1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Samuel Adams Blackberry Witbier - Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)

Samuel Adams Blackberry WitbierSamuel Adams Blackberry Witbier

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
76
okay

1,465 Ratings
THE BROS
75
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1465
Reviews: 669
rAvg: 3.3
pDev: 19.09%


Brewed by:
Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams) visit their website
Massachusetts, United States

Style | ABV
Witbier |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 01-18-2009)
View: Beers (117) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 1,465 | Reviews: 669 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of BierJager89
BierJager89

California

4.18/5  rDev +26.7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25

A: Hazy straw color with a white head.

S: Lots of blackberry and a little wheat.

T: Berries come out at the start, followed by some wheat, finishing with a touch of fruity Belgian yeast esters, but blackberry is present throughout.

M: Medium-light bodied and smooth. Refreshing.

O: Sam Adams rarely gets the credit they deserve, and I think the same can be said for fruit infused wheat ales. Definitely recommended for fans of such beers.

Serving type: bottle

02-06-2014 00:35:49 | More by BierJager89
Photo of Bills453
Bills453

Ohio

2.68/5  rDev -18.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Appearance - actually quite nice! Golden color with tints of red. No head whatsoever unfortunately. Nice sediment floating within it. LOVE SEDIMEMT!

Smell - very sweet. I think the smell of the berries is overpowering.

Taste - unfortunately I don't get any taste whatsoever until after I swallow, then I get some blackberry flavor.

Mouthfeel - asi - asi

Overall - I don't think I'll drink this one again.

Serving type: bottle

01-29-2014 23:06:00 | More by Bills453
Photo of jucifer1818
jucifer1818

Florida

3.86/5  rDev +17%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

- strikingly clear, looking more like a cider or campaign than a witbier. Really, only the most style-driven lovers of wits will have a problem with this (tho YES, I gotja...wit bier means wite beer and this isn't white, and yea its a screwup) but still, grading it against style, it looks very nice if you grade it as a blueberry beer.

Ill compromise and give it a 3.5 for appearance. 3.5\5

s: This beer smells wonderful. It has a sour blueberry smell, mixed in with the character of the beer. Id say that it comes out smelling like a blueberry scone or another type of fruit pastry. not too shabby!

4.5\5

taste: see what I like about this one, is how subdued it is. the blueberry flavor never takes up too much power from the beer, and it never gets to be too powerful to be cloying. Too many fruit beers do that and I find it in bad taste. However, this brew has some problems. It does not have enough wit flavors in it....and what little it has will not satisfy wit diehards (it has just a slight touch of soft bready wheat character). but for what it is as a fruit beer, I've it a 3.75 on taste.
3.75\5

mouthfeel: Relatively middle ground in body final gravity, with a great heavy dose of carbonation. easy drinking.
4\5

overall: Ill be honest, I liked this one, against all expectation. I'm not a big fan of wits OR fruit beer. mixing them together? odds are that if it was not for my blog, I would never had had this one. but I like it. if you treat it as a blueberry beer, its pretty good. I like it. overall, Id give it a 3.5\5

if it had just a BIT more unmalted what (and maybe some more oats) I would give it more.

its good, and great for the uninitiated in beer, especially if their like blueberry's.

unexpectedly good. Not recommended for lovers of the classic wit style...you will not find any classic witness here.

