1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Krampus (Imperial Helles Lager) - Southern Tier Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Krampus (Imperial Helles Lager)Krampus (Imperial Helles Lager)

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
88
very good

1,003 Ratings
THE BROS
91
outstanding

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,003
Reviews: 412
rAvg: 3.9
pDev: 12.31%
Wants: 83
Gots: 73 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Southern Tier Brewing Company visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial Pilsner |  9.00% ABV

Availability: Winter

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: brewdlyhooked13 on 07-15-2008)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Krampus (Imperial Helles Lager) Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 1,003 | Reviews: 412 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of aarunt1
1/5  rDev -74.4%

aarunt1, Nov 23, 2013
Photo of BrutusOrca
1/5  rDev -74.4%

BrutusOrca, Dec 28, 2011
Photo of NvMyBeer
1/5  rDev -74.4%

NvMyBeer, Jan 02, 2012
Photo of kkesty
1.96/5  rDev -49.7%

kkesty, Sep 22, 2014
Photo of greenhorn
2/5  rDev -48.7%

greenhorn, Jan 18, 2012
Photo of BGsWo22
2/5  rDev -48.7%

BGsWo22, Mar 20, 2013
Photo of Achoo_Bacca
2.25/5  rDev -42.3%

Achoo_Bacca, Jul 02, 2013
Photo of padan7
2.28/5  rDev -41.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

Being only 1 hour to the source we consider ourselves very lucky. We bought 2 fresh bottles.

The beer looks quite nice bright & deep golden.

Smells of yummy hops get the taste buds anticipating.

Taste is really a bummer. Munich helles lager? No it isn't. Nor is it delicious or even desirable. Bitter not as in nice but as in nasty.

Mouthfeel & drinkability are overshadowed by dissapointment.

We truly enjoy Hoppe & Oat & Unearthly & Java.

This was not even close to fun. We couldn't wait to get home to try it. That was 2 weeks ago. What are we going to do with the other bottle?

Hey if you want to trade...have at it.

padan7, Dec 11, 2008
Photo of jjanega08
2.4/5  rDev -38.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A= pours a golden amber color with a thin half finger head that has some pretty decent retention and some great lacing for how thin the head is. Really sticky on my glass.

S= Almost overly sweet. Good hop character to it. Nice pine and citrus smells come from it but then there is a cloyingly sweetness to it that I smell. Syrupy in the smell if that even makes sense.

T= Much much better than the smell. Good hop character in it. Hops up front and in the middle of the pallet. The sweetness that I smelled is gone and instead is more of a metallic or glass sort of flavor... Really interesting. Not a huge fan of this metal or old glass that I taste. The bottle I got was fresh from the box at the store so I know it isn't old. This really really tastes like glass. I love the hops at the front but this taste is off.

M= thick and syrupy. Overly sticky on my lips. Heavy and I really really hate the metal/ glass aftertaste that lingers in my mouth.

D= This beer I will for sure not buy again. Really a disappointment. I expect more from ST.

jjanega08, Dec 08, 2009
Photo of RonfromJersey
2.48/5  rDev -36.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

A hazy orange body, topped by a slab atleast four fingers thick of off-white micro-bubbles. Very good lacing.

A quick burst of pine aroma when the bottle first opens, disappears oddly quick, and leaves a perfume note that while not repulsive is not especially inviting or enticing.

Taste begins with a quick sweet note down the middle of the tongue before bitter and flowery hops overrun everything. The odd perfume/floral aroma trait shows up in the finish and refuses to go away quietly. Its almost orangy citrus but takes a bad wrong turn.

Nice full mouthfeel. Off putting finsih kills drinkability.

I first thought an imperial helles would be bock-like, but this is nowhere near there. This is an imperial pilsner trying to be softer, but the hops just didn't cooperate. Love Southern Tier, but this will be a pass if re-released in the future.

RonfromJersey, May 30, 2009
Photo of timahood32
2.5/5  rDev -35.9%

timahood32, Jan 17, 2012
Photo of mwbrady12
2.5/5  rDev -35.9%

mwbrady12, Jul 29, 2013
Photo of chrispoint
2.5/5  rDev -35.9%

chrispoint, Feb 18, 2012
Photo of Matt_Rodgers
2.5/5  rDev -35.9%

Matt_Rodgers, Jun 07, 2013
Photo of clfrost
2.5/5  rDev -35.9%

clfrost, Oct 25, 2013
Photo of jfcaa193
2.5/5  rDev -35.9%

jfcaa193, Feb 02, 2012
Photo of kojevergas
2.51/5  rDev -35.6%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

BOTTLE: 650 ml. Brown glass. Black & grey branded pry-off pressure cap. Purchased at an Austin, TX bottle shop.

Reviewed live as an imperial helles lager per the label. 8.20% ABV. Expectations are above average given the brewery. Served cold into a snifter. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

No bubble show forms as it's poured.

HEAD: A weak floater ring of off-white colour is all that manifests. The ring lasts about forty seconds. No lacing is left on the sides of the glass. Pretty pathetic...

