Dismiss Notice
Sneak peek! BeerAdvocate magazine #104 (September 2015) featuring Leah & Oscar from Highland Brewing in Asheville, North Carolina. Learn more ...
Dismiss Notice
Join The Buzz! Subscribe to our newsletter and get the latest BeerAdvocate updates delivered to your inbox.

Oak Aged Unearthly (Imperial India Pale Ale) - Southern Tier Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Oak Aged Unearthly (Imperial India Pale Ale)Oak Aged Unearthly (Imperial India Pale Ale)

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
90
outstanding

567 Reviews
THE BROS
-
no score

(Send Samples)
Reviews: 567
Hads: 1,115
rAvg: 4.03
pDev: 8.19%
Wants: 65
Gots: 75 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Southern Tier Brewing Company visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  9.90% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: ClockworkOrange on 01-09-2009

No notes at this time.
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Reviews: 567 | Hads: 1,115
Photo of claspada
3.05/5  rDev -24.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

The aromas are loaded with dank hop earthiness and woodiness from the oak aging. Defintely also some Citrus/pine and the alcohol notes finish out the smells.

The tastes are good, with apple brandy-like alcohol that is hot on the tongue right off the bat, but this one is too syprupy for me. I just can't enjoy a beer that tastes this thick. Cloyingly sweet in my opinion. Carbonation is undetectable and the body is too thick to enjoy the hop profile; sugary body sticks to the tongue. I'm also having a hard time enjoying the wood aging because of the extreme cloyingness of this one. ABV isn't tasted but understood because of the thickness in malt.

Overall, this one just doesn't come together for me. The oak is there, but not in a good way, and the thickness/syrup qualities, detract from the hops. (806 characters)

Photo of Florida9
3.05/5  rDev -24.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

A: Thin copper in color. About and inch or so of nice foamy head which dissipates relatively quickly, but does leave some lacing in the process.

S: Malt, piney hops, maybe a little bit of citrus, followed by boozy smell of bourbon.

T: oh god, what is this? Liquified wood? Sure there are some malts and hops there, but they appear to have been beaten into submission by the unique flavor of furniture. please, someone give me a chaser.

M: Full bodied. Syrupy and medicinal. There was decent carbonation when I first popped the bottle, but the CO2 appears to have made a run for it as soon as the opportunity presented itself. Leaves a funky sawdust residue on the tongue.

D: No. Never again. My 22oz bomber was way too much. The only reason I'm even giving it a couple points here is because the folks at ST decided to put a lot of alcohol in this beer. (858 characters)

Photo of alcstradamus
3.06/5  rDev -24.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Nice amber pour with a little over a finger of head that leaves a small amount of lacing. Smell has a good amount of caramel maltiness and wood notes, almost overpowering the hop character underneath which has banana/flower/crayon wax qualities.

The taste is somewhat odd, almost barleywine-esque but a little too light for that distinction. As a DIPA I think this fails, as an Oak Aged DIPA it fails, and as an American Barleywine it is OK. An alcohol solvent taste overshadows what is underneath, and truthfully I believe that the regular Unearthly is a subpar DIPA so aging it in barrels can only do so much. This definitely is better, but I would hardly call it "good"

Medium bodied, this one just doesn't satisfy my palate at all really. It would be fine in 2 oz. samples but as far as being able to sit back and have a pint and enjoy it, I just don't get that kind of pleasure out of this. (897 characters)

Photo of chilly460
3.07/5  rDev -23.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

A - pours cloudy amber with a very fluffy head of tight bubbles. Good detention, not much lacing
S- a lot going on here. Fruity hops are followed by bigtime vanilla from the oak, and some banana. Heavy caramel malt background

T - well, I guess I don't like oak aged ipas. Initial hops hit is nice, but then the sweet vanilla and wood comes in leaving a bad aftertaste for me.

M - great chewy body with low to medium coronation...nice

D - hoppy sweet combo just killed it for me, also why I don't get along with barleywines. Probably a fine beer for the type, just not for me. (579 characters)

Photo of patrickcmcd
3.07/5  rDev -23.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

I asked a friend to purchase me an IPA bomber. He came back with this. Friend is now best friend. JUST KIDDING. Anyway, i wasn't expecting a DIPA so i let this thing rattle around in my car for about a week.

