1. Don't miss our 7th annual American Craft Beer Fest featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers this May 30 & 31 in Boston, MA! Buy your tickets now!
  2. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Phin & Matt's Extraordinary Ale - Southern Tier Brewing Company

Phin & Matt's Extraordinary AlePhin & Matt's Extraordinary Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

1,267 Ratings
THE BROS
79
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1267
Reviews: 604
rAvg: 3.54
pDev: 14.12%


Brewed by:
Southern Tier Brewing Company visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  5.70% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: wailingwench on 10-29-2004)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Phin & Matt's Extraordinary Ale Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 1,267 | Reviews: 604 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of KYGunner
KYGunner

Kentucky

3.69/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Very light but shimmering golden coloring it had a soapy head of white foam.

The nose had a nice tea leaf, brewed tea, barley malt, lemon hop and a small bit of cannabis.

The tea leaf malt flavor seems most prevalent but it balances well with a lemony, floral hop. A grainy barley is noticeable and it couples with a roasted nut. I even detected some hinge root.

The feel is full enough to be satisfying, but smooth and light enough to be sessionable.

Calling it an Extraordinary Ale may be an overstatement but it is very well balanced and just plain good.

Serving type: bottle

04-02-2014 01:38:29 | More by KYGunner
Photo of WhiteHillsStore
WhiteHillsStore

Connecticut

3.7/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

A very good beer. The appearance is a nice hazy yellow with a nice cream colored head. The smell was full of hops and malt. The taste was great with hints of citrus taking a back seat to the malt and just a very satisfying brew. It isn't a weird or terribly complex beer but it is well balanced and incredibly satisfying. All in all, a very nice beer that I would recommend to someone looking to get into craft beer as an intro into how much better beer can be than the standards.

Serving type: bottle

03-29-2014 22:01:19 | More by WhiteHillsStore
Photo of BucannonXC5
BucannonXC5

California

3.68/5  rDev +4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Type: 12-oz. bottle
Glass: 16-oz. glass
From: Eddy’s Beverage Inc. in Saratoga, N.Y.
Price: $15.99 for a variety 12-pack
Purchased: Jan. 15, 2014
Consumed: Jan. 19, 2014
Misc.: DOB on Aug. 30, 2013

Poured a honey golden orange semi-hazy color with 2-to-3 fingers of frothy white head. Above average-to-good lacing on the sides. Above average retention on the top.

Smelled wet Cascade hops, pine, soap, floral hops, citrus hops and light rye.

Tasted bitter rye hops, resin hops, floral hops, honey, amber notes and some unknown spices.

Light-to-medium body. Oily texture. Average-to-lively carbonation. Abrupt finish.

A decent beer overall, but not great.

Serving type: bottle

01-25-2014 05:42:13 | More by BucannonXC5
Photo of dhannes
dhannes

Wisconsin

3.64/5  rDev +2.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

A gift from my brother...poured chilled into a Perfect Pint.

A=Slightly murky golden color, with a hint of orange/amber. I can't quite place it, but it doesn't look like your typical beer. Frothy white head of about an inch that lasted over a minute.

S=Hint of grass and grapefruit, but so subtle that is not off putting.

T=Moderate hop taste, which I am finding rather pleasing...a tad sour, but hearty and robust...sufficient malt backbone as well. Slightly citrusy, slightly creamy.

M=Moderate body...a touch on the lighter side, which could make this a decent session beer.

O=A very nice beer that I could see buying again...my brother like this as well, so I will likely buy this again.

Serving type: bottle

01-01-2014 17:50:31 | More by dhannes
Photo of ryan1788a5
ryan1788a5

Massachusetts

3.75/5  rDev +5.9%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

12oz bottle poured into a pint glass.

A: Mildly hazed and golden in color. Thin white head dissipated quickly. Spotty lacing.

S: Hops greet the nose first with a multi dimensional aroma of flowers, freshly cut grass, and orange peel. Grainy and doughy malt scents underneath. Straightforward, but good.

T: Hops control this beer. Oily, floral, spicy, minty, citrus. Oily orange peel. Moderately strong bitterness. Grainy and doughy malt base is stifled by the hops. Finishes with a long lingering oily hop bitterness.