Serving type: bottle

12-27-2013 19:46:06 | More by jucifer1818
Photo of TheBrewo
TheBrewo

Michigan

3.44/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

Thanks to AngieBaby for supplying this for our little reunion. This brew was poured from the bottle into generic pint glasses, putting forth a ruddy burnt sienna coloring. It held a one and a half finger tall head of dirty snow colored bubbles, showing nice retention. Crisp waves of lacing were left edged around each rim. A light haze cut clarity, but no sediment was noted. Carbonation appeared to be active and pervasive. The nose gave sweetness of blackberry, raspberry, fermented green apples, brown sugar, clean wheatiness, wheat and white flour, sunflower seed and pollen, generic ale yeastiness, gentle grassy hops, and granite. Our first impression was that this was a highly refreshing beer for the style, with just the right amount of fruity sweetness to match the malted base. As we sipped, the taste opened up with immediate tart and sugary sweetness of blackberry, plum, and blueberry fruitiness, raw honey, wheaty and pale maltiness, pine bark, aluminum metallics, and phenolic clove. The middle continued forward with wet and mineral-laden wheaty wash, oily citric peel and pith bite, pine nut creaminess, icy metallics, and heavy yeast burden. The finish showed notes of more wheat, sorghum flour, dried maple leafiness, cheap adjuncts, mineral water, brassy coin, aloe, dried cranberries, and phenolic plastic and clove. The aftertaste breathed of fogged glass, light dusty mustiness, muscat grapes, tart berry mash, flashes of Jolly Rancher cloy, medicinals and plastic, orange flesh, bitter wheat bite, metallic yeastiness, and the softest piney stickiness. The body was lightly medium, and the carbonation was high, giving intense prickle to the hard palate if left in the mouth for too long to taste. The first few sips gave excellent slurp, smack, cream, froth, and pop, but this faded quickly along with the head, and as the beer came to temperature. The mouth was left wet and tingling, with eventual astringency brushed across the back of the throat. The abv was appropriate, and the beer drank quite well.

Overall, the most enjoyable thing about this brew was its drinkability. Again, in line with our first thoughts on the first sip, this was a surprisingly refreshing brew. We tend to preconceive our thoughts about the “macro” craft producers, but for what it is, they did a nice job here. While this isn’t going to win any awards in our book, they kept it seasonal, fresh, and light enough to keep it flowing. That’s where this beer functions well. The flavored and aromatic inclusions were decent represented in the final product, and blended nicely enough, but you’re going to be drinking this one more for the experience and company of close friends than you are for anything groundbreaking on the palate or brain.

Serving type: bottle

12-18-2013 13:57:52 | More by TheBrewo
Photo of Captain_Komamura
Captain_Komamura

Illinois

3.55/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance - It is a cloudy orange color, with a light bubbly head.

Smell - The smell is amazing, I love the blackberry smell of this beer.

Taste - the sweetness of the blackberries hit the tongue first; with the spices and orange peel coming in later. The blackberries are the main flavor.

Mouthfeel - Good-bodied and good carbonation.

Overall - This is a pretty good beer, I enjoyed the blackberry sweetness of the beer.

Serving type: bottle

11-27-2013 21:51:58 | More by Captain_Komamura
Photo of DanRam
DanRam

New York

4.75/5  rDev +43.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4.75 | taste: 5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.75

Poured out of a bottle into a glass, this beer is a gold color that looks like honey. It smells sweet: extremely fruity with a hint of wheat. Sam Adams has a habit of getting things right when it comes to micro-brewed beer. The taste is extremely accurate. Sweet blackberries and fruit with the right amount of wheaty beer taste.

Serving type: bottle

11-26-2013 16:36:23 | More by DanRam
Photo of jjamadorphd
jjamadorphd

Florida

3.66/5  rDev +10.9%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Another Sam Adams offering that was pretty good...

Nice white, puffy head with good staying power. The usual cloudy witbier look, so nothing too out of the ordinary. I was impressed with the strong blackberry smell, slight tinge of hops to go along with it too. The aftertaste in these types of beer could be awful, but this one was wasn't too bad at all. What surprised me was the syrupy feel in my mouth, silky even. Overall, not one of the best Sam Adams, but decent for a summer-time offering.

Serving type: bottle

07-12-2013 22:38:59 | More by jjamadorphd
Photo of boilermakerbrew
boilermakerbrew

Missouri

3.56/5  rDev +7.9%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A- Pours a hazy, deep golden color with a sizable, 3 finger head. Retention on the dense, frothy head is pretty good, lasting 3-4 minutes before lacing just ok. Really no color variation from a normal wheat beer, just maybe a touch darker.

