1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Samuel Adams Cranberry Lambic - Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)

Not Rated.
Samuel Adams Cranberry LambicSamuel Adams Cranberry Lambic

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
63
poor

1,327 Ratings
THE BROS
63
poor

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,327
Reviews: 838
rAvg: 2.67
pDev: 28.46%
Wants: 12
Gots: 22 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams) visit their website
Massachusetts, United States

Style | ABV
Fruit / Vegetable Beer |  5.90% ABV

Availability: Winter

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 11-01-2001)
View: Beers (129) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Samuel Adams Cranberry Lambic Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 1,327 | Reviews: 838 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of t0rin0
t0rin0

California

2.75/5  rDev +3%

11-10-2012 14:25:07 | More by t0rin0
Photo of djrn2
djrn2

New Jersey

2/5  rDev -25.1%

11-20-2011 18:07:14 | More by djrn2
Photo of Thorpe429
Thorpe429

Illinois

2.17/5  rDev -18.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Reviewed from notes.

My dad always buys the Sam Adams seasonal variety packs. I used to love that he was showing an interest in craft; now, it's about all here drinks. Long story short, I shouldn't have to drink this again any time soon.

Pours a faint amber orange color with an off white head. Nose is loads of cranberry juice. The taste adds in a bit of caramel, but this makes it taste more like some caramel candies have been soaking in a glass of slightly-carbonated cranberry juice cocktail overnight. Feel is a bit cloying and a bit tart. Poor drinkability. Many of the winter pack beers are pretty decent; this one is not.

Serving type: bottle

10-16-2010 18:52:31 | More by Thorpe429
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

3.18/5  rDev +19.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Bright orange-gold with not one hint of red. The cream colored crown has a soft texture, deflates to a thin disk and leaves an average amount of lace in ragged rings. The nose is earthy, musty and sweet... and has no cranberry that I can detect. Odd that.

SA Cranberry Lambic is overly sweet, as if corn syrup was added with a heavy hand. The flavor features the same earthy funkiness that is present in the nose. The beer is slightly bitter and slightly sour-acidic, but I still get no sense that cranberries or cranberry juice were added. A light syrupiness means the mouthfeel is slightly more full than medium.

This isn't bad beer when all is said and done. Nor is it good beer. Call me crazy, but if the word cranberry appears on the label, the contents should smell and taste like cranberries. Even if only a little.

Serving type: bottle

03-09-2004 23:50:03 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of brentk56
brentk56

North Carolina

2.9/5  rDev +8.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Pours a hazy peach color without much head; little lacing

Smell: A touch of wet dog and some maple syrup notes; not particularly enticing

Taste: Starts out with a wheat biscuit taste; after the swallow, the sweet maple notes emerge, along with a bit of funk, but no sour lambic notes - this is a fruit beer

Mouthfeel: Light to medium bodied and fizzy

Drinkability: This grows on you a bit; its not as bad as some reviewers believe, but its not that good, either

Serving type: bottle

05-23-2006 00:39:53 | More by brentk56
Photo of nmann08
nmann08

District of Columbia

2/5  rDev -25.1%

11-26-2011 17:41:24 | More by nmann08
Photo of mikesgroove
mikesgroove

South Carolina

1.3/5  rDev -51.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Oured a hazy, cloudy light amber with lots of fizzy, soda like carbonation. No head, no lace, but it did leave a thin film on the top, mostly due to the fizzy carbonation. Smell was not very inviting. Smelled like a cheap wine. Musty fruit smell, some alcohol, but again like a cheap fruit wine, I don't like where this is going. Taste was almost putrid. Spicey cranberry horrible. This was the first beer I have ever dumped down the drain. It was just too much. Too much cranberry, too much carbonation, too much of everything. I am not sure what they were try for with this one, but it just did not work. I was actually suprised as I generally like most Sam Adams brews, even tried this is a tulip, just could not do it.