M: Medium bodied. Creamy. Sharp, aggressive carbonation adds a big crisp bite.

O: Not the most focused effort. The hops really run away with the show here. Still, you can get away with that these days. People are happy with one-dimensional, hoppy beers. And it stays drinkable enough to forgive this.

Serving type: bottle

11-09-2013 18:38:59 | More by ryan1788a5
Photo of StoutHunter
StoutHunter

Michigan

3.33/5  rDev -5.9%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

I picked up a bottle of Southern Tier's Phin & Matt's Extraordinary Ale a couple weeks ago for $1.72 at Toskey Sands Market. Since I've been disappointed lately in Southern tier's larger format bottles I thought I would try some more of their 12oz bottles, so lets see how it goes. No visible bottling date. Poured from a brown 12oz bottle into an imperial pint glass.

A- The label looks ok it's got that typical Southern Tier 12oz format look to it and it's nice to know it's made with three different malts and three different hops. It poured a slightly cloudy golden color that took on more of a golden orange color when held to the light with a finger and a half worth of slightly off white head that quickly died down to a thin ring that stayed till the end and left some spotty lacing behind. This is a pretty nice looking beer, I have no complaints.

S- The aroma starts off with a higher amount of sweetness that had a light candy like aroma to it followed by a good amount of malts that impart a cereal and grainy aroma with some light caramel malt and bready aromas in the background. Up next comes some citrus and fruity hops with citrus rinds seeming to stick out the most and there's some earthy hops aromas in the background. The aroma is nice and pretty well balanced.

T- The taste seems to be pretty similar to the aroma and it starts off with a slightly higher amount of medium sweetness followed by a good amount of malts that impart a grainy, cereal, and light caramel malt flavors with some some bready flavors seeming to stick out the most. Up next comes the hops which impart a nice citrus rind flavor with a little bit of earthy hops in the background with a lower amount of bitterness with a grainy and citrus rind like aftertaste. This is a decent tasting beer that retains the good balance that the aroma had.

M- Smooth, crisp, clean, slightly watery, on the thicker side of being light bodied with a good amount of medium carbonation. The mouthfeel was alright but I thought it came off a little watery,

Overall I thought this was decent beer and it's fairly close to being an average American Pale Ale, it had some nice balance to it, but I didn't think that the malts and the hops clashed a little and I don't think they blended together as well as they could have. This beer had ok drinkability, it was smooth, crisp and clean, but the taste didn't do the greatest job at holding my attention so I think a one or two would be enough for me since it doesn't really keep me coming back for more. What I like the most about this beer was the appearance and balance, I thought they were both pretty nice and worked well with this beer. What I liked the least about this beer was the drinkability, it just didn't keep me coming back for more. I might recommend this beer to someone who likes Pale Ales that aren't that bitter, but I don't think that it will really stand out in the style for most people. I don't think I would go out of my way to buy this again, but I might order it at a bar if I saw it on draft. All in all I did't think this beer was that great, but it wasn't that bad either, it was kind of right in the middle and it didn't really have anything about it that made it stand out. Better luck next time Southern Tier, this beer just wasn't that memorable.

Serving type: bottle

11-02-2013 03:46:37 | More by StoutHunter
Photo of smakawhat
smakawhat

Maryland

3.51/5  rDev -0.8%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured from the bottle into a nonic pint glass.

A bright pale orange body, but a bit hazy and some fine carbonation. Head is fluffy and bleach white on the pour growing easily three fingers with whipped up retention.

Nose smells a little sweet. White sugar, slight candy like fruits. Not much malt, hop, sense or character going on to this.

Palate lands with similar hints of the nose. Mild sweetness and baby like aspirin. Slight medicinal bitterness in the finish but clean. Good malt depth but not much sense of a presence or angle. Tight carbonation twinge on first sip, but manages to tone itself down while consuming.

A rather run of the mill basic pale ale, but drinkable with nothing too off putting.

Serving type: bottle

10-23-2013 01:03:08 | More by smakawhat
Photo of a0lbudman
a0lbudman

Alabama

3.95/5  rDev +11.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A-clear gold color with a white head that laced the glass on the way down.
S-hops with citrus
T-hop flavor that lives you a hop aftertaste that fades with a caramel malt aftertaste
M-medium body that has a medium carbonation
O-the taste seems to be that of a darker beer with the color of a APA

Serving type: bottle

10-21-2013 01:10:23 | More by a0lbudman
Photo of delta490
delta490

Virginia

3.03/5  rDev -14.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A- a light caramel color. The head lasts only around the rim of the glass but does leave some lacing.