S- Juicy blackberry scents come through and dominate this beer's smell. Berry flavor is somewhat sour, and complete drowns out almost all of the wheat and grain scents. There is a tiny hint of light wheat flavor on the back end.

T- Starts with an intermingling of blackberry and a heavy dose of wheat grain flavor. The juiciness in the scent is just not there in the taste. The wheat flavors are good, about what I expect from Sam Adams, but they just drown out most to all of the berry flavors. Ends with the lingering, light tones of the wheat.

M- High in carbonation and medium in body weight. The wheat really gives this beer a heavier feel, but also helps promote a certain amount of creaminess. The berry flavor, if more prominent, would make this a thirst quencher, but even with the low amount of berry flavor, this is still a summer feeling type of beer.

Overall, I'm a little disappointed in the amount of berry flavor delivered in the taste versus the sweet, juicy scent this beer has. Not a bad beer, but there are other fruit beers that are done better.

Serving type: bottle

06-22-2013 16:39:53 | More by boilermakerbrew
Photo of Utica_Brew_Review
Utica_Brew_Review

New York

2.45/5  rDev -25.8%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2.25

Opaque yellow appearance with mild head and little carbonation. Very fruity aroma. Th blackberry definitely comes out here. Smells like hot jello right before you put it in the fridge. Yeasty flavor that kind of clashes with the fruitiness of the beer. No outstanding depth. Unfortunately we didn't like it too much due to our opinion that the blackberry fruitiness clashes with the rest of the beer.

Serving type: bottle

06-21-2013 01:23:34 | More by Utica_Brew_Review
Photo of DavoleBomb
DavoleBomb

Ohio

3.25/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 2.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.25

Poured into a perfect pint.

2.75 A: Mildly hazed dark yellow color. Two fingers of fizzy off-white head that falls quickly and leaves no lacing.

3.0 S: Blackberry dominates the nose. That doesn't mean, however, that the blackberries are particularly strong. It's simply a case of the base beer not being able to compete with the fruit. The coriander is there, but the orange peel is a bit hard to find. It doesn't smell bad, but it's hard to think of it as beer and not a fruit drink.

3.25 T: Taste is about the same as the nose. Blackberry is the leading flavor. Corriander. The orange peel shows up in the taste. Otherwise, just a blackberry wheat fruit drink.

4.0 M: Medium body. Good moderate carbonation. Silky smooth creaminess.

3.25 D: I'm tasty, but it's not much of a beer.

Serving type: bottle

05-29-2013 23:08:45 | More by DavoleBomb
Photo of ThisWangsChung
ThisWangsChung

Maryland

3.15/5  rDev -4.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

12 oz bottle into a pint glass.

A: Pours an amber color that lacks some of the haziness I expect from a witbier. The head is a creamy one finger offwhite shade. As it recedes, it leaves a uniform ring of lacing on the glass.

S: Blackberries. To me, this one comes across as being 80% fruit beer and 20% wit. I do notice a touch of the latter qualities (orange peel, coriander, wheat), but let's be honest, this is pretty much a fruit beer. Aromatically good for that style, though.

T: At first, this displays a lot of blackberry flavors. The aforementioned sweetness washes out past the midtaste, being replaced by generic witbier qualities such as orange peel and coriander. Some blackberry flavors return in the aftertaste, along with a touch of diacetyl. It's not grossly chemical or sweet, though it's not real interesting.

M: Superbly lush and creamy. I'm surprised how soft the feel is, even for a witbier. The finish has plenty of lingering sweetness, but there's just enough astringency to dry it out past the threshold of 'excess sweetness'. Carbonation is surprisingly pleasant.

O: It's no Allagash White, that's for sure. But this is a grade-A panty dropper that has some mass appeal. I wouldn't be averse to buying this again for company - and I would easily choose this over, say, Blue Moon.

