1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Samuel Adams Boston Lager - Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)

Not Rated.
Samuel Adams Boston LagerSamuel Adams Boston Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

7,362 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 7,362
Reviews: 2,441
rAvg: 3.74
pDev: 13.9%
Wants: 73
Gots: 775 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams) visit their website
Massachusetts, United States

Style | ABV
Vienna Lager |  4.90% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Our original beer is full-flavored with a balance of malty sweetness contrasted by hop spiciness and a smooth finish.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 04-27-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Samuel Adams Boston Lager Alström Bros
Ratings: 7,362 | Reviews: 2,441 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of EPseja
4.18/5  rDev +11.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Served from a 12oz bottle at just below cellar temperature in my brand-new Samuel Adams Boston Lager Beer Glass, engineered especially for this beer. I've had this beer countless times in the past and know it quite well. It will be interesting to see if this glass actually adds new aspects in which to indulge...

A - Pours picture perfectly with liquid up to the blue rim and with a beautiful, pillowy head that actually rises above the lip of the glass. The varying thickness of the glass makes for different coloring at different points -- rich, sunny honey at the bottom changing in gradient fashion to a bright, fire-kissed copper-gold at the top. Lacing is craggy and tenacious, and the etching on the bottom of the glass keeps the surface of the beer completely obscured by the ever-replenishing head. With a proper tip of the hat for as assist from the glass, this beer looks especially beautiful, but because it's the glass that helped, I can not award the perfect 5.0.

S - The first thing that comes to mind is warm biscuits. The malts are especially evident up front. Not far behind is a crisp, punchy hoppiness that is neither citrusy or piney, but slightly earthy, green and dry. Very European. Notes of woodiness and hints of leather. Never picked out those "old" notes before... Interesting and inviting.

T - Candy like maltiness up front -- honey-like notes and a slight toasty character, with a great balance of hoppy bite and bitterness coming in the middle. The hops are not especially aggressive, but existant in a way that keeps the bold malts in place. The sweetness falls off quickly during the swallow, and what's left is a bready, biscuity aftertaste with floral nuances. Alcohol is well supressed. Fiercely balanced, if that dichotomy makes any sense.

M - Not watery, not thick, but well developed in texture. A quick hit of aggressive tingle is replaced by a tickle of fading carbonation as it moves through the mouth and becomes frothy and mouth-filling. Swallow is full of nice body, without gassiness.

D - I've said it once and I'll say it again now -- this beer is the A-number-one go-to beer to always have on hand for both yourself, and anyone else who is ready to enter into the world of full-flavored beers. My wife was a Heineken disciple until she met me, and I served her her first Sam Adams Boston Lager. Today, she won't touch Heineken with a 10-foot pole.

This beer is super drinkable, with enough character to set it squarely apart from others, while remaining surprisingly accessible, despite the high-quality of ingredients and the not-so-mainstream style.

ADDENDUM: The one place where this glass really made a difference was in appearance. Secondly, it was very comfortable to drink from. The effect it has on smell is not really noticeable until the beer drops well into the bowl area, where the aroma becomes more concentrated. Nice glass!

EPseja, Jul 18, 2007
Photo of CharlieMopps
3.88/5  rDev +3.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: Pours a transparent amber/burnt orange, with about two fingers of fluffy head that displays above average retention, leaving behind a web of lace down the sides of the glass.

S: A whiff of breadiness and some malt presence, with a backing note of hops.

T: Malts come out up front, flavorful but not overpowering. A pleasing hoppiness comes next, but washes over the palate smoothly. Aftertaste is a clinging hop feel.

M: Carbonation is at an agreeable level, with only a slight oiliness from the hops.

D: A tasty Vienna lager, with more zest than others of its ilk, which proves to be standout and delicious. I'm glad this is a more common option for many American beer drinkers, as it certainly dwarfs the macro lager offerings.

CharlieMopps, Jul 15, 2007
Photo of bluemoonswoon
4.2/5  rDev +12.3%
look: 4 | smell: 5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Continuing with the summer mix pack with this nice lager, 12oz bottle poured into snifter (thought I'd let this one breathe) best before October freshness date.

A: Real nice looking the best of the bunch for this mixed pack so far. Pours a clear brownish orange with a two finger bone white head the fades into a thin cap with nice lacing even on the snifter.

S: Quite nice with a buttery apple sweetness with hints of orange peel floral hop character and a great malt backbone, very inviting I think my mouth is watering.

T/MF: Pretty smooth sweet and slick as expected with a nice hop bite down the center of the tongue. Tastes of apples upfront with buttered cracker on the end, more hops than I would expect for a lager and the apples last through the finish, it's a little hard to pick the malts out of this one as compared to other lagers I've tried Bergoff to be precise, the hops seem more active here. The mouthfeel is quite nice with carbonation active from the front to the back of the mouth, spreading flavor all over the pallate.

