Dismiss Notice
Hello, is it beer you're looking for?

Learn more about beer. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for as low as 68% off the single issue price.

Subscribe now →

Saint Arnold Winter Stout - Saint Arnold Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Saint Arnold Winter StoutSaint Arnold Winter Stout

Educational use only; do not reuse.

187 Reviews
no score

(Send Samples)
Reviews: 187
Hads: 448
Avg: 3.59
pDev: 13.09%
Wants: 14
Gots: 66 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Saint Arnold Brewing Company visit their website
Texas, United States

Style | ABV
American Stout |  5.60% ABV

Availability: Winter

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: kbub6f on 02-28-2002

No notes at this time.
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Reviews: 187 | Hads: 448
Photo of Duff27
3.48/5  rDev -3.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A- Pours a deep brown color with a thin dark mocha head. Quite a bit of effervescence if you look closely. Keeps a nice head-ring around the glass. No lacing.

S- Smell is of roasted malts.

T- Burntness. The usual suspects in a stout...roasted malts, toffee, and a bit a chocolate. Dark fruits are faint but noticeable.

M- Somewhat watery. Touch of carbonation on the tail end of each sip.

D/O- Not a bad little stout. Nothing too memorable but glad I was able to have it. Very easy drinking stout.

 501 characters

Photo of RonaldTheriot
3.83/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Saint Arnold Winter Stout has a thin, quickly-dissipating, beige head and a sort of hazy, brown (red, under light) appearance, with some bubbles streaming up and almost no lacing left behind. The aroma is of roasted barley malt, coffee, a hint of chocolate, and some plum. Taste is likewise of roasted malt, dark coffee, and a touch of chocolate, and again, that plum. Bitterness shows up at the end of the sip and in the aftertaste. Mouthfeel is medium to heavy, and Saint Arnold Winter Stout finishes semi-dry to wet and not particularly easy drinking. This is a sipper. Overall, this is a good beer and worth a try.


 623 characters

Photo of chilly460
3.55/5  rDev -1.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A - Pours a very dark brown with a minimal tan head. Some lacing, but not prevalent.

S - Lots of sweetness from the roasted malts, with a bit of vanilla in the back. Some chocolate and coffee around as well.

T - Sweetness is prevalent but doesn't overwhelm. Also some vanilla shows, as well as a hazelnut as well. No real bitterness from the roasted malt.

M - Medium-bodied with a very creamy finish, nice.

D - Smooth and easy to drink, no profound flavors but good for the style.

 488 characters

Photo of specksnreds
3.83/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Is this beer getting better every year? Seems like it. A little more roasted malt in the nose, but by no means a lot. Looks great with its black translucent pour. Nice head, lots of bubbles. A little lacing and small head. Taste is a tad more complex in the malt department than I remember, and the bitterness is a little more pronounced. Nice job, SA. Definitely worth getting a single every once and a while this winter.

 422 characters

Photo of xnicknj
3.25/5  rDev -9.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle poured into large snifter glass - thanks to philhyde for the extra

Pours a clouded black color with a thinner layer of slightly tanned head. Fades out really quick, with some patches of film and lacing on the glass.

Plenty of chocolate in the nose up front with milky tones, roasted malts, faint char and a touch of licorice.

Some roasted malts mix in with a decent hop bitterness. Notes of milk chocolate with faint hints of licorice. Soft touches of char and molasses. Finishes with more hoppy bitterness and a dash of sweetness.

Lighter medium body for the style, higher carbonation, a bit dry and lingering on the tongue. Easy on the alcohol, but pretty light on flavor and feel as well.

 710 characters

Photo of ms11781
3.03/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Thanks to duff247. Bottled on 12/15/2010. 12oz bottle poured into a pint glass.

Pours an opaque, dark brown color with reddish hues. A 1 finger tannish head falls to a thin off white cap that leaves foamy wisps of lacing that slide back down the glass.