BODY: Translucent semitransparent copper with orange hues. Average vibrance. Clean; no yeast particulate or hop sediment is visible.

Appears adequately carbonated. Overall, it looks more like a pale ale than a helles lager. I can't say the appearance has me dying to try it.

AROMA: Overhopped for a helles lager. Mild piney hop character, floral notes, a kiss of evergreen, and some resins. Pale malts. Clean barley.

It's quite clean and ester-free in classic lager fashion, but aside from that it's really more of a pale lager.

Timid and light in intensity, but pleasant. Not a great aroma for any beer, and not to style by any means. Evokes a weak pale ale, if anything.

TASTE: Caramalt. Some bready malts. Clean lager yeast. Munich malts. It's overhopped, with way too much piney and floral character for a helles lager. A kiss of sour apple. Some light zest. Pale malts. Light spruce.

This is a chaotic mess of a build regardless of style, and a poor stab at a helles lager - imperialized or not. The beer has no focus or direction, and lacks basic cohesion. It's a hodgepodge of eclectic notes. Pleasant enough, but imbalanced as hell and poorly built overall.

It's complicated for a helles lager; I'm all for complexity but this is unnecessary and unsatisfying. Befuddlingly eclectic and diverse, with no clear aim and no unifying notes.

Alcohol is poorly disguised. There are no egregious off-notes.

True to the label, pine dominates.

Do I like it? It's not bad...definitely too sweet, overhopped though it may be.

Shallow depth of flavour. Average flavour duration. High flavour intensity (for a purported helles lager). Lacks any notable subtlety or nuance.

No yeast character comes through.

TEXTURE: Overcarbonated almost to the point of it being biting. Smooth, wet, overly full-bodied...it's just too hefty, heavy, and thick on the palate for a helles lager, and isn't in any way a refreshing brew. Not sure what they're going for with this one.

This texture is as unfocused as the taste. There's some rather unfortunate alcohol warmth - and this is a helles lager?

It's not gushed, astringent, harsh, or scratchy.

OVERALL: It's not an awful beer, but it doesn't really feel like a deliberate one either. It's as though a homebrewer just bought a bunch of ingredients at random and threw them in the brew kettle without any regard for a style...that could work, but it doesn't work here. A mess of a brew which is ultimately quite pedestrian and certainly below average. I'm all for experimentation, but this is quite a failure. Wouldn't recommend it to friends, wouldn't buy it again. Not the quality I hope for when I buy a beer with Southern Tier's name on the label.

Low C-

kojevergas, Nov 12, 2014
Photo of icehawk
2.75/5  rDev -29.5%

icehawk, Aug 09, 2013
Photo of Bucknutty24
2.75/5  rDev -29.5%

Bucknutty24, Jun 26, 2014
Photo of graymazing
2.75/5  rDev -29.5%

graymazing, Dec 29, 2013
Photo of mquartuccio87
2.75/5  rDev -29.5%

mquartuccio87, Oct 26, 2013
Photo of skaboom420
2.75/5  rDev -29.5%

skaboom420, Nov 10, 2012
Photo of taylor714914
2.78/5  rDev -28.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 2.75

Um….well this is odd.  Taplist lists this as an imperial pilsner, however ST says this is a Helles.  Poured a shimmering deep amber color, Krampus smells of toffee, some wheat bread malts, and a touch of hops.  Flavor is off.  Mouthfeel is waters.  Not sure what to think, But I can’t finish this.  It reminds be of a watered down lager with some added sweetness.  Southern Tier misses on this one.

taylor714914, Dec 12, 2013
Photo of TMB0424
2.78/5  rDev -28.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

from notes. poured into flute.

Pours a golden straw body with a tiny head that quickly disappeared. Good retention, however.

I don't know what they were going for with this, but it's not pleasant. Smells of pine - like straight up pine needles from a tree - and an odd, musk-like smell. Not much else here, and it's bad.

Taste is nothing like the smell, but it's not much better. The pine is translated into grapefruit, with that musky taste as well, with a little bit of caramel malts. It's bitter, yes. But hoppy? I don't know. It's very weird.

Mouthfeel is medium bodied, pretty crisp in the mouth. Dry finish. I'm glad we split a bottle of this, because there's no chance I would drink a bomber to myself. Between the pine tree smell and the "offness" of the taste... I just didn't enjoy it.

TMB0424, Jan 15, 2009
Photo of LittleBreeze
2.8/5  rDev -28.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Clear amber. Off white head. The citrus and piney hop smells are attractive. There is something else there...Mint? Grassy? Spices?

The taste is...not good. I described the taste as sort of skunked. I was assured that was on purpose. Okay...ick. Not my favorite style. Mouthfeel was rather nice. Not to much dancing on the tongue.

LittleBreeze, Dec 01, 2008
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Krampus (Imperial Helles Lager) from Southern Tier Brewing Company
88 out of 100 based on 1,003 ratings.