1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Capitol 1900 - Capital Brewery

Not Rated.
Capitol 1900Capitol 1900

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

58 Ratings
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 58
Reviews: 56
rAvg: 3.38
pDev: 12.13%
Wants: 0
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Capital Brewery visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Lager |  ABV ?

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 10-26-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 58 | Reviews: 56 | Display Reviews Only:


3.25/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pretty ho-hum appearance. Gold color, white head.
The smell has an interesting, almost woody quality to it that is kind of hard to put a finger on.
The flavor is grainy with some hint of corn, grass, and the mild flavor of a burnt something. There is a crisp finish to the beer, and a somewhat creamy mouthfeel.
Not a bad beer at all. Nothing too disagreeable about it, really.
Good for a summer BBQ, anyone could probably drink this. Except children, of course.

Serving type: bottle

05-22-2004 23:51:01 | More by GIVEMEBACKMYSON
Photo of BuckeyeNation


3.15/5  rDev -6.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Slightly hazed medium amber, a little darker than one usually sees in this style. The head is a shade darker than pure white, is small and falls to a barely covering film, leaving almost no lace. The aroma is unimpressive, but not unappealing. Pale malt with a prominent fresh graininess; a cut or two above a macro lager.

The flavor is just okay. It's sweet and modestly malty with a balancing hop bitterness, though without much in the way of actual hop flavor. The graininess is as evident as it was in the nose, but is tolerable. An early sweetness gives way to a dry, medium length finish. The body is acceptable for a lager and is more full than some.

Capitol 1900 is a drinkable beer, no more than that. Its good points are negated by its bad points and I'm left without strong feelings in either direction. I'd drink another if it was offered, but I won't be buying it again.

Serving type: bottle

04-13-2004 22:39:26 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of ALESwhatCURESya


3.63/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pretty nice look to this beer. A nice dark gold color and a sweet smelling aroma. There is a very smooth sweetness at first and it finishes dry. This would be a wonderful summer beer. I am not the biggest fan of wheat beers, so this would be a choice for me on a hot day! Nothing spectacular about this beer, but very smooth and refreshing.

Serving type: bottle

02-19-2004 01:15:53 | More by ALESwhatCURESya
Photo of Reneejane


3.25/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Capitol's imitation lager, really. This was the kind of beer that miller light beer drinkers can quaff, but other than that, there isn't much here.

It pours a pale straw yellow suffused with plenty of bubbles to form a white head. The taste is yeasty, and it finishes with a yeast flavor afterwards.

Serving type: can

01-21-2004 00:32:51 | More by Reneejane
Photo of WVbeergeek

West Virginia

3.43/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Appearance: Slightly hazy golden hue with a nice sized white head leaves behind nicely dispersed layers of lace. Aroma: Clean sweetness grainy but nice no unpleasant tones here. Taste: Biscuit malt sweetness no complaints easy drinking with some substantial hop character. Mouthfeel: Light bodied lager but crisp finish and healthy carbonation. Drinkability: Effortless not a beer I would crave but one that definitely is easily consumed.

Serving type: bottle

01-11-2004 02:17:39 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of stoutman


3.28/5  rDev -3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Beer has a nice gold color. Formed a nice white bubbly head that subsided and left some nice lace with a fairly steady carbonated stream of bubbles. . A citrusy aroma and taste of hops and lemon. Light malt finish. An OK beer, but there are better pilsners out there.

Serving type: bottle

12-31-2003 02:28:11 | More by stoutman
Photo of chilidog


3.75/5  rDev +10.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

As part of the fall tasting tour, I got One 1900. Capital says start with this brew, as its the more basic of the beers. It pours a clear golden straw color. The head was a upper carbonated white. It fades to a thin film, no lace is left. The aroma is grainy, bread-like. The taste is also grainy, crisp and clean. The mouth is left crisp and clean as well. I found this to be a very easy drink.

Serving type: bottle

11-22-2003 04:23:14 | More by chilidog
Photo of hotstuff


3.15/5  rDev -6.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

When poured into my glass, the head was small in size with a white hue and it consisted of fine-small bubbles that quickly dissipated. The body was carbonated and hazy with a yellow-gold hue. The nose was malty, sweet, and fruity. The flavor was sweet and fruity tasting wtih a smooth, thin, watery texture and it was light bodied. Not a beer that I particulary cared for by this brewer.