Aroma isn't all that strong. Some light chocolate notes. There is a certain sweetness to it that I can't quite put my finger on. Something along the lines of sweet caramel malt but it seems a bit stronger.

Taste is pretty sweet. There is a lot of sweet malt flavor with perhaps a hint of caramel. No sign of the bit of chocolate that was in the nose. There is a bit of a roasted character through the middle but as the beer warms it disappears. Surprisingly there is a dark fruit flavor detected at the finish. Definitely a slight cherry flavor.

Mouthfeel is thin for a stout. This beer drinks more like porter. Body is on the lower end of medium with a higher carbonation for the style.

Drinkability is ok. The beer itself is pretty good. Decent flavors and it goes down pretty easily. It just misses the mark for being a stout.

 1,087 characters

Photo of GregSVT
3.83/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

12oz bottle into a pint glass

A: Pours a very dark brown with a nice brown head that faces to a layer and leaves a tiny bit of lacing.

S: The nose is faint chocolate malt and a bit of coffee but not much else.

T: Chocolate and coffee from the nose with a slight vanilla flavor on the finish. Very tasty and very sessionable.

M: Creamy and medium bodied although a bit thin.

D: One of my favorite local stouts when it comes out every year and one I buy when I can. This is a nice replacement for higher ABV stouts like Buried Hatchet and is not as expensive.

 563 characters

Photo of Vengeance526
3.27/5  rDev -8.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a dark brown color with a small tan head that quickly recedes and leaves only a little lacing.

Aroma of roasted malt with hints of chocolate upfront and light coffee in the background.

Some light notes of chocolate and roasted malt show up in the taste, but this aspect is rather uneventful otherwise. A bit watered down for a stout in my book.

Light body with medium carbonation. Based on aroma alone, I expected this to be better than it was. The taste just doesn't follow up and the mouthfeel comes off a bit watery. This one is just okay, but not one of my first picks for a decent stout.

 601 characters

Photo of JMad
3.98/5  rDev +10.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

I poured a 12 oz bottle into my pint glass...

The beer is very dark brown, almost black, not quite opaque. The head thin, creamy, and tand colored.

It smells a bit sour and metallic. There is a hint of wood smoke and coffee.

You get flavors of smoke, a little chocolate, and there is a slight sweetness, then a bitter coffee finish.

This beer has a medium body, soft carbonation and a long, dry finish.

I thought it was very tasty, it's not too heavy, and it's not really a typical stout, I thought it tasted like a cross between a porter and a marzen.

 557 characters

Photo of brentk56
3.72/5  rDev +3.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Appearance: Looks more like a dark brown ale than a stout, with a translucent chocolate color that luminesces with ruby highlights; the rather modest head leaves some dots of lacing

Smell: Roasted barley, caramel and milk chocolate

Taste: Milk chocolate, caramel and roasted barley flavors, up front, with just a hint of earthy bitterness developing by mid-palate; past is prelude as the beer tastes the same from start to finish

Mouthfeel: Medium body with moderate carbonation; surprisingly thin for a stout

Drinkability: While not the most complex stout and lacking in body weight, this is still a very enjoyable beer to drink

Thanks, FreeVerse, for the opportunity

 673 characters

Photo of kylejohnson03
3.6/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Picked up on a recent trip to Texas, my first Saint Arnold Brew. Poured from 12 oz bottle into a pint glass. Appearance is black, but the body allows some light to pass which creates ruby reddish flashes in the glass. Small tan head, dissipates quickly. Aroma is lightly roasted, chocolate, but both are somewhat muted. Pleasant, but would prefer a stronger presence. Similar in the taste, all the elements are there buy would love them to stand out a little more. Mouthfeel is a touch too thin, almost watery. Finishes dry. The thin characteristics of this beer aren't always what I want when I grab a stout, but it does increase the drinkability in terms of being able to drink a few and still enjoy it.

 705 characters

Photo of jlindros
3.53/5  rDev -1.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Thanks to duff247.

