1. Extreme Beer Fest tickets go on sale Sat, Sep 27 @ Noon EDT.
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Fancy Pants - New England Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Fancy PantsFancy Pants

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
86
very good

77 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 77
Reviews: 36
rAvg: 3.85
pDev: 12.99%
Wants: 62
Gots: 25 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
New England Brewing Co. visit their website
Connecticut, United States

Style | ABV
Flanders Oud Bruin |  6.00% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

2011: ~700 500ml bottles from 2 Cabernet barrels

(Beer added by: woosterbill on 12-11-2011)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 77 | Reviews: 36 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Thorpe429
3.58/5  rDev -7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Thanks to bmanning for sharing this bottle. Served in a wine glass.

Pours a reddish-brown color with a good off-white head and some lacing. The nose brings some light cherry and wine plus a good bit of acid. Light oak along with fruit and acidity in the flavor. A bit of acetic character through the finish. Light-medium body with good carbonation. Pretty good for an early wild attempt.

Thorpe429, Jan 16, 2012
Photo of nmann08
3.5/5  rDev -9.1%

nmann08, Jan 30, 2012
Photo of Knapp85
2/5  rDev -48.1%

Knapp85, Jan 19, 2014
Photo of JAHMUR
4/5  rDev +3.9%

JAHMUR, Dec 12, 2011
Photo of drabmuh
4/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Thanks Ben, talk about being under dressed for a beer.

Beer is orange and forms a thin white head of small bubbles, minimal lacing, moderate to low carbonation, low retention.

Aroma is a little funky, cherry, a little oak, nice.

Beer is nice, bright with a little vinegar at the end, dry finish, a little fruity, a little mild, I enjoyed it and would probably have it again.

drabmuh, Jan 12, 2012
Photo of mdfb79
3.95/5  rDev +2.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

From 01/08/12 notes. Big thanks to bmanning for sharing this one. 2011 vintage, 500ml bottle into a tulip.

a - Pours a hazy medium orange color with one inch of white head and moderate carbonation evident.

s - Smells of sour dark fruits, wine, light oak, cherries, some earthy notes. Very nice and sour here.

t - Tastes of tart cherries, sour dark fruits, oak, wine, light funk, earthy notes, wood, fruity malts. Taste is not as sour as the nose, but still a 4.

m - Light body and low carbonation. Seems a tiny bit watered down and a little too thin.

o - Overall I thought this was a good flanders. There is some definitely nice sourness to it, especiall in the nose, though it isn't overly sour and doesn't have a ton else going on. Body was a bit too thin as well, but for their first sour beer this is a great start. Looking forward to trying it again sometime and seeing them make some other sours.

mdfb79, Jan 10, 2012
Photo of yourefragile
3.5/5  rDev -9.1%

yourefragile, Jan 14, 2012
Photo of stakem
3.7/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Thanks to BA smoked for hooking me up with this. 500ml bottle poured into a tulip. The brew appears a clear ruby amber color but when held to the light, almost looks more of a reddish copper. A finger of off-white head appears initially and quickly dissolves to just a few bubbles across the surface.

The aroma has a hint of vinegar initially with some lactic tang and an edgy sourness that evolves into a focus on a fruity quality of alcohol and cherries. The more I smell this brew, the more the aroma gets directed towards cherry. A tiny bit of minerals around the edges and almost a cheesy funk aspect. There is a very mild barrel aspect present with a slight indication of vanilla.

The taste is spot on with what you would expect based strictly off the aroma. A tart cherry flavor is the main focus and it seems to be a derivative of both the cherry inclusion and bacterial aftermath. It has some mild earthen flavors throughout with almost a mild cheesy aspect into the finish with a bit of minerals. As it warms up, there is a very mild tannic barrel inclusion across the back. It is faint but it is there with the slightest touch of vanilla.

This is a medium to lighter bodied brew with a modest to light level of carbonation. It is easy drinking and the alcohol is perfectly included here. My only gripe is that the feel is a little thin and almost watery, it could be beefed up just a bit for my liking but the thin quality makes it much easier to approach and increases how rapidly it dissolves in my glass. There flavors of this to be a flanders are similar but just not quite there, it seems to be lacking in depth just a bit. I like where this brew was going and tip my hat to Nebco for giving it a shot, hopefully they continue with the adventurous brews.

stakem, Apr 20, 2012
Photo of dbrauneis
4.33/5  rDev +12.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Bottle share in Hoboken, NJ.