Serving type: bottle

11-01-2003 22:17:12 | More by hotstuff
Photo of maxpower


3.55/5  rDev +5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Clear golden color with a nice white foamy head that doesn't last long , light earthy hay and corn aromas, nice balanced grainy flavor, light bodied with a crisp carbonated mouthfeel, finishes with a light corn sweetness, a great refreshing summer beer, very drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

10-16-2003 14:00:30 | More by maxpower
Photo of moulefrite


3.5/5  rDev +3.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours the color of a gold brick, and sports a good pillow of fluffy, creamy white head. Leaves a solid patchwork of lace till the end. Some corn and grain are picked up on the nose, as well as a slight, sweet buttery aroma. In the mouth the beer is light to medium bodied with good cleansing carbonation and moderate creaminess. The flavors are again grain driven with a slight rye twang that overshadows the malt component, which does not show itself much. Apparently this is the original Schlitz recipe from before prohibition times! I applaud Capital for the research, effort, and most importantly the passion in presenting this offering. A solid beer that will wash down a dog with alacrity. Go Cubs!!

Serving type: bottle

10-03-2003 03:02:55 | More by moulefrite
Photo of DrunkMcDermott


3.45/5  rDev +2.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

As pale American lagers go, this is better than most. No off-tastes, a fine yellow color with just a slight haze. Noticable malt presence is balanced by a just-detectable fruity hop presence. But there is a noticable touch of corn to keep the color light.

Serving type: bottle

09-17-2003 18:55:57 | More by DrunkMcDermott
Photo of ZAP


3.13/5  rDev -7.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a light golden color...little white lace that rims the glass...nose is subtle floral hops and sweet, almost corny maltiness...Body is about right for this style...carbonation is medium...flavor features pretty basic lager characteristics but also some breadiness...seems more of a helles lager though....finishes a little dry...Don't really like the aftertaste/finish...a bit of an odd flavor....

Overall this is OK...their Bavarian Lager is considerably better....This is better than a lot of Macros but not by a huge margin....worth trying....I won't purchase again...

Serving type: bottle

09-16-2003 04:06:03 | More by ZAP
Photo of Tballz420


3.45/5  rDev +2.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

This one is a clear golden color, with lots of little carbonation bubbles swimming around off the pour. At the top is a white head. It has a nice, crisp taste, bringing to mind a few pils iv e had recently. While there isnt much going on with this, it is much better than your average pale lager. I just wouldnt buy it again because this isnt my style of beer.

Serving type: bottle

09-06-2003 18:28:08 | More by Tballz420
Photo of MJR


3.4/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Appearance: Pours a brilliantly clear gold highlighted by countless carbonation bubbles fighting their way to the top. What begins as a thick white head soon shrinks to a thin, mostly complete cap with random lacing.

Smell: The aroma starts out with a bready malt note, then opens up with a touch of herbal hops. Overall, the nose is quite faint and subdued, but remarkably clean.

Taste: Light and delicate, with the palate widely dominated by a light graininess and malty sweetness. There's a bit of a corn flavor, which I'd guess is from it being employed in the grainbill, rather than a DMS side-effect of the brewing process. The hops barely even show up, offering only a hint of a herbal flavor and slight bitterness. Finishes very clean with a bready, malt sweetness.

Mouthfeel: Crisp and clean, with a body that's light and smooth.

Drinkability: Average. This is a clean and mellow brew. It has no damning flaws, except for maybe a lack of character. While this beer goes down easily enough, I'd prefer something with more going on.

Serving type: bottle

07-22-2003 04:46:42 | More by MJR
Photo of Shiloh

Ontario (Canada)

3.88/5  rDev +14.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A very nice brew by the Capital Brewery. Arrived as a medium golden with a lot of bubbly action which quickly disappated leaving a mild center lace with some glass ring and cling.
The body is a medium and the nose is short lived and very slight of grain.
The taste is evenly balanced with a slight edge to the mallts.
Certainly a session brew if I lived near by.

Serving type: bottle

07-03-2003 18:06:33 | More by Shiloh
Photo of tavernjef


4/5  rDev +18.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Nice clear yellow in color with lots of bubbles flowing within, has a one finger high head of bright white puffy foam with some big bubbles located on top, gets light stringy lace. Smell is sweet malts, very crisp and fresh, floral and grassy-like hops finish it off with a light toastyness. Taste is sweet, a touch of sharpness, subdued malts but still quite sweet, fresh, with a decent hop bitterness that shows a light floral quality with a bit of grass and spice. Feel is pretty full, smooth and lingering creamyness and a solid airy dryness into the finish. Quite drinkable for sure, easy going and pleasing.

Serving type: bottle

06-16-2003 16:15:45 | More by tavernjef
Photo of AtLagerHeads


3.6/5  rDev +6.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A crystal clear dark gold body topped with a small ultra-white head. The head dropped quickly and left a thin layer to create ring lacing that did do quite well. The nose is of light caramel malt with some grassy hints from the light hopping. The taste is much better than a typical macro, the body is perfectly appropriate to the style, and the finish is nicely crisp and clean. A very nice lager that would be good for an evening of sociable sipping.

