Tripel - Southern Tier Brewing Company

Not Rated.
TripelTripel

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
78
okay

198 Ratings
THE BROS
77
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 198
Reviews: 189
rAvg: 3.38
pDev: 14.2%
Wants: 2
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Southern Tier Brewing Company visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
Tripel |  9.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: John on 11-14-2004

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Tripel Alström Bros
Ratings: 198 | Reviews: 189
Photo of erosier
4.32/5  rDev +27.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

L: Pours an orange-yellow color with a short and medium bodied white colored head that fades fast to a ring around the beer. Not a whole lot of lacing down the glass.
S: Smells of sweet malts, some citrisy-fruity aromas, and some subtle yeast aromas.
T: Alot less strong than I thought it was going to be which was pleasent. Very sweet malts with some bitter ones mixed together for a nice malty base. Followed by a nice cirtisy fruit flavor and some subtle yeast flavors, followed by a nice slightly hoppy bitter finish.
M: Very crisp, lighter feeling with the right amount of carbonation.
D: Very drinkable beer as the amount of alcohol was not as easily detected as I thought it would be.

Photo of Vancer
2.68/5  rDev -20.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured this one into a snifter, clear amber with a wimpy white head - no lace to speak of.

A real bummer on the quaff - this is no more than an average American pale ale. No real fruit, Belgium yeast or candy cane. Just a floppy pale ale, has a crisp finish, but that's not really right for a tripel either. Booze is well hidden, but so what?

Really disappointed in Southern Tier with this one, this can and should do better

Photo of beerthulhu
3.32/5  rDev -1.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Poured a very clear pale orange color with a minimal head and lacing.

S: some yeasty hints of faint bananas and oranges but sadly doesn't translate to flavor.

T: pale grains, sweet oranges and some candi-sugar sweetness. There was a light fruitiness but not nearly as complex or dominant as one expects per style. A light floral hoppiness rounds things out. Lacked the cloudiness, complexity and yeasty bite most associated per style as well a good complexity of fruitiness. The flavor overall was rather subdued and muddled with no real strong traits contributing to the overall flavor.

M: thin, dry, with a mild carbonation and rather lackluster.

D: Overall just a moderately average beer, not particularly fit to style. Heh. No real incentive to try again.

Photo of TheManiacalOne
3.7/5  rDev +9.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 22oz. bottle into an imperial pint glass.

A: The beer is a cloudy amber color, with a short off-white head that fades quickly and leaves a spotty lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is of Belgian yeast, light malts, spices, some fruit, some hops and some alcohol.

T: The taste is decently balanced with flavors of Belgian yeast, tart fruit, some spice and a little caramel. There's also a good hops presence and a hearty malt character. There's a small alcoholic sting as well. The after-taste is slightly spicy and slightly sweet.

M: Crisp and smooth, medium body, medium carbonation, finish is slightly sticky.

D: Tasty, goes down easy, not too filling, strong kick, good representation of style, this is a pretty good beer to drink for a while if you're in the mood for the style, but it's a certainly not a pounder.

Photo of mtbbaboon
3.7/5  rDev +9.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from a 22oz bottle into a pint glass. I really need to get myself a tulip glass. The color is a clear light gold. I'd expect a little more haze with an anability to see through the beer. Very thin head. Everything else about this beer is mild. Very mild smell of malt and citrus that doesn't really excite the nostrils. The taste is also mild with barely a hint of alcohol. Slight bitterness lingers after the swallow. Feels smooth in the mouth and goes down easy. This beer provides only a mild experience for the senses, but there is a place for mild beers on my beer shelf. You'd never know this was a 9% ABV beer.

Photo of scruffwhor
3.04/5  rDev -10.1%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Picked up a 22oz bomber at Sal's in Elmhurst.

The reveals A golden amber/orange color with no head and no bubbles. Good color, but lacking in all other departments for this style of beer. The aroma Has a light, sugary citrus amidst an herbal backbone. But very faint at that. The taste brings some sugary malts up front on some water crackers. Some light herbal notes. Must be the chammomile. Pretty bland for a tripel, but warming. A little lacking overall from this otherwise great brewery. Need to work on the tripel style a bit more.

Photo of spointon
3.05/5  rDev -9.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

I poured this one from a 22 oz brown bottle into a La Fin Du Monde tulip glass.

