Tuppers' Hop Pocket Pils (Keller Pils) - Tuppers' Hop Pocket Brewing Company
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 194 | Reviews: 168 | Display Reviews Only:
1.1/5 rDev -72.4%
I used to love this Pils, but it now tastes like a homebrew that's gone off. It was very foamy with large bubbles and I poured it down the sink. I hope this was a bad bottle but at $9 for four I took it back. I will try it in the future and hope for better luck.
07-24-2012 16:22:34 | More by alesme2
2.58/5 rDev -35.3%
On tap at the Old Dominion brewpub.
Had a slight off-white glass ring for a head, over a hazy golden-yellow body. There was negligible lace, and not enough carbonation visible. The nose had a mild herbal character, and some sweet cereal notes. The taste was crisp and metallic, with herbal hops. It was a bit sour, and had an off vegetable flavor. The mouth was a bit thick for my taste, with medium-high carbonation. It was still a refreshing drink, but a bit off in a number of areas.
01-30-2007 20:47:22 | More by mjc410
2.65/5 rDev -33.6%
Packaged in a 12 oz amber bottle
Served at about 40F
Aroma at the bottleneck was grassy hops
Poured with moderate head, settling nicely and making good lace
Appearance in the glass was light golden, very hazy like a wit or IPA.
Aroma in the glass was more grassy hops, slight maltiness, attractive toastiness, but also a sour aroma.
Taste: Good bitterness, with a harsh grassy flavor and sour, soapy finish.
As it warms, gets a little more palatable, but is never notably good.
Drinkability: Eagerly bought a few bottles when I saw the pils next the the Hop Pocket ale which I enjoy. After they're gone, won't bother to buy it again. Changing the hop variety(ies) could make a big improvement, I think. Mediocre beer that doesn't really fit the style, nor does it stand on its own.
12-01-2006 03:41:44 | More by BattleRoadBrewer
2.88/5 rDev -27.8%
Orangey-yellow with some haze. Very little head on it so staying power is not relevant.
Sweet bread malts and citrus hops.
Another beer that tastes no where near as good as it smells. A metallic and phenolic tastes are the first things that hit masking anything good beneath. Hops bitterness is not clear...it's there, but finding it is not easy due to the off-flavors. If the smell hadn't been fine and if I didn't know that my favorite watering hole didn't rotate stock regularly, I would have guessed this beer was skunked.
The off-flavors messing around with your tongue drops the rating here even though it still remains pretty crisp. The body is medium.
Too much awfulness to even finish it. I rarely leave a beer unfinished but I wanted to quickly move on to something that I liked.
10-30-2010 20:34:04 | More by Naugros
3.08/5 rDev -22.8%
Picked this up on a trip out east. Pours a cloudy, hazy yellow. Not much aroma to speak of. Taste is harshly hoppy, no gentleness to it. I would guess straight up cluster hops. Almost a slight metallic taste to it. Mouthfeel is thin. Where is the malt? This is almost like drinking a hop tea with a slight beer taste to it.
09-05-2005 20:06:28 | More by deejaydan
3.1/5 rDev -22.3%
Found this to be very average. Pours a light amber, very little head. Aroma is pretty lifeless, a tiny bit of hops and malt. Bitter, metallic, slightly grassy notes, bitty hop bite at the end. Mouthfeel is average at best. There's really no discerning characteristics about this beer.... its just "a beer" for lack of a better explanation. It doesn't have any of the horrid tastes/smells of a macro, but it doesn't have anything great to make it stand out either. Kinda like a nondescript contract brewed house beer that so many places have.
08-17-2005 16:48:48 | More by ChrisBowers
3.15/5 rDev -21.1%
Thanks to Thorpe429 for this extra. My bottle says it is contract-brewed at St. George Brewing Co. in Hampton, VA. No obvious best before date. Served in a pilsener glass.