S- not much. some caramel-esque sweetness is all that I noticed

T- light malt sweetness and slight hops bitterness. It appears to be attempting an English Bitter, but lacks the malt robustness or hops balance. Feels like the flavor needs to be turned up.

M- thinner and a little watery.

O- it's not bad, but it just seems to miss the mark it was aiming for.

Serving type: bottle

10-07-2013 20:49:15 | More by delta490
Photo of Samp01
Samp01

New Jersey

3.36/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Pours a golden amber with a small short lived white head. Aroma and Taste of biscuit malt, citrus notes, some yeast and citrus floral hops. A medium crisp body on the palate with some good carbonation. Finish is biscuit malt, a bit of grains and cereal notes with some citrus flavor and floral citrus hops balance. A bit more lager than ale. Overall a good refreshing

Serving type: bottle

07-06-2013 17:39:34 | More by Samp01
Photo of Immortale25
Immortale25

North Carolina

3.7/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Poured into a Dogfish Spiegelau glass. DOB is 1/29/13.

A- Pours a medium amber color with a 1/2 inch head that retains a bit before retreating to a thin ring around the edge of the glass and a sheer sheet of surface foam. Resilient lacing leaves a thick ring behind on the glass.

S- Semi-sweet cereal grain malt aroma with some earthy hops backing it up. Notes of caramel and bread.

T- Nicely balanced hop/malt combo with more sweetness coming through plus some mild bitterness. The hops are more earthy and play off the cereal grain-like malt well.

M- Standard pale ale feel that's not too dry or sharp. Medium carbonation and a body that's a bit on the lighter side of medium.

O- I remember liking this beer a lot more when I first had it several years ago. Maybe I should have tried to find a fresher bottle for my review.

Serving type: bottle

06-23-2013 00:24:17 | More by Immortale25
Photo of Hoptopher
Hoptopher

Tennessee

2.99/5  rDev -15.5%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

I figured I should put it out there that this review is coming in on my third one of the evening.
Appearance is good, A golden light amber color. Smell is OK, not very strong. A little citrus a little pine. Not a whole lot going on with that. Taste is little better then the the smell. You get the same things, with a litte grapefruit bitterness from the hops and some bready taste from the malts. Mouthfeel is good, light and crisp. This a good beer for today since I've been busting my @$$ in the yard today and it's the hottest it's been all year.

Serving type: bottle

06-13-2013 22:51:07 | More by Hoptopher
Photo of utopiajane
utopiajane

New York

3.59/5  rDev +1.4%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours clear and light. Copper/gold with a fingers worth of foam that fell fast but left a skin and hung around on the sides of the glass. Spritzy looking with constant bubbles rising from the bottom. Nose is floral and herbal. Light orange and lemon citrus.A little pine, grass and corn. There’s even a touch of musty basement. Malt is bread and plenty of caramel. Taste is clean and smooth. Malt is cereal, bread, dough & caramel. Hops are light but stay with the nose. Slightly sticky mouthfeel and a lingering sweetness. Semi dry, creamy and very easy to drink. I thought this was a pleasant and easy to drink ale and while it wasn’t really extraordinary, you could drink a few of these.

Serving type: bottle

06-12-2013 10:30:31 | More by utopiajane
Photo of tittymcj
tittymcj

Connecticut

2.91/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Drank in a bar in Altoona, Pennsylvania.

Decent beer. Not a lot to distinguish it from any other pale ale, in my opinion. Almost the definition of average. Looks like it should, smells like it should, lacks a bit in mouthfeel.

I'd drink it again if none of the other options were new or interesting.

Serving type: on-tap

05-20-2013 13:47:30 | More by tittymcj
Photo of BeerYoss
BeerYoss

Pennsylvania

4.34/5  rDev +22.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.5

bottle

A- Crystal clear light gold; very little head and almost no lacing

S- orange spice, small hint of bitter hops

T- Nice subtle hit of hoppy bitterness up front followed by a tasty toasted malt. very nice balance between the strong, yet not overpowering, hops and the toasted malts. eminently drinkable

M- light to medium bodied. just a touch of carbonation

O- I really like this beer. The hops and malts are really balanced well and taste wonderful.

