1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Extra Pale Ale - Flying Fish Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Extra Pale AleExtra Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

402 Ratings
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 402
Reviews: 192
rAvg: 3.32
pDev: 15.06%
Wants: 4
Gots: 20 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Flying Fish Brewing Company visit their website
New Jersey, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  4.70% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 12-20-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 402 | Reviews: 192 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of sprucetip
3/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

From notes. Bottle into goblet. Very clear golden, thin white head goes away fast to a ring, no lacing. SMELL is very faint, almost nothing. Mostly malty sweetness, something corn-like, hint of hops. TASTE is like the nose, though slightly more easily discernible. Faint malt and hops. Clean, smooth, and balanced (but not much to balance). FEELS thin, a bit too tingly, but with some body. Dry, corn like finish. DRINKable enough, if the lack of body and flavor doesn't deter you.

sprucetip, Feb 20, 2009
Photo of Stunner97
3.23/5  rDev -2.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Appearance- golden yellow, with quickly disappearing white head, very clear and light color

Smell- very slight malt, corn, bit of yeast and very light hop tones,

Taste- Thin light flavor with slight malty and hop presence nothing overwhelming on either front, well balanced english style pale, nothing completely blew me away

mouthfeel- very light, soft thin bodied mouthfeel, low carbonation,

Drinkabilty- very good drinkabilty as its very light bodied and easy to gulp, not something i would do all the time but could see how for many this would be a good session beer,

Stunner97, Feb 20, 2009
Photo of Applesauce1
3.58/5  rDev +7.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

I picked up a sixer of this while in West Orange, NJ, visiting some of my g/f's friends. I forget the liquor store where I got it though. Looked interesting though, so I'll give it a whirl.

Appearance: copper-gold with a 3/4" white head
Smell: floral and hops
Taste: hops, crystal malt, rose (like hookah rose flavor...could be more of a smell actually)
Mouthfeel: light body
Drinkability: could do two or three in a night

Overall, a decent beer, but nothing to get too excited about.

Applesauce1, Oct 31, 2008
Photo of paulthebeerguru
3.5/5  rDev +5.4%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: snifter. pours a crystal clear light orange color with a pure white head. very low retention rate and soft light lacing.

S: some apple notes from the crystal malts. light citrus hop aroma, very light.

T: great malt flavors, some fall fruits, mostly apples and some pears. decent hop flavor, but nothing amazing, light citrus notes.

M: body is a little thin. crisp and mellow mouthfeel.

D: its drinkable, but nothing exceptional. The mouthfeel makes it a little unenjoyable.

paulthebeerguru, Oct 17, 2008
Photo of williamherbert
2.85/5  rDev -14.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Clear light pumpkin orange. Lots of carbonation. Any head it may have had disappears almost immediately. Bright and sunny.

The malt aroma is a flowery pale sort that has the additional and unfortunate aroma of adjunct malts. Any barley does not shine through. A mild, flowery hop.

Pleasant pale malt flavor with a mildly toasted malt bite. It does have a corn aftertaste that to me is unmistakable. The malt is half pale, half non-barley malt, at least as far as I can tell.

It feels like a lager, which is to say not that impressive. It's a very weak pale ale. More like a light lager in many respects, with some pale malts. Disappointing.

williamherbert, Aug 31, 2008
Photo of maddogruss
3.55/5  rDev +6.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Got a pint of this at the Cloverleaf Tavern.

A: Pours an amber body with a small, white head with an ok retention and nice lacing along the sides of the glass through the finish. Definitely a nice beer.

S: A sweet, malt smell with some sugar and honey undertones.

T: A sweet malt and honey taste with a nice, honey aftertaste. Reminded me of the characteristics of an EPA instead of an APA. I did not really notice and hop bitterness.

M: A slightly overcarbonated beer, but still fairly full-bodied. Decent beer overall.

D: A nice combo of mouthfeel and taste makes this beer very formidable. An excellent beer to enjoy a session with or to order a keg of and hang out with some friends. Recommended.

maddogruss, Aug 25, 2008
Photo of albern
3.88/5  rDev +16.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This is a contract brew made by Flying Fish for the Congress Hall hotel in Cape May, NJ. The restaurant is named the Blue Pig Tavern, hence the name. If you've never been to Cape May, it is a picturesque seashore town with loads of Victorian character, and the Congress Hall hotel is the grande dame of the town, est 1816. I'm not sure if this beer is purchasable beyond the tavern itself, but I did buy a six pack to go. Be prepared to spend $16, and what is a bit overpriced APA, but where else are you going to find this.

The beer is a solid APA with a nice copper color and a fairly carbonated body and white efforvescent head. Things go out quickly, and you will be left with just liquid in a short while, zero head or lacing. The nose is light, caramel, nothing fancy. The taste is also very light, clean, slightly caramel notes, and some grape vinous notes in the background. This isn't a complex beer by any stretch, but the smoothness, the uniformity from top to bottom and as it settles is also a big plus. There is a slight butterscotch phenol sourishness to the beer, that knocks it down a bit. Overall, this is a solid ale. If I had more time to investigate, I would have inquired about its ingredients, but it isn't clear whether anyone at Congress Hall would have known. They are busy keeping up appearances.

albern, Aug 24, 2008
Photo of phantomwyse
2.78/5  rDev -16.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

A: Color of raw honey. Initial one finger head becomes patchy and soapy.