Serving type: bottle

02-27-2007 00:15:09 | More by mikesgroove
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

4/5  rDev +49.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Tried as part of their winter variety pack. Seems a bit out of character from what I'd normally expect from Boston B.C. A classic sourness caught me a bit off guard because of the genuine lambic character. Sweetened with malts (or sugars) to reduce the sourness to a solid tartness. The lambic tartness along with the cranberry tartness made for a plesant complex flavor. Still sweetened to drinkable levels. The appearance is a very non-assuming straw color with firm head retention and carbonation. Aromas grab hold with a pleasant sweet-tart character. Very clean and palate-cleansing in the finish. Cranberries make for a Christmas brew, but I'd love to have a few of these in the heat of Summer.

Serving type: bottle

12-11-2006 01:59:22 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of womencantsail
womencantsail

California

2.25/5  rDev -15.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A: The pour is initially bubbly and a cloudy pink with a light pink head. The head and carbonation quickly subside leaving a rather lifeless looking beer.

S: The smell is very, very strange. There are aromas of a classic witbier, such as coriander and citrus, along with a substantial wheat scent. There is also a fake cranberry smell.

T: The taste is just about the same as the aroma. A strong spice flavor mixed with a tartness (I'm guessing from the cranberry juice). The cranberry flavor, however, is rather subdued.

M: The beer is lightly carbonated and has a medium body.

D: This is a really strange beer. It's certainly not a lambic (or anything resembling one). The combination of spice, fruit, and tartness just isn't working out here.

Serving type: bottle

12-07-2009 07:00:05 | More by womencantsail
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

2.73/5  rDev +2.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Appearance: Pours a pale orange body with a small, fizzy white head.

Smell: The aroma has a light wheatiness to it, fruity notes of cranberries and bananas, and comes armed with a lactic sourness. Hint of clove.

Taste: Wheaty, cereal taste starts when in comes the cutting sour-sweet cranberry and banana flavors. A big lactic note chomps down on the palate. A slight acidity sweeps any remnants of fruity sweetness leaving a sour finish.

Mouthfeel: Light-bodied. Medium-high carbonation. Oddly mouth-coating.

Drinkability: I must admit, it's not my favorite in the Samuel Adams line-up.

Serving type: bottle

12-02-2007 22:22:31 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of jaydoc
jaydoc

Kansas

2.25/5  rDev -15.7%

09-02-2013 01:16:05 | More by jaydoc
Photo of kylehay2004
kylehay2004

Florida

3.08/5  rDev +15.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A: single finger slighty pink head which rapidly dissipates. Body is murky and tomatoe juIce red.

S: lots of cranberry and cherry. The aroma forebodes a tart taste.

T: tart and slightly sour. Mostly cranberry and cherry flavor, little else.

M: light body and high carbonation.

Overall a standard lambic. Drinkable but not special or memorable.

Serving type: bottle

02-06-2012 01:55:16 | More by kylehay2004
Photo of spycow
spycow

Illinois

2.75/5  rDev +3%

01-18-2013 05:06:46 | More by spycow
Photo of oberon
oberon

North Carolina

2.83/5  rDev +6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The best thing about this beer is the appearance,it pours a nice prange/red with a decent fluffy head,the aroma is pretty tart and slightly yeasty.Taste is very tart with the cranberry not really evident to much the tartness of this beer is the main thing I get with a hit of sweetness in the finish.Ah not a horrible beer but wont buy anymore of the holiday gift packs to get it.

Serving type: bottle

12-10-2003 22:16:42 | More by oberon
Photo of Knapp85
Knapp85

Pennsylvania

2.83/5  rDev +6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

First time I ha this beer I found it to be cometely undrinkable. I had a few sips and dumped it out. I was given another bottle as a gift some time later and gave it another try. This time It was much better. The red color was always attractive to me but the idea of cranberry isn't for me. I've never been a fan of them so naturally this brew wouldn't please me. For this who enjoy cranberry do try this, you'll probably enjoy it.

Serving type: bottle

03-24-2011 02:45:35 | More by Knapp85
Photo of zeff80
zeff80

Missouri

2.78/5  rDev +4.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A - Poured out an orange color with ruby tones. It had a white, bubbly, two-finger head that left minimal lacing.

