1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Samuel Adams Imperial White - Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)

Samuel Adams Imperial WhiteSamuel Adams Imperial White

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

1,194 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1194
Reviews: 638
rAvg: 3.45
pDev: 19.71%

Brewed by:
Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams) visit their website
Massachusetts, United States

Style | ABV
Witbier |  10.30% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Jason on 01-16-2009)
View: Beers (116) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Samuel Adams Imperial White Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 1,194 | Reviews: 638 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of Sammy

Ontario (Canada)

3.65/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Better than your average wheat beer. Sweetish aromas. Pours creamy head, and creamy above-average thick mouthfeel. Carbonation greater than average. Satisfying and drinkable. Some orange, spices. Some sweetness, fruitiness, the bias is not too sweet.

Serving type: bottle

05-04-2010 23:50:57 | More by Sammy
Photo of BuckeyeNation


4.15/5  rDev +20.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Blurry apricot with a fine yeasty haze and several streams of slowly rising bubbles whose ultimate destination is a three finger crown of sandstone colored foam that is mousse-like in its airy creaminess. Sheer curtains of lace with Swiss cheese holes decorate the upper portion of the glass.

The nose is more BSAA (Belgian strong amber ale) than witbier. There must be something in here other than coriander and orange peel. Grains of paradise? BBC seems to have a penchant for that particular spice. Assorted fruity esters and alcohol are noted as well. Let's hope the flavor is at least as good and at least as interesting.

I'm not sure why the brewery calls this beer a witbier, other than the fact that it uses 50% wheat malt and is spiced. It sure doesn't taste like a wit, not even an Imperial one. What it tastes like is a sweet and spicy Belgian-style ale that began impressing the hell out me from the word 'go'.

There isn't much flavor contribution from the malt, other than a 'just right' amount of sweet breadiness. Candi sugar is most likely present as well. The Hallertau Mittelfruh hops don't add much, other than keeping things from being cloying. Alcohol adds power and flavor intensity.

The spice bill is still hard to figure. C'mon guys, why not give us the specifics? Coriander is an obvious guess. A background pepperiness brings to mind grains of paradise (alligator pepper). I also wouldn't be a bit surprised to find that a Belgian ale yeast is in the house. Maybe not, but it sure does taste like it.

The mouthfeel is lush, plush, soft, smooth and creamilicious. Nigh on perfect carbonation is the biggest reason why the beer feels both full and voluminous, just like the best Belgians. This attribute is the highlight in a beer that has no lowlights.

Samuel Adams Imperial White is delicious beer that has held up very well in the nearly one year since its release. It isn't as good as Bell's Batch 8000 and Southampton Double White Ale, but it isn't that far behind. A yearly release would be cause for celebration.

Serving type: bottle

12-29-2009 15:29:26 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of mikesgroove

South Carolina

2.25/5  rDev -34.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

reviewed from notes, part of the big sam adams tasting on xams day. we plowed through everyone we could find in the damn state! served cold and poured into a pint glass.

alex grabbed this one from the four pack and it may have been the loser of the night to be honest. the pour was ok, nothing to write home about with a quick and fleeting head that did not stay around long at all. aroma is way boozy, holy crap. hot alcohol dominates the smell and the taste, the flavor to the point of obnoxious. thick light cough syrup with soo much candied malt to cover it up i was just insure of where to even begin, this was just not well done. too much for me and it ended in a drain pour, the only one of the night.

overall this was a bad release i have to say, it is just too hot, unbalanced and just does not work on any level.

Serving type: bottle

01-14-2011 03:03:20 | More by mikesgroove
Photo of BEERchitect


3.48/5  rDev +0.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

It's exciting to see a ground-roots brewery break out their molds with some daring and energetic beers. Nothing is more a leap of faith than an Imperial Witbier.

The beer begins with a surprisingly copperish-orange-golden hue that has a viscous character to the sight. A thin head forms and then lasts the session. Lacing and legging evident on the sides of the chalice.

Juicy aromas of fresh oranges jump out at the nose. A cotton-candy maltiness then follows along with a heavy dose of soft, spicy corriander. An unexpected ethanol scent burns the nose hairs and warns to take it slowly.

Extremely sweet flavor hit the palate with a sugary, malty, honey-like flavor. Orange juice, pineapples, and a plethera of esters build on one another and continue to develop the flavors deep into the finish. No hop presence to mention, but the peppery phenols give the complexity and a valid attempt to balance the sweetness.

