1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Samuel Adams Wee Heavy (Imperial Series) - Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)

Not Rated.
Samuel Adams Wee Heavy (Imperial Series)Samuel Adams Wee Heavy (Imperial Series)

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
83
good

657 Ratings
THE BROS
73
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 657
Reviews: 274
rAvg: 3.67
pDev: 16.35%
Wants: 24
Gots: 31 | FT: 2
Brewed by:
Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams) visit their website
Massachusetts, United States

Style | ABV
Scotch Ale / Wee Heavy |  10.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Duhast500 on 02-24-2010)
View: Beers (129) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Samuel Adams Wee Heavy (Imperial Series) Alström Bros
Ratings: 657 | Reviews: 274 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of ZeroSignal
ZeroSignal

Pennsylvania

3.05/5  rDev -16.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12 oz bottle into a SA Perfect Pint

A- Chestnut brown pour with a half-finger's worth of light beige head. Decent retention and a loose lace.

S - Malty in the nose with a peaty smoke edge to it...similar to some Scotch that I've had.

T&M - Medium to heavier bodied, definitely heavier feeling with a pronounced smokiness. Not as much as one would find in a smoke beer, but there is a peaty, smoky undercurrent throughout the entire drink. Lot's of darker roasted and caramal malts that also lend just a hint of sweetness. The 10% ABV is relatively well hidden, but makes itself known in the finish, which is a little on the sweeter side.

O - Overall a bit different then what I was expecting. I'm not typically a fan of "smoky" traits, but I think in this beer it is appropriately leveraged against the malty, sweet nature. I was glad to have tried it, but I'm not likely to revisit. It's not bad, it's just not going to be worth 10.99 a four pack.

Serving type: bottle

03-27-2011 03:18:10 | More by ZeroSignal
Photo of BEERMILER12
BEERMILER12

Maine

3.9/5  rDev +6.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: Pours a ruby red with a fingers worth of mahogany head

S: Malty and smokey, with sort of a metallic twinge to it... Unfortunately, the metallic part is the part that sticks out the most

T: Much better than the smell, but the metallic element is still present. Fairly sweet, but this hides the alcohol well. Only slightly smokey at the end. A malt bomb for sure

M: Very heavy and thick, with medium carbonation

D/O: This would be perfect on a snowy day. A heavy, hearty beer that is a major malt bomb, but there's nothing wrong with that. The only real downfall for this beer is the metallic element that is present in both the smell and taste and the fact that the smoke isn't nearly as present in this beer than in their scotch ale, which was my favorite part of that beer and in the style

Serving type: bottle

03-27-2011 00:43:57 | More by BEERMILER12
Photo of wolfinthemirror
wolfinthemirror

Oklahoma

3.55/5  rDev -3.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a deep dark red, copper color when held to the light with a fizzy beige head that dissipates quickly... not what i'd expect form a wee heavy.

As soon as I put the beer to my nose I get a lot of boozy scents, alcohol and such. faint hits of tobacco and grape juice, or maybe a cheap franzia wine...Definitely Blushberry.

Mmm this tastes very good. Very malty with a fruity mix. There is like an oakiness, whiskey taste from the alcohol. it seems a little rough but I think it would really smooth out with some age on it.
Nice and complex, a lot better than the smell which isn't too pleasant to me.

Smooth, silky feel. not thick, but medium. lower carbonation.

Overall I think this beer is a decent Wee Heavy, definitely not my favorite but it has potential. After a year or 2 i think this beer might really surprise some people.

Serving type: bottle

03-26-2011 05:18:18 | More by wolfinthemirror
Photo of Bouleboubier
Bouleboubier

Pennsylvania

3.98/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Not what I expected, considering how their Scotch Ale turned out. The Wee Heavy has pretty much the same smoky character as the Scotch Ale only it delivers in balance of malt flavor and body (thank you).

Mildly striking appearance - awesome deep ruby color, clean, with a tight khaki head, creamy, but with some bigger bubbles that seem out of place and are slow to disappear. The composition of the head is strange but attractive - swells a good inch up on the pour, retains long, settling into a steadfast blanket. Wheat seems like it was used, but just how much?

Herbal, malty, and softly medicinal is the aroma. I could swear I was getting some caramelized pear and/or chocolate cherry cordial (mostly chocolate). Not much, if any, smoky qualities. A refined and complex scent, but not terribly bold - had to strain to attain.

Sure as heck smoky in the taste but, unlike their Scotch Ale, this has the malt foundation and adequate body to balance. The "flavor" of alcohol is present, but the burn is near non-existent, only a real subtle mellow warming. Taste points: smoked, burlap-ed malt liqueur, liqueur warmth.