S - It smelled of tons of cranberry. I didn't even have to put my nose up to the glass.

T - It tasted of cranberry. It was also quite sweet and had a touch of yeast flavor.

M - It was fairly crisp and smooth. It pretty fizzy, too. A light-bodied beer.

D - I'm just not a huge fan of cranberry, but I can appreciate it in a well done beer. This isn't one of them.

Serving type: bottle

01-06-2008 18:22:05 | More by zeff80
Photo of westcoastbeerlvr
westcoastbeerlvr

California

2/5  rDev -25.1%

11-15-2011 00:48:09 | More by westcoastbeerlvr
Photo of largadeer
largadeer

California

2.2/5  rDev -17.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Appearance - Wine cooler pink with a slight haze. Beer really shouldn't be pink, in my opinion - it just feels wrong. Head retention is very solid, so I'll give it a nod for that.

Smell - Sweetened cranberry juice and minerals. Faintly musty.

Taste - Extremely metallic. Sweet and tart cranberry with slight breadiness. The mineral/metallic flavors really take over in the finish, and it's not pleasant.

Mouthfeel - Light bodied, a touch watery perhaps, with crisp carbonation. Just about the only saving grace of this beer.

Notes - What the hell is Sam Adams thinking with this beer, and why do they keep making it? It's truly terrible stuff.

Serving type: bottle

12-30-2007 22:59:17 | More by largadeer
Photo of NeroFiddled
NeroFiddled

Pennsylvania

4.08/5  rDev +52.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

The full glass displays a slightly hazy (which is OK because it is a wheat beer...) orangeish-amber body with a crimson cast beneath a long lasting head of frothy off-white foam. The head retention is good and it maintains a thin lid throughout the glass and leaves some very nice rings of lace as well. The nose offers a bright combination of grainy malt and mildly tart fruitiness. The body is medium and its fine, median carbonation caresses the tongue before warming to become lightly creamy and smooth. The flavor delivers the promised Cranberry atop a delicate, grainy, wheatish malt base that's backed by just enough hop to keep it from becoming sweet. It finishes crisp and dry with some residual swirling notes of juicy fruit and cereal. Quite nice! I'm quite sure that this beer has improved over the years, and now offers a better balance with a reduced graininess and more fruit in its profile. I look forward to it each Thanksgiving - before, during, and after my meal!

Serving type: bottle

01-05-2004 22:47:04 | More by NeroFiddled
Photo of nickfl
nickfl

Florida

2.6/5  rDev -2.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

A - Two fingers of white foam with a hint of pink. The body is a slightly hazy copper color. Leaves good lace as it slowly settles down.

S - Not much really. Maybe a hint of hops, some cranberry? A hint of sourness.

T - Sugary sweetness with some nice cranberry flavor. A bit of grassy hops and creamy yeastiness.

M - Moderate, very sweet mouthfeel and high carbonation.

D - Well... this is a sad lambic. Waaayyy too sweet and totally lacking in sourness that would bring out the fruit character. Still, the cranberry character is pretty nice, but that may be this beer's only redeeming feature. Maybe instead of trying to pass this off as a lambic they should have called it a cranberry ice-tea (of more charitably a cranberry wheat).

Serving type: bottle

10-29-2007 05:33:00 | More by nickfl
Photo of TheManiacalOne
TheManiacalOne

Rhode Island

1.95/5  rDev -27%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

12oz. bottle poured into a pint glass.

A: Pours a cloudy, light gold color with a short and foamy off-white head and leaves a thick, even lace that fades quickly.

S: Sour cranberry & malt with a very faint whiff of hops.

T: A cranberry & apple sweetness dominates the taste along with some sourness, which you would expect with anything that has a “cranberry” flavor. There isn’t very much else that comes through. Tastes more like apple juice than beer.

M: A little bit smooth, medium body, medium carbonation, finishes a little bit sticky, like I said before, it’s more like juice than beer.

D: You don’t taste the alcohol at all, so if you like the taste I guess it’s drinkable, but I can’t see myself drinking more than the two bottles that come in the mix pack, as long as I have something else available.