Again, very sweet, heavy, and somewhat oily to the feel because of the extraordinary amount of unresolved sugars. Alcoholic heat pushes the beer further than expected. The beer looses the classic cool, soft, delicate, creamy mouthfeel that original Witbiers showcase well.

Rather than an Imperial Witbier, this could easily be considered a Barleywine with a Witbier influence. Interesting nonetheless.

Serving type: bottle

03-24-2009 03:20:52 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of Thorpe429


2.23/5  rDev -35.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Reviewed from notes.

Pours a cloudy moderate golden color with a white head. Nose brings a lot of booze and some stone fruits, peaches, and a bit of banana and spice. The taste is really dominated by booze with some slight peach flavors in the background. Feel is very poor, nearing on awful, with some cloying sugar and booze. Way too thick, even for an imperial wheat beer. Much thicker and more boozy than the typical wheatwine. Not a good beer.

Serving type: bottle

10-16-2010 19:10:33 | More by Thorpe429
Photo of metter98

New York

3.55/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A: The beer is very hazy dark yellowish amber in color and has a moderate amount of carbonation along with some yeast particles visible floating in suspension. It poured with a two finger high off white head that gradually died down and left lots of lacing down the sides of the glass.
S: There are aromas of candi sugar, orange citrus and wheat in the nose.
T: The taste is similar to the smell and is slightly sweet with flavors of alcohol and spices in the finish.
M: It feels a bit higher than medium-bodied and smooth on the palate with a moderate amount of carbonation.
O: The sweetness and alcohol flavors can make this beer a bit difficult to drink.

Serving type: bottle

07-31-2012 02:27:12 | More by metter98
Photo of ChainGangGuy


3/5  rDev -13%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12 ounce bottle - $2.99 at Total Wine & More in Kennesaw, Georgia.

Appearance: Pours a hazed, dark orange-amber body with a full, fluffy, off-white head.

Smell: Souped up, heady scent of barley and wheat malt with some tangy accents and notes of fragrant spices and light fruit and honey candy.

Taste: Sugary sweet tastes of malted barley and wheat that's both a tad bready and a tad tangy. Fair pinches of spice and dried orange peel. Thin drizzle of honey. Faintly spicy, floral hops and bitterness. Some warming alcohol qualities arrive late. Neither the hops nor the alcohol can seem to cut the sweet syrup. The sticky, warming finish is reminiscent of the conclusion for the film Return of the King -- it just won't end!

Mouthfeel: Medium-plus body. Mellow, medium-low carbonation. Altogether thick, heavy mouthfeel.

Drinkability: The one bottle will suffice, thank you. Forgoes the refreshment and grace of a standard witbier with its burdensome body and cloying nature. My kingdom for some effervescence! By the end, my trip to the bottom of the bottle had slowed to a mere crawl, even with the much needed aid of some water.

Serving type: bottle

06-16-2009 23:11:59 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of TMoney2591


2.45/5  rDev -29%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Served in a Sam Adams sensory pint glass.

I remember trying this one when it first came out and strongly disliking it. Figured I'd give it another shot after "developing my palate" (I hate using that phrase, as it really sounds kinda wine- (or anything-) snobby, but I can't easily come up with a better one). It pours a hazy Clemson-auburn (why should Auburn be the only tiger-based school with a color, hm?) topped by a short-lived half-finger of white foam. The nose comprises mandarin oranges, lemon zest, light cardamom, and light toffee. Unfortunately for these elements, they're all covered by a thick fog of McCormick's vodka, plastic bottle and all. Sad, really. If it had meshed somewhat nicely, like a strong screwdriver or something, it would've been fine, but this is just too much. The taste is more of the same, with a bit more orange this time 'round (moving closer to a peel, though). It's just an overly boozy mess of a taste, just like the smell, but is somehow less astringent. I can't explain it, either. The body is a hefty medium, with a light moderate carbonation and a sorta sticky feel. Overall, this is just too much for what it might even want to be. The booziness is so omnipresent and malignant that I really don't want to continue drinking this very much, much less get any more bottles.