There's ample carb and it washes and hums through, but the quite silky smooth, actually quite creamy body keeps the fizz in check. A pleasure on the palate. Booze is damn near eliminated/assimilated from/into the texture.

Kind of astonished how good this was, how much I enjoyed it. Authentic? No... But fine all the same. Of the smoky domestic wee heavies I've sampled, this could possibly be the best. And what's strange is that, if you close your eyes, taste blind, you could almost mistake it for a Russian Imperial Stout. Of course, the nature of the peat-smoked malt versus more of a roasted malt in an RIS gives it away - its malt characteristics are quintessentially of a caramelly Scotch Ale. For what it offers, well done.

Serving type: bottle

03-26-2011 04:11:14 | More by Bouleboubier
Photo of CJfromPhilly
CJfromPhilly

Pennsylvania

3.93/5  rDev +7.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours from the 12 oz. bottle a cola-like dark brown with an off-white one finger head that leaves lacing as it settles into a modest collar. Hard to gauge the carbonation level of a beer to dark to see through. Aroma is of sweet, smoky malt...hints of caramel, toffee, and the smoked peat described on the label. The aroma of alcohol is also present, the way it would be in a single malt scotch. 1st sip brings everything promised on the nose...caramel, toffee, smoky peat, and alcohol. There is a silky smoothness on the tongue, with a solid mouthfeel. Light hints of the smoke & alcohol linger on an otherwise clean finish. Drinkability is quite good for a beer with such a big abv wallop, but these are obviously sippers, not chuggers. Overall, another very good offering from Boston Beer Company, an increasingly underappreciated brewery IMHO, although I can't understand why!

Serving type: bottle

03-24-2011 22:12:22 | More by CJfromPhilly
Photo of DoctorDog
DoctorDog

Ohio

4.05/5  rDev +10.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Presentation: 12 oz bottle into a snifter. "Bottled 10/27/09" printed lightly on the neck of the bottle.

A- Pours a murky dark brown/mahogany. Pours with ~1/2 finger of head, which is quickly faded into a tiny islands of bubbles.

S- Caramel-sweet maltiness, with smoky, scotch whiskey-tinged, boozy notes.

T- Roasty, smoky, and sweet, with the expected scotch bent. Bitterness is fairly low. Finishes with a fairly solid alcohol note that serves well to offset the sweetness.

M- Moderate to slightly light carbonation with a medium-full feel. A bit of alcohol warming. Quite good.

O- Good. Rich and flavorful with a nice feel. Quite enjoyable.

Future outlook: Best Sam Adams product I've had in some time...probably time to try out some of their other imperial line that I've passed on for awhile...

Serving type: bottle

03-24-2011 03:47:49 | More by DoctorDog
Photo of BeerAdvocate
BeerAdvocate

Massachusetts

3.15/5  rDev -14.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Review from BeerAdvocate Magazine Issue #48 (Jan 2011):

Extremely dark mahogany color, small-sized head dissolves to an even thinner lacing. Lots of malt sweetness and a peppery alcohol. Syrup-like mouthfeel; the palate is grazed by some gritty crispness. Massive malt sweetness is almost cloying, and the hint of peat smoke nearly pushes it over the edge. Bitterness from the modest hopping can't even break through, yet there's some oily herbal flavor in the middle. Sweetness sticks even when the warming spicy alcohol hits the palate. A decent stab at the style, but the excessive sweetness throws it off balance a bit--still worth a try.

Serving type: bottle

03-23-2011 14:30:27 | More by BeerAdvocate
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

West Virginia

3.68/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

The whole imperial series lacks finesse but while this one is the type of bruisin' ale that is going to hit you with the alcohol and peated malts that you should expect in a Wee Heavy, in this case think the heat of a single malt with the peated malt roasted dark caramel notes found in this beer. Pours nicely into an Allagash chalice, deep ruby brown almost black if your sitting in the shade, you really have to hold this one toward the light. Flavor, first off the booze really coats the sides of my cheeks and the backend of the palate, when I'm able to cope with the booze level I come up with dark roasted malts almost coffee astringency, dark roasted peat smoked malts with hints of dark chocolate. Complex for sure even a bit of sherry tartness, full bodied a bit of heat cinges your nose hairs, but overall a complex beer to share with good friends. I'm going to hold on to a couple of these beers and wait for the pearl to form.