After a long jog, decided to forgo water and crack this thing open instead. Poured nicely, sorta a caramel/grapefruit color. No head, which left me scratching MY head. I guess "balance" is what Southern Tier was going for.

It literally smelled like a hot candied apple. Sweet, mostly. Malts (OAK?) at the forefront. Hops in the back. Wish it tickled my nose more. I prefer the floral scent.

The taste was pleasant but syrupy. Balanced and consistent from the front of my tongue to the rear. You can tell its oak aged at the very "end". Gives it a cedar taste, not oak. The alcohol taste was disappointing but at 11% I know what I'm getting into.

For the DIPA style, it was solid. Craving an DIPA and don't already have a favorite? Don't be afraid to pluck this from the shelf. If you haven't dabbled in the genre, its a decent gateway. Would have preferred more HOPS and less oak, though. (1,103 characters)

Photo of Jesse13713
3.11/5  rDev -22.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

On tap at Ray's Place in Kent, OH.

Appearance - A sugary cream-like foam rests on top of this earth-toned beer. The beer itself is earthy brown and caramely tan and yellow. It has quite a solid and impressive lacing to the glass.

Smell - Malts and caramel notes overwhelm my nostrils here. The hops are present but hiding in the shadows.

Taste - Much sweeter than I expected it to be. Quite a heavy bourbon note that masks the hops. The bitters come on the finish. Many floral and earthy notes become more noticeable as I continue drinking.

Mouthfeel / Drinkability - While drinkable, it is a little too sweet in a fruity way. It almost tasted like it had porter-like characteristics to me. Fairly light bodied. (715 characters)

Photo of Gueuzedude
3.11/5  rDev -22.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A solid pour into my New Belgium globe glass produces a fat-three-finger thick, nicely tan looking head. The beer is a concentrated amber color that shows a brilliantly clear, copper-amber color when held up to the light. Up front the beer smells of pungent hops with notes of pine, herbaceous hemp oil (with a certain dankness to it), candied citrus fruit (grapefruit, tangelo and bergamot) as well as some bright tropical fruit notes that remind me of lychee, kumquat and a sort of floral, super-peach note. The oak integrates very well with the hop character; it naturally accentuates the herbal notes with a spicy, buttery, woody oak aroma. As the beer warms the alcohol becomes a touch hot.

The beer feels a touch lighter than I was expecting from the viscous looking pour, but it is still fairly full bodied. The hop flavor is a bit reduced from what one would expect from the expressive aroma. The oak character might actually be a little more present, or at least more on par with the hop flavors. The oak and green hops combine to contribute a sort of raw, menthol-like, spicy, dank-buttery-almost-cheesy herbaceous quality that is the dominant note here. Supporting flavors of ruby-red-grapefruit, tangelo and lychee are noticeable in the middle, while the finish has a pronounced green, peppery note that lingers on the palate for quite some time. Speaking of the finish there is an oak derived astringency that couples with the hop-bitterness, as well as the previously mentioned peppery note, to produce an almost harsh finish to this beer. The malt character plays a definite supporting role, but is a bit too crystal malt focused with some intrusive hints of sweet-tea and caramelized, toasted grain that clashes with the hop / oak combination instead of smoothing them out. The sharp / harsh finish is exacerbated as it warms by a hot-alcohol presence.

An interesting beer, despite really being in the mood for something hoppy, this didn't really quite work for me. The oak provides a certain astringency, as well as accentuating a bit more of the herbaceous hop qualities that I would prefer. This is certainly not a bad beer though, and I can see some really enjoying it, but it really just isn't quite for me. My final assessment is that the oak and hops combine to create a flavor that reminds me of raw, herbaceous, citrus infused, dank, slightly ripe cheese and menthol, crystal malt laden tea. (2,418 characters)

Photo of brushtachio
3.16/5  rDev -21.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Wow. I'm really surprised by this ale. I love regular Unearthly but this version seems forced. The oak aging dilutes the hoppy goodness, replaces it with a woody, vanilla, oak profile. In the process, the whole beer suffers.