Serving type: bottle

11-08-2010 00:07:18 | More by TMoney2591
Photo of NeroFiddled


4.2/5  rDev +21.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Wow! I'm surprised that with so much malt the spices actually come through with such sharpness. But I'm getting ahead of myself. It pours a cloudy amber with an orange cast and gold and brass highlights beneath a short head of creamy yellowed-white. The head retention is good and it leaves walls of tiny spots and streaks as it goes. However, for a beer with such a healthy dose of glutinous wheat, and so much malty girth it should be better. The nose is fruity, and rind-like. It's citrusy (lemon) and gently spicy. In the mouth it's medium-full and spritzy , or perhaps that's zesty - with so much body I'm not sure it can be 'spritzy', so, yes, zesty. The flavor is as the aroma suggests but much more full. The malt also steps up to the front. It's wheatish and sugary, and it suggests caramel, or at least darkened sugar amidst the fruitiness (apples, lemon, plum). In a way it makes me think of a warm oatmeal breakfast treat. Oats and cinnamon? - not quite, but along the same lines in a way. It's also interestingly more clove-like than coriander-ish. That must be from the yeast. It's interesting, rich, and satisfying. The alcohol never shows, although it probably helps to focus the finish; and the bitterness is balanced to work with the spiciness so that it off-sets the sweetness of the malt just enough, and then lets it finish dry with a swirl of spiciness. Full and rich, and somewhat complex. Worth trying.

Serving type: bottle

05-15-2009 02:22:17 | More by NeroFiddled
Photo of biboergosum

Alberta (Canada)

3.85/5  rDev +11.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Oh look, another hefty American beer dwelling in the back of my fridge, ripe for playing a close second fiddle in my tribute to Repeal Day...

This beer pours a cloudy, sediment-rife orange-brown colour, with two fingers of foamy, creamy off-white head, which leaves a beautiful thin cobweb of lace around the glass as it recedes. It smells of sweet wheat malt, bananas stewed in vodka, and some mild yeast and spice. The taste is sweet fruity wheat malt - banana, principally, some vanilla/caramel adding to the sweetness, slightly astringent warming alcohol, and coriander and pepper spice. The carbonation is the low, unmiddling side, the body medium-full in weight, smooth, slightly addled by the undeniable booze, but still creamy, from caramel, grain, sugar, and phenols alike. It finishes still mostly sweet, from the usual suspects, tempered just enough by the somewhat unknown drying element.

There seems to be an "Imperial" category for many a style, but not witbiers, which you would think makes pretty good sense. That is, until you run head-on into this offering from the BBC (confusion with this acronym only exposes one's non-American upbringing here...)

Serving type: bottle

12-06-2010 01:59:38 | More by biboergosum
Photo of TheManiacalOne

Rhode Island

2.95/5  rDev -14.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a 12oz. bottle into a pint glass.

A: The beer is a deep amber color, with a short off-white head that fades slowly and leaves a thick lace.

S: The aroma is of bananas, citrus, Belgian yeast, light malts, some spice and a touch of hops.

T: The taste starts out with a harsh alcohol bite followed by sweet flavors of caramel, citrus, spices and some Belgian yeast. The malt character is hearty and there's a decent hops presence. The after-taste is slightly bready and slightly sweet.

M: Crisp and a little smooth, medium body, medium carbonation, finish is slightly sticky.

D: A little tasty, goes down ok, not too filling, strong kick, decent representation of style it's a prime example of why certain types of beer shouldn't push the ABV too high. I thought an amped up version of Sam's White Ale would be pretty good but I was proven wrong.

Serving type: bottle

03-28-2009 01:43:16 | More by TheManiacalOne
Photo of emerge077


2.68/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a dark orange copper, odd for a witbier. Thin layer of white foam that dissipates quickly, to be expected considering the abv.

Smells like circus peanuts candy, super sweet with artificial oranges, though there is something still vaguely resembling beer here too. Sharp isopropyl alcohol rears its ugly head as the beer warms.

Very sweet and somewhat boozy, candied orange and crystal malt reminds me more of a faded imperial IPA than Witbier. Extra sweet and caramelly. Dry prickly finish, alcohol is way too forward here, just unapologetically boozy. Slick and syrupy feel, high gravity largesse, it coats the mouth and nearly triggers the gag reflex... that's no good. Yuck. Going to be a drainpour for the last bit of it. Not recommended.

Serving type: bottle

06-24-2011 01:44:40 | More by emerge077
Photo of russpowell


3.98/5  rDev +15.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Picked this up in Liqour World Fayetteville ARK

Pours an effervescent amber with a sliver of beige head. Sheets of lacing & good head retention

S: Juicy fruit & some phenols

T: Follows the nose with banana creme, & vanilla up front, plus some heat. More banana with a kiss of white pepper as this warms, along with some boozey breadyness & some grainyness. Finishes with a flourish of tropical fruit, with bananas leading the way, damn near pulled a 4.5

MF: Smooth, chewy, & subtle carbonation, pretty warming

A bit chewy, but I am really digging this from start to finish! Well played Sam Adams! I accept this as an IMP Wit, not a wit, but even then; I'd take it over watered down offerings, no problem!

