1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Big Red (Imperial Red) - Southern Tier Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Big Red (Imperial Red)Big Red (Imperial Red)

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
very good

393 Ratings
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 393
Reviews: 320
rAvg: 3.88
pDev: 10.82%
Wants: 12
Gots: 3 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Southern Tier Brewing Company visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Ale |  9.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: oberon on 07-03-2006)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 393 | Reviews: 320 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Homebrew35


2.03/5  rDev -47.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

2008 bomber.
Pours with barely a half finger of head. Hardly a ring of lacing remains. Clear amber in color. Smells Carmely sweet and a sour twang, we suspected the bottles from this vintage to be infected and this definitely is. Tastes sweet and carmel, sour tart lactic acid, shoe leather, tart cherry, some hop bitterness. Hard to swallow after a few ounces. Medium full bodied, medium carbing. Overall this is a let down and sad to know that I've now had three different new and old infected bottles from ST.
Drain poured after 4 ounces shared among friends.

Serving type: bottle

04-10-2011 05:05:51 | More by Homebrew35
Photo of tjeppaint


2.25/5  rDev -42%

03-15-2012 23:25:11 | More by tjeppaint
Photo of beals


2.53/5  rDev -34.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

22oz bomber, poured into a snifter.

first impressions: hm, no "pop" when taking the cap off. something must be amiss.

a: pale, looks like slightly-reddish apple juice. expected this one to be darker, perhaps more opaque. i can see clean through it. no head. no bubbles at all.

s: alcohol, sweet caramel, some esters. slight citrus hop aroma.

t: alcohol, sweet hops, some fruity esters. no, and i mean *zero* carbonation, which throws the whole taste experience off.

m: zero carbonation. i think i must have gotten a bad bottle here.

overall: i was really excited about this beer going in, and i generally love ST's stuff, but this was a huge disappointment -- to the point where i would take it back to the store for a refund, if i hadn't already drank some of it. i know it's mostly due to the lack of carbonation, but you gotta have some QC here, guys.

Serving type: bottle

05-05-2011 01:14:44 | More by beals
Photo of ToddT


2.7/5  rDev -30.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A- Coppery red color with minimal cream colored head. The head quickly fades to a ring and leaves a light amount of lacing on the top of the glass.

S- Subtle aroma of hops more grassy than grapefruit or pine. Caramel and malt is in there too, but not much else.

T- Malt and a big rush of sweetness come at you first. This is then replaced by the bitterness of the hops and an astringent alcohol flavored finish. A little on the harsh side.

M- Thin in the mouth and lightly carbonated. Has that oily, not always pleasant, aftertaste of the hops.

D- Play of the sweetness and the bitterness is out of balance, more of a clash than a counterpoint. The 9.5% ABV is easily noted in the finish. Drinkable but not an easy one.

Needs more balance to make me a fan.

Serving type: bottle

03-13-2009 05:34:39 | More by ToddT
Photo of RonfromJersey

New Jersey

2.7/5  rDev -30.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Orange-gold body, excellent clarity, mild carbonation streams, topped by three fingers plus of off-white foam. Excellent lacing.

Nose is plenty of bread, with a strong candied sugar cookie bite at the front. A little too sweet.

Some nice malt notes on first taste, but the foundation doesn't quite set. Some earthy hops follow the slippery sweet malt, and temporarily overtake it. After a nice hop nip at the swallow, there's a sudden snap of over sweet alcohol at the finish, clashing with a lingering noble hop finish.

Mouthfeel is a bit sloppy, a bit too slick. The slight and sudden alcohol bite hurts drinkability.

A disappointment compared with much of Southern Tier's offerings. A solid idea, but this particular brew just never came together.

Serving type: bottle

10-11-2007 04:01:56 | More by RonfromJersey
Photo of hardy008


2.74/5  rDev -29.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Pours hazy amber with a small off white head, which has decent retention and lacing. The aroma has spicy hops, some earth, grass, and biscuit malt.

Tastes sweeter than expected, based on the aroma. there is caramel and biscuit malt, spicy hops, grass, and citrus zest. This was most likely hoppy when fresh. I didn't know until I checked this site that this ber is retired. Since there is no date on the bottle, I had no way of knowing I picked up an old beer. Since there is no bottle date, I am going to judge any problems I might have with this beer as the brewery's fault. It should be mandatory to date all cans and bottles.

Medium to full bodied, with low carbonation. There is a lingering spicy hop flavor, from the Hallertau hops. Not my favorite Southern Tier beer. I'm not sure if it would have been a lot better when it was fresh?

Serving type: bottle

11-03-2013 04:21:40 | More by hardy008
Photo of LilBeerDoctor

New York

2.83/5  rDev -27.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottle. Pours a clear amber with a small off-white head. Aroma of sweet malt, lemon, raisin, alight booze, some oxidation. Flavor is sweeter, with lots of malt, iced tea, prunes, and raisins. Not very good, not hoppy either. Could be an old bottle, but I'm really not sure. Meh.