I typically like the stuff from Boston Beer Co. and I can see how their trying to use a local flavor to create something different, but this isn’t a good beer.

Serving type: bottle

03-16-2006 03:47:56 | More by TheManiacalOne
Photo of Jason
Jason

Massachusetts

3.18/5  rDev +19.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12 oz brown bottle with a "purchase before" date on the label. "Wheat Beer brewed with cranberry juice and other natural flavors added" stated on the label, nothing about spontaneous fermentation or aging it in barrels, blending and aging for more time. It's a fruit beer nothing more and nothing less.

Dull and cloudy rusty reddish hue, holds a ring of white lace strongly. Fruity aroma, little cranberry with a faint tartness. Maltiness is present in the aroma though not too much as the yeast flavors blanket with faint wild herbal phenols.

Semi-smooth and a touch creamy within the medium body. Tartness is there, some cranberry flavor with some fruitiness as well. Malt is there with a mellow sweet graininess. Hops are very mild. Finishes with a lingering tartness, flash of cranberry and vague malt.

Notes: A good fruit beer but not a lambic at all, how they get away with using "Lambic" on the label is beyond me ... its not even close. The new Longshot Cranberry Wit should take the place of this beer IMO.

Serving type: bottle

12-29-2008 02:53:46 | More by Jason
Photo of feloniousmonk
feloniousmonk

Minnesota

2.15/5  rDev -19.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I have not had this beer in at least a decade or so, honestly, and I remember the consensus back then was that it was so terrible, that I've steered clear ever since. Got some in the latest holiday sample package, so, goody me, may as well get a review out of it.
Clear, pale apricot/brandy color, like a faded cherry, under a slim white head.
Aroma: musty and yeasty, slightly sour, then comes the cherry, creamy, soft, a little off, but not unpleasant.
Taste: kind of dull. A bit flat. I'll keep giving it a chance, though, gonna finish this thing...it's weird, though. The cherry essence is but an echo in the flavor, and there's little real presence on the palate. An old bottle, or this really how this beer is supposed to be?
Huh!
Ridiculous of them to call it "lambic", but even as a "wheat beer brewed with cranberry juice and other natural flavors", this is, at best, a dud. Doesn't taste as bad as I remember from way back when, but it's still very disappointing. Lackluster taste, minimal texture/mouthfeel, forgettable finish. Feels like lightly cherry-dusted damp cardboard.
No wonder they dumped this in the sample pack, can't imagine they move too many pallets of these.

Serving type: bottle

11-21-2004 10:46:32 | More by feloniousmonk
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

West Virginia

2.78/5  rDev +4.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Appearance: Hazy dark amber peach color leaves light cream head with evenly strung lacing. Aroma: Tart cranberry and malts with an eerie bledn of maple syrup among an oatmeal cereal grain scented aroma, kinda weird. Taste: Even weirder funky twang of cran and malt which almost induced the ol' gag reflex as the wave of cloying maple syrup flavor hit me I remember tasting this one in past Holiday samplers and I must say I don't recall disliking it this much. Mouthfeel: Medium body slight spritzy carbonation coats the palate and won't let go. Drinkability: I don't recommend this brew I didn't care for it, and it's definitely not a lambic sorry folks.

Serving type: bottle

12-09-2005 00:07:19 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of russpowell
russpowell

Oklahoma

3.18/5  rDev +19.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured a a pink to dirty brown head that dropped off in nuthin' flat.
Good lacing though. Body is a hazy/dirty brown in appearance.

Smell: A lot going on in this glass sour smells, vanilla notes, and hints of oak.

Taste: Sour, tart and dry through out. Sourness doesn't really make me think of the lambics I tried over in belgium, I will give them a little leeway for "american styling".

Mouthfeel: Pricklyfeel throughout , but carbonation level is fine for the style. Fairly balanced

This effort has thirst quinching aspect to it, that makes me think it would be good with a turkey sandwhich, otherwise I will pass on this.

Serving type: bottle

11-14-2005 04:34:46 | More by russpowell
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Samuel Adams Cranberry Lambic from Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)
63 out of 100 based on 1,327 ratings.