S: Baked bread, strong like an oatmeal cookie. Hops are very piney with only a slight citrus character. Bitter raisons.

T: Disappointing after the smell. Sweet, biscuity malts give way to only a hint of hops.

M: Light body, a little too light, and especially watery, for the style. Finishes dry.

D: The smell is the best part of this beer. It is decently drinkable, but nothing to call home about.

There are better beers from Flying Fish out there, don't let this one deter you.

phantomwyse, Jul 07, 2008
Photo of ralree
3.95/5  rDev +19%
look: 4.5 | smell: 5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A: A murky yellow with a nice fluffy white head of 1.5 fingers that settles down into a good lace.

S: Wonderful hop flavor, a touch of sweetness like honey. There's some definite lemon as well in the background. Refreshing - I can't wait to try this.

T: Lemony hops are the first flavor, followed by a great bread flavor - tastes like it just came out of the oven. After swallowing, moderate hops and a little more lemon, then some fruitiness. Not exactly what I was expecting from an "extra pale ale," but still decent. It's lacking flavor - needs more hops. I might be biased from hitting the Arrogant Bastard ale so much, though.

M: Medium-bodied, perfect carbonation, no astringency. I was expecting puckering from the hops, but it was lacking in that department. It's a little watery, though.

D: Drinks like a charm, and is definitely refreshing. Would be a good buddy on a hot day.

ralree, Jun 18, 2008
Photo of mvanaskie13
4.05/5  rDev +22%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Poured from the bottle a light amber color with slight head that dissipates to nothing more than a coating, but head clings to glass as its downed.

Smell is a light, refreshing malty scent with a hint of hops.

Taste is malt upfront with slight crisp hop finish.

Mouthfeel is light and fresh with a linger malt aftertaste.

Very drinkable, glad they serve this one at Phillies games, perfect for hot afternoons at the Bank.

mvanaskie13, May 24, 2008
Photo of erosier
4.2/5  rDev +26.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

L: Pours a darker amber color with a short and medium bodied tan colored head that takes some time to settle. It laces the glass pretty nicely all the way down.
S: It smells of sweet malts, some citrisy hops, and a twang of fruitiness in the nose.
T: Tastes of very sweet malts followed by a slight fruity flavor and finished off with alot of citrisy hop bitterness.
M: Very refreshing and fresh tasting.
D: Very good beer and very drinkable.

erosier, May 18, 2008
Photo of kenito799
3.98/5  rDev +19.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

On-tap at Citizen's Bank Park, Phillie-Mets game.

Really nice to have local craft brews at the ballpark! Shea ( and future Citifield) and Yankee Stadium, please take note!

This yellow brew with a small head (lacing can't be examined in this plastic cup) delivers a crisp, clean malty scent. The soft malt on the palate finishes with light hoppy bitterness, very balanced and drinkable. This would be a great go-to beer here on a sweltering Philly day...not so appropriate for the wind-blasted upper deck on a chilly April night, but a nice find. Go Mets!

kenito799, Apr 21, 2008
Photo of ommegangpbr
2.78/5  rDev -16.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Nothing too exciting going on here.
The only thing that really struck me about this beer is that it tastes a little bit too... macro brewed. There's something in here that makes me think of rice adjuncts. Very mild to weak hop character with a mild to weak malt character.
Pretty clean and easy to drink. This would be fine as a happy hour special where all the other options are Bud, Miller or Coors.
Aside from that I'd say one shouldn't bother with this beer.

ommegangpbr, Apr 07, 2008
Photo of AltBock
3/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12 oz. bottle poured into a Flying Fish American pint glass. This Flying Fish was a bubbly straw yellow that had a 2 inch head of fizzy white foam. It only took about 1 minute for the head to fizzle away into a small white film and a few spots of lace. It had a solid dry peppery hop aroma with a some flowers behind it. That was it for the aroma. The taste was dry with slightly toasted malts, more peppery hops, and a slight touch of dried flowers in the background. It had a light mouthfeel and a faint aftertaste of toasted malts and flowers. It was average across the board. There was nothing in here that made it below average and there was nothing that would make it above average.

AltBock, Mar 11, 2008
Photo of andrewt960
3.83/5  rDev +15.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A- Poured out of a tap, a nice golden hue, with an orange haze... head was nice and white, with moderate bubbles.
S- Smelled very nice, not overly hoppy, and was slightly fruity...
T- Was a nice hoppy finish, and tasted very smooth. Had a nice carbonated feel. Maltlyness was there but the crispness of the hops melded ever so perfectly.
D- Very drinkable, very refreshing and would like to try it out of a bottle.

andrewt960, Mar 02, 2008
Photo of MMAJYK
3.63/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

A- Bright golden color with orange hues. Head is 1/2" and solid white. Beer pours brilliantly clear.