A= Poured a slightly chill-hazey gold color. With a fairly agressive pour, all I got was a 1/2 inch white head that quickly dissappeared completely. Very little ongoing carbonation release and no lacing to speak of.

S= At first smell, I detected a whiff of something I perceived to be traditional Belgian funky yeast. Subsequent sniffing only yielded slight hints of orchard fruits, herbal notes, and alcohol. Not a fragrance beer at all.

T= A bit too hoppy for the style and nowhere nearly "funky" enough. Definite phenolic flavors in the middle. Not a great finish either as it was dry, bitter, and a bit alcoholic.

MF= Medium body was made to feel heavier as it lacked that Belgian effervescence that I adore.

D= This is not bad beer, its just a lousy example of a tripel. The ingredients listed on the bottle include coriander and orange peel. Maybe these contribute to the off flavors, as they are more normally found in a Belgian Wit.

Photo of BeenJammin
3.78/5  rDev +11.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A - Nice golden hue with a finger sized head

S - Strong malty presence with a bit of fruit and a hint of hops

T - Really strong on the malty flavors but not as much of the fruits that the nose would suggest. There is a slight bit of hop bitterness at the end

M - It is medium bodied and has a sort of sticky feeling to it. Lots of carbonation

D - I enjoyed this beer. Only the second Tripel that I've had so I'm sure that there is even more to this style.

Photo of bassmantin
3.34/5  rDev -1.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours a bright golden orange/yellow with a minimal head. Nice glowing color. Side note - the painted labeling was peeling off the bottle and flaked a little bit, which sucked.

The smell and taste are much different than most tripels I have had... and not in a good way. The malts are much thicker and sweeter with none of that great Belgian sweetness and tanginess that I love in tripels.

This one more resembles a doppelbock or maybe an amber ale. This one just doesn't taste like a tripel to me. I'm disappointed.

Photo of BEERchitect
3.13/5  rDev -7.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

American brewers who do not specialize in Belgian styles, usually are a bit suspect. The pour adds to the apprehension as a firm malty head begins to form, but not the aggressive carbonation or the rocky, froathy head that is typical of Tripels. Aromas are cleanly malted and a bit spicy, but not with the acidic, fruity, dry, spicy character that is needed. Flavors are favorable beer-wise, but very little in the way of Tripel (or Belgian for that matter) character. Light spiciness, elevated alcohol, and moderate fruitiness are all that are borrowed from the intended style. Overly sweet with malts, heavy texture, American hops, and timid tartness that would come from Belgian yeast are among the problems with the beer. Although the beer does not meet the style, the beer is a good beer with very few off flavors.

Photo of asabreed
2.14/5  rDev -36.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Bomber into a Corsendonk tulip.

Appearance: Oddly enough this gets a bit less volatile and dense as it warms, but it leaves decent rings around the glass, soapy and clumpy white, and billows up nicely initially and slows slowly, but like I said, as it warms it becomes less attentive in those fields, which usually is the case when it's colder. All atop a nice golden yellow body with nice streams of carbonation surging within the glass.

Smell: Too big of an alcohol burn, even in the nose, as it warms, with unbalanced out of whack sweetness and no way, in my opinion, to really tell this is a tripel. No hints of yeast or esters, maybe mild candi sugar, and that's about it. Not much fruit. Very weak and disappointing. How are the hops dominating the finish? Or is this just unbalanced and odd bitterness?

Taste: This is barely making the average rating for me, as there's not much to discern. Candi sugar and malt flavors dominate, with not much sense of yeast or esters, mild citrus from the hops, and a finish of mild herbal hops, malts, and candi sugar. A domestic to be certain, but I wish I had paid a lot less if I knew it was going to be like this.

Mouthfeel: Full-bodied, too sticky and cloying, and not enough carbonation.

Drinkability: Wow. A huge, beyond huge disappointment. I don't even think I'd have been able to tell this was the style if I was blindfolded, and that's a bad thing. Beyond a poor domestic rendition, and this should be a beer that they nix for the future. I still want to try more Southern Tier brews, but man, this one's just plain not worth it by all accounts, and it's not getting me psyched to fork over the cash for more, no matter how high the rating might be, and no matter how much I like the style. I want my money back.