A - Pours with two fingers of soapy white foam that lingers for quite a while and settle to a thick cap. Body is a hazy, golden straw color. Tons of bubbles race upwards, and some splotchy lace is left on the sides of the glass.
S - Honey, bread, and caramel malt character, with some light floral and citrus hop character. Pretty nice and refreshing aroma.
T - Yikes! Things went downhill pretty quickly, with slight metallic notes and harsh bitterness. Not sure if this is how it's supposed to taste, but it's not very pleasant. Still drinkable, but not something I'd really want to have again. It gets a little better when it warms up, and the bitterness is more palatable in the aftertaste.
M - Texture is pretty decent. Zesty carbonation tingle, soft medium-light body with some light residual stickiness.
D - Other than the unpleasant taste this is pretty good - not sure why there is such a huge disconnect between taste and aroma. There's potential here, but something has gone wrong in the execution. Perhaps the contract brewing has screwed things up.
05-28-2010 03:45:56 | More by MasterSki
3.2/5 rDev -19.8%
Nice head and quality aroma for a pils. Taste good but metallic. Dry hoppy character. Them saaz hops. Light-medium mouthfeel. Dry bitter hop leaf finish. An interesting pils though we had better over the course of the evening. Thanks for sharing, Radek.
01-10-2005 03:26:36 | More by Sammy
3.28/5 rDev -17.8%
Nice fresh hops coming through on the aroma, it's not pure grain like I get out of most pilsners. Grassy, and somewhat floral as well.
Poured out with a lot of junk, I didn't know this was bottle carbonated. The beer is hazy and dark straw in color. The head was an off-white fluffy thing which had tremendous staying power. Lacing was really nice too, however, there were bits of floating junk in the beer too. It looked unappetizing overall.
Super carbonated was the first thing I noticed. It has a light fruit character, like berries without the sweetness, grain, cereal, and it has this earthy kind of twist to it. Not too bad, at least it's interesting.
11-06-2012 21:20:45 | More by tlazaroff
3.3/5 rDev -17.3%
I really wish I could like this brew better than I do, especially based on the Bros' write-up. This is now brewed by St. George Brewing in Hampton VA so that may account for the difference in reviews. We picked these up at the brewery.
The appearance is fine and the scent is very low-key, improving slightly as it warms. The initial taste is somewhat harsh but mellows a bit as it warms (which I find strange for a pilsner). Both the wife and I get an odd aftertaste as well. I am a fan of keller beers but I'm not picking up much of the style characteristics here.
We will crack open another bottle and edit the review if needed.
03-25-2012 00:15:32 | More by MarvinTheMarzen
3.3/5 rDev -17.3%
A decent pilsener, but not very aromatic nor refeshing. Had this on-tap at the Old Dominion Brewpub.
Appeared very light and airy with a soft golden glow and high level of carbonation and a gentle head that left quickly. Subtle aromas of pine and citrus. The taste was balanced between fruity sweetness and hop bitterness with a slight leaning towards bitterness. Not very much flavor in this beer with a texture that was close to watery and somewhat astringent. I sampled this twice, but opted not to get a pint of it so that illustrates my lack of enthusiasm over this particular beer. Not as dry in the finish or refreshing in it's inherent characteristics as would be expected for this style.
02-06-2006 19:24:40 | More by jaluria
3.3/5 rDev -17.3%
Bottled on Aug. 14, 2003.
This hazy golden orange brew exhibits a nice line of carbonation going up the middle of the glass at a steady pace. A big and frothy white head graces the surface. Retention is solid. It has a great hop boquet mixed in with nice pilnser malt aromas. Decent mellow maltiness mixes with light notes of hay and hops. But it seems "dulled" a little. A little bit of a hop bitterness, but it's pretty rounded. Mouthfeel is a little spritzy and the body is about medium full.
Thanks for the sample Murph.
