1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Merry Monks' Ale - Weyerbacher Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Merry Monks' AleMerry Monks' Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
87
very good

1,685 Ratings
THE BROS
90
outstanding

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,685
Reviews: 716
rAvg: 3.85
pDev: 13.77%
Wants: 38
Gots: 144 | FT: 5
Brewed by:
Weyerbacher Brewing Co. visit their website
Pennsylvania, United States

Style | ABV
Tripel |  9.30% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: SheepNutz on 09-13-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Merry Monks' Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,685 | Reviews: 716 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of tgbljb
tgbljb

Pennsylvania

4.22/5  rDev +9.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

split a bottle with fellow BA mtanji. Poured an attractive golden color, with a moderate head. Beautiful nose with nice scents of spices (cloves). The taste was good without being overpowering and got better as it warmed. This was a very drinkable beer and I recommend it

Serving type: bottle

03-21-2005 00:57:14 | More by tgbljb
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

4.08/5  rDev +6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Quintessential amber, clear and bright. The beer is crowed by a large cap of eggshell colored foam that is soft and rather nondescript. A lazy deflation leads to very little lace; a miniature collar is about it. It isn't a bad look, but it isn't an overly compelling one either.

The nose is definitely Belgian-like and is as much BSPA as tripel. It's also as aromatic as any you're likely to find. I smell sweetened golden fruits (apple, pear and peach) along with a firm smack of clove spice. Whatever else the brewers accomplished in the brewing of this beer, they got the aroma right; credit to the yeast, no doubt.

While the flavor is good, it lacks the immediacy of the nose. Things start out well, but begin to lose steam at the midway point and finish on a subdued note. The taste score will have to be a compromise between the initial 'wow' and the 'less than wow' that takes place within each mouthful.

As in the nose, sticky ripe fruit is the flavor focus and clove and cardamom spice is the accent. This beer isn't as clove-like as some Belgian tripels, but it's no wilting flower in that department either. The body/mouthfeel is medium (to slightly more full) with a pleasingly syrupy, lightly mouthcoating finish.

Merry Monks' Ale hews pretty closely to the Belgian tripel blueprint and is a more than respectable American version. It's close to being very good and its faults are minor at best. Bottom line: this is good beer. Thanks to blitheringidiot for the bottle.

Serving type: bottle

03-11-2005 16:29:48 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of vitesse
vitesse

Georgia

4.33/5  rDev +12.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

served from 12 oz. bottle...

pours a bright tan color with lots of cloudiness. whoo, there's A LOT of yeast sediment in the bottle. i leave it out of the glass -- the beer is already plenty cloudy as is.
anyway, this is a phenol monster. delicious herbal, grassy flavor gives way to monster clove/nutmeg/coriander flavors from the yeast. there's a very slight tartness at the back of all the phenols that i really do like. nice mouthfeel -- not too slick or chunky. very crisp and lively, even though it didn't have a huge head.
overall, a very good example of a belgian tripel. very solid and traditional -- nothing wacky or unexpected, but a well-made beer.

Serving type: bottle

02-27-2005 23:35:57 | More by vitesse
Photo of Zraly
Zraly

Virginia

3.98/5  rDev +3.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours an off-hazy, golden hue with a small, whitish head. Strong phenolic scents, much like a good hefeweizen.

A somewhat interesting American interpretation of a Belgian tripel. I say interesting because it is somewhat a cross between the tripel style and a hefeweizen in smell and flavor. It's a nice, sweet, vamped-up banana flavor with rich, ripe fruit undertones. Somewhat syrupy, but also crisp in mouthfeel. Medium-bodied. A slight tang in the finish that tapers off with a mild dryness. Approachable.

I'd like to think this is a good transitional Belgian-style for newbies. It's not the best, but it functions and is a solid brew.

A great beer to start off a hearty meal.

Serving type: bottle

02-27-2005 23:18:40 | More by Zraly
Photo of Pegasus
Pegasus

Texas

3.13/5  rDev -18.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Pale and clear golden color with a small off-white head and thick, glass-coating lace. Profuse streams of slow rising carbonation were noted.

Aroma: Sweet, light fruit aroma of pears, white grapes, golden raisins, as well as light malt.