A light 1/2 finger fizzy head rises and fades semi slowly over not so dark, coca-cola brown color that gets much darker as the glass gets wider but not very dark on the thinner parts.

Nose has some light roast, a bit of burnt coffee grinds, very slight chocolate, slight fluffy nougat, very light overall.

Taste brings more coffee to start, some coffee some burnt coffee grinds, some roasted malts but lighter, crystal malts, a very light bit of chocolate cocoa powder, a bit of a light malt flavor, and not much on the heavy dark malts, all are light. Finish gets a little more chocolaty and dries a bit, but remains light. A slight earthy hop starts to come, but again not much.

Mouth is lighter with lower but fairly decent carbonation.

Drink is good, its so light, semi dry finish, nothing really heavy.

I don't really dig any of the Saint Arnold beers except the Divine Reserve ones, and Lawnmower ain't bad. I'm beginning to think they're all too light for my heavy beer tastes, but being in Texas and almost always hot, they probably need much lighter beers. Not quite up my alley mostly, but I'm sure they're much better on a hot day in Texas.

 1,177 characters

Photo of woodychandler
3.91/5  rDev +8.9%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

Optimator13 sent this to me as an unexpected extra and my marathon beer day seemed like a good time to open it. Actually, it was on-deck for this afternoon/evening and when the skool disrick closed, it jumped up to right now!

My aggro pour resulted in just over a finger of thick, deep-tan head with low retention. Color was a deep back cherry red with ruby highlights and NE-quality clarity. Beautiful! Nose had a rich chocolaty, roasty scent, like dark chocolate. My mouth was beginning to water. Mouthfeel was thin for a stout but the taste was very chocolaty on the tongue. Finish had an initial wash of chocolate, but then ended with a smoky dryness. Mmmm. Very appropriate for today's beer marathon.

From the label: "As Bishop of Metz, Saint Arnold spent his life warning of the dangers of drinking water and extolling the virtues of ale. During his funeral, his pallbearers stopped to slake their thirst, but regretfully, there was just one mug of ale to share among them. Then a miracle came to pass ... that one mug never ran dry and all of the thirsty mourners in the entire gathering were satisfied."

 1,113 characters

Photo of CuriousMonk
3.24/5  rDev -9.7%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from 12 oz bottle into snifter glass. Thanks to philhyde for the extra. Beautiful stout beer pour, black with dissipating beige head. Nice stout aroma, rich dark chocolate, nuts, and some mild roast. Fun and nice immediate palate, bubbly fresh and stouty! Roasty taste does not overwhelm. Very good stout experience. There is a developing attempt to be bitter towards the end. Just what I expect from St Arnold, quality beer.

 432 characters

Photo of diamondc
3.1/5  rDev -13.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

6 pack on sale for $7.49. Bottled on 12/15/10.

A: Head fizzed out pretty quickly. Ruby tint. No lacing at all.

S: Mild roast, a little berry action going on.

T: Weak milk chocolate, fruity blueberry/raspberry flavors. Not much roasted or bold flavors here. Weak.

M/D: Light for a winter stout which would make you think the alcohol and flavors would be big. Could pass as a decent English Brown Ale, but a stout? Disappointing.

 433 characters

Photo of NefariousR
3.67/5  rDev +2.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured from a 12oz. bottle into a pint glass. No vintage marking, but this is from Winter 2010-2011.

A - Dark mahogany -- I can actually see (just a little bit) to the other side of the glass when held up to light. Thin off-white head.
S - Sweet, somewhat caramelish with fig. Roasted notes in the background.
T - Mostly sweet fruit flavors with only a very slight hint of typical, roasty stoutness. A little unusual.
M - Thin-bodied, with a mild amount of carbonation. Finishes quickly.
D - The thin body adds quite a bit to drinkability, and the flavors aren't too upfront. A solid beer, if a little lacking in the typical "big" stout flavors. Solid.

