1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Samuel Adams Weiss Bier - Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)

Samuel Adams Weiss BierSamuel Adams Weiss Bier

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

83 Ratings
THE BROS
90
outstanding

(view ratings)
Ratings: 83
Reviews: 80
rAvg: 3.52
pDev: 16.76%


Brewed by:
Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams) visit their website
Massachusetts, United States

Style | ABV
Hefeweizen |  4.80% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: kbub6f on 01-04-2002)
View: Beers (116) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Samuel Adams Weiss Bier Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 83 | Reviews: 80 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of Kwak
Kwak

New Jersey

1.35/5  rDev -61.6%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

Not good at all.
Head: Nice start cloudy rocky off white head disappeared in a flash no taste.
Body: Dark orange hue, nice haze wrong color.
Taste: Not good, taste like a bad copy of a great beer style
stick to what you know. I don't recommend this to anyone who likes this style.
Not good, I think I am done with Sam!!

Serving type: bottle

11-27-2002 23:11:30 | More by Kwak
Photo of cokes
cokes

Wisconsin

1.68/5  rDev -52.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Sorry, everyone. This is a beer that I absolutely loathed. Found it tough to finish, and made me yearn for a more traditional weiss.
Pours a hazy pale straw, with very little head. Smell is good with some clove and banana typical for the style.
Taste is bready, lightly fruity and very watered-down. The yeast adds an off-powdery and spicy tasty. This does not mix with the the dilution and seems out of place.
Honestly, this seems like hefe mixed with seltzer water. Way too thin tasting for me. The flavors present makes me glad this was not full bodied. The horrible powery taste coated my tongue and messed up my taste perceptions for an enitre day.

(as a note: VTrain and I sampled this out of the same pack. Was ours bad, since the other reviews seem more favorable? However, we both agreed this was a horrible disappointment. With all the other options available, this will not be purchased again. The review stands as is: One of the biggest failures I have encountered in my beer journeys)

Serving type: bottle

03-27-2002 02:36:53 | More by cokes
Photo of Stingray5
Stingray5

New York

1.85/5  rDev -47.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

I've been a faithful Sam Adams customer for many years, and was excited when I spotted a new style on the shelf. I quickly purchased a six of Weiss Bier, and hurried home to sample this new offering.

Bananas. If I could write a one word review of this beer that would be it. This, combined with a bit too much carbonation for my tastes, rendered this brew nearly undrinkable. I didn't let that stop me, however I found it difficult getting through the six-pack, and was glad when it was over. To be fair, wheats aren't one of my favorite styles, but this was still sub par for the style. Too much bananas, too much carbonation and just plain bland.

Big disappointment from Sam Adams.

Serving type: bottle

05-22-2003 19:09:53 | More by Stingray5
Photo of feloniousmonk
feloniousmonk

Minnesota

2.33/5  rDev -33.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Tiny, departing head, amber color. Tinny, coppery, spicy aromas, slight citrus, a hint of anise...and BANANAS! Yes, the Southern Bavarian weizenbier style does have that banana/clove component, but the Boston boys stuck a whole banana tree in the mash! Flinty taste & texture, thin body, not much for the tongue to do. No yeast, either. I don't enjoy weizens sans hefe. Actually, it says unfiltered, but I can neither see nor taste the yeast. Lousy finish. Not a good beer, at all. Yes, they have bananas, but not much more.

Serving type: bottle

01-19-2003 22:41:48 | More by feloniousmonk
Photo of WMBierguy
WMBierguy

Maryland

2.35/5  rDev -33.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I love Weiss beers, and had to try the Sam Adams version. I also bought a bottle of Weihenstephaner Weiss, my personal favorite, to better judge this beer. As I expected, the Sam Adams version fell well short of the mark set Weihenstephaner and other high quality imports. The first thing that any Weiss beer fan will notice is how watery the Sam Adams version is. When you aste it, you know its a Weiss, but you'd swear that it was half water. The beer itself was lighter in color than the Bavarian beers, and it seemed to be a weaker shade of beer in every aspect. A nice try by an American brewery, but not good enough. Save your money for Weihenstephaner, Paulaner, Hacker-Pschorr, Ayinger, etc. They aren't much more expensive, (in fact, they are probably cheaper than overpriced Sam Adams) and are much, much more flavorful and satisfying.