A: Pours a cloudy dark amber to mahogany in color. The beer has a very thin off-white head that quickly reduces to a film and thin ring at the edges of the glass. Very light lacing is observed.

S: A nice and tart aroma to this beer with oak, vinous red wine, sour cherries, and some light fruit sweetness. Additionally there are some hints of vinegar as well.

T: The flavor follows the aroma of this beer, with a decent amount of vinous notes and vinegar tartness. The beer has quite a bit of oak presence, light spiciness, and quite a bit of tart cherry.

M: On the lighter side of medium bodied with moderate amounts of carbonation. Light dryness in the finish.

O: This beer was quite enjoyable and quite easy to drink. My first beer from this brewery and it was a very nice offering. I will be interested to try some other beers from this brewery as this was quite a good one.

dbrauneis, Apr 15, 2012
Photo of Huhzubendah
4/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Bottle shared by bmanning. Thanks Ben.

The beer is a hazy, rusty orange hue with a small white head. The aroma offers cherries, funk, hints of vanilla, oak, malt. The flavor is decent. Acetic finish with tart cherry accents. Light bodied with a bit of sharpness in the back. Overall, pretty good.

Huhzubendah, Jan 08, 2012
Photo of mdaschaf
4.3/5  rDev +11.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Review from notes. Thanks to my brother for picking this up for me.

A: Pours pinkish/red with a small tan head on top. Not much retention or lacing though.

S: Some cherries right away on the aroma with a lot of the red wine coming through. There is some faint tartness and a good bit of oak. Nice amount of tart and funky aromas.

T: Cherries of course, more sourness than the aroma led on, very nice! A good bit of oak and a little bit of the red wine comes through, certainly not as strong as the aroma. There are also hints of vanilla and toffee.

M: Medium bodied with moderate carbonation. Slightly dry finish.

O: Quite enjoyable. Look forward to trying it again to see how the wine barrels evolve over time. Extremely drinkable.

mdaschaf, Jan 08, 2012
Photo of ShanePB
3.18/5  rDev -17.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 3

Big thanks to mdaschaf for the share. Vintage 2011 served into a tulip.

A: Murky reddish/maroon colored body, some lighter variations of the color throughout. A small white head forms but is gone almost instantly. Retention is not this beers forte, nor is lacing.

S: Musk, old wet oak wood, dry red wine, a bit of that sourness you'd expect from the style but not over the top. In fact, it does smell quite pleasant just nothing too much in the way of deep complexity.

T: Unlike the nose, this doesn't follow through. The sourness never really lifts much off the ground. It's starts off like it's going to have a nice complex sour character but quickly recedes into the flavor profile. Plenty of malt, oak, tannins and a harsh dryness.

M: Not completely flat but close. Little carbonation does try to break things up although the lack of bubbles here is a determent to this beer. This style needs higher carbonation, this is rather disappointing.

Certainly I was glad I tried this one, so thanks again Matt. The beer sounds awesome and is one style I really enjoy but this didn't come close to touching others. A nice attempt, just not refined at all.

ShanePB, Jul 13, 2012
Photo of Durge
4/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4

A cloudy, murky-orange-brown with a slim bit of white scattered head and minimal lacing. The aroma is full of malt vinegar and sweet Cabernet with cherry cocoanut highlights. The flavor brings a bit harsher apple cider vinegar with a deep toffee malt and a hint of whiskey alcohol. This offers a medium body with a somewhat heavy feel, cask like carbonation. Very good stuff for the sour effect I always enjoy.

Durge, Apr 10, 2013
Photo of Jwale73
3.7/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

500ml bottle shared by jedwards (thanks for the opportunity to try this 'want' Jonah!). Pours a dull, burnt orange color with a semi-hazy clarity. Head quickly disperses into a cluster of bright white bubbles around the shoulders. The nose is difficult to describe on this beer - tart, vinegary and acidic; however, the overtones suggest something not particularly light. The beer is definitely style consistent - light pit fruit, citric acid and a yeast. Mouthfeel is light-medium in body with an even carbonation and light acidity. Overall, I found this beer to be somewhat of a Flanders Oud Bruin/Belgian Strong Pale hybrid. Flavors come off a bit on the light side of the spectrum and seem to lack the vinous qualities I've come to associate with the style. Decent, but not worth seeking out in my opinion.

