08:27 | More by stcules
Photo of aquatonex
aquatonex

New York

2.98/5  rDev -23.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Wasn't so impressed with this Belgian Strong.

Pours dark brown, almost translucent pitch with light carbonation, not much head, some lacing. Smell is a bit watery, heavy sweet fruits, malts and a melange of spice are noted. Taste is a bit better, but the balance is all off. Sweetness and strongness (almost sangrialike) abound with a heavy dose of all sorts of spices that I am not completely enjoying (cinnamon, coriander, vanilla, mints??). Now I'm a big fan of heavy spice, but it needs to work well together. A whole lotta stuff going on, no, more like competing. Harmony wasn't there.

Serving type: bottle

01-08-2006 01:38:45 | More by aquatonex
Photo of Todd
Todd

Colorado

3/5  rDev -23.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Notes from the 2002 Kerstbierfestival, Essen, Belgium.

This beer was originally under the names Begijn, Beguine and Pagadder.

Dark amber with red tings. Lackluster foam head / lace. Soft aromas of malt and herbal. Phenolic, light spices, a bit sweet (like tea) and yeast in the finish. Notes of medicinal in the back.

Pretty average. Nothing standouts to makes it unique or interesting.

Serving type: bottle

10-13-2003 13:29:14 | More by Todd
Photo of Stoutsman
Stoutsman

Kansas

3/5  rDev -23.1%

01-14-2012 22:01:58 | More by Stoutsman
Photo of gwiedman1
gwiedman1

New York

3/5  rDev -23.1%

02-01-2014 22:27:56 | More by gwiedman1
Photo of yen157
yen157

New Jersey

3.2/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

When I say this on the Steelgaarden menu at Bethlehem Brew Works I knew I had to try it. What a cool name: Kerkom Winterkoninkske. It just rolls off your tongue.

Poured dark brown with ruby highlights when held up the candle on our table. Head was tight and tan, but quickly faded away. The beer came to me right out of the fridge like all of their beers (unfortunately) do so I knew it needed some time to warm up. It REALLY benefited from warmth. Before I let the temperature rise a bit I leaned over to get a sniff of this very temping looking brew. What a funk! It smelled like a day old ashtray filled with cigar ashes. It tasted awkwardly herbal and spiced. After warming, fruity and toasted malt came out to play with the anise, white pepper, and some other earthy, nondescript flavors I couldn’t quite pin down. The hops provided just enough zing to couple with the prickly carbonation to keep the beer from being to flabby and weird.

I’m really glad I tried it, but I must give this one another go. Maybe I’ll buy an unopened bottle and bring it home so I can really pick it apart on my own time.

Serving type: bottle

05-18-2003 07:04:52 | More by yen157
Photo of paco1029384756
paco1029384756

Illinois

3.23/5  rDev -17.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Pours a cloudy dark brown color with a small light an head.

Scent of sugars and dark fruits. Not very good, too simple and strong sweetness holds it back.

Taste of sugars and dark fruits. No complexity to speak of, it's okay, at least the alcohol is hidden well.

Mouthfeel is medium bodied and smooth, but nearly flat.

Serving type: bottle

05-10-2009 23:38:20 | More by paco1029384756
Photo of dogfooddog
dogfooddog

Panama

3.25/5  rDev -16.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

pours with small light-tan head; odors of bubble-gum immediately fill the local area. attractive if un-beerlike. nose is rather sharp, malty, typical for a belgian brune.

taste follows nose, very malty, a bit acidic bite, and what I am beginning to consider a typical Kerkomse metallic note. resemblence to bink bruin is large but this is more drinkable. The aftertaste becomes notably more metallic into the glass.

this concludes my 6-beer series from Kerkomse brewery, and the verdict is Skip. Too many have notable metallic notes, it really doesn't work well with beer.

Serving type: bottle

12-09-2006 06:03:02 | More by dogfooddog
Photo of bsuedekum
bsuedekum

Missouri

3.25/5  rDev -16.7%

08-29-2012 02:11:34 | More by bsuedekum
Photo of Tilley4
Tilley4

Tennessee

3.33/5  rDev -14.6%
look: 5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Not a huge Belgian fan, but the juniper berries and lavender this is brewed with intrigued me.

Poured a hell of a lot darker than most other Belgians.