Taste: Light and spicy with ripe banana and bready yeast notes. Finishes with a light and pleasant spice note.

Mouth feel: Smooth and pleasant, very full, with slight carbonation.

Drinkability/notes: A very pleasant beer, and recommended.

Serving type: bottle

02-18-2005 03:51:40 | More by Pegasus
Photo of Fish113d
Fish113d

Pennsylvania

3.95/5  rDev +2.6%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pouring a copper color into a pint glass, it leaves 1 finger of head that dissipates rather quickly to about nothing, but the ale appears a bit hazy throughout. Aromas are of honey w/ wheat and some brown malts; some alcohol hints and sugars; maybe some plummy characteristics and vanilla as well. Taste is of vanilla sweetness w/ a sharp burst of sugar and even some slight bananas; also some alcohol burn as well on the finish. Feel is decent carbonation on the front of the tongue on the sip w/ a nice smooth swallow; some alcohol on the finish as well. Nice overall, easy to drink and enjoyable...i request another please!

Serving type: bottle

02-14-2005 22:14:37 | More by Fish113d
Photo of BurghBrewPSU
BurghBrewPSU

Pennsylvania

4.1/5  rDev +6.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Dark bronze-orange appearance, with very little to no head, caused by a bad pour by my bartender. The smell of citrus consumes you. Upon first taste, bananas, pears, and apples are very apparent. After each drink, a hint of cinnamin becomes stronger. The sight, smell, and taste of alcohol is quite obvious. Overall a very drinkable beer. I have also had this on bottle, and i was not dissapointed.

Serving type: on-tap

02-11-2005 01:28:12 | More by BurghBrewPSU
Photo of 99bottles
99bottles

Pennsylvania

2.23/5  rDev -42.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Appearance: Light golden body, moderate carbonation. A white head of miniscule bubbles quickly fades to a thin lacing. Only moderate retention.

Smell: The smell is of typical malt. Very bland nose for a Belgian golden style ale. It lacks the phenols and some of the fruity nuances of the real Belgians. Similar to Golden Monkey, and even more one sided and unimpressive.

Taste: Whoa. Quite transparent. Where are the subtle flavors that make tripels and stong golden ales so unique? This is a dumbed down version that offers little more than burning phenols and sharp hot alcohol through and through. This burns in the aftertaste and shows none of the sweet esters and soft bitterness one might expect. A stong taste of pepper in the finish. I am somewhat disappointed. If it were me, I'd back off on the malt; stop worrying about gravities and jacking the ABV through the roof and find a yeast and style of sugar that compliment the flavor.

Mouthfeel/Drinkability: I wouldn't really want to ever have this again. There are so many good Belgians that this attempt is hardly even noble enough to continue producing. It starts to cloy, and the sharpness of medicinal pepper and phenols with no structure really cause this to be a chore. I'm against drain pours, but this is the least enojyable micro I've had in awhile. Sorry Weyerbacher. I'll stick to the Insanity, and hope this gets revamped in the future.

Serving type: bottle

02-08-2005 16:47:02 | More by 99bottles
Photo of FranklinPCombs
FranklinPCombs

Massachusetts

4.22/5  rDev +9.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I have to say that this beer scores very well across the board, although I have to admit that I have lately become very taken by the Belgian ales. The beer pours a light golden color, crystal clear, with lots of little bubbles that drift up the beer to the top, where a cap of nice white head which leaves pretty much no lace. The smell is heavy on wheats, and lots of rich fruity spiced tones, with a bit of a rubbery smell to it, but not in a bad way. The taste is very full and sweet with tons of malty cherry flavors with a bit of yeast, a touch of hops and a nice burnt dry hint. A bit of alcohol is evident in the taste as well. Lots of carbonation in this beer. It isnt shy about telling you how much alcohol it has definately, but it is still mighty tasty.

Serving type: bottle

01-07-2005 22:14:46 | More by FranklinPCombs
Photo of beveragecaptain
beveragecaptain

New Jersey

3.35/5  rDev -13%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

12 ounce bottle. Pours a hazy orange brown with a half inch head. The aroma is yeasty and very fruity. Strong, tart flavor with an off-putting huskiness. The fruity flavors are nice, but the huskiness is just bad. Slightly hoppy, but not enough. Leaves a tart aftertaste. The high carbonation partially masks the 9.3% alcohol, but one can still sense it.