D: Quite drinkable and an easy pickup when nothing else is around, not mindblowing or tasty as other lagers but very solid notheless.

bluemoonswoon, Jul 11, 2007
Photo of KevinB
3.38/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

One of the classics at this point, like many others this was one of the first micros I had back in the day. Poured a 12 oz bottle into a pint glass. Nice erythrean orange, golden body with a foamy 2 finger white head. Light steady lacing throughout the glass. Pretty solid malt and hops aroma, nice balance between the two. Taste is also a nice balance between hops and caramel malts, resulting in a rich flavor for a some what light ,medium bodied beer. Mouthfeel was pleasant, medium carbonation, pretty clean feel and a tad of dryness in the end. Overall a very good beer and a fail safe option.

KevinB, Jul 11, 2007
Photo of giblet
3.4/5  rDev -9.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

i enjoyed this lager yesterday. nice body, nice carbonation but a little less lace than i expected. not as much smell as i like but it is a lighter style of lager.

this is a very good beer. i would recomend it as a much superior option to the macro beers that everyone buys.

good choice as is most of their offerings.

suckem up and movem out!


giblet, Jul 09, 2007
Photo of kwakwhore
4.35/5  rDev +16.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Clear orange/gold pour with a nice white head which leaves a nice amount of lacing on the glass. Floral hops in the aroma. Nearly perfect balance of hop bitterness and biscuit malt flavors, some sweetness in the malt too. I've had this beer so many times that it's hard to separate the occasions, but this is a consistently good beer. Easy to find, easy to drink, the perfect session beer in the good old US and A. I haven't had another Vienna Lager(including a couple in Vienna) that measures up to it in any respect.

kwakwhore, Jul 01, 2007
Photo of khiasmus
3.93/5  rDev +5.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Had this for the first time in a while at a local steakhouse, and was amazed by how good it was.

A- Pours perfectly clear with two fingers of fluffy white head. Bubbles constantly, and leaves a beautiful lacing down the sides.

S- Malty, balanced by american hops, but both are very evident and well-done. No off notes, just a good, balanced aroma.

T- Once again, a well-balanced, basic beer. The balance is a bit towards the malt in the flavor, and a hint of pine and hops in the finish.

M- Smooth, medium-high carbonation, clean, with a hint of dryness in the finish.

D- Of course. It's cheap, available everywhere, and quite good. Order this next time you go out for a steak. It's not disappointing.

khiasmus, Jun 28, 2007
Photo of williamherbert
3.88/5  rDev +3.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

The bottle pours a light and relatively clear copper color. Lots of little bubbles of carbonation. There is a minor rocky head that disappears pretty quickly. There is a slight haze in the glass, possibly because it's straight out of the fridge. Only a bit of lace.

The beer has a nice "wet" malt aroma; slightly sweet and even a little fruity. In fact, it has the sweet fruity tones of an ale. Doesn't have any of the bitter smell of many lagers.

The malt is much more bitter in the taste than in the smell. The flavor retains the flowery part, which must be the hops (and the only trace of hops at that). Has a taste more like an ale. Slightly bitter aftertaste.

It feels thick like an ale, but with that ever-so-slight lager "sting" at the end. I must say, it's a very competent macro lager. It really does drink more like a thicker ale. Not bad.

williamherbert, Jun 28, 2007
Photo of eberkman
4.4/5  rDev +17.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

Well, I've had God knows how many of these in my lifetime, but I never got around to reviewing it. And with so much else available, I rarely order one of these anymore -- basically I drink it if it's the best option at a party, bar or restaurant. Which is too bad, because it's really much better than that, as I realize everytime I actually have one.

Anyway, it pours a nice, clean, clear orange-gold with a short but substantial white head. Not much head retention, but just enough. Smells are biscuity, malty, yeasty with some hoppy notes at the back end. The taste matches the smell very nicely -- lots of earthy, bready maltiness balanced out very well by pleasant but not overpowering hops. The mouthfeel is crisp with some bite. Extreordinarily drinkable. Probably -- along with Sierra Nevada Pale Ale -- the ultimate American go-to session beer. Certainly the most sessionable lager I can think of, though Brooklyn can give it a nice run for the money.

I should really come back to this one more often. Definitely a classic. And hey, why not support the "locals" (though that would be more rock-solid if I actually had any ties to Cincinnati).

eberkman, Jun 26, 2007
Photo of Stephen63
4.1/5  rDev +9.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A - Looks like amber nectar!

S - Pleasantly sweet with candy like aroma.

T - The sweetness was very apparent and welcome. Toffee/caramel flavour was dominant.

M - Very pleasing level of carbonation.

D - Extremely easy to drink and could spend an evening drinking this.