Serving type: bottle

05-14-2003 16:15:54 | More by AtLagerHeads
Photo of bditty187


3.6/5  rDev +6.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Slightly tawny-gold hue, translucent, small white head, fair retention, some lace. Gritty, grainy nose, sweet too… the malt is found here, as is an adjunct (corn most likely). Decent palate, sweet yet malty… the nose would indicate the taste would be grainy… it is far from it, very smooth and buttery (not in a negative way). Hints of hay, grass. The bitterness is minimal. Nicely done. Light-medium body. Drinkable. While this beer is not something I’d seek out I do realize its positive merits.

Serving type: bottle

04-06-2003 17:57:54 | More by bditty187
Photo of drizzam


3.35/5  rDev -0.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

My first foray into the world of the Capital brewery started with the 1900. It poured a clear gold color with a smallish white head that really didn't leave much of a lace. On drinking it I noticed it to have a thin but somewhat creamy mouthfeel, the taste being maltier and low on hops...somewhat bready as the beer warmed up a bit. I wasn't at all disappointed with this selection, I may have to partake again in the future.

Serving type: bottle

03-26-2003 12:51:59 | More by drizzam
Photo of BeerBuilder


3.5/5  rDev +3.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours to a clear golden color, with a white head. Leaves a bit of lacing when sipped down. The aroma is grainy and sweet. The flavor has a bit of a grain taste, but also a bready flavor. It has more malt flavor than most American lagers. The hop bitterness is evident, but low. Overall it is an easy drinking, smooth beer; a tasty brew with more flavor than most American lagers.

Serving type: bottle

01-15-2003 06:00:46 | More by BeerBuilder
Photo of brakspear


4/5  rDev +18.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

I think this beer gets lower reviews than it deserves because there is now a prejudice against any beer using corn adjuncts. But this isn't a modern macro, but a pre-prohibition American pilsner that is a fine representation of a classic Middle Western American beer style. This is probably similar to what our great grandparents drank in Chicago, Milwaukee, and Detroit before being called up to fight the Kaiser.

The beer pours golden with nice carbonation and a soft white head that lingered long in my glass. Very nice.

The aroma is a smooth blend of malty six-row barley, corn sweetness and unasuming hop spice.

I really thought the taste was refreshing, a much maltier beer than modern American lagers, the corn was evident, but it actually makes the beer rather tasty. The hops are not as noticeable as I would like, but are present to a greater degree than modern beers.

Capital has re-discovered a very nice beer style, refreshing, easily drinkable, but still full-flavored. I may add this as a regular to my beer cave.

Serving type: bottle

01-13-2003 17:16:12 | More by brakspear
Photo of Winter


2.6/5  rDev -23.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured a dark golden color with a white head. Aroma consisted of corn, malt, hops and an increasing "bready" aroma as the beer warmed. Light bodied and creamy mouthfeel. Pleasant crispness with a mildly hoppy finish. This was okay, but something I'd probably not pursue again.

Serving type: bottle

01-07-2003 21:34:02 | More by Winter
Photo of feloniousmonk


3.43/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Big white head, clear, pale yellow appearance. Honey and floral notes on the nose. Smooth, mellow. I'm not a lager lover, but I didn't dislike this one. Decent, if only to the point of inoffensiveness.
Not something I'd purchase again, but I won't slander it either.

Serving type: bottle

12-09-2002 16:19:21 | More by feloniousmonk
Photo of Realale


2.35/5  rDev -30.5%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Very nice full golden color. Head dissipates quite quickly.

Nose is very malty sweet, with a good dose of creamed corn. Little hop present at all.

Palate is very grainy. Lots of malt and definitely a detectable element of corn. Quite sweet initially, although not as sweet as it smells, but balances out somewhat by the finish. This tastes like it did not ferment out fully, and someone forgot at least one of the hop additions!

Certainly accomplishes the ramped-up malt and corn profile of a pre-prohibition American lager, but this was definitely out of balance. Hopefully, just batch variation (based on reading other BA reviews) and not a permanent change to the recipe, but this was not a good beer, and certainly not up to the standard of other Capital offerings I've had. I tasted a second bottle from the same six pack, and it tasted the same. Purchased in Wisconsin, only about 60 miles from the brewery.

Serving type: bottle

11-19-2002 12:09:20 | More by Realale
Photo of Dogbrick


2.48/5  rDev -26.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Pretty ordinary Pils. Part of a Capital sampler pack so I am trying to work my way up the chain. Shouldn't be too hard to beat this one. Slight hops aroma, mildly smooth refreshing flavor but pretty bland overall.

Serving type: bottle

10-18-2002 08:13:57 | More by Dogbrick
Capitol 1900 from Capital Brewery
78 out of 100 based on 58 ratings.