Nose bears very little resemblance to a IIPA. Instead of hops there is wood, vanilla, pepper, cinnamon. All of these elements carry over to the taste along with the expected Unearthly sweetness. But with the diminished hops, it ends up being a little one sided. I wonder if this beer is suffering (ratingwise) because I am judging it to style or comparing it mentally to the regular Unearthly. If I approached it as a hopped up Barlywine a la SN Bigfoot, would I appreciate it more? (709 characters)

Photo of SFLpunk
3.17/5  rDev -21.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

22oz brown glass pry-top. No date.

Appearance: Pours a very clear, pale amber with yellow tones (looks like a light ale/darker lager). Thick sudsy white head that stays for a long while.

Nose: Hops - vanilla - hops - vanilla - hops - etc. It smells like my local homebrew supply store. Lots of white chocolate, lemon, white cake batter, a little musty note. Smells thick and sweet.

Palate: Immensely sweet up-front with vanilla and cake batter dominating the flavors. Some bitter orange/grapefruit sneak in towards the middle and the hops claw their way back and try to stop the beer from being sweet, but alas. Body is medium to light.

Notes: Can't really get behind this offering. The oak seems to only mute the hop flavors while adding some really unpleasantly sweet notes. I keep coming back to white cake batter, and that's not really a flavor I like in my IPA's. Maybe in a wheat beer, or an old ale, but it's off-putting here. Going to stick with the regular Un*Earthly for now. (989 characters)

Photo of warnerry
3.19/5  rDev -20.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Bottled 3/1/12, poured into a tulip

A - Pours a beautiful clear copper with one and a half fingers of tan head. Head doesn't last that long. Only small spots of lacing left behind.

S - Oak is very prominent in the aroma. Otherwise big sweet malty aroma with some piney hops.

T - Initially sticky sweet (seems to be a common theme with Southern Tier) and malt heavy. Eventually, some hop bitterness comes through and the oak really starts to ramp up. The bitterness is no match for the sweetness. There seems to be some IPAs that have a smell/taste that reminds me of bolonga, and this is one of them (granted, I've been vegetarian for almost 20 years, but I ate a lot of the stuff as a kid, so take that with a grain of salt). Not necessarily good or bad, but a bit distracting. Stays sweet throughout. The hops and oak are no match for the sweetness. Decent, but not really what I look for in a DIPA.

M - Full, sticky sweet mouthfeel with some bitterness on the finish.

O - Can't help but wonder how I would review this if were listed as an American Strong Ale. As a DIPA, it is too thick and sweet, with a less than assertive hop presence. Doesn't taste too bad though. (1,176 characters)

Photo of loren01
3.2/5  rDev -20.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Poured into my Deschutes snifter a hazy orange color, decent sized head but not much lace down the glass
S: Slight spicy scent, caramel malt scent in there as well...also definate alcohol smell
T: Astringent hoppiness, alcohol and oak flavors
M: Full bodied beer, sticky and warming
D: Too thick any syrupy for my taste. This isnt a very drinkable beer. (356 characters)

Photo of nitro0292
3.21/5  rDev -20.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Bomber, no freshness date. Tried to drink @ slightly chilled temp, then chilled to brewer recommended temp.

A - poured a hazy amber. Almost two finger head with solid retention and good lacing.

S - Overwhelming malty and bready, few citrusy hops but not enough to balance the malt sweetness.

T - Enough hops to balance the malts, but thats it - very strong malty backbone - clearly a DIPA here, much closer to DFH 120 than DFH 90 as I was hoping, but @ 11%ABV it is a fair expectation. Hop heads would prefer a stronger hop presence to add more power to the hop profile.

M - Full, think mouthfeel, not quite syrupy, but close. A bit too much for me.

D - HAD to drink cold, @ more than recommended temp was simply to thick. Had to put in freezer (even the glass) after opening to finish. Much more drinkable @ a colder temp.