Weyerbacher has been a hit or miss brewery, and while this beer is not terrible, it is definitely not a hit.

Serving type: bottle

01-03-2005 06:13:58 | More by beveragecaptain
Photo of HardTarget
HardTarget

Texas

3.18/5  rDev -17.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Aroma: Light alcohol aroma mixed with some hops, a faint banana and light spices.
Appearance: Painfully clear yellow with a thin collar of white foam.
Flavor: A nice Belgian banana yeast taste with a hint of lemon. As the beer warmed a slight vinous quality emerged but is tempered with a hot alcohol taste that dragged it down a bit.
Mouthfeel: Very thin for a Golden Strong (the Bros list as a Tripel, I’m not going to argue), a light body with firm carbonation
Overall Impression: A good Belgian style ale, but not a Belgian ale. It’s just not as rich and full as other offerings from this style. It seems to have some flaws beyond that. I’m thinking too much sugar in the brew is thinning it out and making the alcohol a bit hot. Also got a slight cardboard taste, and given this was a trade and it didn’t list a date, I’m clueless as to the source. All in all, not a bad beer.

Serving type: bottle

01-02-2005 13:55:22 | More by HardTarget
Photo of goodbyeohio
goodbyeohio

Oregon

1.63/5  rDev -57.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

ugh.. this might be one of the biggest beer letdowns of my drinking career.

appearance: murky yellow with no head retention

aroma: yeast, yeast, yeast, and malt. no spices or sweetness evident in the aroma. already, this beer is worrying me.

taste: this beer tastes like a mix between vinegar and the back of an envelope. yeast and lemon are prevalent tastewise, leaving much to be desired in such a respected format.

keep in mind, this was my third bottle of a six pack- i wanted to make sure this beer was as bad as i first thought before penning this review.

maybe it was the high standard set by the 33 st bernardus 12 abt i consumed the night before, but this beer seems really substandard. for the first time in recent memory, i will sacrifice two of the six beers i purchased to the sink fairy.

however, based on other reviews, i will continue to seek out weyerbacher brews hoping something will make up for the tragedy that is merry monks.

Serving type: bottle

12-22-2004 04:30:55 | More by goodbyeohio
Photo of blitheringidiot
blitheringidiot

Pennsylvania

3.58/5  rDev -7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Label Lingo and bottle babble: Drunk monks on the label that gives up no ghosts.

Golden orange glow with a scant spotty bubbly head cap into me (what?) WEYERBACHER Merry Monks Goblet. Foamy bubbly cling ring sticking to the corners.

Some doughy general yeasty peppery notes reminiscent of Duvel, but more pronounced.

First Swigs: Fresh bread dough yeastiness and spicey cloves. Peppery flavors parallel the nose. Warm awl-kee-hawl flavor is detectable. Some ripe bananas, sweet grape wine and fruit cake notes. Lingering pepper aftertaste.

Soft foamy carbonation. High ABV, full body and one dimensional flavor reduces the Drinkability factor.

Last swigs: Almost like a white wine overly bready yeast tripel. 9.3% ABV. Never has the word “peppery” been more apropos.

Beer is good. Happy Belgian style beering.

Serving type: bottle

12-20-2004 04:52:47 | More by blitheringidiot
Photo of sulldaddy
sulldaddy

Connecticut

4.2/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

I am drinking this brew from a 12 oz bottle at room temp and pouring into a snifter. The beer pours a bright lively gold color with bleached white head fading very quickly to an edge layer and then to nothing at all. Aroma is biscuity yeast with some lemon tartness and also berries and white grapes. I maybe get a hit of clvoes as well. Overall the aroma is very appealing. First sip reveals a very gentle almost non-existent carbonation and very light body as well. Not expected.
Flavor is light and fruity with some lemon, green apple and general sweetness. Finishes very dry making my mouth long for the next sip to re-moisten my palate. A very clean and refreshing beer, not sure of abv but it is hidden. very nice to drink.