 653 characters

Photo of FosterJM
3.53/5  rDev -1.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

201st review on BA
bottle to snifter

App- Poured a nice dark brown, little pencil thin head. Not too thick of a pour either.

Smell- Very bland, some malt, some light chocolate and a little roast coffee.

Taste- Nothing really jumps out on this one. A little sweet and light for a stout. Not overpowering by any means. A good stout to have when you want a stout but not a STOUT.

Mouth- Light/medium with a pretty high carb level to it. A bit of a fizzy drinker.

Drink- It was a nice extra from a good trader. I like St. Arnolds #9 and I think St. Arnolds does a nice brew here too.

 584 characters

Photo of Mississipping
3.12/5  rDev -13.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12oz bottle chilled and poured into a Bruery snifter

A: Dark brown with amber peeking through when held to light. Aggressive pour yields almost no head. What was there was a khaki color. Look quick or you are likely to miss it. A thin ring remains, but it's a sad, thin ring that's embarrassed by the other beers in the room. No lacing.

S: Roasted malt and bitter chocolate are present, but there's really not much else there. Maybe, maybe just a bit of coffee, but that might be wishful thinking. The balance between the two is nice, but it leaves a lot to be desired.

T: Following the smell is roasted malt and bitter chocolate. Not unexpected, but not that impressive. It almost seems watered down. In the background there's an odd metallic (iron?) taste, with just a slight hoppiness. The two do not mesh well and it leaves a odd aftertaste. Bummer.

M: Light bodied with a good amount of carbonation; just a little prickly. I definitely would like to see the carbonation level toned down. Leaves the mouth dry after each sip.

D: If it weren't for the odd aftertaste, this would really be pretty drinkable. As it is, however, it's almost a drain pour. I'll finish it, but it's not something that I'll look for again.

 1,225 characters

Photo of slackerlack
3.32/5  rDev -7.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A - Dark brown, almost black.
S - Strong chocolate and coffee smell. Also smells roasty.
T - Tastes just like it smells. Chocolate, coffee, malty, watery.
D - Goes down very smooth with no burn.

For a dark stout, I was very surprised how watery and non thick this beer was.

 274 characters

Photo of rcfunk
3.16/5  rDev -12%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I had this beer last year for the first time and loved it. So much in fact that I eagerly awaited its return this year. Maybe I expected too much, maybe my tastes have changed, maybe I know more now than I did then, maybe my memory ain't so hot, but man, what a sorry disappointment. . .

A - I remember last year being singularly impressed by the light color of this beer: "wow, I thought, I translucent stout." The color seems to have changed substantially since my last experience with this beer. It is darker - a deep translucent garnet color to be precise - based on the taste, I'll wager this is due to a new addition of roasted barley for the 2011 batch.

S - Distincly beerish, with highly detectable roasted barley and an almost botanical quality which I would label as chinotto if I had identify it - perhaps an adjunct a la Anchor Brewing, or perhaps yeast esters conflicting with the astringency of the roasted barley.

T - Mediocre. Leaves an unwanted, long lasting bitterness in the mouth which is either from a very high cohumulone bittering hop, or again due to the misplaced use of roasted barley.

M - irrelevant (not worth mentioning)

D - I wish I didn't have a six pack of this in my fridge.

I am guessing that the highly unusual appearance of this beer last year generated weaker than expected sales of the product for the brewery. Accordingly, I expect they adjusted the recipe to make the beer appear darker and more "usual" which had the side effect of killing what made this beer unique.

Again, I may just be a curmudgeon with bad memory and changing tastes and sensibilities, but hey, isn't that the definition of a beer geek?

 1,656 characters

Photo of EgadBananas
3.95/5  rDev +10%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Thanks to philhyde for this!

Dark dark brown on the pour, with tinges of brown around the edges, opaque through the center. A very light brown head of a solid finger forms, medium sized bubbles, dissipating to a creamy film. Laces okay.