I don't know if I would buy this again, even given the ABV (more in Barleywine territory) I thought it was a bit over the top malty. I have seen other reviews that say it is very hoppy, so maybe my bottle is old? I would prefer a Monster Ale if looking for an alcohol hop bomb or a Rouchefort 10 if I wanted a meal.

I am a huge fan of Southern Tier, but I would much prefer a Victory Hop Wallop or even a DFH 90 minute. In the case of the former, it has a much thinner mouthfeel, and as a result a stronger hop flavor. The DFH 90 is more along the lines of this brew, but with a little stronger hop profile.

Fairly sure this is an old bottle. Will give it another chance and review again. (1,521 characters)

Photo of tomwilliams134
3.26/5  rDev -19.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured froma 22 oz bomber to a fluted tulip glass. Smells like oak barrels, similar in smell to White Oak Jai Alai.

The oak definitely dominates the beer. It over shadows the hops, but there is still plenty of malt backbone. Solid body, with just the right amount of carbonation. Not as hot as I expected at 9.5 ABV. I expected more hops in an IIPA. Good, but not my favorite from ST. I'm glad I tried it, but I won't drink it again. (441 characters)

Photo of SpeedwayJim
3.28/5  rDev -18.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

EBF 2011 leftovers. No bottling date. Poured from a 22oz. bomber into Lost Abbey stemware.

A: Standard pour yields a 1 finger frothy, substantial off-white head with moderate retention. Beer is a clear dark orange. Lacing is spotty and sparse with little cling. An attractive beer.

S: Nose is sweet citrus hops, tangerine, and peach. Also a bit of cane sugar and vanilla. Aromatic and appetizing but just a tad too sweet for my liking and for the style.

T: Opens sweet citrus, vanilla, and cane sugar. Peach and tangerine in the middle with a very muted, hop bitterness lingering in the background. This is most assuredly the anti-hop bomb. Very sweet overall. Finish is more cane sugar and sweet tropical fruit. Aftertaste is citrus and even more sugar.

M: Light to medium bodied with low carbonation. Smooth and watery in the mouth. Goes down easy with just a slight tingling of bubbles at the end. Finish is messy with a lingering aftertaste. A bit too flat for its style in my opinion.

D: This is a good beer. However, true to Southern Tier style, I think its very polarizing. Hopheads will hate it as its very sweet for an IPA. In addition, personally, I don't want my IPAs to be oak aged. The vanilla and barrel subtleties just don't work with the style. Definitely worth a try as you could be absolutely blown away by it, but go in with said expectations. (1,372 characters)

Photo of quasimoto
3.28/5  rDev -18.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Woody oak and musty horse blanket are very prominent in the nose. Green grassy hops, pine aromas and some what citrus round out the back end. The oak is really making the aroma much more of an age issue. The hops transfer to the flavor along with the horse blanket. Sweet bread like malts, and Golden graham cereal are the flavors I get. The mouth feel is rather smooth and not overly carbonated. dates and the golden graham cereal finish off the palette an dleave a sticky dryness...if you can understand that. (511 characters)

Photo of bigfnjoe
3.3/5  rDev -18.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a bomber into a perfect pint.

A- pours a very carbonated light orange, darker near the top, with a one finger white head. Not much lacing

S- mild, shockingly for a Southern Tier beer...getting some light piney and citrus hops.

T- getting a lot of the oak....some sweetness, possibly vanilla...citrus hops...a slight bite of pine near the end. Its really...mild. Bomber might have some age on it. Disappointing

M- feel is fine. Maybe a little too sweet

D- again...its fine. Just kinda there. If only I knew how fresh this was (542 characters)

Photo of beachbum1975
3.3/5  rDev -18.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

This is my first oak aged Double IPA. Shared with my buddy Dave today and reviewed on the fly. New shiny label with a hops cone wearing a crown.

Pours into my cab glass a clear amber with brassy edges. White creamy head which dissipates quickly leaving a chunky, bubbly halo and fine mist of surface foam.

Smells of big, piney hops and wood (ie, oak!) and light vanilla. The nose is big and potent on this one. Very interesting...