Serving type: bottle

11-22-2004 00:33:34 | More by sulldaddy
Photo of maltedmilk
maltedmilk

New Jersey

3.9/5  rDev +1.3%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

This is the first time I’m doing a review. I have read many here. I thought I would give it a shot.

I like this beer. It’s very strong and has a nice pleasant taste. Be careful, it can sneak up on you.

It has a golden, cloudy look and no head to speak of. What little head there is, fades quickly.

It is a little sweet but not overwhelming. It is easy to drink.

I like the label. I have to mention that. The label is almost like it’s laminated. It feels nice and looks nice. I have had Weyerbacher’s Old Heathen also (which I also like). The image on that label is better though. But who cares besides me.

Serving type: bottle

11-13-2004 02:53:00 | More by maltedmilk
Photo of silenius
silenius

Illinois

2.23/5  rDev -42.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

There must be something wrong with all of the samples of this beer I try. I really want to like it, but it is crummy.

Nice deep orange with a yellowish halo and nice head that fades quickly.

I'm off put by the slight vinegar characteristics I get from this plus something else sharp in there.

Taste is off. Sharp cider vinegar twinge with some caramel malt flavor to cut it.

Mouthfeel isn't so bad, but a little sharp from the acid taste.

Won't be drinking much of this one.

Serving type: bottle

11-03-2004 00:06:16 | More by silenius
Photo of bashiba
bashiba

Iowa

3.48/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Thanks to santoslhalper for giving me the chance to try another a good beer.

Poured into my glass a slightly cloudy light orange color with very little head that was gone very quickly.

Smelled a fresh wet wheat and a sour citrusynes with a nice yeasty odor..

Taste is of a slight sour wheat flavor with a hint of honey and followed quickly by a very strong mix of Orange and Grapfruit flavors and a little bit of yeast, with just a touch of floral hops at the end.

Mouthfeel was slightly slick with a nice warming following.

Drinkability was good consindering I had no idea the ABV was anywhere near this high until typing this, very good job of hiding the high alcohol.

Serving type: bottle

11-02-2004 04:32:17 | More by bashiba
Photo of Rastacouere
Rastacouere

Quebec (Canada)

3.25/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 1.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Merry Monks appears a totally clear dark gold with minimal head that sadly completely fades out after 10 seconds and then looks a bit dull. Expressive yeast on the nose reminds of raw pie crust. Good fruit esters range (melon, banana, mango). Floral and spicy(mint, jasmine) hops somehow manage to leave an impression despite all the other things happening while the aroma is not all that intense. Sweet initial taste, but there’s a firm hoppiness developping in a perfumey and herbal way, almost grassy. I don’t know why I don’t like it more, but the hypothesis is just the huge competition level in this particular style where you need big demarcative aspects (mostly complexity, appearance and balance) to be at the top. This one gives me the impression of a balanced ale with well contained alcohol which makes for a very decent american take on the style despite lousy looks. It was perhaps a tad overexpressive on the yeast though.

Serving type: bottle

10-25-2004 18:08:42 | More by Rastacouere
Photo of ppoitras
ppoitras

Massachusetts

4.1/5  rDev +6.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

12ozer bottle purchased as a single from Yankee Spirits, Sturbridge, MA.

Poured into an imperial pint glass, formed a fluffy 1" white head above the brightly golden brew. Head lasts well, and lacing is good. Aroma is wheaty, with plenty of Belgian-style spicing. Taste is upfront lightly sour, and fills out with wheat and some light spices. Mouthfeel and drinkability are both good, just not so sure how we hit the style definition, if one cares about such things. Fits the bill tonight.

Serving type: bottle

10-19-2004 23:28:21 | More by ppoitras
Photo of santoslhalper
santoslhalper

Pennsylvania

4.22/5  rDev +9.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

First off, what a great picture on the bottle. Those are some merry monks there. Pours a nice hazy orange with a good inch high head. Head goes quickly, dissapating to a white collar that sticks for the whole glass. Nice lacing as well. Smells ridicously sweet, almost too sweet. A spicy alcohol backs the sweetness. Very strong smelling. Tastes great. Medium body and carbonation. Very nutty at first with some herb hints. Sweet on the finish with lots of fruits. Peppers and cloves are present in the aftertaste. Tastes much like a Saviugnon Blanc. With age I'm sure this will taste even better. I set a few back. A very complex beer that will keep you sipping fo a while. Highly recommended!