Serving type: bottle

03-22-2011 03:44:39 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of pzrhsau
pzrhsau

District of Columbia

3.43/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: Nice burgundy color with a slight head that doesn't last very long.
S: Nice fruity leathery burnt malt scotch flavor with a great undertone of alcohol.
T: Slightly smokey but not overly smokey. Not too overpowering considering the alcohol content. Has a little feeling of a scotch to it.
D/O: Very strong but doesn't overpower. I feel like they didn't do enough for the style. I could have used it having more smoke. Still a very good strong beer.

Serving type: bottle

03-22-2011 01:04:40 | More by pzrhsau
Photo of chodinheaven
chodinheaven

Maryland

3.9/5  rDev +6.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A deep red almost black color with a head that doesn't show up until the end of the pour, but remains there thinly for a while afterwards. Smells of some strong sweet malts and booze and generally tastes similar. Reminiscent of my dad's scotch collection in fact. It's boozy and sweet, like a much less strong peaty highlands scotch. I bet it would age well also. Very complex with some sweet malts that complement the alcohol and scotch-like mouthfeel. Booziness threatens to overwhelm the taste buds (and does so when I taste scotch) but this manages to fit fairly well in beer form. I think this is the strongest scotch ale I've tried and I like the idea of the higher ABV mimicking the scotch mouthfeel rather than only the taste. Good beer, glad I tried it.

Serving type: bottle

03-21-2011 03:41:29 | More by chodinheaven
Photo of AnPiobaire
AnPiobaire

New York

4.03/5  rDev +9.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I have to say that I have always been a fan of Sam Adams brews I do not pray at the altar of Sam Adams. I tried this particular brew on the reccomendation of a fellow craft brew fan.

As I first poured the SA Wee Heavy it had a very rich deep dark reddish brown hue. It poured with a thin cream colored head that quickly dissipated. My initial nosing struck me that it did not smell very far off from several scotch whiskies I have nosed. The maltiness comes through with a subtle smokiness that became more evident as the brew warmed slightly. The initial taste is the sweetness of malt, but not overly sweet. Wee Heavy is surpisingly easy to knock back given it's higher ABV, and I could be in for some trouble. It was very nice and almost chewy on the palate and the higher alcohol content did not translate into that "boozyiness" that can sometimes get in the way of the other flavors. Overall this is a very nice brew that will never dissapoint.

Serving type: bottle

03-21-2011 00:34:35 | More by AnPiobaire
Photo of csiewert
csiewert

Oregon

3.73/5  rDev +1.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This beer pours a thick brown color with a finger of tan head that leaves a little lacing on it's way down. The aroma is complex, with hints of roasted barley, peat and smokey fruit. The taste starts with some hints of figs and smoked peat, then finishes with a caramelly roasted barley sweetness. The mouthfeel starts a little harsh with overcarbonation, but finishes with a velvety feel. Overall a good scotch ale.

Serving type: bottle

03-20-2011 19:41:40 | More by csiewert
Photo of StaveHooks
StaveHooks

Oklahoma

3.93/5  rDev +7.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - A deep dark brown with garnet highlights. A 1.5 tan head sinks into a thin cap. Delicate lacing towards the bottom.

S - Old lacquered church pews. Dark fruit-figs and prunes sit underneath a smokey peat and alcohol soaked wood.

T - Sour and smoked wood, slightly salty, roasted nutty malt, boozy dark fruit, alcohol invades the entire mouth. Finishes tangy with a woody alcohol-type dryness.

M - Full bodied, viscous, smooth carbonation, alcohol is bold and heavy even for this style.

This beer has great character and deep flavors. The alcohol was screaming through this beer. It had nice low level bitterness. There was no hiding it. It actually develops levels of flavors but was on the verge of taking them over.

Serving type: bottle

03-17-2011 01:36:21 | More by StaveHooks
Photo of woosterbill
woosterbill

Connecticut

3.95/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

12oz bottle courtesy of vonschplieffen into a Duvel tulip.

A: An unhurried pour results in nearly an inch of fine, pillowy tan foam atop the dark brown, practically black body. Pretty good retention and tight, patchy lace. Attractive, but not quite stunning.

S: The peat smoke really dominates here, delivering woody, boozy, and medicinal overtones. The underlying malt can be sensed, but doesn't provide the aroma with as much heft as I'd expect for such a big beer.

T: Starts out with some sweet candied malts, followed by some chocolate roastiness and a big wave of smoke. There's lots of really tasty stuff going on, but unfortunately the aftertaste dies off into nothing but spicy, astringent alcohol. Harsh, but worth it for the front end.

M: Soft full body with matching carbonation. Voluptuous.

D: While the booziness is a bit overbearing, the flavors are spot on for the style and provide a great balance of malt sweetness and smoky dryness.