Medium bodied and medium to full flavored. Compared to their regular Unearthly, the hops are muted, but still there. The woodiness definitely places a role in this one. The woody aroma carries over into the mouth. Kinda reminds me of a hoppier version of their ST Cuvee #1 (which sadly, I wasn't a big fan of).

Ordinarily, I enjoy this beer for it's hops presence, and I'm not a big fan of this interpretation. Sorry! (852 characters)

Photo of Jules11788
3.33/5  rDev -17.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3

A: Pours a nice clear golden honey color; pinky width head, medium lacing.

S: Lots and lots of sweet malts. No hint of hops at all

T: BOOM! Super super sweet, sticky malt assaults the tongue; good amount of toffee and caramel push through as well. Not at all what I was expecting from a DIPA. No trace of hops whatsoever.

M: Rich, creamy, thick and full-bodied; exactly what I look for in a DIPA.

O: Jesus christ it was like drinking carbonated malt-syrup soaked with toffee and caramel. Thank god I was drinking this at a tasting or I would never have been able to finish the bottle myself. It's ironic because I LOVE thick, sweet beers, but this thing was just waaay too much to handle. Interesting for a tasting, but would never spend money on it. (754 characters)

Photo of Retail1LO
3.33/5  rDev -17.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

22 oz. bomber into a a Guinness pint glass.

Originally, I thought I'd picked up a ST 2XIPA. I was mistaken. So here we are. This is different. This poured with a thin head that dissipated nearly instantly. A beautiful see-through amber color. The oak aspect of this beer jumps out at you right away as soon as it hits your tongue. You know this is wood aged. It even has some bourbon notes to it, although it's not a bourbon barreled beer. Despite this, it's tough to tell this is an 11% ABV beer. The one thing noticeably absent for being an IPA, is the hops. They're completely drowned out by the oak. A unique IPA, but man, I had trouble downing an entire bomber. Wouldn't object to revisiting this in the future just to see if this was an odd bottle, but...it's not something I'd run to the store to get. (810 characters)

Photo of FeDUBBELFIST
3.36/5  rDev -16.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

10 oz draft pour into a wide mouth pokal.

A: Served with hardly a head and now just a barely off-white film on top. A spare amount of lacing is laying down. The brass-bronze color body is perfectly clear.

S: The oak really pulls through on the nose. I am surprised by the hops to malts ratio. The balance between the two is too close for a DIPA. Ultimately, the hops do outweigh the malts, but the difference to me is negligible. Orange and piney hops. Toasted cookie malts, light brown sugar. Grass, hay and wood. The nose is soft and far too weak for a DIPA.

T: The taste follows suit but it is marginally better. This is much closer to an English style barleywine than a DIPA.

M: Extremely creamy and very soft mouthfeel. Borderline flat. More carbonation in this brew would have helped the mouthfeel immensely. Plus a little too hot on the way down. Mildly bitter and nothing sweet. There is a vinous nature on the palate and a dry oaky finish as expected.

D: Well, this one is easy to drink, mainly as a result of it's across-the-board average-ness. NOWHERE near as stimulating as beers in this style should be. Kind of a disappointment actually. It seems that if the ABV were lower, the brewer would have had more control of the ingredients. If this is a DIPA, let the hops take center stage and give them a microphone! Needless to say, this beer is too big for its britches. I prefer the un-oaked version. (1,421 characters)

Photo of rmcnealy
3.39/5  rDev -15.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

22 oz. bottle, served very chilled in a becker. I don't see any date stamp but with the turnover in stock at the place purchased, it should be of the most recent available batch.

Poured dark amber with very minimal cream colored head. Initial aroma is not very robust. There are very subtle hints of an undiscernable citrus with a much more overwhelming distinction of carmel and malt smells. As with most high alcohol content IPAs, there is not that substantial hoppiness taste that I look for in the style. A positive is the beer is not very syrupy and has just a traceable bite. The taste overall is much more telling than the initial aroma leads you to believe. Overall, a decent beer that is not over-the-top boozy for a high ABV but lacks the hoppiness I look for in a good IPA.