Serving type: bottle

10-07-2004 23:23:37 | More by santoslhalper
Photo of smcolw
smcolw

Massachusetts

3.58/5  rDev -7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Straw colored and cloudy, with an impressive three finger head. It has slippery lace (the kind that slides down the side of glass).

Lemony citrus notes with a very crisp aroma. Natural wheat smells with a slight sour touch. The smell is closer to a traditional wheat beer rather than a Belgian style ale.

Sour flavor up front, like a mild lemon. Fairly dry for this style. Very full in flavor, but this dies quickly upon the swallow. The sourness predominates the entire tasting.

This is an interesting change of pace to the typical pale ales available. For that alone, it's worth seeking out. In a flight of Belgian beers, I don't think this would fair that well, but is a great change of pace.

Serving type: bottle

09-05-2004 17:34:14 | More by smcolw
Photo of claytri
claytri

Maryland

4/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

It pours a nice cloudy gold. The aroma is a pleasant mix of spice and alcohol with a little bit of yeast and malt in the background. The taste is very full, it has a lot of spice to hit, a little fruit, really no hops, and it has an alcohol bite in the finish, a very nice sourness to it all. The feel is oily and medium bodied. This is quite a drinkable beer, and you could find yourself running through several without taxing yourself.

Serving type: bottle

08-09-2004 04:09:38 | More by claytri
Photo of putnam
putnam

Michigan

2.55/5  rDev -33.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

(Would the unbroken streak of sublime liquids from packages featuring images of smiling monks with vessles of frothy liquid held aloft be continued? I'm thinking of St. Bernardus products and Dr. Loosen Erdener Praelat Rieslings.)

Mute, orange and caramel aromatics occur beneath adequately fizzy, orange-colored liquid. On the palate it is a bit wild, dry and aggressive, with metallic, electric orange peel and over-fermented bread flavors. Gassy, with robot-fart metal belches replete with ripped, stripped sugars and hot grease nuances. Thin where it counts, hot where it shouldn't be, this is a careless, industrial "craft" beer. Aggressively alcoholic and lacking texture. A shame. Not worthy of the description "tripel."

Serving type: bottle

08-07-2004 02:49:05 | More by putnam
Photo of CharlesRiver
CharlesRiver

Connecticut

3.93/5  rDev +2.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I noticed that other people were noting the age of theirs. I can't find a single date on mine. Cool lable though. Golden yellow in color with very little head even after an aggresive pour. The smell is great. Spicy and sweet with some floral notes. Very little carbonation at all. The cap did fizz when I popped it but not effervesant at all in the mouth. The taste is sweet and actually some sour notes. I do like it but it isn't like most other triples I have had. The monk says, "Shhhh, be quiet!"

Serving type: bottle

07-24-2004 00:02:47 | More by CharlesRiver
Photo of malthead
malthead

California

3.63/5  rDev -5.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

2 months old. As this is the first tripel I've really reviewed, I wasn't sure whether to decant and leave the yeast, or to swirl it in. So I decanted half the bottle into one glass and swirled the yeast in the remainder into another glass.
Both samples have good color and a nice head, which fades to a thin coating pretty quickly. Smell is candy-like, maybe bubblegum, some banana.. really big smell. The taste in the glass without the yeast is sweet, the malt is really light and very little hops... tastes spicy, with a little sour apple in there too, maybe some white grape juice. In my second sample, the yeast add a bitter note on to the end of the finish... maybe it wouldn't be too noticable when diluted in a full bottle, but in my sample, I think the yeast brings a bitterness that is a little too distracting from the general sweetness of the beer. Mouthfeel is very smooth, almost coating, but it has a good carbonation to cut through that. Pretty good drinkability, considering it's pushing 10%abv.
With my negligible experience with tripels, I'd say this is pretty good, with real sweetness and complex fruityness that make it a nice, relaxing sipping beer.

Serving type: bottle

07-22-2004 03:22:55 | More by malthead
Merry Monks' Ale from Weyerbacher Brewing Co.
87 out of 100 based on 1,685 ratings.