Serving type: bottle

03-10-2003 21:58:43 | More by WMBierguy
Photo of Rifrafboy
Rifrafboy

Minnesota

2.63/5  rDev -25.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

If Samuel Adam's has a fault, that's if they have a fault, it's a bit too much sweetness. S.A. Weiss goes above and beyond in this dept. The beer pours thick and cloudy, like a Belgian wheat beer with yeast still in the bottle. The smell is like warm burnt sugar. The drinker first tastes a cotton- candy- like sweetness which overpowers any hop or malt taste. The taste is thick and sweet, but very smooth. It goes down like a good cream soda with very little "burn". There is a heavy, syrup-sweet taste left in the mouth which makes one think of brushing the teeth quickly. Over all, this seems less like a beer than it does a thick carbonated soda pop from a 50's era fountain, only not for teens. If you like Bavarian wheat beer give it a try. There are better examples elsewhere, however.

Serving type: bottle

11-15-2002 15:52:11 | More by Rifrafboy
Photo of Jdiddy
Jdiddy

Rhode Island

2.68/5  rDev -23.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

I expected much more from this beer. Most of what comes from Sam's is amazing. This is much less than average compared to the finer Weiss beers (Hoegarden, Blue Moon, etc.).
Typical cloudy color but not such a great tasye. Smoky, yeasty, balance just seemed off. Would not be eager to drink again.

Serving type: bottle

06-15-2002 19:05:41 | More by Jdiddy
Photo of bewareOFpenguin
bewareOFpenguin

Massachusetts

2.68/5  rDev -23.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Bland. If I could write this 25 times, I would. I exspect a wheat beer to be fresh and bold. This was neither. It just laid there like a dead fish. Nothing really crisp about it. No great hops or snap to it. Uneventful. Perhaps it sat too long on a shelf, but I doubt it. Not the best product from this brewery.

Serving type: bottle

04-21-2003 06:43:23 | More by bewareOFpenguin
Photo of packetknife
packetknife

Idaho

2.7/5  rDev -23.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Golden and cloudy. Bleached white bubbly head but it didn't hold. My first thought was to Hoegaarden or Blue Moon. Again, for my second new beer of the night I am dissapointed. It smells spiced, it looks good. It has no taste. Even after watering myself to clean my mouth and waiting a while. It has no real taste. I could drink it forever as it has no taste and no noticeable bite. Darn my luck.

Serving type: bottle

05-11-2002 16:23:26 | More by packetknife
Photo of garymuchow
garymuchow

Minnesota

2.78/5  rDev -21%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Nice head that wasn't excessive. Slightly cloudy with a yellow-gold color. Aroma appropriate for style with phenols predominant and a slight wheat background. Mouthfeel seemed a little flat for style and leaving a thin quality to it. Flavor seemed to lack what I would expect in terms of wheat character and for a Bavarian style a shortage of phenols and fruity esters. Flavor was more barley malt than wheat. For a brewery I generally like this was rather dissappointing.

Serving type: bottle

04-10-2002 18:53:38 | More by garymuchow
Photo of rastaman
rastaman

United Kingdom (England)

2.8/5  rDev -20.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

AIBA 2003: Not too bad, but like a lot of things from sam Adams, pretty average, or perhaps slightly above average, lightly estery banana and clove flavours, but on the light side for sure. Drinkable, if a bit boring, man that Emersons weissbier i had at the festival sure kicked this ones arse in everyway.

Serving type: bottle

05-10-2003 07:40:56 | More by rastaman
Photo of Bierguy5
Bierguy5

Ohio

2.98/5  rDev -15.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a cloudy orange/golden color with no head. No head on a wheat beer? I tried and tried, but no luck. Smells grainy, with some citrus and banana notes. Taste is sweet and tart, slightly spicy in the form of cloves, along with a sour "off" taste. Very rough, some flavors are fighting each other. Light body with some carbonation, but needed to be more carbonation. Overall, not as bad as this may sound, but not up to par. Freshness may have been an issue here, I will certainly look for another sample and re-review if necessary. I haven't typically seen problems like this in any SA product.

Serving type: bottle

08-19-2004 01:49:45 | More by Bierguy5
Photo of John
John

New York

3.05/5  rDev -13.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Not a bad stab at a Bavarian Hefe. However, when compared to the real thing this one comes up a bit short. Thinish body and lemony with a subtle clove note. What's missing, IMHO, is a fuller body with that touch of creamy banana, malt sweetness and the usual pillowy head. One of the better US brewed Hefes though.

