1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

San Miguel Pale Pilsen - San Miguel Brewery Inc.

Not Rated.
San Miguel Pale PilsenSan Miguel Pale Pilsen

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
65
poor

174 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 174
Reviews: 84
rAvg: 2.72
pDev: 23.16%
Wants: 2
Gots: 10 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
San Miguel Brewery Inc. visit their website
Philippines

Style | ABV
German Pilsener |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: rastaman on 08-09-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 174 | Reviews: 84 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by Pipmeister:
Photo of Pipmeister
2.78/5  rDev +2.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a clear straw color with a white foamy head. The smell is a slight mixture of hops/skunk/tire, not the mist pleasant smelling beer ever. The taste is pretty crisp with average body, alot of malt breadiness with a clean finish. It lacks complexity however, A's expected. Overall it's a sub average pils that lacks in the flavor dept but I can see it being an enjoyable and easy drinking on a hot afternoon or evening.

Pipmeister, Jul 12, 2011
More User Reviews:
Photo of beerhunter13
2.5/5  rDev -8.1%

beerhunter13, Aug 12, 2012
Photo of tbryan5
2.75/5  rDev +1.1%

tbryan5, Dec 31, 2012
Photo of Weizenmensch
1.73/5  rDev -36.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

A squat brown bottle with a gold label and no freshness date.

Pours a pale yellow with a medium-density head which dissipates quite quickly, leaving a spidery lace. Not-too-fizzy with large bubbles.

Unpleasant skunky odour that kind of smells like a hot fart. Otherwise this beer has a serious composure and demeanour of faint grassy hops and definite adjuncts which smell like melting plastic.

Taste is worse still. Adjuncts come out of the woodwork and stain the underside of one's tongue. Nothing pleasant to speak of, really. It's drinkable if served very cold, but don't expect anything a true Bohemian pilsener would offer in abundance.

Mouthfeel: Acrid, with bubbles where there shouldn't be.

A very cold beer for a very hot place. Perhaps I was harsher on this beer than I would be if it hadn't followed a particularly hit-the-spot Bavarian Hefeweizen. I'm getting more of them, nothing like them on a cold winter's eve, or a hot summer's day, or any day in between. No more money on this ordinary San Miguel crap though.

Weizenmensch, Jul 20, 2005
Photo of olradetbalder
1.75/5  rDev -35.7%

olradetbalder, Yesterday at 01:48 PM
Photo of GuidedByVoices
2.75/5  rDev +1.1%

GuidedByVoices, Mar 25, 2012
Photo of Marius
2.5/5  rDev -8.1%

Marius, Jul 07, 2013
Photo of jazzyjeff13
2.5/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A 320ml bottle with a BB of Sept 2012 (on the cap). Acquired from Chi Yip, an oriental specialist shop in York. The label is printed onto the bottle, and the ingredient list includes cereals/sugar.

Poured into a tulip pint glass. A clear, pale golden colour with good carbonation. Forms a decent head of creamy white foam that lasts for a minute or two before subsiding. Aroma of light malt with plenty of corn/overcooked veg and a hint of stewed hops. Slightly sweet. Deteriorates rapidly as it warms, resulting in an unpleasant DMS-laden nose.

Tastes of ultra-light malt with a mild, dry finish. Faint notes of corn and stewed veg. A subtle sweetness, with a hint of staleness and solvent in the background. A very mild bitterness upon swallowing. Mouthfeel is smooth and tingly, but watery and insubstantial. Slightly astringent. Aftertaste of corn/stewed veg.