Smells pretty much like other Belgians, except maybe a little sweeter.

This is actually one of the best Belgians that I have had. I don't love the beer but it is better than most.

For those that are fans of the style, this would come highly recommended.

Serving type: bottle

01-03-2008 01:26:08 | More by Tilley4
Photo of smcolw
smcolw

Massachusetts

3.35/5  rDev -14.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Good lace but it doesn't last, moderate head; cloudy and ruby brown in color.

Sugary sweet aroma with light nutty spice

Thin bodied and above average carbonation. Lots of berry sweetness, but I cannot detect the juniper flavoring. There's very little lasting aftertaste; what is there is sugary.

I'm rather blase about this beer. This is largely unbalanced...if you like sweet beers, this might be a good choice.

Serving type: bottle

12-09-2007 03:09:37 | More by smcolw
Photo of Estarrio
Estarrio

Massachusetts

3.38/5  rDev -13.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Ok, a Belgian brewed with juniper and lots of hops? I must try this one. Unfortunately, the promise of bountiful hops would never pass into fruition.

Poured dark, opaque brown with plum tones and a small tan head. The head yields to fine, sticky lacings.

Sweet, chocolate malt in the nose, this somewhat reminds me of a cross between Belgian ale and a bock so far. Not much else going on with the aroma, except for some dark fruit esters and a perceived sweetness.

Sweet and chocolate malt flavors are present up front. The finish includes some dark fruit esters and a cider-like, sweet berry profile. The aftertaste is slightly bitter and tart with no perceived alcohol flavor. The flavors are not unpleasant but they aren't spectacular either. They don't really seem to jive well with each other.

The mouthfeel is the highlight of this beer with a medium/full body, ample carbonation and a delightfully creamy mouthfeel. The drinkability takes a hit from the forgettable flavor.

This is not bad brew at all but it is not one that I would seek out again. The juniper berries really take over the taste as this warms. For a beer that markets the determination to "bring real hops back into Belgian brewing", I'd hope for a hoppier, less cider like brew.

Serving type: bottle

01-20-2007 03:29:06 | More by Estarrio
Photo of BostonHops
BostonHops

Massachusetts

3.4/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

pours a ruddy, mostly opaque mahogany tone with just shy of a finger tan head that lapses fairly quickly into a ring around the glass; decent lacing.

inviting nose advertises sweet, caramel malts, dark fruits, and some spice notes. pretty standard for a BSDA, though no shame in that. flavor doesn't follow the aroma too well; the malts, dark fruits, and spices are there, but something about the balance doesn't sit all too well with me. not picking up on huge hop characters despite the label's mention of them, though there is a touch of bitter hoppiness in the finish. also picking up on a bit of a metallic presence.

creamy, medium to full bodied mouthfeel with average carbonation. drinkable, enjoyable in the way mediocre pizza is enjoyable, but a pretty average tasting belgian strong dark ale - a style loaded with superstars.

originally reviewed: 01-03-2011

Serving type: bottle

05-24-2012 21:10:38 | More by BostonHops
Photo of GCBrewingCo
GCBrewingCo

North Carolina

3.4/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

The beer poured into the glass lightly hazy deep brown with an amber hue. The head was medium, yet frothy and long lasting. (The bottle was darn near completely full!)

The aroma was malty with a very strong dark caramel up front and a strong candy character. Dark fruits were present, raisins and prunes, and a strong bit of muted spice that was impossible to divide into individual components. The aroma contained quite a bit of alcohol.

The flavor was without much character. Some dark caramel and a light trace of spice, but mostly just muted and muddy flavors with no standout amongst them except for some earthy hop contributions. Spices did seem to increase as the beer warmed, but the dark caramel overwhelmed them and led to a very boring flavor.

The finish was dark caramel and light muted spice into the aftertaste. The body was medium full with a moderate carbonation. An ok beer, but nothing exciting enough to purchase again.

11.2 ounce bottle.

Serving type: bottle

08-25-2006 23:20:22 | More by GCBrewingCo
Photo of Cresant
Cresant

Kentucky

3.43/5  rDev -12.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured this 11.2 oz brown bottle into a Chimay glass. The body was slightly cloudy and prune juice colored. The tan head slowly faded to a fing.

Smell was molasses and steel. Dried fruits. Breadiness as the beer warmed.