Serving type: bottle

04-26-2013 21:04:45 | More by ThisWangsChung
Photo of jmendels
jmendels

Michigan

3.15/5  rDev -4.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

An interesting beer, to say the least. I wasn't overly impressed but not completely discouraged after tasting this. It has the wheat flavours, coupled with the blackberry through out. It's worth a shot, even if to see what it tastes like. Personally, I felt underwhelmed but I can see the appeal.

Serving type: bottle

04-20-2013 02:38:14 | More by jmendels
Photo of Darkmagus82
Darkmagus82

Virginia

3.24/5  rDev -1.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Poured from bottle into pint glass

Appearance – Pours from bottle as a lightly hazed orange-amber color with a two finger white head. The head fades relatively quickly and leaves only a slight level of lacing.

Smell – The aroma is quite sweet of berries. It is a mix of blackberry and raspberry with hint of a wheat background.

Taste – The taste starts out with a smooth mildly blackberry sweet flavor with some bready wheat mixed within. As the taste advances it starts taking on more sweetness of berries, both raspberry and blackberry. While it gets sweeter from the start to the middle, the sweetness fades slightly as it advances to the end. Oddly the blackberry flavor seems to get stronger as the sweetness fades with it leaving a semi-sweet but not overly sweet blackberry and light wheat flavor on the tongue.

Mouthfeel – The body of the beer is quite light in its creaminess with a carbonation level that is on the medium to higher side. Both are suiting for the berry flavors of the brew, making it more refreshing and easier drinking.

Overall – An alright berry flavored brew. Not overly sweet, yet maintaining a decent berry flavoring.

Serving type: bottle

01-19-2013 01:39:52 | More by Darkmagus82
Photo of StonedTrippin
StonedTrippin

Colorado

3.55/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

very refreshing all season fruit beer. it pours just a tiny bit dusty, mostly blonde, with maybe the faintest purple hue and an average white head on top thats gone in a few minutes. the nose is a little strange, with the fruit sweetness not really coming through at all, and the yeast and wheat malt being more dominant. not until the flavor can you tell its a fruit beer, the blackberry is strong and forward, without being too sweet at all. its summery and fresh, while being wintery and preserved at the same time, i like this beer because its one of the few in the genre that i think retains its drinkability for all 12 months. the finish is a little dry, with the yeast imparting just a hint of citrusy acidity and pep. nice feel, light in body with strong carbonation. its refreshing and satisfying and i much prefer this to most other fruity infused wheat beers out there.

Serving type: bottle

12-24-2012 16:43:05 | More by StonedTrippin
Photo of UCLABrewN84
UCLABrewN84

California

3.1/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Best before 3/2013.

Pours a hazy honey orange with a foamy bone colored head that settles to a film on top of the beer. Small dots of lace slowly drip into the remaining beer on the drink down. Smell is of malt, grain, berries, and a slight vomit aroma. Taste is much the same with a mild tartness and thankfully no vomit flavor. This beer has a good level of carbonation with a crisp mouthfeel. Overall, this is a pretty average beer that is drinkable but not something I would go for again.

Serving type: bottle

12-21-2012 03:06:19 | More by UCLABrewN84
Photo of chinchill
chinchill

South Carolina

2.73/5  rDev -17.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12 oz bottle a few months past best by date but kept under constant refrigeration. Pours a hazy amber hue with a small, weak head. Medium-light body. Slightly acidic rather than soft, particularly in the finish.
The aromas are mostly fruity and berry-like with a light malty backbone and a hint of spice. Flavors are similar -- fruity, spicy, berry flavors dominate while the malt adds some light bread background -- but the more generic berry aroma seems more specifically blackberry upon tasting. A bit too sweet for me, but about as expected on this count. Somewhat unappealing aftertaste.