Notes: What do you know, another good but not quite great beer from Sam. I'm continually impressed by BBC's ability to create consistently solid beers in such a huge array of styles, but here again I'm not tempted to buy more. Definitely worth a shot for anyone who likes a big Wee Heavy.

Cheers!

Serving type: bottle

03-15-2011 00:44:33 | More by woosterbill
Photo of sentomaster
sentomaster

Connecticut

3.45/5  rDev -6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Appearance- Immediately turned off by the dark brown, almost black poor. as I feared from the description on the bottle of 'loads of roasted malts', it maybe too much.

Nose- big hit of sherry alcohol- and an intriguing bit of something mistook for a light earthy fruitiness, I realize it is instead a light earthy peat aroma. I was really hoping for some light fruits so it's a bit of a bummer, but the a peat is very nice in the nose. Slight agitation really brings out the smoky, earthy, peat.

T/M/D - sweetly roasted mall hit your tongue first. They provide a nice backbone for the peat you can feel waiting underneath. the two flavors really dance on the front of your tongue as it warms. the peaty flavors really grab the spotlight as it moves to the back of the palate. Alcohol briefly warms and it finishes with tons of peat smoke; like peat hung over charred campfire wood. There is a nice touch of herbal tea like hops. The roastiness pretty much subside by the end and the herbal quality lingers.

Medium body with a light, fine carbonation that packs tiny little bubbles. Very drinkable for 10 percent, but I think I'm fine with one considering all that smoke and peat. The peat is interesting and well done, but a bit much at the same time.

A nice brew. I find myself almost utterly lost now when grading American wee heavy. I'm not much for 'grading to style' - if a beer is good its good - but when American breweries say wee heavy and scotch ale I expect Traquair, Bellhaven, Orkney; yet they never come too close to those brews which I love. I think I've given up on finding an American equivalent...

Serving type: bottle

03-14-2011 05:57:22 | More by sentomaster
Photo of chiccabeer
chiccabeer

Massachusetts

3.5/5  rDev -4.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured the bottle into a glass. A decent amount of foam was formed. The beer has a dark amber look to it. The smell is malty and sweet. This beer has many layers of flavor. The first to hit the tongue is malt, with a rich almost chocolate flavor. The finish leaves with a lasting enjoyable flavor. Would be good as an after dinner drink. Cheers.

Serving type: bottle

03-13-2011 03:34:30 | More by chiccabeer
Photo of bgjohnston
bgjohnston

Connecticut

4.1/5  rDev +11.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

I am always on the lookout for a good Scotch ale.

Pours very dark with a medium tan head. Not too foamy, but settles about right. Clear dark coffee color, with reasonable carbonation.

Smell hints at dark candied fruits and promises a robust malty base. Taste delivers, and then midway through savoring the first sip, there is a very pronounced smoky peat flavor that just shows up out of nowhere (at least for me, didn't smell it coming). Very nice. This stuff is not nearly clean enough to make good Scotch whiskey out of, but it definitely gives a nod in that direction.

Mouth feel is not particularly thick or heavy, also a surprise, given the strength and color of this brew, and I have to bump it upward for the ease with which it went down.

Good stuff, and should be readily obtainable if it remains a regular part of the series.

Serving type: bottle

03-11-2011 00:46:01 | More by bgjohnston
Photo of OldRaysputin
OldRaysputin

Rhode Island

3.78/5  rDev +3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: Pours a dark chocolaty brown with a head that settles after only about 15 seconds.

S: Getting the smokiness from the peat and roasted malts. Dark fruits. Dark Chocolate and coffee.

T: getting that nice smokiness you would expect from a scotch yet its very subtle at the same time. Not too strong on the alcohol. Sweet and rich.

M/D: Soft, even creamy, on the palate. Nice mouthfeel. minimal carbonation. Overall a good brew. I would be interested to try this side by side Sam Adams Scotch Ale.

Serving type: bottle

03-10-2011 23:18:34 | More by OldRaysputin
Photo of musicforairports
musicforairports

New York

4.1/5  rDev +11.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Pours pretty close to black, but on second glance with some light behind it it's not quite black. Head is nice but doesn't stick around; some nice lacing does though.

Smells like toffee, figs and all sorts of dark fruit and dark malts.

Tastes like the nose, with alcohol surprisingly not present, and lots of robust malt flavors that draw to mind toffee, coffee, and other malt flavors.

A bit creamy on the mouth but none to thick at all to keep this from being crazily drinkable for a 10 percent ABV beer.