Photo of czfreeman
3.53/5  rDev +4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a hazy golden straw color, capped by a nice two finger frothy head. Active carbonation bubbling after head settles.
This beer is very floral in the aromas, lots of sweet peaches, hops, oranges.
taste is not exceptional. It is good, a decent Tripel, but not mind-blowing. Taste is not as powerful as the nose, a slightly watered-down version of the peaches, but the sweetness is definatley, at times a little too much.
Drinkiablity is kind of low due to the sweetnes and lack of carbonation tartness. If youre looking for a De-Dolle-Dulle-Teve-jump-out-of-youre-seat-and-laugh-because-its-so-damn-good-experience, buy the De Dolle.

Photo of jar2574
3.11/5  rDev -8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Nice looking, yellowish pour, with a hefty head of small white bubbles that cling to the glass on the way down. Unfortunately, the appearance is the best part of this beer.

Smell is sweet, but not strong enough to warrant a higher rating. Kind of faint, and just a tad bit stale.

Flavor is average, especially considering that this is a tripel, one of my favorite types of beer. Slightly acidic. That's odd for a tripel. There's a touch of sweetness, but not enough yeastiness. Not complex, mostly malty, slightly sweet and leaves a bad aftertaste.

It leaves a filmy residue that doesn't taste great. Good try, but won't buy it again.

Photo of zeff80
3.9/5  rDev +15.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

A - Poured out a golden amber color with flecks of amber. A small, fizzy white head left some trails of lace.

S - It smelled of grapefruit, corriander and yeast.

T - It had a nice yeasty flavor mixed with candy sugar, and fruity sweetness.

M - It was crisp and sharp. A light to medium-bodied beer with a warm alcohol presence.

D - This is a nice tripel. Really good blend of sweet flavors.

Photo of jdoncbus
3.83/5  rDev +13.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured the carbonated beverage into a Duvel tulip glass. A nice golden, hay colored appearance with a bubbly two finger head. Oily lacing occurs but nothing too heavy.

Nose has a certain sour, doughiness to it with notes of yeast and faint peppery hops. Can make out very mild citrus rind, lemon grass and orange as well. Very distant alcohol smell.

Oily and crisp on the palate. The candied malt is the initial flavor to leap out, consisting of a semi-toasted flavor combined with a caramel and brown sugar finish. The hop presence rounds out the experience with coriander, lemon and pepper. The mouth is left nicely dry and the tongue puckering for another drink.

I am no expert with tripels but I am beginning my journey towards Belgians and especially the American spin on things. I enjoyed this beer quite bit and found the alcohol to be well hidden though you should take cautionary measures because it does pack a punch. I love Southern Tier and find this to be another notch in their well-respected headboard.

Photo of stemcell001
3.2/5  rDev -5.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a 22 oz. bomber.
Nice appearance, golden slightly amber with a thin white head that leaves some nice lacing ion my glass.
I smell the orange peel and coriander before any of the sugar and malts.
Taste - Again I get hit first with coriander and orange peel. I almost miss the hops completely until halfway through the glass. If they restrained the spices in this one and let the malt body and alcohol shine through more, it would have increased the drinkability. As it is, I had some difficulty finishing the entire bomber.

Photo of ColForbinBC
3.38/5  rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

22oz bomber served in a tulip

Pours a golden amber with a tint of orange and a small, half a finger bone white head. A small whitecap hangs around and leaves minor lacing. A very small amount of carbonation for a tripel.

Smells of candied sugar, grapefruit and oranges, flowers, coriander, and an alcohol warmth.

Taste is of coriander, pale malts and bittering german hops. The spiciness is a bit much and doesn't let the other flavors really shine through. As it warms however, the bitterness of the hallertau and saaz start to pull through.

Creamy and medium bodied.

Not hard to drink, but not easy either. The coriander really hits hard and poses a bit of an issue.

Overall, this isn't the best southern tier offering I have ever had. They probably ventured a little outside of their comfort zone on this belgian. They took a fair stab at it, but it came up a little short in the end.

Photo of russpowell
3.91/5  rDev +15.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Got this from beeronthebrain, cheers Khen!

Pours an effervescent bronze with a pinky of pearl white head. Some lacing & head retention

S: Cereal, lemons, pepper & perfumy hops.

T: Leafy hops, apricot, & honey up front. Nice fruitless follows, as this warms. Leafy hops, light lemon hop & grapefruit hop, apple peels all show as this warms. Finishes with nice citrussy hops & good fruityness

MF: Medium-bodied, low carbonation but a good hop balance

Drinks pretty easy for the style, the hops don't quite seem right to me, but not bad. An above servicible take on the style

Photo of hellcatsjg
3.78/5  rDev +11.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Cloudy orange with a slight layer of foam that last for the whole glass.