Serving type: bottle

05-30-2009 02:51:24 | More by russpowell
Photo of WesWes

New York

3.58/5  rDev +3.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

The beer pours a hazy dark golden/orange color with a thick frothy white head that slowly fades to lacing. The aroma is decent. It has a very rich, pale and wheat malt scent with some light spicing and a fruity yeast aroma. There is some alcohol warmth, but it's minimal. The taste is decent as well. It has a thick pale and wheat malt flavor. It's not as spicy as a traditional white ale. It borders on wheat wine territory. It goes down smooth with a bit of heat in the finish. The mouthfeel is fine. It is a full bodied beer with adequate carbonation. This is a pretty good beer. I'm not overly impressed, but I wouldn't turn it away if it was offered.

Serving type: bottle

01-03-2010 00:22:07 | More by WesWes
Photo of Mora2000


3.9/5  rDev +13%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

The beer pours an orange color with a decent-sized white head. The aroma is about what I expected. I get a lot of coriander, with a little bit of orange peel to balance things out. Smells like a regular witbier, only more intense. The flavor is similar. The predominant flavor is the coriander, but there is some syrupy, sweet orange marmalade notes in there as well. There is also a little bit of detectable alcohol. Easy to drink. Medium mouthfeel and medium carbonation. I am not a huge fan of Imperial Whites, but this one was pretty good. It has a nice balance of the coriander and orange, which is what I look for in a witbier - imperial or otherwise.

Serving type: bottle

02-14-2011 01:58:35 | More by Mora2000
Photo of zeff80


3.99/5  rDev +15.7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A - Poured out a cloudy, orange color with amber highlights near the top of the glass. It had a small, foamy, off-white head that left soapy trails of lace.

S - It smelled of clove and tons of yeast. It had some nice banana aromas mixed with wheat.

T - It tasted spicy with hints of nut. It had nice sweet wheat flavors with yeast and clove taste, too.

M - It was crisp and very sharp. It was medium-bodied with a warm alcohol presence.

D - This is quite possibly the best wheat beer I've ever had. It really is finely crafted with great aroma and flavor.

Serving type: bottle

04-10-2009 20:48:53 | More by zeff80
Photo of jlindros


3.2/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Tall white fluffy head fades at a medium pace with a touch of lacing over clear golden copper orange color.

Nose has lots of wheat, sweet malty aromas, a little syrupy, lots of wheats with some light citrus, orange peel, and even hint of banana, light spices, and light booze.

Taste is sweet, syrupy, creamy, lots of wheats again, spices bringing coriander, orange zest, and a few other spices, light fruits, lots of tingly and warming booze, a slight esthery flavor and some weird iffy off flavors even. Finishes sweet and sticky, with a lot more warming and tingly booze, syrupy, and fruits as well as spices.

Mouth is medium to a bit heavier bodied, boozy and decent carbonation.

Drink is meh, quite a bit of booze, sticky and syrupy, weird flavors and spices, meh.

Serving type: bottle

03-08-2011 00:51:14 | More by jlindros
Photo of Gueuzedude


3.48/5  rDev +0.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours quite hazy into my 25cl tulip glass with a three finger thick lightly tanned colored head. The beer is a hazy amber hue that shows a bit of brightness when held up to the light. The aroma smells quite a bit of orange, this almost drowns out everything else, though it isn't overly loud. A lot of the fruitiness seems to come from the fermentation character, which boosts the citrus note.

Thick and chewy feeling, the beer also has a fair amount of sweetness too it. The sweetness is boosted by sweet orange peel. There is also an earthy, lightly vegetal coriander note to the finish as well as a touch of spicy pepper. There is a touch of alcohol here that provides some heat. Some sweet grain notes combines with the citrus to create some notes a bit like honey.

This beer is fairly simplistic and really not all that great. Not horrible either though, just not exactly enough like a Wit to be what I was looking for.