Jwale73, Apr 01, 2012
Photo of woosterbill
4.38/5  rDev +13.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

500ml bottle into a Duvel tulip. This one was aged in Cabernet barrels for about 2 years along with Brett, lacto, pedio, and (for the last few months), cherries. NEBCO's first stab at a sour. Here we go!

A: A straight pour starts out looking disturbingly undercarbonated, but by the end some fine effervescence reveals itself so as to create almost an inch of tan head that's creamy on the bottom and coarse on the top. Retention is surprisingly great given its slow start, but lacing is a bit lacking. The body is a warm, translucent copper hue that becomes cloudy once I add the yeasty dregs (knowing the bugs and such that are in here, I want all the funky goodness). Overall it's a nice-looking beer for the style.

S: Oh my. I've gotten to try this beer a few times out of the barrel, and its aroma has always been its strong suit; this bottle is no different. Vinous oak jumps out right away, followed by sour cherries, vanilla, lactic acid, and a bit of acetic vinegar. It's fruity, sour, oaky, complex, and just amazing. My only complaint is that it isn't quite as powerful as I'd like - it smells so great that I just want more of it.

T: Tart acetic character is up front, followed quickly by cherry skin, red wine, tannic oak, ripe cherry, vanilla, and cranberry-esque bitterness on the finish. It's significantly more sour than it was any of the times I tried it before, and that's a welcome change. I wouldn't mind a bit more juiciness from the cherries, though, and what malt it had originally has been pretty much entirely taken over by the barrel and bugs. I was originally afraid that this one would be on the sweeter side of the style, but now it's looking like that isn't the case at all. Even when it warms its slightly sweetness is pretty well limited to the oaky vanilla and cherries. Overall it's nothing short of delicious.

M: Very lightly carbonated and slick. What carbonation is there is nice and delicate, but I could deal with a bit more life as a buffer to the acidity.

O: I'm glad to announce that this experiment, so long in development, is an unqualified success. It's not face-meltingly sour or anything, but rather provides a complex and balanced array of classic Oud Bruin goodness. I wish it didn't take so long to create, as I'd love to sip this out of a can.

Cheers!

woosterbill, Dec 11, 2011
Photo of ColForbinBC
3.65/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

500mL bottle poured into a flute

Pours a transparent orange with a core of light brown. Some bubbles try to form a cap, but can't muster anything more than loose bubbles. No lacing whatsoever.

The aroma is of oak, red wine vinegar, sour cherries, and cabernet. A solid aroma, with the cabernet taking the lead.

There is no carbonation here at all. I'm not sure if that is due to age or the intention of the brewery. A little carbonation can really go a long way with this beer.

Sour cherries at first with red wine vinegar coming in through the middle. The finish is of dry oak and a mild tartness. After a while, a little bit of sweet cherries poke through and linger. The cabernet influence is relatively prominent throughout.

Overall, this is a nice little Oud Bruin. An adventurous style to tackle and outside of the carbonation issues, this is pretty right on.

ColForbinBC, Feb 11, 2012
Photo of VelvetExtract
4.58/5  rDev +19%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

Pretty excited for this one.

A-Pours a translucent copper-orange. Nearly zero head to speak of aside from except for a strange, lopsided cluster of rapidly fading bubbles. Nearly no head as well, but who cares.

S-Pungent nose of both tartness and sweetness. Fruity and tart cherries and an almost citrus fruitiness too. Tart funk is pretty attractive. A damn potent aroma. I am excited to try this. A bit of vinegar. I can detect some nice woodiness after a few sniffs as well.

T-Tartness is perfect. Very interesting flavors. Tart cherries and funkiness. A nice lasting grassy flavor. Nice vinous notes. Sweet and juicy but quite tart. Great balance between the two opposing flavors. Finishes pleasantly woody.

M-Medium body with a mellow carbonation setting. Exceptionally slick. Finishes a bit like wine on the palate.