Not good - doesn't come close to a decent pilsner. This is adjunct-laden crap, and the aroma/flavour fully reflect that. Bland and weak, with nasty off-flavours and a touch of solvent/alcohol. I can't imagine this being decent, even in the Philippines. Avoid.

jazzyjeff13, Jul 30, 2012
Photo of valkyre65
3/5  rDev +10.3%

valkyre65, Dec 09, 2011
Photo of vfalstad
3/5  rDev +10.3%

vfalstad, May 27, 2013
Photo of rastaman
2/5  rDev -26.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Very light yellow colour, head fades very fast. Very thin, a bit fizzy, tastes like water, very bland, which is pretty much like any other beer froM San Miguel.

rastaman, Aug 09, 2002
Photo of Trashcat
2.75/5  rDev +1.1%

Trashcat, 1 minute ago
Photo of r0nyn
2.88/5  rDev +5.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured into a mug from a bottle.

Appearance is a pale golden hue, transparent and full of bubbles. Big, fat white head that takes its sweet time in dissipating. Smell is decent, with malts and grains easily detectable, but not really much else happening. Wasn't expecting too much out of a pilsner anyway.

Taste is malty upfront, with a bitter bite and just a hint of hoppiness. There is a very mild sweetness behind it all, providing some contrast to the astringency. Aftertaste is just lightly bitter and on the dry side. Mouthfeel is light and crisp, as expected of a pilsner, but quite bubbly, so much so that the carbonation was a bit of a distraction. Not that it took away from my overall enjoyment of the beer, but it certainly has to be noted.

With a low ABV and an easy-to-stomach taste, San Miguel is a great beer for a social gathering, especially one with Filipinos. It's a decent, if unspectacular brew that does its job.

r0nyn, Aug 27, 2010
Photo of biboergosum
2.55/5  rDev -6.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

330ml squat bottle. 'Enjoyed for over a century', proclaims the back label.

This beer pours a crystal clear, pale golden straw colour, with two fat fingers of puffy, rocky, and cushioned white head, which leaves a nice display of drooping sudsy lace around the glass as it fades away.

It smells of semi-sweet corn and a lesser grainy malt, a musty, um 'fruitiness', and earthy, herbal hops. The taste is more sweet, pithy corn and wan bready malt, some mildly interesting, indistinct spice (if only for its obfuscated point of origin), stale lemon juice, and vegetal, dead flower hops.

The carbonation is moderate, just a weak edginess throughout, the body on the light side of medium weight, and smooth in the most lenient sense of the word. It finishes off-dry, the now evidently stale, corn-flecked malt waging a bland offensive against a mild booze and earthy bitterness offset.

San Miguel's offering is hardly reminiscent of pilseners of the old world, and generally just another foreign watering down of the style. A bit here, a bit there, trying to prove itself, but still pretty unimpressive overall. I can't imagine where this one would suffice, but hey, maybe that's my imagination's fault. Nah.

biboergosum, Jun 12, 2011
Photo of Metalmonk
3.05/5  rDev +12.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Wow, a pull tab? Cool! I'm not ancient, but old enough to remember having to avoid those damn things on the beach unless you wanted your feet sliced to shreds. But still: cool! And thanks to msubulldog25 for this rarity.

Pull tab pulled, and the pour results in a snow-white head that starts out thick then minimizes and stays for the duration at a quarter-inch. Pale lemon-juice yellow color, and super clear.

Suspiciously sugary and corny smells, although that grainy and sweet essence of a decent German pils comes through a little. A bit doughy, some steamed veggie character...all in all, not bad, but not super-impressive either.

Flavor is no surprise, and no world-class medal winner. But it's not a total failure either. Watery grains, watery honey, a touch of lemon, boiled veggies, faint sulphur, and Corn Pops cereal sweetness all intermingled. There's very little depth, and maybe no depth, if such a thing can be measured. But far from atrocious.

Texturally this kind of turned me off. Too watery, lacking the prickle and roundness of a good pils. Not a disaster, but with a flavor that could use an assist, the mouthfeel doesn't pull through.

Expected worse, but there are enough traits here that make it a better option than your typical U.S. corporate piss-lager. Of course, it's not much of an option when you can't get your hands on it, not to mention that lots of U.S. craft brewers are offering kick-ass pilsners, both traditional and imperialized. Better yet, travel to Germany or Czech Republic and experience the real deal...