03-18-2004 04:26:11 | More by Bighuge
3.33/5 rDev -16.5%
Pours into a stange with a 2 inch, thick white head and a cloudy, pale golden/yellow body. The aroma is very light, a spicy saaz hops smell with a light bready background. The taste is dominated by hops, starts with a biscuit-like malt flavor and segues into resiny, spicy hops taste that coats the mouth, you can really taste the saaz hops in this one. Im sure this isnt as fresh as could be and thats why the taste isnt really all the way there (this bottle is dated from may 2003) and if it was fresher it would be much better i think. But even so, a 2 year old bottle isnt half bad.
04-27-2005 23:45:36 | More by silver0rlead
3.35/5 rDev -16%
A hazey golden brew with a thin white head and good lacing. The aroma includes wheat and tart citrus. The flavor brings a light citrus hops with some, oat, biscuit and light malt. It is nicely carbonated for a refreshing and light drink and finishes pretty dry. Drinkability is OK but it is more on the dry side than I would like for multiple knock-backs. Give it a try, depending on your tastes, this may appeal to you as a relatively tastey summer brew option.
10-01-2007 03:57:45 | More by Durge
3.4/5 rDev -14.8%
pretty golden with some haze because i stired it up an army of bubbles floating up to support a half-inch head that is white and laces quite nicely the glass. plesant malt and wheat scents like grass. tuppers hop profile detected in nose, very signature. should be good. green and grassy taste with predominant hops plowing through the malts. citrus fruit and some vegetable tastes. the hop profile is a bit too active for my understanding of the pils style, maybe i'll have to broaden my pils horizons...no problem! also it seemed to mellow out after it sat around for a month or so, interesting indeed. maybe if i thought it was a summer brew or some sort of special lager i wouldn't have this trouble and i could dig it that way. the mouthfeel is great and bubbley but i'd say a bit watery. a light maltiness hides behind all of this hop activity and as usual goes well with the tuppers hop treatment, i'm sorry i lashed out like that earlier. this beer is nice and very drinkable and golly is it crisp.
09-18-2003 23:23:28 | More by pio
United Kingdom (England)
3.43/5 rDev -14%
Fairly soft and lightly buttery malts, with some lightly spicy, quite floral hops, Faintly sharp finish with the hops, mild bitterness, a pretty good pilsener, with an added sharpness in the bitterness, pretty spot on for a pils, without the softness of a nice Czeck one. Nobbad.
06-16-2003 02:19:47 | More by rastaman
3.48/5 rDev -12.8%
$1.52 for a single. Slightly cloudy yellow with just a bit of brown color. Taste is standard american pale ale to the letter - sharp american hop flavor. This must be a Pilsener by ingredients only, because the taste is not there. Well, maybe in the malts now that I think about it.
This is an interesting take on the style, I would recommend everyone try it.
07-28-2005 22:13:06 | More by benmiliron
3.5/5 rDev -12.3%
This was my first Tuppers. I had a revelation with Prima Pils, so I wanted to try one from a different brewer. Guys like Tuppers, Victory, Stoudts, Troegs, Clipper City...all make me appreciate living on the Right Coast. This is one fine pilsner offering from Tuppers.
Light golden pour with a thin white head. Light on the nose as well, with a hoppy kick. Light on the palate, good balance of hops and malt and a light mouthfeel, too. HEY!!! IS THIS A LIGHT BEER?
Very drinkable, sessionable, and a good choice for summer.
05-15-2006 19:22:54 | More by ITK4ever
3.5/5 rDev -12.3%
Bottle: Poured a golden color pils with super huge fluffy white head with good retention. Aroma of well balances floral hops. Taste is quite refreshing with a good malt backbone and nice crisp hops. Body is above your average pils. Very good for the style.
10-26-2005 12:49:17 | More by Phyl21ca
Tuppers' Hop Pocket Pils (Keller Pils) from Tuppers' Hop Pocket Brewing Company
89 out of 100 based on 194 ratings.