1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Worthington's Red Shield - Museum Brewing Company / White Shield Brewery

Not Rated.
Worthington's Red ShieldWorthington's Red Shield

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
81
good

56 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 56
Reviews: 22
rAvg: 3.54
pDev: 10.73%
Wants: 1
Gots: 4 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Museum Brewing Company / White Shield Brewery
United Kingdom (England)

Style | ABV
English Pale Ale |  4.20% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: aasher on 08-01-2012)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 56 | Reviews: 22 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of RonaldTheriot
4.5/5  rDev +27.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Worthington’s Red Shield has a very thick, foamy, creamy, off-white head, a hazy, golden appearance, some bubble streams, and heavy lacing rings left on the side of the glass. The aroma is pungent, sweet, full, and bready, and the taste is of those elements, with a mellow bitterness and a light toffee note. Mouthfeel is medium and soft, and Worthington’s Red Shield finishes semi-dry, easy drinking, and delicious. Overall, this is wonderful, and I recommend it!

RJT

RonaldTheriot, Dec 12, 2013
Photo of innominat
4.25/5  rDev +20.1%

innominat, Jan 05, 2013
Photo of dacarr
4.25/5  rDev +20.1%

dacarr, Sep 06, 2012
Photo of ChaseBacon
4/5  rDev +13%

ChaseBacon, Jun 14, 2014
Photo of fionn13
4/5  rDev +13%

fionn13, Feb 06, 2013
Photo of BamfBacon
4/5  rDev +13%

BamfBacon, Jun 14, 2014
Photo of CooleyA-UDIGA
4/5  rDev +13%

CooleyA-UDIGA, Nov 09, 2012
Photo of jkurlandski
4/5  rDev +13%

A good British pale ale--a session ale worth trying again.

jkurlandski, Sep 16, 2014
Photo of BeerFMAndy
3.95/5  rDev +11.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

500 ml bottle poured into a nonic.
4.2% ABV, Best Before End: 15 MAR 14 on back label.

A - Highly carbonated, a moderate pour produced a huge frothy off-white head which could be visibly watched decending. Thin, delicate lace webs are left above the clear pale goldenrod beer.

S - Worthington's Red Shield has a very dusty, dry, earthy nose which gives off an old wood paneling-like scent followed by some English hops. A touch of light bitterness and squeeze of tiny citrus crosses the simple pale malt base as a bit of mineral hardness closes the aroma out.

T - Light caramel notes cross the smooth pale malt's path while subtle English hop earthy notes and a very faint fruity yeast ester emerges. Simple and understated but nice and drinkable.

M - Hard mineral water and high carbonation bite the tongue but the beer remains smooth, softly drying out with a moderate lingering bitterness that begs for another sip.

O - Worthington's Red Shield pale ale states, "closer to cask" on the neck label, as well as an endorsement by CAMRA. I certainly wouldn't call myself an expert, but I'm pretty sure that cask ale is much, much less carbonated than this for starters. Don't get me wrong though, this beer is quite drinkable and smoothly tasty with just a bit of bite for a very sessionable pint I could continue drinking. I just don't find it remarkable.

BeerFMAndy, Aug 15, 2012
Photo of NeroFiddled
3.94/5  rDev +11.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Worthington's Red Shield
16.9 oz. brown bottle, dated "Best Before End 15 MAR 14 075"; sampled on 15 JULY 2014
$3.99 @ Wine Legend, Cherry Hill, NJ (and past BEST BY date)

Appearance: Hazy deep gold / amber body beneath a very full, big-bubbled head of frothy "antique" white. Average-sized bubbles can be seen racing towards the surface. The head retention is quite good but the lacing leaves a bit to be desired.

Aroma: Malt, as might be expected. Yeasty fruitiness, mainly apple. Sweetish.

Taste: Malty, grassy, and fruity. There's more fruit to it than the apple but I can't place it. It's almost a tropical fruit flavor... melon/pineapple perhaps. It's not particularly bitter, and the malt seems to be stretching to get away, although the malt will broaden as it ages and oxidizes so I assume that it would be a little bit more in focus if I had a fresh sample. Some mineral character and a drop of honey appear in the finish along with more grassy hops. It lingers nicely, giving you more time to enjoy it.

Mouthfeel: Light-medium in body. Gently crisp.

Overall: An obviously well-made bitter that's readily accessible and yet rich in character. Remarkably drinkable.

NeroFiddled, Jul 15, 2014
Photo of flagmantho
3.9/5  rDev +10.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from 500mL bottle into a dimpled mug.

Appearance: pale orange hue with a light haze and a moderate effervescence. Head is a thick finger of frothy white foam. Not bad at all.