Serving type: bottle

05-24-2009 20:15:52 | More by Gueuzedude
Photo of Knapp85


3.9/5  rDev +13%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

The Imperial White Ale was probably my favorite of the three that came out in this series. I thought that the Stout and Bock would have taken the crown but they didn't. This beer pours out much darker orange than I expected it to for being a white ale. The head was pretty thick looking and left behind some good lacing. The smell of the beer has the typical coriander and yeasty citrus aromas along with some spice. The taste translates the aroma into flavor and even gives off some floral flavors as a bonus. The mouthfeel is much thicker than expected as well. The be isn't all that heavy but it had some serious body to it. Overall it's a really nice brew and really worth looking into.

Serving type: bottle

05-24-2011 20:45:24 | More by Knapp85
Photo of jwc215


3.53/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours clouded orange - dark and orangey for the style - with a creamy tan head. As the head descends, lacing sticks.

The smell is of orange marmelade, black pepper/ coriander, some bread and some alcohol. Interesting nose.

The taste is of orange marmelade/jam with bread (crust) and coriander. It has a sticky sweetness with black peppery spice to balance it somewhat. Sweetness and alcohol are a bit too much. Finishes a bit sticky.

It is full-bodied and a bit too sticky sweet for me.

A thick, syrupy interpretation - like a candied version of a wit. Quite boozy, too. Interesting...different.

Serving type: bottle

07-05-2009 13:41:33 | More by jwc215
Photo of RblWthACoz


2.25/5  rDev -34.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Eh. This just hits me as too sickly sweet. And the fact of that makes it so that it overpowers anything else that may be trying to show. So, it's a one act show with a strong alcohol and boozy tone stepping in for an intermission. A miss in my book.

Serving type: bottle

08-27-2012 03:03:04 | More by RblWthACoz
Photo of WVbeergeek


3.15/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

A feeling of awe comes over me when I see a Sam Adams brew at 10.3 percent abv, but why does it have to be an Imperial Wit. Appears a deep honey golden hue with a creamy off white head, body is clouded and full of spice. Aroma proves the appearance with coriander, orange peel, and loads of honey like sweetness with booze hidden decently in the smell. Syrupy feel to the flavor with spices booze and honey sweetness cloying from the front the back. Mouthfeel is just as cloying as the actual flavors going on a fuzzy furry feel like licking a peach comes over ya. Carbonation is supposedly soft and fluffy but I'm getting syrup and booze with a touch of remnants of a white ale and a honey like blur passes my senses. Drinkability is pretty pour not a beer I would sit on any pedestal I guess I have to look for the Impy Stout, and I know the Bock had some redeeming qualities at one point.

Serving type: bottle

07-02-2009 03:00:49 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of Gavage

New Jersey

3.35/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Appearance: pours a clear orange color with some yellow highlights. A 1/2" head falls quickly to a thick surface foam. A few big bubbles hug the rim.

Smell: alcohol and orange citrus are bold, and some softer coriander lingers in tha background.

Taste: a somewhat grainy wheat base with soft banana, coriander, orange slices profile. The alcohol is a bit over the top here and extremely warming, taking away from the flavor.

Mouthfeel: medium bodied. Crisp throughout. Some dryness arrives late. Aftertaste is long as alcohol dominates.

Drinkability: this is a true slow sipping beer. One in a session is all you will consume. If you want a boozy beer, this will do.

Serving type: bottle

02-27-2009 22:42:42 | More by Gavage
Photo of smcolw


3.53/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Cloudy orange-amber color. Very small head, particularly for the style. Light spotty lace on the glass.

Fresh raw wheat aroma with a strong dose of yeast. Notable alcohol in the background.

Starts off smooth and alcohol oily. The flavors of wheat are muted. In fact, the most distinctive aspect is sour, citrus flavor. The aftertaste is all alcohol. Overall, not my cup of tea (or beer that is).

Serving type: bottle

02-22-2009 19:17:43 | More by smcolw
Photo of Halcyondays


3.38/5  rDev -2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12 oz. bottle, listed as 10.3%,

A: Pours a cloudy murky goldenrod/orange, with a full, long-lasting white head, excellent lacing.

S: Smells pretty similar to their regular white beer, flowery, perfumy, orange zest.

T: Definitely an Imperial, it has all the nice spice flavours of the original White which I liked, but a ton of booze mixed in.

M: Sweet and boozy, full-bodied with solvent character.

D: A nice attempt, but the few other Imperial Wits I have had have hid the alcohol much better, in this one it tends to dominate the drink, there's just not enough malt to hold back the 10.3%, but in the end it wasn't a hard beer to finish.

Serving type: bottle

03-25-2009 16:19:45 | More by Halcyondays
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Samuel Adams Imperial White from Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)
79 out of 100 based on 1,194 ratings.