Got this at the TGI Fridays in Glasgow. Apart from this the beer list was one which would have you drinking water with your meal, but this was a very pleasant surprise. A fine brew and probably the best lager I have tasted.

Stephen63, Jun 24, 2007
Photo of NCSUdo
3.88/5  rDev +3.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Had this one on tap at RDU airport, waiting for a flight to Austin, TX. Had it before but first time I decided to take notes.

A: Small head, little lacing, clear amber in color. Nice looking for a well known domestic produced lager.

S: Sweet malty nose, bitter hop character with a definite citrus undertone.

T: Crisp maltiness. Huge malt up front, bitter hop finish, slight cereal taste.

M/D: Good mouthfeel, carbonation just right. Crisp and semi-dry, fair drinkablity. Light bodied, good beer to have a simple or complex meal. Definite session quality.

This beer is usually hit or miss with me, but it is almost always the best thing available at most resturaunts in the area.

NCSUdo, Jun 24, 2007
Photo of McStagger
3.58/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Mmm...Sam Adams. Always a good choice, right? Let's review the ole standard; Boston Lager.

A: Pours out a light amber with hints of burnt orange. Creamy off white head. Excellent retention and great lacing of the head.

S: Favor fairly erupts from the glass. Very prevalent hops are the first thing noticed. Further smells reveal hints of slightly sweetened grain.

T: Beer is still fairly hop oriented. However, the hops are muted in the tasting. Slightly sweet, slightly cloying grain and toasted sugar can be detected on the finish, with the hops returning in a roasted fashion after the mouthful of beer has been drunk.

M: Beer has a creamy beginning that turns into a nice carbonation on the mid-palate that is accentuated by the hops. Excellent texture.

D: While I'm not a huge hop-head, this beer has an excellent balance between hops, toastiness and cream. The cream makes it easy on the palate, while the hops give it enough backbone to stick up to a bar filled with cigarette smoke.

McStagger, Jun 19, 2007
Photo of nullforge
4/5  rDev +7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Clear amber color with a foamy white head that collapses to a thin cover that retains well. The head has some lacing with a respectable stickiness to it. The nose contains gently toasted caramel malt and floral hops. A very sweet and inviting aroma. The taste offers sweet malt with some caramel notes. This is well balanced by a hop bitterness that is both floral and spicy. The body is medium-light. The strong carbonation creates a smooth, slightly silky mouthfeel.

This is a great every day beer. Its simple enough to be inoffensive, with just enough malt and hops to keep it interesting.

nullforge, Jun 18, 2007
Photo of Frozensoul327
3.03/5  rDev -19%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Deep orange color with a touch of a reddish coppery hue. Smaller head of white foam. Uniform rings of lacing in the glass.

S: Biscuits and malty grains. Mild sweetness tea leafy quality. Not bad.

T: Medium malt flavor with a balanced hoppy note. A light buttery biscuit note and dough round this one out. Not bad, but slightly one sided.

M: Nominal. Slightly crispy and smooth. Minimal creaminess.

D: Fair at best. It's not a bad beer by any means, but to me it reaks of mediocracy, and is rather forgettable. Just doesn't do it for me.

Frozensoul327, Jun 17, 2007
Photo of errantnight
3.9/5  rDev +4.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A pretty, rich brass/gold with a fairly craggy head. Clear as day with excellent lacing... it's purdy.

A fine aroma of biscuity-sweet malt, if a bit faint once the head recedes.

A hearty lightly toasted sweetness with a clean, spicy bittering aftertaste... only the sweetness ticks around just a tick too long. Leaving what is otherwise a fairly light, crisp beer feeling heavier and richer than it really is.

Eminently quaffable, if somewhat forgettable... every time I forget just how delicious and solid this beer is, I take the time to re-examine and see the flaws... still, a stand-out fallback, and worth revisiting from time-to-time for nothing more than a hint of nostalgia (this was one of the first craft brews I was turned on to) and a reminder that even as beer profilerates it needn't be excessively bland and characterless.

errantnight, Jun 12, 2007
Photo of brendan13
3.88/5  rDev +3.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A - Amber colour with a few centimetres of off white head that falls away quite quickly.
S - Floral hops are the first thing that comes to the nose backed up with some sweet fruit notes.
T - Biscuity malt comes through with the taste backed up by a smooth flow of the floral hops.
M - Possibly the best mouthfeel I've had from a lager. Quite full with a refreshing finish yet not too overcarbonated.
D - A nice beer that I wouldn't have any problems drinking lots of. The only problem is that $4.95 a bottle here that limits it somewhat.

brendan13, Jun 11, 2007
Photo of bacabuck
3.88/5  rDev +3.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Not only is this a fine beer, it's a fine beer every time. Pours out a deep copper with lots of hoppiness on the nose. Taste is rather complex and seems to change depending on what temperature the beer is being served at. Colder temps (<45'F) gives a sharp refreshing brew. Temps above 50'F bring out the well balanced hops/malt flavors. A terrific beer that is readily available. Only downfall is that it has lost it's microbrew charm.

bacabuck, Jun 10, 2007
Photo of TheDragonTony
4.2/5  rDev +12.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured from a 12 oz brown bottle into one of those "fancy" Samuel Adams glasses.