Serving type: bottle

01-07-2002 09:20:11 | More by John
Photo of Mitchster
Mitchster

Michigan

3.1/5  rDev -11.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours out to a cloudy dark golden, honey-colored brew, forming a large whipped head with exceptional retention and good lacing. Aroma is brisk...at first the aroma of bananas, followed by pale malt, bubbles-gum esters, and then an obtrusive metallic odor. Slight hoppiness and sparse cloves are noted. Carbonation is medium-strong. Taste begins with a bit of lemon zest, a touch of musty grain sack, medium malt body, copper and zinc, and an odd touch of amber malts towards the moderately astringent finish. Medium in body with a rather ruddy mouthfeel and finishing in lemon zest, pennies, and dirty leather.

Rather weak for the style and unimpressive. It has a few redeeming qualities but the metallic note and off tastes kill it. Semi-enjoyable if you don't pay attention to it. Definitely better American bavarian style wheats out there.

Serving type: bottle

01-05-2004 03:05:20 | More by Mitchster
Photo of marc77
marc77

California

3.13/5  rDev -11.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

The head is quite thin when compared to other Hefeweizens (I usually end up sipping the head on a good hefeweizen before I get to the liquid itself.) Cloudy from the wheat, with no yeast haze at all-- probably why they call it a Weiss and not a Hefeweizen. Typical yeasty esters are there and a dominated by clove while banana esters are at a minimum. A slight mustiness is perceptible as well. It's definitely more mild overall in aroma than commonly available German wheats. The body and mouthfeel are a bit lacking and don't have that proteinaceous creamy and smooth quality that a good Hefeweizen should have. The innocuousness of the overall flavor makes it fairly drinkable, but for a weizen it's a bit prosaic.

Serving type: bottle

04-10-2002 20:06:29 | More by marc77
Photo of yen157
yen157

New Jersey

3.13/5  rDev -11.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured clear and dark honey colored, but I swirled the heck out of the bottle trying to get every last bit of sediment out. I did and the beer went from clear to very opaque. The head started off about 2/3”, but quickly fell to < 1/8” of slightly sticky cream. Sweet wheat malt in the nose along with some banana and something slightly spicy, like white pepper. The first thing I noticed on sipping was a tiny, yet acute sourness. Nothing as bad as what I experienced in a bad Hitachino Nest Weizen. Anyway, the beer was kinda toasty, but it did have definite wheat and yeast flavors. Very medium carbonation kept this beer from being too slick in the mouth. Good, flavorful brew. I probably won’t get this again because there are so many other (better) wizens out there.

This bottle was two months past the notched “Drink by” date on the side of the bottle. I’m attributing the sourness to this. Also, hop contributions and other flavors may have changed over time. I would like to try this fresh, but I’m pretty sure it’s seasonal. Oh, well. I’ll have to wait until next year.

Serving type: bottle

04-28-2003 06:27:11 | More by yen157
Photo of hbis2gut
hbis2gut

New Hampshire

3.13/5  rDev -11.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

I was initially caught off guard by the appearance of this beer.
The carbonation, color, and head all look extremely convincing.
Alas, for the true weiss aficianado, this beer is an imposter at best.
Don't get me wrong though, as an American wheat beer, it is quite drinkable. I find it a much closer attempt than Redhook's offering.Dry husky malt flavor with background sweetness. The carbonation is it's best feature, nice small bubbles.The aroma is of raw wheat. It has a nice light-yet-full body as well. In the end, I just kept searching for the old familiar german weiss-smile that always comes out in me and it never showed up.

Serving type: bottle

12-09-2003 04:31:50 | More by hbis2gut
Photo of budgood1
budgood1

Minnesota

3.15/5  rDev -10.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

pours out a cloudy, dirty rusted colour. a fairly big and foamy head reduces quickly and leaves rings of lace. light aromatic fruit esters lean toward the banana side, with a spicy clove kicker. mouthfeel is thick and creamy, rather full bodied for an americanized bavarian wheat beer. the body of the beer seems to be the best part of it, though, because it lacks in the flavour department. spritzy lemony, banana and spice make for a decent taste profile, but those characterisics definitely are understated. a bit crisp in the finish, making it refreshing and drinkable.

so, in review....questionable looks, great body, but no brains......hmmmm....so i took it home...tried it out...appreciated the good parts but i don't really want to see it again. but if i was offered it again for free with no strings attached....you betcha.