Smell: light golden malt aroma with a fair bit of sweetness. There's also a yeasty, doughy character that is kind of interesting. Hops are kept to a minimum. Not bad, although it's a bit sweet and yeasty for me.

Taste: noble, earthy hops right up front, with a bit of citrus to them as well. Body is much less on the sweet side and has a bit of tartness and graininess as well as a good bitterness. Much different than you'd expect from the aroma; this is what I expect from an English pale ale.

Mouthfeel: medium-light body with a good level of carbonation and a pretty decent creaminess. I like it.

Overall: this is actually a pretty good beer. The aroma threw me off a little bit, but in general this is a nice pale quaffer. I would love to have a few pints of this on cask down the pub.

flagmantho, Sep 23, 2012
Photo of acevenom
3.79/5  rDev +7.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 3.75

Poured into a glass mug. The beer pours clear dark golden with a thin, white head that retains well. There are large quantities of visible tiny bubbles in the beer. There are aromas of bready malt, light toffee, and some grassy and earthy notes. The taste is very much like the nose. It has some mild breadiness with some sweetness. I get those grassy and earthy hop notes. The body is light with moderate carbonation. The finish is dry. This is highly drinkable. This is a good beer.

acevenom, Jun 08, 2013
Photo of sandanders
3.75/5  rDev +5.9%

sandanders, Sep 15, 2014
Photo of schaffer9252
3.75/5  rDev +5.9%

schaffer9252, Oct 14, 2013
Photo of bushwack
3.75/5  rDev +5.9%

bushwack, Jul 28, 2013
Photo of cdwil
3.75/5  rDev +5.9%

cdwil, Oct 19, 2012
Photo of koes0024
3.75/5  rDev +5.9%

koes0024, Dec 20, 2013
Photo of kew
3.75/5  rDev +5.9%

kew, Oct 19, 2012
Photo of kjkinsey
3.75/5  rDev +5.9%

kjkinsey, Jan 17, 2013
Photo of harsley
3.75/5  rDev +5.9%

harsley, Jan 07, 2014
Photo of BlackHaddock
3.7/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Bottle conditioned 500ml: BBD of 19 Apr 2014. Poured slowly into a UK pint sleeve on 8 Jan 2013 @ home.

No sediment left the bottle so I had a clear, bright, light amber bodied beer sat in front of me with a full and deep foaming head of large white bubbles.

Both the nose and taste are semi-sweet with a citrusy twist. Pleasant enough and easy to drink with the malt content just about winning in the taste stakes: lemon biscuity feel to the flavours.

Fairly well carbonated and fresh tasting: I enjoyed it.

BlackHaddock, Jan 08, 2013
Photo of UCLABrewN84
3.7/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

Best before 3/15/14.

Pours a murky orange with a foamy khaki head that settles to a partial film on top of the beer. Small dots of lace form around the glass on the drink down. Smell is of malt, grain, earth, grass, and slight fruit aromas. Taste is much the same with fruit and grass flavors on the finish. There is a mild amount of hop bitterness on the palate with each sip. This beer has a good level of carbonation with a crisp mouthfeel. Overall, this is a pretty good beer that is tasty, refreshing, and easy to drink.

UCLABrewN84, Mar 16, 2014
Photo of aasher
3.58/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

The front label of this beer describes it as their blond but the back describes that this s their English Pale Ale. This beer pours a very light bodied dull, slightly tarnished gold in color with a one finger, bright white head. The nose features good balance. There is just a touch of hop character with plenty of malt to round it out. The flavors are pretty mild. There is almost a presence of minerality. The malt, despite the style and country of origin, slightly reminds me of Munich. Of course hop character is minimal. It drinks very light in body with more aggressive carbonation than I expected. Overall this is a pretty standard beer for the style. If English pales are your thing this beer will be up your alley.

aasher, Aug 01, 2012
Photo of nebula1999
3.5/5  rDev -1.1%

nebula1999, Aug 11, 2013
Photo of LiquidAmber
3.5/5  rDev -1.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a Samuel Smith imperial pint glass. Pours a light to medium golden amber with a half finger white head with good retention and light lacing. Aroma of biscuit malt, earthy with a hint of citrus. Flavor is very attenuated biscuit malt with light grassy hops and light wheat. Flavors are nice, but quite bland. Light bodied, but pleasant carbonation. A bit of a disappointment after the White Shield, which was flavorful.

LiquidAmber, Mar 12, 2013
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Worthington's Red Shield from Museum Brewing Company / White Shield Brewery
81 out of 100 based on 56 ratings.