Appearance: 3 fingers of cloud like head nice lacing clear and golden.

Smell: Very pleasurable, and very hoppy.

Taste: Sweet up front followed by a nice hop bitterness. Balanced quite well.

Mouthfeel: Very good, perhaps a little more creamy/ less crisp than I would expect from a lager.

Drinkability: I could easily session this beer.

I've had these glasses for a while, but this is the first Samuel adams that I got to try out of them. I am aware that this was not a scientific test but damn this was the best tasting Samuel Adams Boston Lager that I've ever had.

TheDragonTony, Jun 09, 2007
Photo of botham
3.28/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

pours a rich amber color with two fingers of white head that remain for a couple minutes.

smells strongly of hops, with little else. there is a hint of sweet fruitiness that is overpowered by the hops. this should be a bitter one.

taste is full of hops. bitter in the mouth. barley is lacking here, not much sweet to speak of. alcohol is in the background, but still present.

aftertaste is bitter and dry. makes the drinker want to drink more to get rid of the dry.

mouthfeel is somewhat creamy. smooth hops sums it up.

overall, this is a decent lager. although it is technically a "boston lager", which must be a bitter style, it is well crafted for what it is. worth a try.

botham, Jun 08, 2007
Photo of BlackHaddock
3.05/5  rDev -18.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Brown 355ml bottle best before Dec 2007, drank June 2007.

The front label states 'THE BEST BEER IN AMERICA', no mean boast, thought there might have been a disclaimer on the rear label but there wasn't.

Poured into my Hoegaarden Grand Cru stemmed tulip glass, it fitted well, a good deep amber body with a large, strong biege foaming head, bubbles rising through the liquid to replenish the thick head.

Hops and yeast are in the aroma, maybe some caramel too, but no overpowering or exciting esters hit my nose.

The flavour was a little bit sickly-cum-toffee-malty, with a sticky mouthfeel that didn't sit well on my palate.

Not a great beer in my opinion, fine but, I will not be seaching for another in a hurry.

If this is THE BEST BEER IN AMERICA then I must be heterodox and say it is not.

BlackHaddock, Jun 05, 2007
Photo of DoubleJ
4.38/5  rDev +17.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

On-tap at Fridays. Same old goodness from draft as the bottle, except a touch better with the mouthfeel. Sometimes I think I overlook how good this stuff is as I'm trying different kinds of beer. A good decision when restaurants have a limited tap selection, but it's at its very best when coming from draft at a Boston bar, as it's overall flavor is much sweeter and carameley.

DoubleJ, Jun 02, 2007
Photo of robocrouch
4/5  rDev +7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: Poured into a pint glass from the bottle. A great amber/red color with a decent white head. A good looking beer for sure.

S: Caramel sweet malts with fresh hops. Smells awesome.

T: Just like the smell the beer tastes really good. Very balanced between the sweetness of the malts and the sharp hop finish. A very good tasting beer.

D: I love this beer. It is good for any occasion and it is becoming available almost anywhere I go. I will defiantly be seeing more this beer in the future

robocrouch, Jun 02, 2007
Photo of happygnome
3.73/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

a: nice golden amber color with about a half inch of head that dissapears fast leaving a good amount of lacing
s: caramel malts dominated by hop aroma
t: for its style the hop presence is very good
m: medium bodied with average amount of carbonations

overall this is a mighty fine beer

happygnome, Jun 02, 2007
Photo of beckscrusader420
4.13/5  rDev +10.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

As far as Sam Adams beers go this is not my favorite but again it is a good beer. Theres just something about the way they brew their beer that gets you really nicely buzzed. If you like lagers then this is the way to go if youre in a supermarket. In a small liqour store you might a bit more selection depending on the season. For the SA's that are year round this is an overall good one if you prefer lagers like myself. If youre into ales theres always the Boston Ale but thats another review.

beckscrusader420, May 29, 2007
Photo of mdm46410
3.43/5  rDev -8.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Draft in a pint glass. Pours a darker golden color with a thick foamy lasting head. Light lacing. Aroma is fairly faint. Consists of caramel and a fairly sweet malt scent. Flavor is fairly subdued with hints of malts and a bit of light citrus. Body is light to medium with a heavy dose of carbonation. Leaves a bit of a hoppy aftertaste that is not present during initial consumption. A good session beer, but nothing more.

mdm46410, May 28, 2007
Samuel Adams Boston Lager from Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)
84 out of 100 based on 7,362 ratings.