Serving type: bottle

05-11-2013 01:39:46 | More by BeerYoss
Photo of DrinkSlurm
DrinkSlurm

Connecticut

3.71/5  rDev +4.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Poured from tap at tap and mallet in Rochester ny. Pours an orangey golden color. Looks like a run of the mill pale ale. Subtle hop aroma and bready malt. Taste is crisp bready malt - biscuit I guess with a nice hop balance. Easy drinker but a bit bitter and dry finish almost tanic. Its a solid brew just not my fav.

Serving type: on-tap

04-25-2013 00:29:26 | More by DrinkSlurm
Photo of NiceTaps
NiceTaps

New Jersey

3.88/5  rDev +9.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

12oz bottle poured into a room temp pint glass.

A- It pours a clean light golden-amber color with a slim half-finger head that leaves some lacing. There's gentle bubbling which may explain the sparse head and lacing.

S-There's no denying the pale malts: bicuity, bready, yeasty, some sweet caramel balanced by a slight bitterness.

T- A pretty tasty bread basket. Moist breads and sweet malts. Quite good for such a low hop profile.

M- All that maltiness adds up to some chewy solid feel. Now the hops work their magic by keeping the sweets in check.

O-Extraordinary? Maybe not, but I could see this as a staple-like brew with the likes of a SNPA.

Serving type: bottle

04-14-2013 18:24:21 | More by NiceTaps
Photo of Jparker37
Jparker37

Wisconsin

3.59/5  rDev +1.4%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

12oz bottle poured into an oversized tulip.

S - Balanced. Nice grainy malt. Grassy hops, splash of citrus, spicy yeast reminiscent of a saison.

A - Golden in color with great clarity from a careful pour. Medium sized cap of rocky white foam. Fair amount of lacing.

T - Has some simple base malt flavor. Hop bitterness kicks-in early. Malt sweetness midway along with earthy hop flavor. Decently dry finish with short hop flavor after.

M - Medium-light body, medium-light carbonation, semi-dry.

O - The aroma is distinctly similar to a saison. More of an English hop emphasis with solid balance. Little sweet in the taste. Very drinkable good brew but a bit out of APA style. Not sure whether to grade it well for uniqueness or poor versus typical APAs.

Serving type: bottle

04-13-2013 02:05:42 | More by Jparker37
Photo of 57md
57md

Pennsylvania

3.45/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a light copper with a thin layer of head that dissipated almost immediately. This offering had a mildly hoppy and floral nose. The flavor is relatively thin with some dry hoppiness on the finish. This is a mediocre pale ale that is certainly not bad, but not even close to superb either.

Serving type: bottle

03-31-2013 07:02:18 | More by 57md
Photo of mtstatebeer
mtstatebeer

West Virginia

3.26/5  rDev -7.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

12 oz. bottle. Pours a clear golden color with, initially, a decent and frothy off-white head, diminishes quickly, fair lacing. Aroma is pale malts, caramel, bread, citrus and maybe a hint of pine. Flavor is bread and caramel malts, pine, grass, and a little bit of yeast. Mouthfeel is light-to-medium, a little watery, and a bitter finish. Easy drinking beer, not very complicated.

Serving type: bottle

03-29-2013 01:27:40 | More by mtstatebeer
Photo of rangerred
rangerred

Tennessee

2.93/5  rDev -17.2%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

12oz bottle into a pint glass.

Pours a clear light gold with a half finger white head. Decent head retention with the plentiful carbonation but just a few streaks of lacing.

The aroma has strong lemon/lime notes with a little bit of a musty basement scent. I can pick up some light bread from the malt too but there really isn't a whole lot going on.

The flavor has a quick shot of lemon, lime, and must but then it all just completely disappears. All that is left is a moderate to high drying bitterness and some bready malt. I really can't believe how quick the hops disappear seeing this was only bottled a couple months ago.

Overall, a sessionable beer but also a bit flavorless. Founders and Lagunitas both make great "session" IPA's with less alcohol but tons more flavor. While I know this isn't technically a session beer it is quite refreshing but lacking all around.

