1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

New Holland Zoomer Wit - New Holland Brewing Company

Not Rated.
New Holland Zoomer WitNew Holland Zoomer Wit

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
77
okay

121 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 121
Reviews: 104
rAvg: 3.33
pDev: 16.52%
Wants: 3
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
New Holland Brewing Company visit their website
Michigan, United States

Style | ABV
Witbier |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Summer

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Mitchster on 08-28-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 121 | Reviews: 104 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of amishbooze
3.75/5  rDev +12.6%

amishbooze, Aug 18, 2014
Photo of Lymardi
2.04/5  rDev -38.7%

Lymardi, Aug 15, 2014
Photo of Farky87
4.25/5  rDev +27.6%

Farky87, Aug 02, 2014
Photo of KFBR392
3.65/5  rDev +9.6%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: light head on the pour. Golden bright yellow color. Sticky lacing left behind.

Smell: some easy wheat and oats on the front. Bright hops additions on the body.

Taste: gummy hop body is well done. Some rounded wheat is felt on the body with lingering hops. Nice dry oates are felt on the back end.

Mouthfeel: crisp and really drinkable.

Overall: if you are a wit fan this is definitely worth a try. Hop additions are really well done.

KFBR392, Jul 29, 2014
Photo of harpus
3.25/5  rDev -2.4%

harpus, Jan 29, 2014
Photo of Hopstout
3.5/5  rDev +5.1%

Hopstout, Nov 02, 2013
Photo of GinsuDave
3/5  rDev -9.9%

GinsuDave, May 15, 2013
Photo of Bung
3.25/5  rDev -2.4%

Bung, Mar 23, 2013
Photo of matjack85
3/5  rDev -9.9%

matjack85, Jan 26, 2013
Photo of buddyvelt
3.5/5  rDev +5.1%

buddyvelt, Dec 05, 2012
Photo of leprechaunandfatman
3.75/5  rDev +12.6%

leprechaunandfatman, Nov 12, 2012
Photo of rolandboy
3/5  rDev -9.9%

rolandboy, Nov 10, 2012
Photo of salinasa
3.25/5  rDev -2.4%

salinasa, Jul 15, 2012
Photo of iparules
3/5  rDev -9.9%

iparules, Feb 19, 2012
Photo of djrn2
3/5  rDev -9.9%

djrn2, Feb 16, 2012
Photo of Tyrawlings
3/5  rDev -9.9%

Tyrawlings, Feb 11, 2012
Photo of TasteTester
3/5  rDev -9.9%

TasteTester, Dec 17, 2011
Photo of brandoman63
3/5  rDev -9.9%

brandoman63, Nov 29, 2011
Photo of Knapp85
2.03/5  rDev -39%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I think this beer may have been an old bottle or maybe a bad batch. I'm almost sure that this beer shouldn't have been as bad as it was. I like most Wit beers but this one fell through the cracks for me. It's almost tasted sour, and nowhere near as refreshing as it should have been. Anyway this brew was a cloudy yellow color, with a lot of lively bubbles in it that tingle your mouth.

Knapp85, Mar 20, 2011
Photo of JizackFH
3/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured a hazy yellow with a small head with lttle retention. There was hardly and lacing at all left on the glass. It smelled of wheat and some spiciness from the yeast. There were also some notes on citrus. The smell was very faint though and I felt that I had to work for it a bit too much. This beer tasted kind of like an average tasting wheat beer to me. There was some citrus and spice notes. The mouthfeel was pretty light, carbonation was okay, and it went down decently smooth. This beer was decently drinkable. I think it would go pretty good on a hot day at the beach. There wasn't too much about this beer that really stood out to me too much, but I think I would try it again.

JizackFH, Nov 02, 2010
Photo of marcobrau
3/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Cloudy and yellow with a burst of carbonation that forms about a half-inch of head then quickly falls to a collar of bubbles. Smells of ciitrus. Fairly thick body. Surprising amount of bitterness. Peppery towards the finish. Not sure of this in production anymore, but it tasted relatively fresh. A good spring beer.

marcobrau, May 20, 2010
Photo of GRPunk
3.95/5  rDev +18.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

On-tap in an imperial pint glass.

A- Hazy, golden color I'd expect for the style and about finger thick head. Good, sticky rings left on the glass.

S- Citrus and wheaty qualities. Added spice, a grains of paradise/black pepper aroma.

T- Much as the aroma would suggest. A lot of citrus and the peppery spice combined with the wheaty flavor.

M- Pretty smooth, with a bit of graininess. A little puckering/drying effect from the citrus qualities.

D- It's an easy summer drinker.

GRPunk, Jan 16, 2010
Photo of kimcgolf
3.03/5  rDev -9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured to a hazy light yellow with little head or lacing. Aroma was faintly spices and wheat, but I had to work hard to get that. Mouthfeel was a little on the thin side, though I did notice a slight tingle. Taste was more of the muted spice of the nose, and the finish was short and non-descript.

Not much to this one

kimcgolf, Oct 01, 2009
Photo of barnzy78
4/5  rDev +20.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

12oz. Rigorous pour with a swirl of the bottle towards the end of the pour to loosen the yeast sediment reveals a chalky, opaque, hazy yellow ale topped with a rather thin white head. It does, however hold some retention and leaves some sticky lacing on the glass. Aromas were of wheat and fruity Belgian yeast with hints of banana and slight citrus zest, albeit very faint. Tastes were good - spicy, wheaty, fruity, and yeasty with a slight nuttiness and tartness on the finish. Little carbonation leads to a light-to-medium body, which made it seem somewhat heavy for a wheat ale, although I personally prefer a heavier mouth-feel, so it was ok for me. Overall, I really enjoyed this offering - especially if you ignore the style that it falls into - but as a Witbier it is good, but there some flaws if you compare it to other more traditional ales in its category. I could easily buy a 6 of this and be happy with my purchase.

barnzy78, Aug 15, 2009
Photo of BierFan
3.3/5  rDev -0.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12 ounce bottle into a weizen glass. No "bottled on" date or abv is to be found on the label.

Appearance: Nice sized white head shows decent staying power. Bright hazy yellow body.

Smell: Not alot going on in the aroma. Sweet and "wheaty".

Taste: Very refreshing beer for the summer. Hops are in the background, almost undetectable. Has a little bit of an acidic twang to it.

BierFan, Jul 16, 2009
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
New Holland Zoomer Wit from New Holland Brewing Company
77 out of 100 based on 121 ratings.