O/D-This is one hell of a beer. I'm really trying to pace myself and see how it changes with warmth but its very drinkable. NEBCO is one of, if not my favorite breweries from New England. I love their stuff and this one trots down the same line of deliciousness as their other brews. Just very pleased.

VelvetExtract, Dec 21, 2011
Photo of CheapBeerBuzz
4.25/5  rDev +10.4%

CheapBeerBuzz, Sep 28, 2012
Photo of jaxon53
4/5  rDev +3.9%

jaxon53, Jul 07, 2013
Photo of scottfrie
3.5/5  rDev -9.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

500ml bottle into Portsmouth snifter. Thanks to Michael for both!

A: Pours a deep dark ruddy amber color with a very thin and fizzy off-white head that quickly faded into a bubbly film. Not much in the way of lace.
S: Big notes of dry oak, vinous red wine, and both sour and slightly sweet cherries. I get a hint of vinegar as well, but cherries and oaky dry red wine dominate. Reminds me a bit of Supplication.
T: Not as potent as I was expecting. The cab barrel is really vinous and imparts a great flavor, and the cherries remind me of tart black cherry skins. Finish is quick and the aftertaste falls short though. Overall, flavors are a bit muted and more mellow than I was expecting. This tastes good I just it just really falls off in the finish.
M: Very low carbonation to the point that this is downright watery. Thankfully the acidic notes I smelled did not translate to the mouthfeel. This beer is lightly sour, and definitely dry, but it’s actually rather soft, smooth, and easy to drink; it just needs more bubbles.
O: Great flavors just a not enough of them. Also this was easy to drink but way too thin. I would drink this again though, and hopefully future batches are even better. Thanks again,Mike.

scottfrie, Mar 11, 2012
Photo of millerbuffoon
3.25/5  rDev -15.6%

millerbuffoon, Jan 19, 2014
Photo of sulldaddy
4.1/5  rDev +6.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

SPlitting a bottle at cellar temp with Stopper. Poured into a snifter the beer is slightly cloudy chestnut hue with frothy eggshell white head as an edge layer only and not much else for foam.
Aroma is funky and tart with some caramel that is overshadowed by by fruit and funk, maybe a little of that musty wet blanket scent?
First sip reveals a light body with very mild carbonation and a smooth texture. Flavor is some caramel and biscuit mixing with dark and light fruit. Very funky and musty with some tart acidic notes on the finish. I think I get a bit of sour cherry but I may have imagined that in the background.
Very complex flavor profile and still pretty easy to drink. I enjoyed this brew and would recommend to folks that like the sour and tart end of the beer spectrum.

sulldaddy, May 14, 2012
Photo of Arbitrator
1.95/5  rDev -49.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Chilled bottle into a glass, courtesy of t8000shx. Thanks, Ben!

A: Pours a surprisingly clear amber-body with reddish tint and off-white head. I expected a Flanders brown aged with fruit in cabernet barrels to have more of the opaque reddish-brown color of Russian River's Supplication or Consecration; this is strange.

S: This has a musky, old tannic aroma with some red wine. Mild phenolic presence (pepper). Kind of weak overall.

T: This is inoffensive; again, "weak" comes to mind. I mentioned to largadeer that this was wine-barrel aged ("This was wine barrel aged?!?!" - his response) with cherries ("This has cherries in it?!?!" - his response) and he remarked that they failed all around to express those flavors. I'd agree; in a vacuum, I'd accept this as a light-drinking saison or something similar, but even then its simplicity fails to distinguish it from anything else. I'd say it's middling if I knew nothing else, but its attachment to the Flander Bruin style actually drives it below that point. There's just no "there" there.

M: Lifeless, with little carbonation in the beer; oddly tannic and watery in the finish. I just can't find anything positive to say here.

O: This was well-received as some sort of saison or light-drinking wild ale, but we had trouble reconciling its actual execution with the style it purported to be.

Arbitrator, Sep 29, 2012
Photo of hoppymcgee
4/5  rDev +3.9%

hoppymcgee, Feb 18, 2012
Photo of jzeilinger
3.5/5  rDev -9.1%

jzeilinger, Jan 19, 2014
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Fancy Pants from New England Brewing Co.
86 out of 100 based on 77 ratings.