1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Blasphemy - Weyerbacher Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
BlasphemyBlasphemy

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
88
very good

744 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 744
Reviews: 335
rAvg: 3.93
pDev: 12.47%
Wants: 49
Gots: 125 | FT: 7
Brewed by:
Weyerbacher Brewing Co. visit their website
Pennsylvania, United States

Style | ABV
Quadrupel (Quad) |  11.80% ABV

Availability: Spring

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Ego on 03-10-2007)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 744 | Reviews: 335 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of deltatauhobbit
3.18/5  rDev -19.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a copper color with very little head and virtually no lacing.

Smell is predominately malty with undertones of vanilla and some other kind of fruity aroma, little hop presence.

Taste is malty, diacetyl being present so it's quite buttery, vanilla is intrusive, a very warming beer as the alcohol is pretty evident as the oaked aspects mellows the sweetness.

deltatauhobbit, Feb 06, 2008
Photo of axeman9182
3.18/5  rDev -19.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

750 mL bottle, appears to have been bottled 04/06/11. Allowed to warm some before being poured into my Brooklyn Brewery tulip.

Weyerbacher Blasphemy pours hazy, and is somewhere between brown and maroon. There are very nice light red highlights shining through. The bone colored head is barely there, fades quickly, and doesn't leave a stitch of lacing. A disappointment all around, although I do have to cut the beer just a little slack on this count due to the prodigious alcohol level. The barrel aging is readily apparent in he aroma. Notes of caramel and vanilla immediately jump out, before fading in with some dark berry and fruit smells. The nose is balanced in equal measure by a spicy phenolic character and a warming bourbon and boozy note, which could stand to be a little more subdued. The flavor works off that blueprint, but dials up the alcoholic heat and bourbon even a bit more The plum and raisin flavors up front don't seem as dark and intense as they normally are. The peppery phenols are there, but largely drowned out by the hot alcohol aspect of the beer. The body is somewhat full (though also somewhat dried out for a 12% beer) and nicely creamy. It's aided by an expansive, yet subdued carbonation. I had high expectations for Blasphemy, as I think Belgian style beers do better in bourbon barrels than a lot of brewers realize, and I think Weyerbacher does some great barrel aging (Heresy, and especially Insanity). This one though, was definitely a bit underwhelming. I chalk it up more to the base beer than the barrel aging.

axeman9182, Nov 08, 2011
Photo of Brew_42
3.2/5  rDev -18.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Pours dark brown with a thin white head.

Smells-Vanilla, caramel,bourbon.

Tastes- The bourbon flavor was a bit over powering. But once the alcohol flavor faded a bit there is some brown sugar/vanilla sweetness that saves the beer from being to boozy.

MF-Very boozy beer with little to no carbonation.

Overall-Better than most beer with such a high ABV. The sweetness manages to prevent it from being too overwhelming but I will probably stick to Tripels and Dubbels in the future.

Brew_42, Aug 23, 2013
Photo of mnstorm99
3.23/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Bottle poured into a snifter.

Nice amber color with a quickly dissipating head, but it laces pretty well down the glass
Aroma is sweet alchohol, not much hops to be found.
Taste is alchohol, probably a little too much. raisen sweetness and the sweet over powers any hops I might be looking for.
smooth feel on the tounge and easy going down, with just a touch of a burn.
I might be able to have one of these at a time, but there are many better options in my opinion for that type of usage. Average beer that I am not sure the oak really helps at all.

mnstorm99, Oct 11, 2007
Photo of DrJay
3.23/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Hazy caramel orange colour with a thin layer of fine beige bubbles. Solid collar with a bit of spotty lacing. Fruity aroma, some banana, coconut flesh, oak, mild vanilla, and a bit of caramel. Same in the flavour, but with additional oak and sweetness, it's also got an earthy and bready character, plus alcohol towards the end and a lot of heat in the finish. The sweetness really seems to be reigning in the alcohol here, and it's needed. The body is definitely on the full side with plenty of carbonation and a fair bit of dryness. Lots of warmth that stuns the tongue too. This one really seems like a car wreck, but somehow it hangs together. I'm not sure how Weyerbacher pulls that off in some of these big beers, but the result is pretty good here.

DrJay, Feb 27, 2008
Photo of ChainGangGuy
3.23/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Pours a hazy, dark copper body with a small, fizzy, white head.