Serving type: bottle

03-26-2013 00:47:18 | More by rangerred
Photo of farrago
farrago

New Jersey

2.84/5  rDev -19.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.75

Average finger’s worth of just off-white foam, full mix of bubble sizes, lots of dimpling but decent retention, the lacing is thin but spreads into broad sheets and sticks nicely. Bright yellowish gold color with a touch of zinc or rust to deepen it, crystal clear with only a few random bubbles visible, looks kinda adjuncty. The nose is grainy with a strong pepper component, also offers pizza crusts, cornmeal and some orange to lemon citrus to sweeten it up, same for the vague apricot, peach fruit accents, becomes leafier and greener as it warms. Medium-bodied, has some prickle to it and seemingly intentional bitter bite, on the hoppy side for an APA. Then it has the resinous feel without the pine flavor. More of the pepper, rye to pumpernickel bread, mineral water and with larger presence of savory garden herbs than flowers. The tartness suggests a space reserved for grapefruit citrus and more tropical like pineapple, nectarine, papaya fruit but the chair left empty. Its overall dryness tends to distract, not that it lacks flow but you start getting bitter beer face.

Serving type: bottle

03-19-2013 00:10:21 | More by farrago
Photo of Treyliff
Treyliff

West Virginia

3.4/5  rDev -4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A- pours a transparent golden-yellow with a small whit head that reduces to skim the surface

S- sweet sugary malt, light floral hop, cooked corn and grainy hop

T- grainy malt turns slightky sweet, the finish provides a bit of floral hop with some lemony-citrus tartness and slightly bitter linger.

M- light body, medium spritzy carbonation, with a slightly foamy mouthfeel and finish

O- nice and light, enough flavor to let you know it's their but still easy drinking pale ale

Serving type: bottle

02-21-2013 04:22:05 | More by Treyliff
Photo of BlackBelt5112203
BlackBelt5112203

South Carolina

3.45/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle poured into a nonic pint glass at fridge-cellar temperaute.

L – Pale amber color with a 1.5-finger bubbly, frothy, white head. Pretty nice retention and some great lacing. Clear with a good amount of bubbles.

S – Bready, biscuity, and grainy malts with grapefruit, lemon, grassy, and somewhat floral hops. It’s kind of hard to pick out the elements of hop bouquet on this one, but this is the best I can muster.

T – It starts off sweet with bready, biscuity, and cereal malts with a hint of caramel. Bitter hops appear towards the finish with lemon rather than grapefruit, grassy, and slightly herbal notes. There’s something else going on here with the hop profile, but I can’t put my finger on what it is.

F – Medium-bodied with good carbonation, a sticky and creamy but crisp mouthfeel, and a mildly bittersweet and dry finish. Bittersweet malt and hop flavors linger on the tongue for a bit but not for too long.

O – This is a pretty good pale ale. The hop profile is interesting. It’s pretty tough to pick out all of the individual aromas and flavors. It’s very different than any other APA that I’ve had, and unfortunately not in a great way. It’s not a bad beer by any stretch, but something about the aroma and flavor just seems “off,” and I can’t really put my finger on what it is. Regardless, it is a drinkable and refreshing beer and I’m glad that I tried it.

Serving type: bottle

02-18-2013 03:44:48 | More by BlackBelt5112203
Photo of peabody
peabody

Kentucky

3.69/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Pours out a clear yellow with one finger of white small creamy suds. No lacing to speak of.
Smell is slightly malty with very faint fruityness like lemon and the hop is in there too.
Taste is refreshingly clean and flavors of darkness follow the initial wateryness.
Second taste brings out the hop flavors and the bitter maltyness. This is a complex flavorful brew that is hard to pin down.
Mouthfeel is all over the place. It starts out very clean and refreshing then it gets slightly sticky and bitter then leaves the palate for just a tad then the dark bitterness sticks around in the back of the throat.
Overall this is a cool beer. I could see sessioning this one and using it as a great lawnmower beer. Very nice.

Serving type: bottle

02-02-2013 01:21:04 | More by peabody
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Phin & Matt's Extraordinary Ale from Southern Tier Brewing Company
80 out of 100 based on 1,267 ratings.