Found at Cardinal Liqours - Niles, IL. (827 characters)

Photo of dsa7783
3.4/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Bottle copped from Gary's in Madison...
I loved the original Unearthly so had high hopes for this oak-aged version...
Appearance: Dark-copper, amber hue... Impressive head and lacing...
Smell: Raw, wet, sticky hops... Slight oak as I was expecting... Honey and caramel thrown into the mix as well...
Taste: Unbalanced... Waaaay too much oak... Spoils the hop presence and overall flavor of a great beer. Sometimes it's better to leave well enough alone... Not a fan... Way too sweet...
Medium- to full bodied stuff...
Not particularly drinkable... Average at best for a double ipa... (583 characters)

Photo of firkinhophead
3.4/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

pours a glowing crystal-clear orange. Not much head or lacing to speak of, but not surprising given the 11% ABV.

the nose is loaded with dank hop earthiness, strong esthers of fermented tropical fruit and citrus rind, and unmistakable alcohol. challenging but inviting.

apple brandy-like alcohol is hot on the tongue right off the bat, and the body seems thin and solvent-like, despite a fairly noticeable cotton candy sweetness that sticks to the tongue. drying alcohol and a dull wood taste seems to wash away the hops until the finish, where they re-emerge as resiny pine and orange rind.

this one just doesn't come together for me. the oak is there, but not in a good way, and the hotness detracts from the hops. I'd like to try one with some age on it, but I don't see it improving that much. I guess I'm in the minority on this one. (841 characters)

Photo of amneziak
3.4/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Appearance: Interestingly enough, there's not a huge amount of head from this one- maybe only one or two fingers at most. It is, however, extremely clear with a traditional off-white foamy head. Color is a beautiful warm burnt orange. Lacing is also very nice.

Smell: Smells pretty good, but almost puts off a "varnish" sort of character which would be indicative of strong pellet hops. There is a decent amount of bright citrus in this one paired with some over-ripe peaches. I'm also pulling out some extremely pungent hoppy aromas of grapefruit and pine. At very least it smells like it's a really well-rounded beer. We'll see once I've tasted it.

Taste: Not as tasty as the nose would lead you to believe. All the traditional IPA components are here, but they are weirdly arranged on the nose and tongue. Perhaps the oak component doesn't allow the citrus components to really shine the way they should.

Mouthfeel: This is a very well-balanced brew. The bitterness from the hops is matched with a solid malt backbone that helps it stand up through the whole bottle. This is probably one of the better elements of the beer as it turns it into more of a sipper than a session beer. The big 11% ABV probably adds something to this, too.

Overall: I'm not losing my mind over this one, but I can see why it's received such good reviews. It's a really intriguing beer. It's been a real pleasure drinking it, but I'm a little perplexed overall by the addition of the oak. I've yet to try the un-oaked version, but I am highly curious to know what it will taste like without this component. If it allows the hop aromas to stand out more, then I believe it will be a beauty. (1,677 characters)

Photo of UnderPressure
3.41/5  rDev -15.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

An orangey copper color (really nice color). Pretty hazy. Barely any head (maybe a 1/2 inch). But this beer is pretty cold.

It has that double IPA malt smell (which I'm not absolutely crazy about). Some hops with some funky woodyness from the oak.

I'm getting a lot of the oak in the flavor. A lot of hops, too, but I'm used to the hops. The oak thing is kind of new to me. The oak thing pairs pretty well with the hop bitterness. They remain two separate flavor components, but they linger together. It brings a flavor (not surprisingly) like wet wood. Pretty interesting. Of course, I'm tasting significant malty flavors, too, but nothing out of the ordinary with this style.

The thick mouthfeel hit me right away. A really heavy bodied brew.

It seems like all the imperial IPAs I've had lately all have the same basic flavor with some subtle variations. This one is no different. But, it's one of the more interesting of the bunch. (938 characters)

Oak Aged Unearthly (Imperial India Pale Ale) from Southern Tier Brewing Company
90 out of 100 based on 567 ratings.