Serving type: bottle

06-29-2003 11:29:55 | More by budgood1
Photo of BattleRoadBrewer
BattleRoadBrewer

Massachusetts

3.15/5  rDev -10.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This beer is not 100% retired, actually. Served on tap at the 2007 Sam Adams Beer Summit Oktoberfest in pint glass tankard.

Appearance is cloudy straw colored.

Aroma is very juicyfruity, clearly not the same yeast as some of their other wheat beers.

Flavor is bland, no defects, but nothing special.

Mouthfeel is balanced between bitterness and silky feel.

Overall not a bad summer quencher.

Serving type: on-tap

09-15-2007 15:00:26 | More by BattleRoadBrewer
Photo of Bierman9
Bierman9

New Hampshire

3.2/5  rDev -9.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Hazy golden-orange color....nose has that bavarian spicy banana-clove touch, which I like.... a bit thin body-wise.... the right flavors are there (banana and clove) but need to be more pronounced... Not bad...

overall: 3.35
appearance: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | mouthfeel: 3.5 | drinkability: 3

7

Serving type: bottle

01-11-2002 16:40:33 | More by Bierman9
Photo of HardTarget
HardTarget

Texas

3.2/5  rDev -9.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Aroma: A light fruity apricot/apple/grape melody that together comes across as a white wine aroma with accompanying slight sour smell.
Appearance: Hazy dark yellow (as it should be for style) with a thin white cover that left dots of lace.
Flavor: Buttery with slight wheat notes. No banana flavor noted
Mouthfeel: Medium body with good carbonation
Overall Impression: Sampled this in the middle of an extended tasting session and it just didn’t stand out. The buttery taste seemed to be an off flavor and the sour wasn’t sharp enough to be a focal point like a Berliner Weisse. Like a lot of Sam Adams beers, pretty good mild example of a style. Thanks to Pegasus for the sample.

Serving type: bottle

03-06-2005 09:52:45 | More by HardTarget
Photo of skar
skar

New York

3.25/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle

Appearance/Head: Golden color. Light haze. Some head, which faded fast. A Hefe-Weizen should really have a better head.

Aroma: Wheat malt. Lemon. Some banana/clove but light for the style.

Taste: Grainy, malty, herbal flavors. The aftertaste has too much sour and citrus flavors. It is almost like they added a lemon for me. It lacks the true banana/clove flavors of the style.

Bottom line: Pretty weak Weiss. It joins many other Samuel Adam brews by being drinkable interpretions of the style, without being memorable or classic.

Serving type: bottle

11-03-2003 13:27:07 | More by skar
Photo of mophie
mophie

Delaware

3.28/5  rDev -6.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Cloudy golden appearance, with a creamy head that dissipates a bit too quickly. Faint orangey/banana aroma, with a touch of spice (clove). Taste is also a combination of mild citrus, banana and spice, with a slightly sweet, nutty finish. Overall, mild and somewhat refreshing. Not necessarily the best weiss beer out there, but not too bad on a warm afternoon.

Serving type: bottle

04-14-2002 14:06:54 | More by mophie
Photo of BitteBier
BitteBier

Indiana

3.4/5  rDev -3.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Nice hazy yellow-orange color. Aroma of banana stands out most. Taste is very smooth, perhaps too smooth, as it lacks any remarkable character. Flavor flushes from mouth rather quickly, leaving just a slight yeasty, bitter taste at the back of the tongue. Still, it's as drinkable as one expects from the Sam Adams label.

Serving type: bottle

07-06-2002 19:09:06 | More by BitteBier
Photo of aracauna
aracauna

Georgia

3.4/5  rDev -3.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Cloudy gold color with a dissapointing lack of head. Big soda bubbles rise sporadically from the side of the glass. Aroma is dominated by spicy yeast under which the malt/wheat cower. The flavor hits you with the spicy yeast and finishes with a mild esteriness that seems a little odd with the mild spiciness of the yeast. It is very crisp, but unlike most beers that invoke the crisp clause, it isn't overly watery. I'd take some of the real German hefes or an Oberon over this anyday, but this is a surprisingly bold attempt at the style from a brewer that seems to me to produce mostly tame beers.

Serving type: bottle

07-07-2002 20:08:05 | More by aracauna
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Samuel Adams Weiss Bier from Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)
80 out of 100 based on 83 ratings.