Serving type: bottle

03-10-2011 03:41:24 | More by musicforairports
Photo of YouSkeete
YouSkeete

Massachusetts

4.28/5  rDev +16.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A: Dark brown, almost bronze around the edges. No head whatsoever, very very partial lacing.

S: Roasted coffee, caramel, oak and wood, mild fruity sweetness. Hints of dry hops and bourbon as well.

T: Big nice malt character right off the bat. Roasted coffee and espresso beans, dry hopped malts, and a mild scotch bite. Hop character and alcohol is well balanced. Caramel sweetness is just a little tiny bit on the strong side, though it creates a great balance with the rest of the body. Hints of bittersweet dark chocolate and candied fruits follow.

M: Sticky and milky on the palate, full body with moderate carbonation. Oaked scotch and fruity sweet aftertaste.

D: Easy as hell for a 10%abv. A great addition to the Imperial Series.

Serving type: bottle

03-08-2011 23:52:46 | More by YouSkeete
Photo of bonkers
bonkers

New Jersey

4.1/5  rDev +11.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

I poured from a 12 ounce bottle into a nonic, reddish/amber color with a medium white head, light lacing. The aroma has sweet malts, hints of smoke. The flavor is sweet toffee, hints of smoke, no alchohol. The body is full, decent carbonation. A very nice beer, dangerously drinkable for a 10% brew.

Serving type: bottle

03-07-2011 12:34:43 | More by bonkers
Photo of rlee1390
rlee1390

Indiana

4.25/5  rDev +15.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A-Dark black, about half a finger of head, some lacing is left behind.

S-Smoked and roasted malts, peat.

T-Starts with the smoky and roasted malts, ends with some bitterness. Well balanced the peat is a wonderful.

M-Heavy, smooth not much carbonation.

D-Extremely drinkable, leaves behind a great after taste. Possibly the best beer Sam Adams brews, haven't had the rest of their Imperial Series but this could be there best offering.

Serving type: bottle

03-07-2011 00:03:58 | More by rlee1390
Photo of carl
carl

Kansas

3.83/5  rDev +4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

I sampled this beer in a four-pack from the refrigerated section at a local liquor store. Overall, this is quite a good beer, but I don't think it really exemplifies the style well.

Appearance: Nice but nothing special. Dark beer with a low-to moderate head. The foam is lacy and clings to the glass reasonably well.

Aroma: Here we find the beer's strong suit. The odor is complex with a strong alcohol overtone - reminiscent of whiskey. There is a faint sweet, cheese smell and an overall inviting mix of subtle scents

Taste: Again, there is a faint sweetness, but the overall flavor is roasted-ness and the hop bitterness. The hops are not overpowering, but seem slightly out of place for a style that typically is low hopped and malty. The malt load is apparent but not strong - the beer is balanced toward the hops. There are hints of chocolate and a smokey note.

Mouthfeel: The beer has moderate body, smooth with low carbonation.

Drinkability: Very easy going beer - you don't notice the alcohol and it goes down easily.

I wouldn't put this beer in any other category, but for a wee heavy I found it too tilted toward the hops. A very nice beer once you know what to expect.

Serving type: bottle

03-06-2011 13:16:36 | More by carl
Photo of Nerudamann
Nerudamann

Oregon

3.4/5  rDev -7.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Sampled at a beer fest (I know I know, I shouldn't review beers at a beer fest, but I took steps to make sure I concentrated and kept my palate fresh) in 3oz size.

Look - dark, but clear. About one and a half finger's worth of khaki-colored foam that dissipates somewhat quickly.

Smell - malty, somewhat chocolaty.

Taste and Mouthfeel - Very strong..you can taste the alcohol. Good but strong mix of malts and hops. Syrupy in taste, but the texture is a good balance, but mostly creamy.

Drinkability - it's a bit strong for repeated drinking, and not very complex, but not bad tasting either.

Serving type: on-tap

03-06-2011 03:16:13 | More by Nerudamann
Photo of nickthegun12
nickthegun12

Alabama

3.93/5  rDev +7.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

not bad beer....i've tasted better scotch ales!

appearance is dark reddish brown color...with a fading head....and not much lacing to speak of...

smells like a stronger version a sam's regular scotch ale....the smoked peat malt comes out better in this one...

the taste is a little sweet....and has an underlying smoky flavor....not bad...

the feel is a good balance with the not going on the dry side....not too much carbonation...

the drink ability is there surprisingly....has much more drink ability than the other imperial beer by sam....

Serving type: bottle

02-25-2011 23:57:40 | More by nickthegun12
Samuel Adams Wee Heavy (Imperial Series) from Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)
83 out of 100 based on 657 ratings.