Serving type: bottle

07-11-2009 14:51:33 | More by LilBeerDoctor
Photo of Arbitrator


2.85/5  rDev -26.5%
look: 5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 5 | overall: 2.5

Chilled bottle into a glass. I can't remember for the life of me who sent this one -- I think amietaj1 or busch03. Sorry guys, my trades are running together in my head. But I appreciate the bottle, and thank you to the sender.

A: Pours a hazy copper-amber body with a couple of inches of fluffy foam. Retention is impressively long; over 5 minutes the head collapses in sections before leaving a thick island clump on top, which floats around as I drink. There is also a thick collar around the edges that leaves some beautiful lacing down the sides of the glass.

S: Toast, caramel malt, and a bit of chocolate. The hops are floral and spicy, which makes for a pretty interesting aroma. Needs some agitation to bring it out though.

T: Something's off about this. The first few sips have a harsh and medicinal quality to them. The beer does have red characteristics, with caramel driving the flavor and toasted / chocolate malts fleshing it out. But it doesn't seem, well, "Big" as the name says. It's just "Red." The spicy and floral hops are kind of weak against the sweetness, and contribute more to the idea that this is just a hopped red ale. I also find that the choice of floral hops makes for a strange flavor contrast that I just can't get into. The finish is toasty, with no trace of the ABV.

M: Since the pour brought out a lot of the carbonation in the head, the result is a medium-bodied brew with low-moderate carbonation and a generally creamy effect. Absolutely well hidden ABV.

D: This is a very mellow imperial red. That's an accomplishment in itself, but it also makes the beer fairly unremarkable in its flavor profile. I don't think I'd really care to pick this up again.

Serving type: bottle

08-14-2009 04:20:50 | More by Arbitrator
Photo of Patrick999


2.88/5  rDev -25.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 2

I swear I like Hallertau hops, but they just don't do it for me here.

It looks like a big red ale. EXTREMELY clear orange-red, wow. That is one clear beer. Lots of active bubbles and foam.

Aroma is of pungent onion, leafy tobacco....interesting multi-faceted green noble hop smell. Whatever my opinion of the taste, it's pretty cool to have a hop bomb with different hops than are used in most other hop bombs.

I was good with Big Red up until I put it to my lips. Once again, it has that unpleasant dull Southern Tier bitterness! It seems that no matter what hops they use, they can't avoid it. Tastes like chewing on dirt, twigs and leaves, and not in a good way. This just isn't to my taste.

Pretty good creamy mouthfeel...for me this is a damned good beer in all categories except taste and drinkability.

Serving type: bottle

04-16-2010 21:13:30 | More by Patrick999
Photo of caddybuyer

New Jersey

2.93/5  rDev -24.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Gotta hand it to Southern Tier...I love those painted bottles

A-Veiled light amber IPA'ish look to it. Not quite what I expected for something classifed as a red/amber ale. Fluffy white head that settles rapidly.

S-Pine hops on the initial nose, with some malts in the background. I expected a bit more here.

T-When cold, the initial sip is overwhelmingly harsh, not in a bitter hops kind of way, but in a "this tastes like raw kerosene" kind of way. It searches all over for a kind of malt and hops balance, but just ends up being overpowering. As it warms, it mellows to more of a barleywine profile, but never quite ends up in the right place.

M-Medium mouthfeel, a bit over carbonated.

D-Not. A very unfinished feeling product. I'm guessing that with some cellaring it will mellow out a bit, and I intend to buy another and do just that to give it another chance.

Imperial Amber? I would classify this more as a barleywine...and as such, there are much better out there...

Serving type: bottle

03-04-2009 00:32:59 | More by caddybuyer
Photo of MMAJYK


3/5  rDev -22.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

From my notebook.

A- Honey gold with reddish highlights. Head is minimal, just a thin ring. Not very amber...

S- Honeylike malts dominate, touch of hops, touch of smoke and roast.

T- Sweet, no hops to compensate. Off balanced mess, actually.

M- Light and low carbonation.

D- Not a good beer. Off balanced and just all over the place.