Smell: Oaky, alcohol-drenched aroma. Lesser notes of raisins, vanilla, toasted coconut, and malts, but you can easily foresee the punishment coming up in the flavor.

Taste: Strongly oaken and boozey all wrapped up with a harshness. No surprises there. Unfortunately, it squashes the delicate vanilla, coconut, and malt flavors. Mild spiciness. Hint of nut shells. Golden raisins marinated in ethanol. Boozey, astringent finish.

Mouthfeel: Medium-bodied. Medium carbonation.

Drinkability: Maybe a few years in the cellar would help Blasphemy come together better, but as it stands, I'd rather just stick with the QUAD. Even the dude on the label is struggling to keep it down.

ChainGangGuy, Feb 15, 2008
Photo of zillo043068
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

zillo043068, Feb 18, 2013
Photo of JeffreyJDavis
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

JeffreyJDavis, Dec 01, 2012
Photo of bgjohnston
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

I was curious to try this beer (their oak-aged Quad) along with a bottle of their straight (non wood aged) Quad. The result of this comparison surprised me, as I expected this one to be the more drinkable of the two.

I poured each into goblets, and let them warm a little from cellar temperature. This one poured a somewhat cloudy dark amber, with a white head. There was a nice fruity smell, with a hint of oak and alcohol.

The flavor was very big, with a lot more going on than I can really describe, but there was fruit, cinnamon, and bourbon present. Unfortunately, I found it to be a bit harsh. It was a little better at room temperature, but even then it still reminded me of cheap whiskey that hasn't been aged enough.

In the end, I found the bottle of Quad that I picked up right next to this one on the shelf to be a much more harmonious combination of flavors, and significantly more drinkable.

bgjohnston, Jan 20, 2009
Photo of Dcunicelli
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

Dcunicelli, Jul 14, 2013
Photo of PirateCraft
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

PirateCraft, Wednesday at 01:47 AM
Photo of Hearneator
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

Hearneator, Dec 05, 2013
Photo of Vylo
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

Vylo, Jun 10, 2012
Photo of Hugonaut13
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

Hugonaut13, Dec 02, 2012
Photo of anteater
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

anteater, Jul 05, 2013
Photo of kayrex
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

kayrex, Dec 18, 2012
Photo of Brutus627
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

Brutus627, Jun 27, 2014
Photo of SiegeSpitfire
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

SiegeSpitfire, Sep 07, 2013
Photo of JustinMatthew
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

JustinMatthew, Jul 17, 2013
Photo of Budinetz
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

Budinetz, Jan 16, 2013
Photo of THECPJ
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

THECPJ, Aug 17, 2013
Photo of Mlarz2100
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

Mlarz2100, Aug 10, 2014
Photo of GTB
3.25/5  rDev -17.3%

GTB, Jul 05, 2013
Photo of Lexluthor33
3.3/5  rDev -16%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

An amber colored brew with some reddish tints. Small head and thin lace.

The aroma was of alcohol solvents,fruits/cherries along with caramel & oak hints.

The taste started off with alcohol then some subtle malts with the a light bourbon taste. Some oak and fig taste was in there too.

The feel was smooth yet hot. Boozy is the word. Medium body and moderate carbonation. Hot in the finish.

Notes: Not well balanced in my opinion. Too boozy for it's own good so drinkability is not bad ,but a slow sipper. I felt it was still a decent brew with a good subtle bourbon taste and a very warming effect. The alcohol just needs to be a bit masked in this beer and then I think it will garner a higher grade from me.

Lexluthor33, Feb 09, 2009
Photo of smcolw
3.3/5  rDev -16%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours dark amber with a slight cloudiness. Impressive head that leaves good ring lace.

Sweet aromatic sugary malts. Really no balance to the smell.

Strong alcohol warmth in each sip, which would be expected at 11.8%. No noticeable hop counterpoint except well after the swallow. Extremely rich, almost oily; the carbonation is present but not strong enough to counter-punch the body.

This is a one-sided beer. If you like that side, you'll love this beer. It's contrary to my preferences and thus, the relatively light review. If you like mega-malty, powerfully alcoholic beers, this may be perfect for you.

smcolw, Jul 04, 2007
Blasphemy from Weyerbacher Brewing Co.
88 out of 100 based on 744 ratings.