Serving type: bottle

11-29-2012 02:01:58 | More by chinchill
Photo of Hopswagger
Hopswagger

South Carolina

3.48/5  rDev +5.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

P:  Orange copper body with a thin layer of white airy quick vanishing head.  Subtle haze on the body with no real apparent carbonation. 

S:  An explosion of blackberries, subtle coriander, lemon juice, and hints of lavender. 

T/M:  Tart blackberry syrup, lavender, and very washed out spices. Cinnamon shows up in the throat after the carbonated semi dry finish. The wit flavors are hidden behind the assault of timidly bitter blackberries.  Acidity is really cut due to the syrupy fruit.  White watermelon rind, honey dew melon, rose petals show up as the beer warms.  Mouthfeel is silky and appropriately carbonated. 

O:  I love the idea but the wit was not broadcast as well as it should have been. Aggressive blackberry and under achieved wit flavors. Not a huge fan (as a witbier)but it's really easy drinking. I think my wife would love this. Something I wouldn't buy again for myself but maybe for the lovely lady at home.  Should have just marketed as a fruit beer. 

Serving type: bottle

10-16-2012 00:17:59 | More by Hopswagger
Photo of Beastdog75
Beastdog75

New Jersey

3.05/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

I have to hand it to Sam Adams for being what is probably the most adventurous out of the big name brewers in America. Their Blackberry Witbier sounded like it would be a most interesting beer. After trying it, it passes as a decent fruit beer but it was nowhere near as interesting as I thought it could have been.

This brew pours an orange-amber color with a finger of foam that lasts for a little over 30 seconds. The aroma consists of a sweet, sugary smell with some hints of the aforementioned fruit, with some light grain aromas underneath it. The mouthfeel was pretty smooth and had a slight slickness to it. The carbonation was a bit lower than expected. In regards to the flavor, the blackberry taste is pleasant and not overpowering although it is still the focal point here. The light grainy flavors lie almost hidden under the blackberry taste, and there is some dry citric hoppiness in the finish. This somewhat bitter dryness lingers on into the aftertaste where a some "fleshy" fruit notes are present as well. There is no alcoholic warmth present in the finish.

This ends up being a decent, inoffensive fruit beer that is pleasantly refreshing. Although labeled as a witbier, I didn't detect any notes that would lead me to belive that this was brewed with wheat. As a fruit beer, it does the job.

Serving type: bottle

10-12-2012 02:44:16 | More by Beastdog75
Photo of jmbranum
jmbranum

Oklahoma

3.53/5  rDev +7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

I like blackberries. And I like Witbier. I'm not sure I like this particular beer.

Aroma is heavy and fruit laden. Very attractive pour, light amber with just a tinge of pinkish violet.

Flavor is strange to me. Kinda muddled. Fairly dry. Blackberries are present but don't quite fit.

Medium mouthfeel with a good bit of carbonation.

Overall, this beer was a miss. It just didn't quite work. I think it would have worked better if it were a little bit sweeter (some of the other viewers say this beer is too sweet, which I just don't get. Maybe I got a weird bottle?)

Serving type: bottle

10-09-2012 21:25:42 | More by jmbranum
Photo of VncentLIFE
VncentLIFE

North Carolina

3.3/5  rDev 0%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A light straw yellow body with a thick white head. I want it to be a bit more cloudy, but its pretty clear.

The smell actually isnt bad. Like other SA fruit flavored beers, its got an artificial candy sweet blackberry smell. base sweet Wit underneath is more wheat than yeast, but theres still a hint of banana shining through.

Tastes like blackberry candy. Syrupy sweet blackberry hard tack. The yeast just doesnt come out. It finishes clean and sweet, but I want more of something. Blackberries arent normally this sweet, honestly. I think thats the fault. A nice dry yet sweet blackberry flavor with a nice yeasty Wit would be fantastic, but the yeast is just lacking any kind of punch. Its more of a bready yeast than an estery yeast as well.