S- Light on the nose with hop tones but a little bit straw like and sweet from the malts.

T- Sweet, but mild malt with a nice balance of subtle bittering hops. Leaves the mouth clean and dry with a citrusy zing.

M- Thin and high carbonation.

D- Very high for me. Refresing and oh-so sessionable. I could drink this all day.

Overall- This is the first brew I have had from these guys and I really liked it. I think that this beer is quite good and a very underrated.

Thanks to leftmindedrighty for throwing this in as a nice extra in our trade!

MMAJYK, Feb 28, 2008
Photo of nrpellegrini
3.1/5  rDev -6.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Bottle poured to pint glass.

A: 1 finger white head that stayed
S: pretty hoppy, floral, little stink
T: crisp, clean, watery, slight hops but not overpowering
M: no huge hoppy bite, smooth, crisp
D: decent

An ordinary APA.
Not something I would go out of my way for, but definitely drinkable, good beer.

nrpellegrini, Feb 27, 2008
Photo of TheDeuce
3.18/5  rDev -4.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Pours a pale golden color, full head comes up to the top before settling down.

Smell-slightly floral, a little bit of citrus and malt come through as well, nothing too crazy but at least you can note some stuff

Taste-light on the tongue, pretty decently balanced and smooth.

Mouthfeel-again pretty balanced and smooth, a good sessioner.

Drinkability- light and a good sessioner, well balanced, very light.

Overall-a lighter version of the APA, a good starter beer for the non-initiated but there are far better versions.

TheDeuce, Feb 17, 2008
Photo of marcpal
3.13/5  rDev -5.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Served on tap into pint glass.

A: Golden pale color with small head and minor lacing.

S: Not much here, malts and grains but pretty straight forward ale.

T: Grains and malts but there is some hops here which I think added some taste to this light, drinkable beer. Sweet in the background but not awful.

M: Thin and extremely light.

D: Good session beer, serves its purpose. Not the most exciting of beers, but not objectionable either.

Not the most exciting beer, but is has the sessionability and serves well for a day full of watching football, as it did.

marcpal, Jan 06, 2008
Photo of RblWthACoz
2.98/5  rDev -10.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a clear gold-ish. Nose is like rotting funk. Flavor is seriously lacking. The first swig I got, I almost lost it and just spit it out. Basically I can't finish this because the aftertaste is so nasty. The feel is nice with a good level of carbonation, but who cares. If it doesn't taste good, what does it matter??

RblWthACoz, Dec 31, 2007
Photo of Biscuit033
4/5  rDev +20.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A: Clear golden pour with about a finger head with nice lacing.

S: Malty sweetness, wheats and grains, slightly earthy and a touch of metal.

T: Fruity(strawberry-like), malts and light bitter hop flavors mainly pine and earthiness. Nice balance of malts and hops.

M: Bubbles tingle the tongue with a crisp, dry finish.

D: This is a very easy session beer more in the style of a British Pale Ale that has enough complexity for the style.

Biscuit033, Dec 13, 2007
Photo of Lupe
3.3/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Color is pale, light-amber with a thin white head disappears quickly, and leaves behind no lace.

Soft aroma of sweet malt, light fruit, and faint hops.

Light malty flavor - bread and fruit. Some melon and berry. Light hops add a touch of spice. Flavor fades quickly.

Light to medium in body, soft and fairly crisp. Easy to drink, but kind of boring. Very average.

Lupe, Oct 21, 2007
Photo of tempest
2.88/5  rDev -13.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

You know, it seemed nice at first, but as it warmed up the flavors became less pleasant. It came off as an overly sweet, grainy beer, without much hop character or complex malt. At first, the beer had a somewhat rich taste, but that led into an off-tasting astringent, alcohol taste. Looked nice, for what that's worth, but this beer doesn't seem right.

tempest, Oct 16, 2007
Photo of sharkheadlasers
3.43/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This "XPA" pours a golden color with a head that is initially heavy, but dissipates quickly. The smell is malty, lightly smokey, and biscuity. I could swear I smell noble hops in there, but faintly. The taste has just enough hops to make an appearance. There is a saltine cracker taste with some light caramel notes. The beer is drinkable, crisp and clean. This makes for an enjoyable session beer.

sharkheadlasers, Sep 18, 2007
Photo of AlexJ
3/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pale, crisp amber yellor with a billowy head of white that disappears quickly, leaving little traces.

Aroma is light with sweet golden malt, crackers, and faint herbal and spice hops.

Flavor starts of with moderate light malt, raw dough, and honey with a meager countermeasure of grassy, herbal hops. Not bad, but very average.

Body is light to medium with average drinkability. Tiresome.

AlexJ, Sep 12, 2007
Extra Pale Ale from Flying Fish Brewing Company
76 out of 100 based on 402 ratings.