Taste was very fruit. Rich and tangy prune-like sweetness was not cloying. This one begins with some light bitterness but this is overtaken by a sweet warm finish. Lacked the typical spiciness of winter beers. I liked the hops presence here.

Mouthfeel was medium and somewhat zesty. Overall better than expected.

Serving type: bottle

02-07-2009 20:03:32 | More by Cresant
Photo of tedsox31
tedsox31

Illinois

3.43/5  rDev -12.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Poured from a bottle into a goblet. The color is a dark brown with a large head that dissipates quickly. Some lacing on the side.

The smell to me is of mint, a variety of malts, and sugar. It is a pleasant smell that reminds me of sitting by a fireplace with a mug of something hot in my hand.

The taste is strongly of malt and belgian candi sugar. There is also a minty backtaste from the juniper. No hops in the taste.

The mouthfeel is creamy and carbonated, not much of an aftertaste.

Overall this beer was not anything special for me. I enjoyed the mouthfeel quite a bit, but the taste and smell weren't enough that I would go back for another.

Serving type: bottle

10-15-2008 23:09:19 | More by tedsox31
Photo of perrymarcus
perrymarcus

Massachusetts

3.45/5  rDev -11.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

pours a ruddy, mostly opaque mahogany tone with just shy of a finger tan head that lapses fairly quickly into a ring around the glass; decent lacing.

inviting nose advertises sweet, caramel malts, dark fruits, and some spice notes. pretty standard for a BSDA, though no shame in that.

flavor doesn't follow the aroma too well; the malts, dark fruits, and spices are there, but something about the balance doesn't sit all too well with me. not picking up on huge hop characters despite the label's mention of them, though there is a touch of bitter hoppiness in the finish. also picking up on a bit of a metallic presence. drinkable, enjoyable in the way mediocre pizza is enjoyable, but a pretty average tasting belgian strong dark ale - a style loaded with superstars.

creamy, medium to full bodied mouthfeel with average carbonation. average drinkability.

Serving type: bottle

01-03-2011 01:51:07 | More by perrymarcus
Photo of Gueuzedude
Gueuzedude

Arizona

3.48/5  rDev -10.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Pours with a frothy, initially fat-two-finger thick, lightly amber tinged, tan colored head. The beer is an opaque, dark amber color that shows a clear, deep ruby hue when held up to the light. The aroma is redolent of dark fruit notes that are noticeable even as I pour this brew. Rich, almost jam like fruit reminds me of concord grapes, raisins and prunes, caramelized banana. The aroma is quite malt influenced, with the fruitiness being both from the malt and fermentation. Other malt notes of toasted malt, brown sugar and lightly browned malt. Really the aroma is just dominated by the rich fruit notes; this certainly is appropriate for a Winter brew.

Sweet and somewhat thick as it hits my tongue. A light spiciness as well as some peppery carbonation provide a small respite from the dominant fruit notes. This finishes with a distinct flavor of caramelized bananas and a bit of dark grain astringency / bitterness. This beer is actually pretty well carbonated, it foams quite a bit as it hits the tongue, but the body is substantial enough that I did not recognize how carbonated it was at first. In the very long finish this has a note that reminds me of woody coriander and perhaps a touch of menthol. That sort of spice note (especially the menthol) seems to pick up a bit as the beer warms, so I can only guess that this is from the Juniper berries.

Not a bad beer, certainly appropriate for a Winter beer as it is quite rich and sweet. I could wish for a bit more complexity, but wasn't really expecting it to begin with.

Serving type: bottle

01-29-2008 00:19:18 | More by Gueuzedude
Photo of russpowell
russpowell

Oklahoma

3.5/5  rDev -10.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours ruby red with a pinky of tan head. Alright lacing & head retention

S: Dark fruit & leafy hops & honey

T: Dark fruit, leafy hops, & dryness up front. Figs, more dryness, plus more leafy hops as this warms. Finishes dry & figgy

Medium bodied with low carbonation

Drinks alright, nothing special here, not really tasting the juniper here. The ABV is well hidden, but this is kind of so-so one or two would be my maximum before moving on. Had higher hopes for this one

Serving type: bottle

10-03-2008 02:11:07 | More by russpowell
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Bink Winterkoninkske from Brouwerij Kerkom
87 out of 100 based on 158 ratings.