I like how it finishes tho, nice and clean with the blackberry flavors lingering.

Serving type: bottle

09-22-2012 00:06:02 | More by VncentLIFE
Photo of metter98
metter98

New York

3.4/5  rDev +3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A: The beer is hazy straw yellow in color and has a moderate amount of carbonation. It poured with a two finger high off white head that died down but never completely faded away, leaving a thin head covering the surface and lots of lacy rings of bubbles down the sides of the glass.
S: There are light aromas of blackberries in the nose; these become sweeter as the beer warms up.
T: Like the smell, the taste is a bit sweet and has lots of blackberry flavors and only some hints of the underlying wheat.
M: It feels light-bodied on the palate and has a moderate amount of carbonation.
O: Although this beer is easy to drink and might appeal to some type of people (such as those that like sweet fruity lambics), I thought that the blackberry taste seemed a little too pronounced and artificial.

Serving type: bottle

09-13-2012 23:12:15 | More by metter98
Photo of Maxwell
Maxwell

Massachusetts

3.58/5  rDev +8.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 2 | overall: 3.5

The beer pours a hazy piss yellow with an ever so slight hint of blue that makes the beer seem like a grayed yellow, almost like a corn syrup. The head poured thin and cream white, but dissipates very quickly leaving a thin wall of lacing. The smell is a nice bouquet of light blackberry and light wheat with an interesting spice lying below. The wheat-stink is definitely the dominant smell though. The beer tastes thick with a lovely mix of the wheat malty-sweet and the more sour-sweet of the blackberries. Slight citrus seems to be hiding in the back of the flavor, and nicely rounds the beer giving it a ghost of a bitter hint. The aftertaste is a lovely light lingering of the berries in your mouth. Mouthfeel is a little strange with very fierce carbonation that leaves a burn on the tongue but other than that the mouth is very clean and slightly dry with a wetter feel on its roof. The beer is slightly creamy in feel with a good lighter beer feel hidden underneath the harsh carbonation. Overall this is a very decent more mass produced beer. It is actually one of my favorite berry-based beers, I think, as they got the berry taste wonderfully mixed with the witbier style and I don’t really care if they used real berries or berry syrup. This beer is worthy of a try.

Serving type: bottle

08-10-2012 00:48:29 | More by Maxwell
Photo of netrioter
netrioter

Texas

3.88/5  rDev +17.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

found this bottle lying in the back of my friends fridge that was probably back there for a year or longer...

drank from said bottle

tasted like a beer after you had a shot of Leroux Blackberrt Brandy and you chased it with a Sam Adams

in saying that...it was a good flavor and went down smooth....cant justify 9 dollars for a 6 pack of this but id try it again.

Serving type: bottle

07-21-2012 23:01:54 | More by netrioter
Photo of pkalix
pkalix

California

3.9/5  rDev +18.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

better taste than expected. nice wheat with fruity taste. doesnt seem to have the same old hop style as all the other sam adams brews and is slightly surprising. some bitterness in the aftertaste, but it was to be expected from this brand. i havent met a supremely astonishing taste character yet from this brewer....

Serving type: bottle

07-14-2012 01:17:01 | More by pkalix
Photo of rangerred
rangerred

Tennessee

3.13/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12oz bottle into a pint glass.

Pours a hazy golden yellow with a two finger white head.

Blackberries are definitely present in the aroma along with a little bit of lemon and coriander. Not bad at all.

Sweet citrus is front and center on the taste and I can definitely pick out blackberries. It doesn't taste artificial which is a plus considering this is a problem with some fruit beers. A little coriander and a soft wheat mouthfeel make this a pleasing drink.

Overall, not bad but pretty average all around. I'm not sure if I would seek it out again but it is refreshing and a decent brew from Sam Adams.

Serving type: bottle

07-09-2012 00:37:11 | More by rangerred
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Samuel Adams Blackberry Witbier from Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)
76 out of 100 based on 1,465 ratings.