Smell: Light aroma of citrus, malts, and grassy hops.

Taste: Nice crisp flavor that starts with a sweet citrus flavor and transitions over to a spicy hop flavor into the swallow.

Mouthfeel: Medium body but quite creamy feeling. The flavor coats the mouth well and leaves a nice flavor.

Drinkability: Would be higher scored if the beer was not a belgian Tripel. While delicious, the beer is hoppier than I think the style should be. Very good brew that is not a great representation of the style. Definitely worth a try though.

Photo of Proteus93
3.3/5  rDev -2.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: A light gold, poured into a Unibroue snifter. A decent, sticky puff of head.

S: Apple peel, more hoppiness than I might expect for the style, and a touch of cloves and spininess.

T + M + D: The flavour is a quite herbal and hoppy. Rather bitter, a little bit of that being the Curaçao coming through. Not quite as smooth as I'd hope, with a bit of biting bitterness, but overall it's tolerable. I don't know if I could call it a "Belgian style ale" at the end of the day, though.

Photo of beachbum1975
3.06/5  rDev -9.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I got this beer as my Mystery beer from Southern Tier's seasonal 12-pack. It was a 12 oz. bottle poured into my St. Bernardus chalice.

Appearance: Light, clear apricot in color. A small amount of suds on the initial pour, but no head after a minute.

Smell: Slight wheat, yeasts and candied sugars detected. Not a whole lot on the nose.

Taste: Light to medium bodied, Belgium candied sugars and light yeast and alcohol taste on the finish.

Mouthfeel: Light and sweet drinker with ample carbonation, even though the head wasn't apparent on the beer.

Overall a nice, easy drinker. Not my favorite tripel, but it was balanced and enjoyable at the least.

Photo of kindacold
4/5  rDev +18.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Not bad. I give this beer a solid 4 all the way through. Looked light and clean, smelled like a tripel should smell, tasted pretty darn good, and went down easy. I'd get this again, but there are definitely MUCH better tripels out there.

The one thing I ABSOLUTELY LOVE is that they list almost ALL of their ingredients on the side of the bottle. Looks like I'll be trying to brew this one this summer!!

Photo of Antilochus
3.82/5  rDev +13%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

22oz bottle to myself at Chaucer's in London, Ontario. 9.00% abv. Into a tulip(ish) glass.

Cloudy golden-orangey body under a decent white head. Poor retention, white collar.

Nose is very fruit-forward. Kiwi, pineapple at first then apples and pears. Alcohol noted. Pale malt and yeast also apparent.

Palate is surprisingly bitter. This is not a traditional tripel. Raw hop oil, woodiness, with a super bitter finish. As it warmed the profile changed. More fruit: apples, pineapple, chocolate. Medium mouthfeel, with substantial pale malt sweetness.

An interesting brew: I love tripels but this is not in the same league as other tripels or STs other offerings.

Photo of bort11
3.14/5  rDev -7.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

22 oz bottle poured into my Boulevard Smokestack goblet. Thin white head that quickly disappears. Spotty lacing at best. Color is a clear golden honey

Smell is faintly spicy with cloves, a hint of nutmeg, and dried apples. Taste is dominated by the cloves flavor and has a strong alcohol taste. Hints of pine and dried fruit.

Mouthfeel is a bit thin and the carbonation is crisp. I'm feeling the warmth in my chest. May or may not be a bad thing. This one is not wow-ing be. Seems a bit heavy handed and unbalanced.

Photo of shabbtastic
3.73/5  rDev +10.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - 22oz bomber into a tulip. Color was an orange haze with a huge bubbly white head. No lacing was going on and the carbonation was great.

S - Sweet citrus fruit such as orange, tangerine and pineapple we noticed. Bready yeast followed by a buttery biscuit.

T - Buttery up front followed by the sweet fruit of the citrus with a weak hop finish. Definitely a lot going on but overall it was pretty bland. This could be an exceptional beer bit it just misses the mark.

M - Medium bodied, slick finish.

D - Very drinkable, the alcohol is masked very well with the balance of the brew. I would reach for this one again; Southern Tier has yet to really disappoint me.

Tripel from Southern Tier Brewing Company
78 out of 100 based on 198 ratings.