Samuel Adams Imperial White - Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)

Not Rated.
Samuel Adams Imperial WhiteSamuel Adams Imperial White

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
79
okay

1,262 Ratings
THE BROS
80
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,262
Reviews: 640
rAvg: 3.45
pDev: 19.71%
Wants: 26
Gots: 56 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams) visit their website
Massachusetts, United States

Style | ABV
Witbier |  10.30% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Jason on 01-16-2009)
View: Beers (117) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Samuel Adams Imperial White Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,262 | Reviews: 640 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of polkaishot
4.5/5  rDev +30.4%

Photo of durwood64
3/5  rDev -13%

Photo of BucannonXC5
3.53/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a bottle into a pint glass. Color was hazy orange. Just a tad (1/4 inches) maybe of head. Light lacing on the top that had circled the glass with a bunch in one spot (probably where I poured). Hardly any lacing in the middle. The lacing dissipated within five minutes. Spider-web film on the sides of the glass.

Heavy whiff that I could smell from two feet away. Alcohol and cloves dominated the smell. I also got wheat and orange peels. A sweet sugary smell as well.

Tasted a mix of cloves and orange peels, backed by a heavy dose of alcohol. The alcohol is definitely not hiding. I also got caramel in there. Feels a bit like a winter warmer.

Medium body. Sticky texture. Soft (below average) carbonation. Smooth finish.

An OK beer overall, although I was expecting a bit more. Definitely a witbier. Good finish, though.

Photo of bcal16
4/5  rDev +15.9%

Photo of 80b
3.5/5  rDev +1.4%

Photo of rogerdclark
4/5  rDev +15.9%

Photo of PrimScrewhead
4.5/5  rDev +30.4%

Photo of rjplumer
2.45/5  rDev -29%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Hazy deep amber with thin off-white head. Noticeable orange-peel coriander aroma. Hoppy fruit bitterness to start. The heavy fruit sourness in the middle is a turn-off. Not terrible but I’m having a hard time wrapping myself around this one. This isn’t what I expected so I’m disappointed. Seems like more an attempt at an IPA.

Photo of AnIrishCroi
4.3/5  rDev +24.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A: Dark orange/copper. Cloudy haze with light carbonation. Medium off white head with very good retention and lacing.

S: Orange, wheat, grains, sweet. Subtle hint of pepper?

T: Sweet light hops. Orange blossom with hint of accompanying fruits. More bold than Blue Moon but of same general family.

M: Full mouthfeel with med-heavy body. Not dry, slight creaminess in finish.

O: Full bodied, heavier beer. Noticeable flavor even right out of the fridge. Develops nicely as beer comes to room temperature.

Photo of nickfl
1.5/5  rDev -56.5%

Photo of Ford1873
3/5  rDev -13%

Photo of Hoagie1973
2.28/5  rDev -33.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Thanks to kbnooshay for the bottle.
Darker than any Wit I've ever seen. Color is more akin to an APA. 1-finger creamy off-white head.
Smells just a touch wheaty but mostly the barley malt dominates. Alcohol is obvious along with a little fruitiness and some butterscotch.
Mouthfeel is syrupy with little carbonation and the flavor has a boozy sweetness that's just off-putting. Alcohol dominates the finish. Nothing present that one usually enjoys or expects from a Witbier. No orange or coriander to speak of, just a sweet boozy mess.
This one's a failure; doesn't resemble a Witbier in any capacity, "imperial" or otherwise.

Photo of rlee1390
3.48/5  rDev +0.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A-Cloudy deep orange/copper but no head whatsoever

S-Orange with spices and some wheat.

T-Oranges and wheat, banana a long with a little alcohol as well.

M-Medium bodied, slightly more carbonation than the appearance suggested

O-The light subtleness of a witbier is missing, none of the spices and wheat flavors are present. Also the alcohol is not masked well at all.

Photo of WestSideAmish
3/5  rDev -13%

Photo of TexAggie011
3/5  rDev -13%

Photo of VipertheIV
3.5/5  rDev +1.4%

Photo of schoun
4/5  rDev +15.9%

Photo of Deshelto
3.5/5  rDev +1.4%

Photo of WrathsU
2.28/5  rDev -33.9%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

A - Barely any head on a vigorous pour. Copper hazy body. No lacing to speak of.

S - Faint sweet fruit smell mingled with what smells a bit like the fault dms. Very faint smelling in general.

T - Hello alcohol. Very boozy up front. Very sweet tasting. Banana, and other mingled fruits throughout. Not much else going on though.

M - A still beer, not much carbonation bite. A mediocre amount of alcohol burn.

O - Not the best Sam Adams on the market. Way to sweet, and way to boozy for me. Nothing like the complex delicacies found in your standard witbier.

Photo of atr2605
2.63/5  rDev -23.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A-pours a hazy golden straw color with a small white head
S-A little softer than I expected but the orange peel and spice still comes through
T-Not great. The high alcohol gives it a cough syrup flavor with the orange and spice coming in the aftertaste
M-Thick and syrup like.
O-not a fan. I was really curious when I saw it because I had never even heard of an imperial witbier being done. Luckily it was pretty cheap but Sam Adams definitely did not create a unique brew here, or at least not in a good way

Photo of desaironak
4/5  rDev +15.9%

Photo of adiamant1989
4.5/5  rDev +30.4%

Photo of 2378GCGTG
3/5  rDev -13%

Photo of Sinewave
3.5/5  rDev +1.4%

Photo of Stoffel
3.5/5  rDev +1.4%

Samuel Adams Imperial White from Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)
79 out of 100 based on 1,262 ratings.