Serving type: bottle

12-01-2008 18:14:34 | More by MMAJYK
Photo of IdrinkGas


3/5  rDev -22.7%

01-31-2012 05:47:02 | More by IdrinkGas
Photo of atone315


3/5  rDev -22.7%

12-31-2011 04:29:24 | More by atone315
Photo of clay23

New York

3/5  rDev -22.7%

07-03-2013 19:54:33 | More by clay23
Photo of ejimhof


3/5  rDev -22.7%

03-23-2013 16:24:22 | More by ejimhof
Photo of EasyReader

North Carolina

3/5  rDev -22.7%

11-24-2011 04:59:00 | More by EasyReader
Photo of Jspriest


3/5  rDev -22.7%

11-14-2011 17:56:42 | More by Jspriest
Photo of jophish17


3/5  rDev -22.7%

12-24-2011 07:37:21 | More by jophish17
Photo of Alex5

South Carolina

3/5  rDev -22.7%

12-10-2013 05:23:02 | More by Alex5
Photo of jfcaa193


3/5  rDev -22.7%

02-02-2012 03:14:08 | More by jfcaa193
Photo of jmarsh123


3.08/5  rDev -20.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a dark gold with a 1.5 finger white head.

Some sweet bready malt and spicy hops.

Starts off with a slight floral hop presence. Healthy amounts of caramel malt finishes with a dry earthy hop finish.

Medium mouthfeel with adequate carbonation.

Nothing overly complex. Would prefer a little bit bolder hop blend in this as the malt overpowers a bit.

Serving type: bottle

11-04-2011 00:09:09 | More by jmarsh123
Photo of sleazo

New York

3.08/5  rDev -20.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

A_Pours a hazy brown with slight hints of red. Decent off white head results in vertical whispy columns of lace.

S_Caramel malt dominates the nose with hints of grassy medicinal hops. There is also an iodine like quality here as well. The alcohol and malt make this smell more like a barley wine.

T_The Alcohol is more subdued in the taste. The caramel malt makes its presence known but it is backed up by a grassy and slightly spicy hop backbone. The finish lacks a burn fromt he % but produces a good balancing bitterness.

M_A bit sticky, mild carbonation.

D_This was purchased last summer. It seems like the type of beer that would have been very hot if drank immediately. I would say it is surpsirngly mellow alcohol wise but the overall flavour is strong. Definitely drinks more along the lines of a barleywine. This is another Southern Tier beer that pushes boundaries. To be honest I am not sure if the idea behind the beer makes complete sense(Hallertau in an American Imp Red?) but it is interesting.

Serving type: bottle

05-08-2008 02:35:48 | More by sleazo
Photo of mikesgroove

South Carolina

3.13/5  rDev -19.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

One of the next in the series of big beers from Southern Tier I was set to try. I grabbed this one out the night I got home from Vacation as I had been wanting something a little heavier and new. Served chilled from the cellar fridge and poured into a n oversized wine glass, this one was consumed on 10/14/2008.

The pour was rather non impressive. A nice light brown color with a good amount of cloudiness and haze to it. Not much in the way of a head reaching up through it at all, in fact it was rather lifeless on the first pour, though the second got a bit better. Nice side glass lacing towards then end and some moderate carbonation coming up through it.

The aroma was sweet, nice touches of caramel malts and an almost candy like sweetness that was wrapped up nicely in a bit of a grassy, earthy, hop like nose. The flavor was more of the same, but I have to admit I am not terribly impressed here at all with this. Lots of alcohol in the flavor here, a bit of a hotness that I have not seen in the rest of the series. Lots of grainy malts, touches of light caramel and a mostly understated hop flavor. Lingering taste of hot alcohol and grain left me hanging again as well as I really was expecting more from this here.

Overall I am not so sure about this one. I have been rather impressed by everything from Southern Tier up until now. This one really just left me kind of flat. Needed more depth in the flavor and more character for me.

Serving type: bottle

10-22-2008 10:43:50 | More by mikesgroove
Photo of ppoitras


3.15/5  rDev -18.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

22oz bottle purchased as a single from Julio's, Marlboro, MA.

Poured into an imperial pint glass, formed a 1/2" beige head over the slightly cloudy red brew. Head holds on nicely, with coating lacing. Aroma is balanced with grains and hoppy character. Flavor starts with a moderate maltiness, but is quickly overpowered by hops bitterness. The malt does make a comeback near the swallow, but then is quashed by the somewhat raw alcohol aftertaste. Mouthfeel and drinkability are both not working very well for me either. That parting blow of booze that lingers in the mouth just does nothing for me.

Serving type: bottle

11-29-2006 22:36:02 | More by ppoitras
Photo of jwinship83


3.15/5  rDev -18.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A- pours into the nonic a dark amber color with a finger of white foam. The head sticks around for a while and leaves spotty lacing along the sides of my glass

S- lots of bready malt and a little bit of fruity hops. Kind of a let down, I was expecting it to be very hoppy.

T- lots of malts. Caramel and bread like. Finishes with a small amount of piny or fruity hops.

M- medium bodied with ample carbonation.

D- one bomber was enough. I was kind of disappointed with this one, I remembered it being a lot hoppier last time. i don't think ill be checking this one out again for a while.

Serving type: bottle

01-30-2009 15:24:22 | More by jwinship83
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Big Red (Imperial Red) from Southern Tier Brewing Company
87 out of 100 based on 393 ratings.