Metalmonk, Jul 22, 2010
Photo of Sammy
2/5  rDev -26.5%

Sammy, Oct 28, 2013
Photo of tdm168
3.08/5  rDev +13.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A - pale, translucent golden yellow with a soft, foamy, soapy, white head that has decent retention

S - grainy and sweet

T - grainy, sweet, corn, sugar in the finish, faint herbal bitterness

M - medium bodied, moderately carbonated

This is a clean, easy to drink beer, but it's not a good representation of the style. It's overly sweet, grainy, and ultimately, forgettable.

tdm168, Jun 23, 2012
Photo of Ciocanelu
2.5/5  rDev -8.1%

Ciocanelu, Dec 07, 2013
Photo of Fatehunter
1.88/5  rDev -30.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

A thin head on a clear, bright golden colored body.
The aroma is non-existent; the mildest grain.
The taste is mildly bitter and then watery middle to end.
A crisp texture, high carbonation and light body.
A lot going against this beer: smell, no taste and high carbonation coming up at the top of the list.

Fatehunter, Jan 19, 2013
Photo of beerluvr
3.1/5  rDev +14%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Sampled from a dimpled German stein. Pours a clear and bright gold with a long lasting tight collar of rocky white foam, fresh grassy malty nose with some hay noted. Crisp and light, very clean with a nice residual hop bitterness...begs for another sip. Finishes clean too and on a hop note. Well made for sure...very nice warm weather session lager.

beerluvr, Jul 23, 2012
Photo of PeprSprYoFace
3.48/5  rDev +27.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a shaker pint. Pours a golden clear with a nice white head. Decent lacing.

Aroma is probably the worst part but not aweful. Almost skunky but the beer isn't skunked in flavor. I'm assuming it's the hops.

Taste is solid. Nice pils taste with a bit of extra hop flavor and bitterness than your regular pils would have.

Mouthfeel is dry with higher carb.

Overall it's tasty. Not super easy to find and I don't know if I would buy it again but it was worth a try.

PeprSprYoFace, Jul 12, 2011
Photo of basica
3/5  rDev +10.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I do not have much of an expectation of this beer; after all it was a hmm I haven tried it so
perhaps I would kind of a buy. I was surprised to read pretty good reviews about it here and
there. The San Mig bottle looks like those short and fat Belgian bottles, like the Duvel; I am
not sure why but that's not important. Let's get on to this Philippino beer. I shared this with
my dad and divded it into 2 glasses. It pours out with a sufficiently large 1 finger head with
average retention. It smells of malts and it was slightly different; maybe because it is a
little citrusy. The taste was a little unexpected. The malty taste came along with the a
slightly sourish taste which was kept in check so it was ok. The malts had a different taste
probably citrus fruity like and I kind of liked it. The mouthfeel was lager typical but the
after taste of malts and light citrus notes was definitely more lasting and more pleasant.
I have to admit I am a little surprised and so was my dad who prefered the San Mig to the
Tiger anytime. But all in all it does not impress me; it is just that from a zero expectation,
I am naturally surprised... not that it's all that good.

basica, Jul 29, 2007
Photo of Kunstman
2.5/5  rDev -8.1%

Kunstman, Nov 11, 2012
Photo of tone77
3.08/5  rDev +13.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 12 oz. bottle. Has a pale yellow color with a 1 inch head. Smell is rather mild, some grains. Taste is crisp, refreshing, a bit mild, some grains, bitterness at the finish. Feels light in the mouth and has good drinkability. Overall this is a mediocre beer, much better when I was drinking it on an isolated beach one night in Bohol with some locals.

tone77, Feb 07, 2011
Photo of Fusion7777
3/5  rDev +10.3%

Fusion7777, Feb 02, 2013
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
San Miguel Pale Pilsen from San Miguel Brewery Inc.
65 out of 100 based on 174 ratings.