The nose is chock full of roasted, toasted malts, some nice chocolate sweetness and a hint of espresso and (faint) hops.

Taste is nice and slightly sweet, with some cocoa, more pronounced espresso notes, maltiness, with a hint of finishing hops. Pretty coherent with the aroma and it's just as pleasant.

The feel is a little creamy, medium in body, though it's bordering the lighter side. And aside from maybe it being a bit on the crisp side, the feel is pretty good.

Overall, this is a solid little stout, with solid drink-ability. Definitely my favorite from St. Arnold. We should be seeing in stores here soon, and I'm pretty stoked now.

 885 characters

Photo of champ103
3.1/5  rDev -13.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

On cask at the Stags Head in Houston. I am really excited to try this because I don't think I have ever seen this on cask.

A: Pours a dark brown, nearly black color. A two finger tan head forms, and recedes in a minute. Some lace as well.
S: A strange sourness up front. Sweet malt and some fruity aromas. A light roasted character as well. Odd, but interesting.
T: Again, and odd sourness that kind of dominates. Some dark fruits and sweet malt. A light roasted flavor. To much of a strange sourness that works at odds with the rest of the stout.
M/D: A thin, watery, and almost under carbonated body. Not hard to drink, but one is enough.

Saint Arnold usually hits it out of the park with their cask offerings. Not to mention I am a fan of the Winter Stout to begin with. Though this is just off, and seems week to me. Along with the odd sourness. I want to question the cask, or Stags Head quality. Though both those are usually fine. A disappointment for me.

 964 characters

Photo of StoneBrewFanatic
3.72/5  rDev +3.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A - Pours a dark brown into my pint glass with just a finger of head that dissipates quickly and leaves little to no lacing.

S - Roasted malts, bitter cocoa, roasted coffee, tart fruit as in cherries and slight milky notes.

T - Follows the nose well, but in a very mild way. Roasted malts, cocoa and coffee, nutty dryness to it, hints of dark fruit and lactose are present.

M - Too thin and over carbonated in my opinion for a stout.

D - Not my new favorite, but very drinkable, good session stout.

 502 characters

Photo of Stigs
3.92/5  rDev +9.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

12oz bottle, got this as an extra from a BA i cent remember which right now...but thank you! served in a DFH signature glass.

A - somewhat aggressive pour yielded about half an inch of light khaki foam, tight and bubbly. quickly fell to a thin layer and ring around the glass. the beer is dark, burnt brown when held up to the light.

S - slight roasted malts, some light fruitiness in the form of plums, cherries...nice fresh roasted coffee beans at the end, with some lactose sweetness in the finish.

T - following the nose with lightly toasted malts, turning into chocolatey sweetness and an earthy hop bitterness. the coffee flavor only briefly glances in the second half, before turning into some nuttyness and cherries...like the lack of overdone "christmas/winter spices"

M - abundant amount of carbonation, tight and fizzy...not too distracting. thinnish bodied, but slick all the way around and going down.

D - overall, this was pretty light and enjoyable - yet complex enough to keep my attention. there are better stouts out there, yes...but this one strived to be better than just average, and succeeded. a good, drinkable beer all around.

 1,158 characters

Photo of caresville
3/5  rDev -16.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

thanks to twiggamortis420 for this one!!

a- just a shade shy of total blackness, not much of a head with a vigorous pour in a tulip (not saying much) and no lacing or carbonation. pretty average.

s- not too much overpowering my nose here, milky, caramel, i think i smell some hops. doesnt smell much like a stout.

t&m- thin and smooth, im going to have to go back to milky when saying its like liquid milk chocolate bars. a little bitter on the swallow, not alot going on here either.

d- well this one is getting 3's across the board for the fact its super easy to drink and i wouldnt mind having this again but it is boring as all holy hell.

 646 characters

Saint Arnold Winter Stout from Saint Arnold Brewing Company
82 out of 100 based on 187 ratings.